Want a CPUZ Screenshot Verified?? Post it here...

ok, I want to start this post to help weed out fake, or questionable overclocking scores.
this is a small way we can do this.

if you see a Questionable OC, then just post it here.
But the CPUZ Checksum Numbers must be clear and visible.
there is no way around this, and can be assumed that a cheater will try to hide the numbers on purpose or say "I didn't know about the numbers"

so, 2 things.
Must be a screen shot, don't just list the numbers, wanna be able to clearly see the numbers myself, to help either me, or any other mod willing to do some checking, or so more scrupulous members can try to weed out photo-doctord screen shots.

I will check this post ever few days, or as often as possible.
so be patient.
checking a screen shot should only take a minute or two to post the results.

so, if you see a screenshot that you think is "iffy", and want it checked, post it here, and I, or another mod will do our best to check it.
just please, don't bombard me with 50 screenshots to check at once :D

here is a example of the numbers I need to see, and what a checked and verified screen shot will look like.

PS to everyone.

I don't want to have to post a confirmation shot of every posted screen shot, as thats just wasting space, and alot of my time.
if it's really important to have a confirmation shot, please let me know.
otherwise I won't be posting one for every shot I come across.

By the way, this isn't a Item you can download, and isn't freely available, and no I can't send you a copy, or let you download it from me or anything else, so don't PM me asking me where to get it, or whine to me that it "sucks", that I won't give you a copy.
I've had one Person PM me already, about about 10 people in the last month all asking me for it... the answer is always no.
not cause I am trying to be mean, thats just the rules.
The Author didn't make this a public item for many reasons.
to keep someone from writing a fake program, to keep CPUZ as reliable as possible, and things like that...

For suicide shots sometimes the number can be read a bit off in this example of my 3.0C @ 4.1 on water cooling

http://www.brainwashstudios.com/steve/41ghz.jpg

yes, CPUZ can be off by 1-2 mhz in some cases.
CPUZ updates itself in real time, so if you press print screen, as its changing the code, then the numbers can be alittle off and make the MHZ off by a tiny margin, but this is fine.
anything more then 3-4 mhz to me is kinda odd, cause I never seen it happen yet, and I been checking these for the last few months.
a 1-2 mhz offset isn't unusual, but anymore then that is.
10 mhz or more off, and to me somethings wrong.

your screenshot here, is well within the margin of error, so it passes I say ;)

This is an awesome service. :toast:

Could you please check the following shot:
http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/3150.gif

Spot on Perfect.

3150 on the dot.
nice OC ;)

PS to everyone.

I don't want to have to post a confirmation shot of every posted screen shot, as thats just wasting space, and alot of my time.
if it's really important to have a confirmation shot, please let me know.
otherwise I won't be posting one for every shot I come across.

He can't because its missing the numbers at the bottom :(

Pretty interesting about the numbers, good to know you can at least identify the cheaters.

Thank you kunaak :D ;)


loudhoward: I am sorry but I dont follow you?

Can't you just take a legitimate screenie from someone else? or another forum and post it as yours? I'm guessing that's what most cheaters would do. My guess is cheaters wouldn't even take the time or have the knowledge to use photoshop, when they could simply post someone else's screenie.

Check this 1 pls

Mine pls too... THX :D

http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/10x300_OCZ_CPU-Z.jpg

I don't think everyone needs to be checked, the purpose here I think is to weed out questionable results that are used for world record attempts or extreme benching. People wanting their 3 gig A64's and 4 gig P4's checked probably are legit anyway. Its the 4+ gig A64's and 6+ gig P4's that might be called into question.

egal, yours checks out perfectly- 3950.

Mrki, yours checks out perfectly too, 3000 mhz on the dot.

My guess is that if you are willing to post your own screenie then you are most likely not cheating. Like Kanati stated, this should be used for those times when some jacka.. states that he has his A64 running 3.2ghz on stock voltage and air cooling or other really far-fetched crap.

How is the number relavent to the clockspeed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by black rose

How is the number relavent to the clockspeed?

---

Thats the secret. :rolleyes:

http://www.lowyat.net/uploads/pr0di9...x10SuperPI.jpg

Mind checking this Kunaak?

Thanks a Million.

Cheers

passes perfectly, 2600 mhz on the dot.

what is that little CPU clock program?

Got it from CPUID, I use it every time I overclock my processor. It seems that the CPU-Z at times loads a tad slower. I guess not enough cooling for the proc... This bench was with DIY water cooling setup with the reservoir clough up with blocks of ice... This 3500+ of mine aren't responding to anymore voltages. Looking forward for some phase changing cooling on it :)

Kunaak,
I'll give you a hand, if needed.

Jupiler,

sure, if you see a person wanting thier shot checked, go ahead ;)
I can always use alittle help.

Hey guys,this is with my older 3.0c MO chip,tell me if its true or false :p:


http://www.overclocking-madness.com/images/307FSB.jpg

true ;)

4608 P4 is what I got from the checker.

Dude that was the fastest reply i ever had :D Thanks its is true :)

http://www.teampuss.com/berkut/415ghz.jpg

Intel Pentium 4 4156 is what I get.

Nice OC there :D

If the cpu wasnt so stubborn (about the fsb) there would be much more.

Cooled by a CO2 cascade @ -75C

Both pass on the dot. :D

yeah I kinda figured you'd want the screen shots for OC's like that, haha...

Kunaak, do you know where I can get the whitepaper on the numbers? I want to make a php script to check them :p
Sorry, if they are secret :D

They are, for obviouse resons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aonic

Kunaak, do you know where I can get the whitepaper on the numbers? I want to make a php script to check them :p
Sorry, if they are secret :D

---

can't give you any numbers, white papers, or anything else concerning the CPUZ checker.

it's not meant to be available to people other then a few people the Author lets use it, for many reasons...

mainly to keep someone from writing a fake Checksum program.
as far as I know, only a few of us mods from XS have it. then the author of CPUZ himself.
but don't bug him for it, cause thats a dead end too.

Here's a screeny of a FX 55 I've been hassled about on other forums. I'd like a little back up here please.

AMD 64 FX 3315.

right on the dot. :)

sticky?

er why are people checking if their OWN overclocks are true or false?

pointless++?

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage


longhorn??
http://www.pcinpact.com/images/bd/news/13068.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage

longhorn??

---

Both numbers give an Athlon XP at 2165 and 2164 Mhz respectively. Strange.

a fake?
please, u can post a screen of cpu-z frequency checker??

for a proof

thx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

longhorn??

---

Its def. not longhorn. Looks like a milk styled skin to stylexp :)

in a few minutes I'll have CFC by franck himself :)

Here :


http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/checksum.jpg

Wow.. Our first cheat..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jupiler

Here :


http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/checksum.jpg

---

thx :)

Can you verify this pifast and SuperPI score please,so when its verify't ok,then i can say that my score is legit:).

He,it's not a worldclass score,but it's my score and the best i did,yet;),asoon that my dfi nf3 back is from rma we will try again and do better :banana: .

Both are OK.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RocKer

Can you verify this pifast and SuperPI score please,so when its verify't ok,then i can say that my score is legit:).

He,it's not a worldclass score,but it's my score and the best i did,yet;),asoon that my dfi nf3 back is from rma we will try again and do better :banana: .

---

Kunaak or Jupiler,

can you guys take a look and verify this screenie from SuperPi Challenge on my native forum? here it is:

thanx a lot,

No problem.
CPU checksum is not valid, unknown cpu.

Thanx a lot Jupiler.... can you please put that CPU Freq Checker on top of the screenie.... i want this guy to get busted.... he's one position above me in the SuperPi Challenge.... plizzzzzz ???

Here you go :

thanx a zillion, man :thumbsup:

Jupiler, one more please... not sure about that, it might be genuine.... thanx!

ladnie to tak nie wierzyc kolegom ? ;>

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by berkut

ladnie to tak nie wierzyc kolegom ? ;>

---

czolem Berkut.... it's for a good cause ;) one cheater is busted already and there's more work to be done :)

Doesn't match either.

OMFG.... one thing please.... before i do so much noise on my other forum, can you verify my screenie from this Challenge, please

EDIT: and the one that my buddy submitted - partner in crime :)

thanx a lot, Jupiler for your time and kindness :toast:

Long time ago

http://www.de.tomshardware.com/cpu/2...es/5255mhz.gif

Is it possible? No CPUz ID?

Could you check this one for me?
I'm not to sure about this guy ;)

OPP

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crankster

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

---

Well if it comes up as a cheat we'll say no:D

OPP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage

longhorn??

---

That looks like a Mac/Linux OS. Is the checker valid across any platform?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by G H Z

That looks like a Mac/Linux OS. Is the checker valid across any platform?

---

Its just a mac skin for XP, it doesnt change any system files(well other than the skins) so cpu-z should not be changed in any way. And you cant run OSX on anything than MAC hardware ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crankster

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

---

yes, it is FUGGER's.... trust nobody, eh OPP :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OPPAINTER

Could you check this one for me?
I'm not to sure about this guy ;)

OPP

---

LOL
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=19625

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crankster

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

---

Yes, now I can say it was FUGGERS:D
:toast:

OPP

sticky no?

Karnivore, please can u check my latest screenies, plizzzz.... matter of life or death.... :D

EDIT: i vote for STICKY, too...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Karnivore, please can u check my latest screenies, plizzzz.... matter of life or death.... :D

EDIT: i vote for STICKY, too...

---

The Yoto Screenie appears to not be showing the Checksum, but here is yours.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=19626

thanx a lot....
damn it, i missed that one about Yotomeczek... :(
anyway, great thread and thank you very much for your help, Karnivore....

Can you please help me check this guy too?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gokou

er why are people checking if their OWN overclocks are true or false?

pointless++?

---

Nope, not pointless at all for me. If anyone questions my overclock I just point them to this thread.

This one looks OK.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by agenda2005

Can you please help me check this guy too?

---

:slobber:

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30Ghz.JPG

I'd be very pleased if you can check this two:
http://img55.exs.cx/img55/1853/5222.png

http://img92.exs.cx/img92/2983/5101.jpg

thx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

:slobber:

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30Ghz.JPG

---

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :owned:

At first i waz thinking is real! but there were to many numbers there...
:banana4: :banana4: wil that be next year? :rotf: :owned:

Cold_Ice


http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=19645&stc=1

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=19646&stc=1

thx

may you want to check the decreased multiplier.

I am curious because the cpuZ is switching from x14 to x18 on the fly like Fugger told us before.

this shot was taken on a x14 moment.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...57defVcore.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by meke

may you want to check the decreased multiplier.

I am curious because the cpuZ is switching from x14 to x18 on the fly like Fugger told us before.

this shot was taken on a x14 moment.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...57defVcore.jpg

---

not a fake

I tested

thx

Kunaak> I got CFC by Franck

Note to People who keep Messaging me, asking me for the CPUZ Checker.

stop messaging me.
I can't give it to you.
its not mine to give.
no reason you have can allow me to give it to you.
it's just not mine to give.

so please, stop PM'ing me for it...

I got 4 today alone.
I am getting tired of telling the same story over and over, when it's already in my first post... :(

Respect the author wishes i think :)

http://www.tweakers.net/ext/f/45570/full.jpg
could you do my score plz :) thnkz
842106231

Your's ok too, Peter.
Nice oc, BTW.

thnkz :)

i got one. can you check it please.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by confuzzedintel

i got one. can you check it please.

---

here you go.

Can u check my newcastle on air plz ?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...o/Det0x_pc.jpg

both verified

Quote:

---

I am getting tired of telling the same story over and over, when it's already in my first post...

---

I guess the CPU Verify Ability is both a gift and a curse huh Kunaak ;)

Perkam

not not really.
haven't recieved a single PM about it since I posted it for the second time that I can't give it to you, no matter what the situation is...

Kunaak, could please confirm the CL1.5 0 0 0 7 0 timings on these RAM. Thanks, for your time and this service :)

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/2410.JPG

Uhm, the RAM timings are what matter, as I wrote. I have no need to confirm my 2.4ghz A64 can run 2.41ghz or haven't you acquired the RAM part of the checksum reader? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tek

Uhm, the RAM timings are what matter, as I wrote. I have no need to confirm my 2.4ghz A64 can run 2.41ghz or haven't you acquired the RAM part of the checksum reader? ;)

---

no :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SH4D3H

I'd like to know what this CPU's real clock is.
Its prolly a fake one anyway, 4 GHz Athlon XP :slobber:

---

checked and 4104MHz is ok

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...tique/4104.JPG

I believe it's just a cpuz bug showing this massive FSB and this Vcore can't be real...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Firefoxx

I believe it's just a cpuz bug showing this massive FSB and this Vcore can't be real...

---

Agreed, CPUZCheck does not confirm the clocks of the processor, itt only confirms the numbers displayed by CPUZ match the checksum. You can still manipulate CPUZ to not read properly, and the 4ghz AXP is about as fake as I think I've seen..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SH4D3H

I'd like to know what this CPU's real clock is.
Its prolly a fake one anyway, 4 GHz Athlon XP :slobber:

---

Jajajajajaaj a palomino 0.18m
:D :banana4:

Yeah, that is true about CPU-Z. I have seen my 3700+ show 1.5ghz HTT clock, making the final clock 18ghz :D

It usually happens under heavy load, like running M32 and SiS at the same time.

If I had been quick with a capture, I am sure the CPU-Z checksum would have "confirmed" the 18ghz :)

Anyway to check if the memory speed is for real?

I need to tjek some dude claming he's running @ ras-2-cas = 0 :S