QX9650@7,81sec

Printable View

03-29-2008, 02:21 PM
Brandybuck

QX9650@7,81sec

System:

. Intel QX9650
. ASUS P5E3 WS-Pro X38
. OCZ 1600EB CL7 DDR3 2GB Kit
. Silverstone 1kW PSU
. HWA LN2 Container rev2.0
. CPU Cooling by LN2

Finally sub 8 sec. :D System pics coming soon :)

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/1411/74808690ff5.jpg
03-29-2008, 02:28 PM
BlueAqua

Nice! It's tough to break that 8sec barrier and you smashed it. Good stuff.
03-29-2008, 02:34 PM
_TheMaster_

Good Job!! Gratz!! :D
03-29-2008, 02:45 PM
ME4ME

very nice superpi time!

hehe, 2.0V .. i like it:clap:
03-29-2008, 02:51 PM
4Qman

well done.

What temps you run at with the Ln2 under load on the CPU please?
03-29-2008, 02:51 PM
George_o/c

Wow ! :eek: Congratulations Brandy, amazing SPi 1M run (45.5k PP ;)) :up:
03-29-2008, 02:58 PM
BenchZowner

Congrats on the time BrandyBuck.
But why are you running only 388MHz FSB ? ( bad RAM or just running DDR3-1552 5-5-4-15 ? )
03-29-2008, 02:59 PM
DeDaL

WOW great !!!

Can you show OVPmod please ?
03-29-2008, 03:00 PM
Brandybuck

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Congrats on the time BrandyBuck.
But why are you running only 388MHz FSB ? ( bad RAM or just running DDR3-1552 5-5-4-15 ? )

This Cpu has very bad fsb:) , It's not working good up to 400fsb:down:

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeDaL

WOW great !!!

Can you show OVPmod please ?

Ok I will show system pics and ovp mod pics:up:
03-29-2008, 08:59 PM
andre X_X

very nice run, great efficency too :up:
03-29-2008, 10:28 PM
Solarfall

hehehe thats madness.. nicely done Brandybuck.. :up: :toast:
did you took any pics of you session ?
03-29-2008, 10:58 PM
Ghost742

nice job!!! so the chips craps out with a higher fsb? my 6550 doesnt like anything over 420 either, hope not all of the 9650 are like that.
03-29-2008, 11:01 PM
madfaze

:shakes: :up:
03-29-2008, 11:16 PM
antari

Nice result! What's the batch number?
03-30-2008, 01:36 AM
Harshal

Superb run :)
:up:
03-30-2008, 01:57 AM
Omastar

2v? :o Jeez.
03-30-2008, 02:21 AM
RockfordFosgate

Congratz HWA OC Team ;)
03-30-2008, 04:17 AM
Brandybuck

Hey guys , did you try C1 stepping cpu? I think little faster than C0 in spi:up:

Quote:

Originally Posted by antari

Nice result! What's the batch number?

It's confidental (ES) , year 2008 but cpuz not shown ES
03-30-2008, 04:36 AM
NightRaven

nice stuff!

no wonder i havent seen a retail c1 ard here yet!
03-30-2008, 05:05 AM
Garrett

2.000v... sick but I love it :up: Great result!
03-30-2008, 05:41 AM
PPInDaHouse

Great run there, your pp is really good ;)
03-30-2008, 06:35 AM
biG_aL

nice done

masallah helal olsun beee :up:
03-30-2008, 01:26 PM
loopy83

Max vali?
03-30-2008, 02:44 PM
Nosfer@tu

GREAT WORK :D
No coldboot bug ?

What was temps ?
Must be a NICE pot to stand 2.0 Volt at that speed :D

msconfig and 2 cores or all 4 :D ?

Grats on sub 8 sek ;)
03-30-2008, 02:52 PM
M.Beier

Very impressive, I wonder how the heck you made such good time... The FSB sucks as you mention yourself, it must be very aggressive timings, because you cant use high ram freq :(

CL: 5-5-5-12 PL: 5?
03-31-2008, 12:05 AM
Brandybuck

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Very impressive, I wonder how the heck you made such good time... The FSB sucks as you mention yourself, it must be very aggressive timings, because you cant use high ram freq :(

CL: 5-5-5-12 PL: 5?

I don't use very agrresive timing , sorry ı forget to show memory timing. I use 776mhz 6-5-5 timing but C1 stepping cpu very good for spi.
03-31-2008, 12:54 PM
Brandybuck

Hey guys

I tested 2 different stepping C0 and NEW C1(ES) same system

QX9650 C0 5750mhz ---- 8,125sec
QX9650 C1 5750mhz ---- 7,92sec

I think C1 stepping is very fast for spi , If anybody try c1 stepping , please share:)
03-31-2008, 01:01 PM
BenchZowner

0.2s faster clock per clock ???? :D
If it's true...then wow!
I've got to get a good QX...where's that damn thing called luck when you need it ? :(
03-31-2008, 01:07 PM
PPInDaHouse

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandybuck

Hey guys

I tested 2 different stepping C0 and NEW C1(ES) same system

QX9650 C0 5750mhz ---- 8,125sec
QX9650 C1 5750mhz ---- 7,92sec

I think C1 stepping is very fast for spi , If anybody try c1 stepping , please share:)

Thanks to share that, its good to know, but thats a very big difference, anyone can confirm this too?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

0.2s faster clock per clock ???? :D
If it's true...then wow!
I've got to get a good QX...where's that damn thing called luck when you need it ? :(

haha, where is luck, what I've been saying last weeks :D
03-31-2008, 01:14 PM
Brandybuck

Should be Andre Yang tried this new stepping:D
03-31-2008, 11:13 PM
before

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandybuck

Hey guys

I tested 2 different stepping C0 and NEW C1(ES) same system

QX9650 C0 5750mhz ---- 8,125sec
QX9650 C1 5750mhz ---- 7,92sec

I think C1 stepping is very fast for spi , If anybody try c1 stepping , please share:)

Could you please save CPU-Z registers dumps (.txt) and then send them to me or post them in this thread? What needed are 2 dumps, (1) with C0 (2) with C1.
04-01-2008, 12:25 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandybuck

Hey guys

I tested 2 different stepping C0 and NEW C1(ES) same system

QX9650 C0 5750mhz ---- 8,125sec
QX9650 C1 5750mhz ---- 7,92sec

I think C1 stepping is very fast for spi , If anybody try c1 stepping , please share:)

Holy crap, thats ALOT!!!
04-01-2008, 01:05 AM
kiwi

hmm, I wonder what results would be with pre 45nm bios :) Could be up to 0.5s faster clock per clock :eek:
04-01-2008, 08:12 AM
TheKarmakazi

Very nice results man, sub 8 is a dream! As others have asked what temps were you running at? Any chance we can see a pic of your cpu pot?
04-02-2008, 01:29 PM
dpa

you get boost because bios not supports this cpu yet.. same thing as we had when C0 came.. :)
04-03-2008, 03:41 AM
EXPANDER

@Brandybuck

Very beautifull Score:toast: :toast:
04-04-2008, 09:04 AM
Rol-Co

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandybuck

Hey guys

I tested 2 different stepping C0 and NEW C1(ES) same system

QX9650 C0 5750mhz ---- 8,125sec
QX9650 C1 5750mhz ---- 7,92sec

I think C1 stepping is very fast for spi , If anybody try c1 stepping , please share:)

can you do the same test at lower speed and both cpu 1m and 32m, ill guess C1 is slower at 32m ;)
04-05-2008, 04:23 PM
Stoolman

Killer score... Good job!
04-05-2008, 04:30 PM
Stoolman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rol-Co

can you do the same test at lower speed and both cpu 1m and 32m, ill guess C1 is slower at 32m ;)

This is the same thing as with the first scores we got with 45nm on the Asus boards.. The C1 is faster because the BIOS does not fully support it.
I did a run myself with a 9770 C1 on the same board and scored 7,9 sec on only 5,6GHz.. which is nearly not possible on a board with a bios that supports the new stepping..
Using a Asus board with a unsopported bios is a hell of a lot faster!
04-06-2008, 08:10 AM
rgkpt

nice score :D
04-06-2008, 09:34 AM
Rol-Co

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stoolman

This is the same thing as with the first scores we got with 45nm on the Asus boards.. The C1 is faster because the BIOS does not fully support it.
I did a run myself with a 9770 C1 on the same board and scored 7,9 sec on only 5,6GHz.. which is nearly not possible on a board with a bios that supports the new stepping..
Using a Asus board with a unsopported bios is a hell of a lot faster!

i know i kept you guys buisy for a day with that tweak don't you remember, but it is slower at 32m so thats why i ask him to run both.
you will problaby see that 32m c0 wil be faster because of the supported bios.
04-06-2008, 10:28 AM
Sam__

thats an awesome time! nice job.

as others said... temps?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 PM.

XtremeSystems