Phenom//Nvidia//ATi 3Dmark06...Whats your Score..Phenoms ONLY

Ok now that more Phenoms are getting Overclocked i thought id Start a 3Dmark06 thread...

Please Post AMD Phenoms:D ONLY......... No X2's//Core2//Q's......



Not the best ,,but with TA770 progress is coming along very good..ALL Stock Phenom and GTS512

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...gsAllStock.jpg

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...00mhzbench.jpg

Overclocked GTS to 817//2160//2200 CPU@2400mhz

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...0at2400mhz.jpg

I cant wait for a Optimized Bios with no TLBfix.....The Performance is being held back alot..At 2400mhz it still makes me some what satisfied..:yepp:

http://img.techpowerup.org/080201/7oc.jpg

http://img.techpowerup.org/071218/7oc.jpg

Nice, DaMulta =o

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/2...turedd8.th.jpg

It should be noted that I get ~13K whether Crossfire is enabled or not... Which sucks. Big difference in scores at higher resolutions when Crossfire is enabled though. But not at default 1280x1024. Why not? =(

Woa...!!

Battle of the TITAN!! :eek:

Fan Girls cheering up... :cheer: :cheer: :cheer:

Ranking:

1st : :worship: 13283 - Hosser - ATI 3870

2nd :12556 - DaMulta - ATI 2900XT

3rd : 12010 - gOtVoltage - nVdia 8800GTS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaMulta

http://img.techpowerup.org/080201/7oc.jpg

http://img.techpowerup.org/071218/7oc.jpg

---

DaMulta, you're SM2 and SM3 scores are really really low.

Look at my SM2 and SM3, http://img.techpowerup.org/071013/13k_2900pro112.jpg
Sorry, its an conroe, but you're cpu score is much higher with the Phenom. You should have much higher SM2 and SM3.

Yea, I don't know. I don't have that chip anymore. I might has a black 9600 soon to play with.

I had my card clocked at 900Mhz as well..

To DaMulta
Can you post Ht3 speed, mem spec, mobo, please? :D

I think my Nb was on 3, and the HT was on 400Mhz.

My memory was on the 800 divider, and I think it was around 1000Mhz.

4-4-4-14 I believe

Mobo the MSI 790FX

I need to look around to see if I took any ss of that.

Here was a CF run 24/7 stable
http://img.techpowerup.org/080202/stable.jpg

Whoa dude!

Phenom @ 3.1G!? How are you managing this!?

look at the cpuz in that shot:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaMulta

look at the cpuz in that shot:)

---

But... But... Aww. :(

Why does 3DMark say 3.1 then?

I don't know, but windows will pick up those odd speeds as well.

Hi guys, some 3DMark06 scores with MSI K9A2+ Phenom 9500 + 8800GT; MSI K9A2+ Phenom 9500 + HD3870 (single); MSI K9A2+ / ASUS M3A32 DLX + Phenom 9500 + HD3870 (CF)

13486 - K9A2 Platinum Phenom X4 9500 @2816 Geforce 8800 GT @750/2050

http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/8...0613486dd9.jpg


12815 - MSI K9A2 Platinum - Phenom X4 9500 @2827 - ATI HD3870 @891/2700

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2...2815nc9.th.jpg


15010 - MSI K9A2 Platinum - Phenom X4 9500 @2805 - ATI HD3870CF @850/1251

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/7...00hd387jt7.jpg


15126 - ASUS M3A32-MVP DELUXE - Phenom X4 9500 @2783 - ATI HD3870CF @891/1278

http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/2...00hd387us7.jpg

aGeoM ... don't u have no spare parts for me? :p

crazy scores!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lostfaith

aGeoM ... don't u have no spare parts for me? :p

crazy scores!

---

yeap, send me a nice hot carabbien woman, and I'll see...

:lol2:

Biostar TA770 A2+ w/ Phenom @ 2600, Heavily untweaked

Stock 8800GT 600/900/1500

Second Shot is with the TLB Patch disabled, Ram tweaked to 400 4-4-4-12, 8800GT still stock

:D Great 3Dmarks Guys/Gals....Keep em comming.....Phenom will only get better...:D

Phenom 9600@2.5
ATI HD3870 X2@stock
12559

gpu about=760
RAM about=999

CPU about=2.500
OS=x64

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13752950



EDIT**
P.S. @ ownage his cpu score is higher cause he's got 2 more cores then your Conroe

Well, thought I'd post my wimpy score too...
Not really too shabby for a lowly HD3850.. :p:

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3.../0129_3D06.jpg

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...0130AOD_25.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ownage

DaMulta, you're SM2 and SM3 scores are really really low.

---

He left his HT and possible NB too low, that's why. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gOtVoltage

Ok now that more Phenoms are getting Overclocked i thought id Start a 3Dmark06 thread...

Please Post AMD Phenoms:D ONLY......... No X2's//Core2//Q's......



Not the best ,,but with TA770 progress is coming along very good..ALL Stock Phenom and GTS512

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...gsAllStock.jpg

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...00mhzbench.jpg

Overclocked GTS to 817//2160//2200 CPU@2400mhz

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...0at2400mhz.jpg

I cant wait for a Optimized Bios with no TLBfix.....The Performance is being held back alot..At 2400mhz it still makes me some what satisfied..:yepp:

---

Thats a pretty crappy score. With my 6400+ BE and only a GT, I got 12.5~13k.

Thats Phenom Bioses are no where near as optimal as what the 6400+ can do ...My 6000+ does 13200+ with GTS.. Now once the Bioses are optimized for Phenom we should see 13000+ @ around 2400mhz easy..

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13951067

Just stock for now.
I'll do some OC's soon.
9600BE + 3850HD

Scores way higher then my old 6000 X2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

He left his HT and possible NB too low, that's why. ;)

---

Hmmm, well they had to be low to hit those speeds. My CPU score did go up, I find it odd that NB, and HT will affect the outcome of what my 3d will do.

Can't wait to get another AMD Quad to play with again, but I would like to get an Intel machine first.

What's up with the 3850's scoring so close to the 8800GT/GTS cards in this thread?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by n6b72g

What's up with the 3850's scoring so close to the 8800GT/GTS cards in this thread?

---

AMD has the spider platform working nicely together. Individually they aren't anything special, but together they seem to work very well.

question: why are the cpu scores so low? just curious, dual core intels get a substantially higher cpu score.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaMulta

Hmmm, well they had to be low to hit those speeds. My CPU score did go up, I find it odd that NB, and HT will affect the outcome of what my 3d will do.

---

They will definitely if the bandwidth can be saturated. NB all the way to 2.6G does definitely help as it increases MEM/IMC bandwidth greatly and reduces heavily their latencies, and HT you need at least to 1.6G or you'll see lower scores than possible. CPU speed with Phenom affects MEM bandwidth quite a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mnewxcv

question: why are the cpu scores so low? just curious, dual core intels get a substantially higher cpu score.

---

Which dual cores get 3500-3900 CPU score at sub 3GHz? None do and I have them of both sides. They all scores in the 2k region.

Those Phenom scores are ~200 points below a Q6600 G0 at those speeds, so quite in-line. QX6700 B3 did 39xx at stock which is around the speeds these guys are showing. They are what we expect going off what we know of Phenom perf. Some of them are -200 points because they're on Vista.

KTE +1.. I cant wait untill Phenom Bioses mature:yepp:

3870x2 working will have some 3Dmark06 soon Im not shure if its using Both cores all the way yet...@ 2300mhz ive only reached 12600? Still playing with settings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mnewxcv

question: why are the cpu scores so low? just curious, dual core intels get a substantially higher cpu score.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

Which dual cores get 3500-3900 CPU score at sub 3GHz? None do and I have them of both sides. They all scores in the 2k region.

Those Phenom scores are ~200 points below a Q6600 G0 at those speeds, so quite in-line. QX6700 B3 did 39xx at stock which is around the speeds these guys are showing. They are what we expect going off what we know of Phenom perf. Some of them are -200 points because they're on Vista.

---

As you can see my 1st bench with 8800GT and CPU @ 2816 scored ~4250 in XP x86 and in Vista x86 @ 2805 ~3900, proofing KTE's post.

http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=14

Hi guys First post for me and that's my phenom 9600 :)

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6...15largerx9.jpg

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=14 (Phenom 9600 BE - at stock, no TLB patch), nVidia 8800 GTX on an Asus M3A-MVP Deluxe DDR2-800 5-5-5-12

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=14 (Phenom 9600 BE - at stock, (with TLB patch enabled), nVidia 8800 GTX on an Asus M3A-MVP Deluxe DDR2-800 5-5-5-12

Jack

:welcome: Kar0nt3,

Nice score, what's up with the super low clocks on the 3870x2? Crank up your NB, the 3870x2 and you've got a shot at 16K

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flasker

:welcome: Kar0nt3,

Nice score, what's up with the super low clocks on the 3870x2? Crank up your NB, the 3870x2 and you've got a shot at 16K

---

Many thanx :)
I think it's an error of GPUZ that's doesn't support well the 3870X2..I don't think i can hit the 16k score..i've to try to go on with phenom frequency or put under oc the X2..
I'm trying different settings but if I the NB I lose performance..I'm trying to understand this curios matter...

Nice scores guys!
I will post some from my this weekend!

:)

@Kar0nt3 What cooling for that Phenom?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lightman

Nice scores guys!
I will post some from my this weekend!

:)

@Kar0nt3 What cooling for that Phenom?

---

It's under Zalman CNPS 9700 Cu-Led :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kar0nt3

It's under Zalman CNPS 9700 Cu-Led :)

---

Now thats what i like too see....3.0ghz on Air....Yeah you can sqeeze some more outa that 3870x2...

10441 marks with everything at default, no tweaks for OS or BIOS.

Phenom 9600 @2,3GHz
MSI K9A2 Platinum (BIOS 1.1)
MSI 3870 OC @800/2250
4 * 1GB OCZ Platinum @800MHz (5-5-5-15)
Windows XP SP2

My score: 7001 Marks

Phenom 9500 @2420Mhz, 7900GTO @720/830MHz, Crosshair, TLB patch enabled, Ballistix 4096MB @880MHz 5,4,4,4,12 2T, Vista x64

Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5584306

Edit: 7294 Marks

Phenom 9500 @2420Mhz, 7900GTO @730/840MHz, Crosshair, TLB patch disabled, Ballistix 4096MB @880MHz 5,4,4,4,12 2T, Vista x64

Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5604670

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5454955

9500 @ 2.5ghz, 3870 crossfired @ 850/1250

that seems kinda low for 2 3870s crossfire, what cat driver are you using? 8.3 dropepd my CF'ed 3870s score down to 11800 ish and when i reinstalled cat 8.2 i shot back up to 14288 (this is all with a 6400+ proc tho)

I don't mean to piss on anyone's parade but holy crap does AMD hardware give low 3dmark results now... My E8400 + 8800 GT scores 13.7k, and I could hit 15 with tweaks and some decent memory.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gOtVoltage

Now thats what i like too see....3.0ghz on Air....Yeah you can sqeeze some more outa that 3870x2...

---

are you talking about overclocking the 3870X2?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kar0nt3

are you talking about overclocking the 3870X2?

---

YOUR 9600BE... ALso if ou raise the CPU/ memory too 900/1053mhz that would get you over 16000+ i believe

i have to try to OC my X2..my phenom isn't a BE.i've changed the bios of the mobo..it seems to be more stable..i've to test well this new one..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techguy2k5

I don't mean to piss on anyone's parade but holy crap does AMD hardware give low 3dmark results now... My E8400 + 8800 GT scores 13.7k, and I could hit 15 with tweaks and some decent memory.

---

Decent glasses first, IMO :rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SocketMan

Decent glasses first, IMO :rofl:

---

Yes, almost the sense-making... Almost...

All I know is I look at Phenom rigs with Crossfired cards scoring lower than my C2D + 8800 GT and can't help but think "why would anyone buy anything else?"

This sounds liks a fun thread. Anyone keeping / making a ranking system? :) I will try to submit my scores soon.

Ton

I just wanted to be clear:

I'm not trying to start a flamewar. I really want AMD to do well. I used to be a huge fan. When I was ready to build my current rig though, I had no choice but an Intel CPU and an Nvidia graphics card. AMD just didn't have any competitive parts at the high-end. They seem to be doing well with the 3870 X2 though, and I really hope RV770/R700 and the followup to Agena do well. The more competition, the better it is for all us enthusiasts. I hope to one day build an all-AMD rig again. In 2006 I had an RD580 board, 2x X1900 XTXs in Crossfire, and an Opteron 175 o/c'd to 2.6GHz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techguy2k5

I just wanted to be clear:

I'm not trying to start a flamewar. I really want AMD to do well. I used to be a huge fan. When I was ready to build my current rig though, I had no choice but an Intel CPU and an Nvidia graphics card. AMD just didn't have any competitive parts at the high-end. They seem to be doing well with the 3870 X2 though, and I really hope RV770/R700 and the followup to Agena do well. The more competition, the better it is for all us enthusiasts. I hope to one day build an all-AMD rig again. In 2006 I had an RD580 board, 2x X1900 XTXs in Crossfire, and an Opteron 175 o/c'd to 2.6GHz.

---

Yea there are a few guys here with the "best of both worlds" an INTEL rig and
an AMD, or a few of each. Thats the right approach IMO anyway. It's like
having a brunet wife and a blond girlfriend, everyone's happy for as long as they don't get to close to each other:D

Kar0nt3: Your score can be higher, your score will be low because you've left your HT too low (1GHz).

Try 8x NB and 8x HT multi, you should be good for that quite easily.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

Kar0nt3: Your score can be higher, your score will be low because you've left your HT too low (1GHz).

Try 8x NB and 8x HT multi, you should be good for that quite easily.

---

now i'm trying to go on with the frequency of phenom...i'll try rhe 8x...
i've tried to oc mi X2 with ati overdrive but the score doesn't change...it's strange and i don't know why...:shrug:

edit

I used the 2 8x settings...but results don't changed...:shakes:

13988 Phenom 9600BE @ 2.691GHz / MSI 3870X2

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5664698

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=327030

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SocketMan

gpu about=760
RAM about=999

CPU about=2.500
OS=x64

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13752950



EDIT**
P.S. @ ownage his cpu score is higher cause he's got 2 more cores then your Conroe

---

"EDIT**
P.S. @ ownage his cpu score is higher cause he's got 2 more cores then your Conroe'


your %100 right,minus 2000 points of his 3dmark06 run and then see his score.

rule of thumb for mild overclocks dual and quads

cpu score 3dmark06
dual core 2,000 +\-average

quad core 4,000 +\-average

keep this in mind when comparing systems and 3dmarks.


i was thinking wow to til i seen his was running a quad core.i get 3dmark06 11,700 (bone stock)evga gtx + overclocked e6600 at 3.6. with a q6600 simply add 2,000 more to that for overall score.


anyway nice thread and awesome amd clocks guys.:up: my old opty 165 i have here(in my closet) on my old dfi ultra d would o\c to 2.8x2 on water
%100 stable.loved that setup but needed more cpu powa,so i went to the darkside

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kar0nt3

now i'm trying to go on with the frequency of phenom...i'll try rhe 8x...
i've tried to oc mi X2 with ati overdrive but the score doesn't change...it's strange and i don't know why...:shrug:

edit

I used the 2 8x settings...but results don't changed...:shakes:

---

Make sure you close the 3dmark application before you over clock the card with
ati overdrive.
Set all 3d options to application preference.
Set mipmap details all the way to the left (performance)
There also might be some options in BIOS under "PCIe' that need to be changed.
Not sure exactly which ones, one with p2p write beetween GFX0/GFX1 should be (I think) enabled.

Almost forgot
Which OS are you using?
is it 64 bit? the scores are bit lower for 64 OSes I think.
You got a good result ,relax,it's quality over quantity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SocketMan

Make sure you close the 3dmark application before you over clock the card with
ati overdrive.
Set all 3d options to application preference.
Set mipmap details all the way to the left (performance)
There also might be some options in BIOS under "PCIe' that need to be changed.
Not sure exactly which ones, one with p2p write beetween GFX0/GFX1 should be (I think) enabled.

Almost forgot
Which OS are you using?
is it 64 bit? the scores are bit lower for 64 OSes I think.
You got a good result ,relax,it's quality over quantity

---

Yeah I set all frequencies after closing 3D06 and set all on performance...
Under bios options there are several voices on the bios of the M3A32 under pcie settings..but i don't know what they means...somebody could help me?
Thanks..
It's XP 32bit :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by railmeat

rule of thumb for mild overclocks dual and quads

cpu score 3dmark06
dual core 2,000 +\-average

quad core 4,000 +\-average

---

I don't agree with this at all. Perhaps it's true for AMD systems, but certainly not for Intel. I have a friend with a stock (for now) Q6600 that gets just over 3800 points for a CPU score, not even 200 points more than my o/c'd E8400. I'll be knocking on 4000's door when I finally get some decent RAM tomorrow and can continue to o/c beyond 4GHz (stuck @ 3.87 for now).

I am impressed with the recent ATI cards - some good scores there! Here is my most recent attempt: 12574
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5683985
Puts me in second place for Phenom/GTS512...although Im certain that won't last long.

Hipro just took back (7?) world records using 3870X2's exclusively. With 9800 GX2 Quad SLI and 9800 GTX Tri SLI right around the corner though, I expect to see those records fall before the month is out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techguy2k5

Hipro just took back (7?) world records using 3870X2's exclusively. With 9800 GX2 Quad SLI and 9800 GTX Tri SLI right around the corner though, I expect to see those records fall before the month is out.

---

One of the reasons why people get the crappy AMD hardware:rofl:

But seriously I can't answer for anyone,but myself :
one of the reasons to get an ATI card(s) - 38xx specifically, was the fact that the GPU Folding@Home Client should be out this spring.
There are no GPU clients for Nvidia in the works (as far as I know)

Hi guys,

I'm looking for some help or confirmation of a few things re: ASUS M3A32-MVP mobo.....

Does anyone know if the SB600 AHCI/SATA RAID Vista install problem and the SATA Optical drive issue, has been fixed or not.....

I am currently thinking about getting this mobo but I have 2 Seagate SATA-II NCQ HDD's in RAID-0 , and only have access to to 2 SATA DVD-RW drives...

I know there were problems with installing Vista under AHCI and that a SATA Optical Drive wasn't recognised as a boot device, when installed on the SB600 controller with the HDD's.....

I know the ASUS downloads says that BIOS 0801 has a fix for this problem, but checking through forums for confirmation suggests that the problem still exists, even with the latest 0902 BIOS.....

So I'm wondering if anyone here has been able to install Vista on this kind of configuration....

2 x SATA-II HDD RAID-0, SATA DVD-RW, Vista HP 64-bit.

Another question as well is after downloading and reading the manual for the mobo, I notice under the RAM section it says

Quote:

---

*note 128MB chips not supported

---

I was hoping to install 4GB of RAM (2 x 2GB) PC2-8500..... but given that 2048/16= 128MB I'm guessing that this means that ASUS are essentially saying that their mobo does not support 2GB RAM modules, only 1GB modules....

I did see that Karon here has 4GB of RAM but theres no detail in any of the screenshots posted or in her sig, of how its made up.....

I hope someone may be able to confirm that the mobo will support 2x2GB and if so which brand and model #.....

OK I think thats it...lol...

I'm just trying to find out all the little problems before I decide to buy it or not, so would really appreaciate the help...

Many thanks

Kaz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kar0nt3

now i'm trying to go on with the frequency of phenom...i'll try rhe 8x...
i've tried to oc mi X2 with ati overdrive but the score doesn't change...it's strange and i don't know why...:shrug:

edit

I used the 2 8x settings...but results don't changed...:shakes:

---

Use Rivatuner 2.8 to set the fan and Enable overclocking..But use AMD GPU Tool to set the Clocks... it will perform so much better than using AOD for the 3870x2.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/RivaTune...nload-163.html

AMD Gpu Tool. and a How too:D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=177639

Set the fan to 100% for benches and only enable Low level driver dont use it to overclock,,it will only do one GPU..GPU Tool you can set memory and both GPU's.

Note: Im scoring 13000+ @2400mhz now...It just takes time:up: Also enable APLICATION CONTROLED for ANTIALIASING and ANISOTROPIC FILTERING...you will get better performance than if you set it to Performance on those two.

Also leave ADAPTIVE ANTIALIASING OFF

let me know what you get..

P.S. Nice clocks guys/gals..i havnt had time to list everyones scores in order..I hope i will soon..

KAZGIRL....AHCI its very buggy...Also ive read and believe you set The RAID to Normal IDE for the setting and it will auto detect satas with the raid driver being installed before hand...AHCI bugs out. Im not 100% shure... Dont know about the memory ATM i always use 4x1gigs ..I switch between 32bit XP/Vista and XP64bit..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gOtVoltage

Use Rivatuner 2.8 to set the fan and Enable overclocking..But use AMD GPU Tool to set the Clocks... it will perform so much better than using AOD for the 3870x2.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/RivaTune...nload-163.html

AMD Gpu Tool. and a How too:D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=177639

Set the fan to 100% for benches and only enable Low level driver dont use it to overclock,,it will only do one GPU..GPU Tool you can set memory and both GPU's.

Note: Im scoring 13000+ @2400mhz now...It just takes time:up: Also enable APLICATION CONTROLED for ANTIALIASING and ANISOTROPIC FILTERING...you will get better performance than if you set it to Performance on those two.

Also leave ADAPTIVE ANTIALIASING OFF

let me know what you get..

P.S. Nice clocks guys/gals..i havnt had time to list everyones scores in order..I hope i will soon..

KAZGIRL....AHCI its very buggy...Also ive read and believe you set The RAID to Normal IDE for the setting and it will auto detect satas with the raid driver being installed before hand...AHCI bugs out. Im not 100% shure... Dont know about the memory ATM i always use 4x1gigs ..I switch between 32bit XP/Vista and XP64bit..

---

sorry but i lost this post ;) thanks for suggestion i'll try as soon as i have time :yepp: many many thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techguy2k5

Yes, almost the sense-making... Almost...

All I know is I look at Phenom rigs with Crossfired cards scoring lower than my C2D + 8800 GT and can't help but think "why would anyone buy anything else?"

---

Deleted.

I'm not sure why I bothered.

NB=2400//HT=2400//CPU=2700//DDR1067
GPU=910//GDDR4=1130
:)

http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=14
Downloaded gpuz-0.19, froze the system after I run it:mad:
Good thing I saved the page first;)