AMD Processor Pricing
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...18_609,00.html
Printable View
AMD Processor Pricing
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...18_609,00.html
Is it just me or I thought all Phenom II x4 945 has been 95W (at least based on the roadmap)?
it's always been 125w, but i'm glad to see that there is no price difference. yet.
In stock here in Sweden.
http://www.komplett.se/k/ki.aspx?sku=488303
so i guess the people saying those highend p2 chips running notably cooler than specced were right and the 125W specced parts were more like 105W or so and they managed to bring down tdp for at least some parts...
945 3.0 95W
955 3.2 125W
965 3.4 140W
mhhh seems like tdp goes way up above 3ghz though...
maybe they are trying to get tdp down to have a 125W 965?
965 never was and never will be 140W TDP.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
As far as the 945 goes, i would take a guess and say in real world it consumes about 10W less at load then a "125W equivailent" :p
Rose...bud.....
C.....3.......
Perkam
C3?!?!?!?! WHERE?!?!/!?!1!?? pls tell.......Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
This looks interesting.
965BE
http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/...er_id=!ORDERID!
945 95w
http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/...er_id=!ORDERID!
it shows a crap load of 965BE coming on the July 24. amd 945 95w on the 29th.
This site has been wrong a lot of times as far as ETA goes but you never know. Probably crap?
Besides, they claim 140 W for the 965?:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mats
945 3.0 95W
955 3.2 125W
965 3.4 140W
I thought 965 was 140w?? What's is supposed to be? 125w?
I thought AMD ditched that idea>>>
http://www.guru3d.com/news/amd-pheno...have-140w-tdp/
It's not a BE with unlocked multipliers? If not, meh. Still a very good power rating though. Leaps and bounds better than my Phenom II 940 hehe.
As far as I know it's 125w, and I don't know the Guru3D doesn't list any sources. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
well since the HW inventory list says 140w and guru says 140w. I think its safe to say its 140w.
Is this cpu a new stepping or just a better bin? I see this new chip on newegg but not the 965, when is the 965 supposed to be available?
As far as I know it's a 125 TDP part, that's what is said by most sites I just Googled through in about 5 minutes. Including this one: http://www.salland.eu/?pid=188500&ref=2Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
I dont know about you but I dont give a crap if its 140 or 125 or 95w as long as it overclocks well, who gives a crap!!?? Energy efficiency is the last thing I'm concerned with when I'm overclocking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmore
is this xtremesystems or energyefficientsystems? :shrug:
I'd say you should give a crap is you only care about overclocking, since a lower TDP rating also means you have to cool less and this may give you some extra headroom. Though in this case the lower TDP rating is more of an indication that AMD's manufacturing process in improving.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Yeah maybe at stock voltage. all that goes right out the window when you start bumping vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmore
have to Cool less? in my experience these low wattage chips get so much hotter when you add voltage. It seems they get more efficient and run cool at stock volts but the slightest bump in vcore and they sizzle.
The TDP ratings of 965 is still 125W TDP I promise :p:
This is probably just CTI and/or STT at work.
Yes it is 125W!Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartidiot89
No, it's not.Quote:
Originally Posted by ..::G80::..
Here's my experience with 95W X4 945:
http://www.abload.de/thumb/dsc02338mgmz.jpg
Default voltage (VID) and temps @ idle (inside case, under Xigmatek 1284 LowRPM with ~28 C ambient)
http://www.abload.de/thumb/amdoverdrive3bteo.jpg
Required voltage for primable 3.6GHz under 64-bitnom Vista Ultimate
http://www.abload.de/img/cpu-z8qd0.jpg
Yeah you need to O'Ced this baby via HTT, but that doesn't matter even if you forget to lower HyperTransport multi
http://www.abload.de/img/cpu-z2oqcy.jpg
all this on ASUS M3A79-T and BallistiX DDR2-800... maybe some good AM3 mobo can pull out even more from this CPU under these voltages, but I'm happy with "975-alike" clocks @ 1.35V :up:
massman, i think some ES are 140W but apparently the retail ones will be 125W
I don't have a 965 ES
hmmmm i also thought they are 140W and initially thats what amd said... but in all the recent infos i could find it seems to have changed to 125W...
maybe there will be both versions?
Newegg has them plus a whole host of other retailers.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103696
http://www.google.com/products?clien...N&hl=en&tab=wf
Recent info leaked by forum users? Or (semi-)official sources?Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
I've got some papers here and unless I lost the ability to read I can confirm it doesn't say 125W in bold letters :p:
I presume that the combination of frequency and voltage makes it difficult to fit all samples into the 125W category. Probably with new revisions of the silicon 125W will be possible.
no, i mean amd docs... in older amd docs it says 140W, in the newer ones it says 125W... so there are either 2 versions or they changed it to 125W...Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Don't see them making two versions, so must be changed.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
I seen, default voltage x4 965 was 1.4V...But it was maybe bug of BIOS, some BIOS for new CPUs has fallse setings CPU vcore. Think, for x4 965 is not ptoblem 3.4GHz with the same vcore as x4 955.
I'm with massman on these one :up:
we will see, i dont know exactly TDP, but know about next chips from AMD and this is point for me :)