Printable View
still under nda, can't post anything more
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/8800gtsg92.PNG
3dmark06 default
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/3d0602.jpg
under XHD 1600P 2560x1600
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/3d0601.jpg
thought: AA lover please use RV670 XD
Interesting, thanks for the heads up :up:
No NDA for me :)
Very first run no time for anything else yet.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/8800GTS.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/3DMark06.jpg
no nda for me either but it causes problem to whoever gave it to you :)Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
i still want to get more card later :)
I bought the card :)
is the gddr3 killing it at high res? The ATi cards aren't very good at AA as it is... What's going on there?
Ryan
whoever sell it has problem XDQuote:
Originally Posted by T_M
jk. if you buy it that is good to post anything. but for me i need to protect who gave it to me :D
yeah understood guess.
Nvidia won't come after anyone. They are not stubborn, they know that all these prereleased scores cause chatter which in turn will cause massive sales.
Here is your comparable gts vs my gt, though your cpu scores are higher.
I am running a x3210 at 3520mhz and your q9650 is running at 3640mhz.
I then clocked my gt at exactly the same specs 650-972-1625
Below is the result details of your submitted project.
Main Test Results
8800GT 3DMark Score 14138 3DMarks
8800GTS 3DMark Score 14743 3DMarks
8800GT SM 2.0 Score 5815 Marks
8800GTS SM 2.0 Score 6013 Marks
8800GT SM 3.0 Score 5551 Marks
8800GTS SM 3.0 Score 5741 Marks
8800GT Cpu Score 5503 Marks
8800GTS Cpu Score 6015 Marks
8800Gt Scores
8800Gts Scores
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 47.637 FPS (gt)
1 - Return to Proxycon 49.491 FPS (gts)
2 - Firefly Forest 49.286 FPS (gt)
2 - Firefly Forest 50.73 FPS (gts)
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.824 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.995 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.657 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.901 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 52.856 FPS (gt)
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 55.368 FPS (gts)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 58.16 FPS (gt)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 59.44 FPS (gts)
can we have some tests at normal speed cpus please?
Normal?
Like the 3.6GHz in my post above?
yes versus the 4.4 ghz in the first post. cant we just have a stock test for once?
TM anyway you can lower your cpu clock and get closer to the 5500 06-3dmark cpu score so we can compare?
I think the qx is 5% faster at same core (3520mhz - 5% = 3344mhz)
Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
Sorry, I had a great laugh out of this. These two things are completely at odds with one another.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Intersting results though....
denny i want one HD3970 , its a new card??? :D :D
serious: nice tests
:up:
Me wants! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Too bad 3dmark06 scores do not reflect the actual performance of these cards at all anymore...
QFMTQuote:
Originally Posted by IcY18
I guess i am not that up-to-date on the acronyms...Quote:
Originally Posted by nzbleach
Not sure if i need to back up my claim or nod in agreement.
Well QFT is "quoted for truth" so use your imagination as to what the M stands for...my sense is he is strongly agreeing to say the least... :p:
(and your statement was correct so...)
Thanks for the info.
I still don't get it :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by WrigleyVillain
and i always thought QFT meant "quite f*cking true",lol. :D
so QFMT is adding the word "majorly". :p:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/30003D06.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/33003D06.jpg
Now for some real testing :rolleyes:
Looks like it needs high resolutions to start pulling much from the GT.