-
G.SKILL Triple Channel X58 series F3-16000CL6T-6GBPIS 6-9-6-24 (2GBx3)
-
Hyper Pi 12P X 32m
2060 6-9-6-24-72-1 1.65
http://forum.nexthardware.com/galler...2_2050.6.9.jpg
please give me time to find a good bios for them, actually R3E and E7659 don't work well in OC
-
Nice Hiwa
Tanx For Pics :)
-
-
yeah powerchip for sure :)
:cool: so that's 2x boxes with 3x sets of 3x2GB each = 6x sets of 6GB kits - 36GB of memory ? :slobber:
i like :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
interesting
powerchips??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ViViD
Nice Hiwa
Tanx For Pics :)
thanks yeah they are new PSC ICs ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eva2000
yeah powerchip for sure :)
:cool: so that's 2x boxes with 3x sets of 3x2GB each = 6x sets of 6GB kits - 36GB of memory ? :slobber:
i like :D
lol no george they are 12gb 2 X 6gb kit :D
i'll test 0704 bios on R3E tonight hope it helps me.
-
oh, misleading the 3 labels on each box says 2GBx3 each hehe
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eva2000
oh, misleading the 3 labels on each box says 2GBx3 each hehe
:rofl: maybe dude
12gb --2000 6-9-6-24-72-1 1.64
http://forum.nexthardware.com/galler....12gb.6.9..jpg
not bad :up:
-
hmm hiwa
could u raise that tRFC to 110 .. with dqvref -50
seems to be the trick with tref 849..
see how far u can go with that.
awesome rams. INSANE RTL's
that definately pawned any elpida hypers
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
hmm hiwa
could u raise that tRFC to 110 .. with dqvref -50
seems to be the trick with tref 849..
see how far u can go with that.
awesome rams. INSANE RTL's
that definately pawned any elpida hypers
no performance in that case dude, i am trying to show good timings and tighter possible now, let try it later maybe under cold -180 :D
-
2000MHz CL6 is really great :)
It's interesting to see it can do 1600MHz CL4 :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sam_oslo
2000MHz CL6 is really great :)
It's interesting to see it can do 1600MHz CL4 :D
1600MHz CL4 :rofl: Lol
I Like High Bus In Low Cash Latency :D
-
-
finally a review of these thanks hiwa :) now lets see c6 over 2k :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sam_oslo
2000MHz CL6 is really great :)
It's interesting to see it can do 1600MHz CL4 :D
haha Cl4 on PSC is not easy :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Achill3uS
finally a review of these thanks hiwa :) now lets see c6 over 2k :D
hey :)
sure let's go slowly this time, i have to learn how tight the PSC timing ;)
will try 12GB 7-8-7 this afternoon let's see where they can go :shrug:
-
wow, very nice kits, and works insane together, amazing! :up:
Keep pushing bro, waiting your ln2 results! :P
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
haha Cl4 on PSC is not easy :D
So it's possible?
I thought that CAS 4 is illegal for DDR3?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shadewither
So it's possible?
I thought that CAS 4 is illegal for DDR3?
i don't think so, try it :D
-
new PSC are crazy nice i am in love with them :ROTF:
12GB-1900 7-8-7-24-72-1 1.64 :yepp::yepp::yepp:
http://forum.nexthardware.com/galler....12gb.7.8..jpg
-
With the homeruns that G.Skill has hit the last three years with their high performance memory kits, I find it amazing that anyone even uses anything else anymore. I've got a 6Gb kit of the F3-16000-CL9 and they are smoking fast too. They can run DDR3 1904 with 8-9-8-24 timings and a good piece over DDR3 2000 with 9-9-9-27 timings. I've always had great luck with all of the G.Skill ram I've used.
-
Hiwa is that max freq at 7-8-7 or just a quick run? Do you plan on doing any 6GB runs on air?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chuchnit
Hiwa is that max freq at 7-8-7 or just a quick run? Do you plan on doing any 6GB runs on air?
sure
when the cowboy back in the his hell, he left some years ago with pantera ,still waiting :D
i'll try it for sure, it's a quick run @ 1.64 vdimm ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
sure
when the cowboy back in the his hell, he left some years ago with pantera ,still waiting :D
i'll try it for sure, it's a quick run @ 1.64 vdimm ;)
You talking about Phil the lead singer? Sorry I couldn't follow what you are saying.
What vdimm do most PSC chips scale to? Are these new IC's from PSC or just super bin?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chuchnit
You talking about Phil the lead singer? Sorry I couldn't follow what you are saying.
What vdimm do most PSC chips scale to? Are these new IC's from PSC or just super bin?
i am talking about phil, sad we lost pantera ;)
http://screamermagazine.com/images/phil-01.jpg
they are normal retail ICs ;)
they scale well between 1.65 to 1.70 on air but under ln2 scale very good over 1.75 to 1.80
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
Yes very very sad indeed. One of my favorite bands of all time. :yepp: I wish Phil could get off the drugs. His voice is like gold for metal. He has insane range. Too bad about dimebag too :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
they are normal retail ICs ;)
they scale well between 1.65 to 1.70 on air but under ln2 scales very good over 1.75 to 1.80
Sweet. Hyper is too hard to find nowadays besides Dom GT's. These PSC's don't seem too bad. Looking foward to 6GB air runs when you got time. ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chuchnit
Sweet. Hyper is too hard to find nowadays besides Dom GT's. These PSC's don't seem too bad. Looking foward to 6GB air runs when you got time. ;)
you are right, hypers are damn expensive and fragile , i tried a lot of PSC IC under cold and hyperpi/memtest never die a kit ;) new ICs seems cool to push and tight tRCD we weren't able to do before :up:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
you are right, hypers are damn expensive and fragile , i tried a lot of PSC IC under cold and hyperpi/memtest never die a kit ;) new ICs seems cool to push and tight tRCD we weren't able to do before :up:
True, its getting there - when is a question the individual will have to answer :yepp:
One thing is certain; PSC under cold is interesting!
Keep on the testing buddy :up:
-
-
nice with low uncore volts but frequency :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eva2000
nice with low uncore volts but frequency :D
low uncore =low vtt = +200 runs on my a0 :D
-
-
Looking good hiwa. Is there any chance of talking you into doing a little super pi efficiency testing with these? I'm interested in how far you can push these before going cold. :)
-
sure but u mean with server 2k3 or XP ? , i am testing some 12GB 7-7-7-24 with lower possible voltage first ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
sure but u mean with server 2k3 or XP ? , i am testing some 12GB 7-7-7-24 with lower possible voltage first ;)
You pick man. I'm an XP kinda guy myself, but with the right tweaks they are basically the same. :) No hurries at all. I know that my request is low low on the priority list. So tell me more about this 7-7-7-24 testing :yepp:
-
hiwa arent those Cl6 rtl at 2k seems a bit loose
shouldnt it be hmm around 48/49,51,53,
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chuchnit
You pick man. I'm an XP kinda guy myself, but with the right tweaks they are basically the same. :) No hurries at all. I know that my request is low low on the priority list. So tell me more about this 7-7-7-24 testing :yepp:
sure i'll try but need to found 64bit if we want to see all memory usage
sorry for delay i'll try 7-7-7-24 this evening
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
hiwa arent those Cl6 rtl at 2k seems a bit loose
shouldnt it be hmm around 48/49,51,53,
you are right but with +3400/3500 Uncore i have to set higher RTL on channels,will try tight them for sure ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
hiwa arent those Cl6 rtl at 2k seems a bit loose
shouldnt it be hmm around 48/49,51,53,
probably won't scale as high unless shove more cpu vtt volts which probably ain't a good thing with 980X/gulftowns heh
-
-
Definitely an improvement in their new IC's huh? That's darn good for so many GB!
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
hiwa arent those Cl6 rtl at 2k seems a bit loose
shouldnt it be hmm around 48/49,51,53,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
sure i'll try but need to found 64bit if we want to see all memory usage
sorry for delay i'll try 7-7-7-24 this evening
you are right but with +3400/3500 Uncore i have to set higher RTL on channels,will try tight them for sure ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eva2000
probably won't scale as high unless shove more cpu vtt volts which probably ain't a good thing with 980X/gulftowns heh
oops forgot the uncore was lowered
eva.. u mean 980x high vtt aint a good thing?? so like 1.6v?? on vtt??
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cstkl1
oops forgot the uncore was lowered
eva.. u mean 980x high vtt aint a good thing?? so like 1.6v?? on vtt??
if u have good IMC 1.50 is good with +5.0GHz uncore and +980 mem ;)
the good point on gulfy is u can set lower uncore to push max your memories so IMC count but not like nehalem.
sorry george
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
if u have good IMC 1.50 is good with +5.0GHz uncore and +980 mem ;)
the good point on gulfy is u can set lower uncore to push max your memories so IMC count but not like nehalem.
sorry george
So the 980's arent like the nehalems where u need to double your uncore? Can you try running those @ lower timings @ 1600? Also whats the highest OC you can do with these dimms @ the lowest timings?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Johnny87au
So the 980's arent like the nehalems where u need to double your uncore? Can you try running those @ lower timings @ 1600? Also whats the highest OC you can do with these dimms @ the lowest timings?
Exactly you can use Unlink uncore ;) sure when my cpu back Alive :D (this chip need holidays for 2,3 days) i am waiting new chips, already have a retail but really don't want kill +6.2 06 cpu ;)
-
how far with only 6GB ????
-
Mate i want some of these,12GB---2164 6-9-6-24-88 1t 1.65 im guessing thats on air yeah? INSANE!
-
Very nice kit indeed. Thanks for sharing. Do you know how is the perofrmance of 6-8-6 comparing with 7-7-7 at the same frequency??
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Johnny87au
Mate i want some of these,12GB---2164 6-9-6-24-88 1t 1.65 im guessing thats on air yeah? INSANE!
yep air
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kentaro
Very nice kit indeed. Thanks for sharing. Do you know how is the perofrmance of 6-8-6 comparing with 7-7-7 at the same frequency??
as i know massman will prepare a good giude for that
is a easy to calculate but need a formula ;)
i try to explain you with a simple formula with FIX mem freq and fix uncore (if u change uncore you have to caculate IMC latency with RTL )
tCL = (CAS *2000)/ memory frequency in ns
2200 6-9-6-24 VS 2200 8-8-8-24
SO 2200 6-9-6-24 calculation :
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
9 X 2000 / 2200 = 8.18XX
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
24 X 2000 / 2200 = 21.18
then you calculate the addition of them = 5.45+ 8.18+ 5.45+ 21.18 = 40.89ns
2200 8-8-8-24 :
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
24 X 2000 / 2200 = 21.18
7.27+ 7.27+ 7.27+ 21.18 = 42.99ns
so with same uncore the 2200 6-9-6-24 is faster than 2200 8-8-8-24
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
yep air
as i know massman will prepare a good giude for that
is a easy to calculate but need a formula ;)
i try to explain you with a simple formula with FIX mem freq and fix uncore (if u change uncore you have to caculate IMC latency with RTL )
tCL = (CAS *2000)/ memory frequency in ns
2200 6-9-6-24 VS 2200 8-8-8-24
SO 2200 6-9-6-24 calculation :
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
9 X 2000 / 2200 = 8.18XX
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
24 X 2000 / 2200 = 21.18
then you calculate the addition of them = 5.45+ 8.18+ 5.45+ 21.18 = 40.89ns
2200 8-8-8-24 :
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
8 X 2000 / 2200 = 7.27
24 X 2000 / 2200 = 21.18
7.27+ 7.27+ 7.27+ 21.18 = 42.99ns
so with same uncore the 2200 6-9-6-24 is faster than 2200 8-8-8-24
Great info Hiwa :cool:, thanks dude! :up:
-
Quote:
SO 2200 6-9-6-24 calculation :
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
9 X 2000 / 2200 = 8.18XX
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
24 X 2000 / 2200 = 21.18
then you calculate the addition of them = 5.45+ 8.18+ 5.45+ 21.18 = 40.89ns
So your running a 2000 uncore right? I think i get it,, So for example the one i quoted you did
6x2000 uncore divide 2200 =5.45?
-
No Johnny87au, it is impossible to run 2000MHzUncore when your memory frequency 2200 (with Gulftown lowest Uncore is memory frequency x 1.5 - so 2200Mhz need almost 3300MHz Uncore).
This is only a formula to calculate true CAS Latency of the memory modules. It shows the time (40.89ns) required to access memory at a given CAS and memory operating frequency.
btw: Nice thread and benching hiwa :up:
-
yeh i know its a formula to calculate the latency etc but what is the 2000 in this? i know the 2200 is the memory speed..
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
Edit i think i got it, ur running 4000 uncore right hehe.. i know how to work out this formula im just not sure what the 2000 is..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Johnny87au
yeh i know its a formula to calculate the latency etc but what is the 2000 in this? i know the 2200 is the memory speed..
6 X 2000 / 2200 = 5.45XX
Edit i think i got it, ur running 4000 uncore right hehe.. i know how to work out this formula im just not sure what the 2000 is..
no no, i will try to make a good text and try to explain you guys better
i just make a simle example with fix uncore and rtl ,
ps: 2000 is a fix constant ;)
-
if you go calculate
2000 mem 7-7-7-21
VS
2000 mem 8-8-8-18
WITH FIX RTL AND UNCORE
7 + 7 + 7 + 21 = 42ns
8 + 8 + 8 + 18 = 42ns
please someone try this with Setted RTL in bios :up:
They are examples guys :up:
-
@hiwa
Nice review you got here same as your other one with the G.Skill DDR3-2133 3x2GB Perfect Storm Kit:up:
Which between the 2 is better? Which of the 2 would you choose? This or the G.Skill DDR3-2133 PS?
TIA!
Cheers!
-
2133 are bbse , buy them ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hiwa
2133 are bbse , buy them ;)
Thanks for replying! I actually have the PS 2133 kit.:up:
So what I have is already better? Thanks
