coldbug

what if the coldbug is only caused by the cpus internal overheating protection malfunctioning under low temperatures? after all its designed to work from 20 to 80 degrees celsius... maybe 0 to 150 degrees in an extreme case, but thats it... most engineers dont know that we use cpus at much lower temps or they simply dont care.

there are several temp probes in a cpu, at least 1 per core plus one in the imc on newer amd cpus afaik. there is one probe per core that can be read externally, AND another probe which is read by the cpu itself! this probe cannot be read externally, at least not directly through a set of pins afaik. its purpose is to protect the cpu from overheating, as soon as it meassures 125 degrees internally inside the cpu it will trigger the termtrip process which forces the mainboard to shut down. It also shuts the cpu down and prevents it from doing any more work afaik, but im not sure about that.

how are the temperatures meassured? afaik its resistor based... as we all know resistance changes the colder a material gets. but even the most ideal materials dont scale linearilly the colder they get... so amd had to decide for a resistor that works well in the range they will need, 40 to 150 degrees i guess... the closer to the limits you get the less accurate the reading gets. not only that, you have to read the temperatureand interpret the values you read... you want to keep things simple and short, so they used a basic algorythm i guess...

so basically there are two probes in each core, and one is a closed circuit and is read by the cpu itself and the other one is ready by the mainboard. but as far as i know they are vitually the same thing. the mainboard/bios reading the temperature has proven to be very innaccurate as most of you probably already experienced first hand. does anybody remember how mainboards/bioses read temperatures below 0 degrees as +300 degrees or even higher some years ago? how come? well the algorythms used to meassure the temperatures couldnt handle the readings they got or simply werent coded to calculate below 0 temperatures.

this resulted in mainboards not booting or shutting down back then, because they thought the cpu is overheating! it was fixed by ignoring the temperature or by using new algorythms that read below 0 more or less correctly and hence didnt shut down.

so, the cpu overheat protection mechanism is based on exactly the same idea... and strangely enough we are having almost exactly the same problem now... couldnt it be that its the same problem causing the coldbug? the overheat protection beeing triggered somehow?

AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processor Electrical Data Sheet #31119

page 33:

Quote:

---

Notes:
1.Thermal diode sourcing current should always be used in forward bias.
2.TOffset supports diode thermal monitor using two sourcing currents only. AMD does not support other sourcing current
implementations.
3.TOffset is used to normalize the diode thermal monitor reading to the Tcontrol scale. TOffset should be added to the diode
thermal monitor reading.
Tcontrol = diode thermal monitor reading +TOffset .
System thermal policy should ensure that Tcontrol_max is not exceeded. Tcontrol_max is specified in the appropriate
power and thermal data sheet.
4.Thermal solutions should not be designed and validated using the thermal diode. Thermal solutions should be designed
and validated against the case temperature specification per the methodology documented in the appropriate processor
thermal design guide.
5.TOffset is unique for each processor and is programmed at the factory. TOffset value is found in the Thermtrip Status
Register described in the BIOS and Kernel Developer’s Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processors, order# 32559.
6.If the diode thermal monitor has an ideality factor different from 1.008, a small correction to this offset is required.
Contact your diode thermal monitor vendor to determine if additional correction is required.

---

then you face another problem, you wont be able to have the same resistance for all cpus... some will have a sligthly higher and some a slightly lower resistance... so one will read 40 degrees when its actually 30, and another one will only read 20... to compensate for that the resistance is meassured at the fab and an offset value is programmed into the cpu, to adjust the reading of the termal diode!

how about the internal diode used for the overheat protection though?
does it have an offset value as well? if we could reprogram this offset value we could prevent the cpu from shutting down thinking its running too hot and could improve the coldbug situation or maybe even get rid of it completely.
IF the coldbug really is caused by this! :D

Im pretty sure that itspossible to reprogram the offset value to change the temperature the internal diode freaks out at and shuts down the cpu to prevent a meltdown. i mean its only logical right? you mfg millions of cpus, knowing the laws of physics and probability you KNOW there will be so and so many units that will work flawlessly...BUT the resistance used for the internal overheat protection mechanism is way off and those cpus will shut themselves down at way too low or way too high temperatures.

so what do you do? ignore it and sell them anyways hoping they will never run too hot so they melt down or will run cool enough to not shut down even though the temp is still ok? or do you throw them away?

i suspect there is an offset value for the internal overheat protection probe as well... if we could find it and reprogram it with a microcode upate we might be able to fix the coldbug, very promising imo :D

hmmmmm what if the same offset value is used for both temp probes? :D
is it possible to reprogramm that toffset value using msr walker from crystalcpu?

#32559 Rev 3.08 July 2007 BIOS and Kernel Developer’s Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh
Processors

Quote:

---

Chapter 3 Functional Description 39
3.7.2.2 Hardware Thermal Control
Hardware Thermal Control (HTC) is a hardware mechanism used to reduce processor power
consumption. The processor enters HTC active state when the die temperature is greater than the
HTC temperature limit or when PROCHOT_L is asserted. While it is in HTC active state, processor
core clock grid (GCLK) is periodically ramped down for a specified period of time, and consequently
processor performance is reduced. Deterministic power savings are accomplished by unconditional
GCLK ramping down. After the temperature drops below the HTC temperature limit (plus a specified
number of degrees of hysteresis), the processor automatically exits the HTC-active state if
PROCHOT_L is not asserted. The processor can enter the HTC-active state only when PWROK and
RESET_L are both high. The processor can not enter the HTC-active state while in the C3 ACPI
state. Special bus cycles can be generated when HTC active state is entered or exited. The
Northbridge clock grid (BCLK) is not ramped down when HTC is active.

---

"plus a specified number of degrees of hysteresis" sounds to me like there IS an offset for the hardware overheat protection mechanism :D

you go buy intel and forget about cold bug low ocs and also you get more performance ? and this is coming from someone that loved amd

damn! its read only :(

Quote:

---

TOFFSET (thermal diode temperature offset) is supplied as a read only field in the Thermtrip Status Register.

---

maybe theres a way to tell the cpu to STFU when it whines that its overheating? :D

hmmmm

Quote:

---

Chapter 3 Functional Description 39
3.7.2.2 Hardware Thermal Control
Hardware Thermal Control (HTC) is a hardware mechanism used to reduce processor power consumption. The processor enters HTC active state when the die temperature is greater than the HTC temperature limit or when PROCHOT_L is asserted. While it is in HTC active state, processor core clock grid (GCLK) is periodically ramped down for a specified period of time, and consequently processor performance is reduced. Deterministic power savings are accomplished by unconditional GCLK ramping down. After the temperature drops below the HTC temperature limit (plus a specified number of degrees of hysteresis), the processor automatically exits the HTC-active state if PROCHOT_L is not asserted. The processor can enter the HTC-active state only when PWROK and RESET_L are both high. The processor can not enter the HTC-active state while in the C3 ACPI state. Special bus cycles can be generated when HTC active state is entered or exited. The Northbridge clock grid (BCLK) is not ramped down when HTC is active.

3.7.2.3 PROCHOT_L
The PROCHOT_L pin is asserted as an input to force the processor into the HTC-active state or becomes asserted as an output to indicate when the die temperature is greater than the HTC temperature limit.
As in input to the processor, PROCHOT is ignored if THERMTRIP_L, PWROK or RESET_L is low or if HtcEn (Function 3 Offset 64h) is zero. As an output, it is low to reflect the HTC-active state. PROCHOT_L will be recognized when it's state has been stable high or low for greater than 10ns, however to get any effective power reduction from PROCHOT_L assertion, the assertion time must allow for several throttling periods to elapse. Each throttling period is approximately 6us. See “BIOS Requirements for PROCHOT_L Throttling” on page 286 for how to enable PROCHOT_L based throttling.

3.7.2.4 THERMTRIP_L
The processor provides a hardware-enforced thermal protection mechanism. When the processor’s die temperature exceeds a specified temperature, the processor is designed to stop its internal clocks and assert the THERMTRIP_L output. THERMTRIP_L assertion is only valid when PWROK is asserted and RESET_L is deasserted. THERMTRIP_L assertion indicates the processor die temperature has exceeded normal operating parameters. PWROK must be deasserted in response to a THERMTRIP_L assertion to enable proper processor operation. Once asserted THERMTRIP_L remains asserted until RESET_L is asserted. If the processor’s die temperature still exceeds the thermal trip point when RESET_L is deasserted, THERMTRIP_L will immediately be reasserted and the processor’s internal clocks stop.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [XC] leviathan18

you go buy intel and forget about cold bug low ocs and also you get more performance ? and this is coming from someone that loved amd

---

intel has coldbugs as well and 45nm coldbugs are getting worse and worse ;) ive already heard some 45nm quads dont like to run below -60 degrees... and the newer the batch the worse the coldbug afaik ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [XC] leviathan18

you go buy intel and forget about cold bug low ocs and also you get more performance ? and this is coming from someone that loved amd

---

Not the point. We want understanding as well as great bench scores.

Trying AMD under LN2 is still extreme ;)

well f3/g1 steppings can hit pretty high clocks with air and water, i think if we could get rid of the coldbug 4.5ghz would be possible with x2's :D yeah intel cpus still clock and perform better, but anybody calling an x2 with 4.5ghz slow is exaggerating quite a lot :D

Saaya, by the time I refreshed you had presented, analyzed, evaluated and already concluded all your original post theory. :D :D

We'll see whats possible. Gotta read up more.

I'm wondering if the black editions temp sensor bit is read only or if they unlocked that also...............

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

Saaya, by the time I refreshed you had presented, analyzed, evaluated and already concluded all your original post theory. :D :D

We'll see whats possible. Gotta read up more.

---

hehehe, yeah i should have finished reading the docs and then write a post :D
too bad i dont have a k10 setup, i was offered a k10 cpu 3 times and refused, then i was offered a board but only if i had a cpu, so i refused :doh: :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fart_plume

I'm wondering if the black editions temp sensor bit is read only or if they unlocked that also...............

---

im affraid no :(
too bad actually... i mean for amd making that msr writeable or disabling the internal overtemp protection should be really easy... and people who buy an fx want to run it with ln2 so... they really should do something like that...

In the case of K8 I dont think the problem is temperature sensor related as you can increase temperature from the point of no POST to the point where the memory controller stops scaling in clock speed and have a significicant difference.

For instance if you have a no-post at -20c you might be limited to 240mhz at -10c and be able to hit 350mhz at +15c...

For CPU's that have the cold bug limit their clockspeed rather than FSB speed I think you are right on this issue.

well i discussed this with fredyama and he said he tried several fx cpus and while most of them would only run at -20, one of them could run at down to -50 degrees... hmmmm i need some dry ice or ln2 so i can do some research :hehe:

just check the "I found the golden one" thread in the AMD section for all the proof you need ;)

There's many who've been subzero with K8 now past -25℃. I mean, look at this 2005 Prometeia review with K8 chip: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.c...d=1793&page=12

But you'll have variance everywhere naturally. It seems some chips are very badly CB'd while others are not so until around -60C (idle). In either case, the major problem is scaling with voltage and why you don't see high frequencies regardless of cooling. The voltage scaling limit is very low on too many K8/K10 chips, heck, you can at many times hit the limit on standard air. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by STEvil

just check the "I found the golden one" thread in the AMD section for all the proof you need ;)

---

hmmm that thread is huge... mind pointing out a particular site to me, dont really want to read through the past 20 pages that came up after i last read it :D

kte, so you think it does have to do with the mfg process after all?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1152
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1155

saaya you appear to really want to figure this out........fwiw i still have this chip and board......although i would suggest a diff board for better memory compatibility....unless sapphire fixed the bios which i highly doubt.....anyway I would be willing to lend them out, however they are not for sale as you can see this chip didn't seem to be bothered in the least......at -31C

edit it appears my webspace is borked atm......it's an LDBHE x2 3800, best one i had......and manta prototype......3.5g @ -31C DI run.........

meh check the image out in the I'm Back!!!!!!!!!!! thread in intel the image is in that thread.....

heh, yeah im on a prototype board as well and the bios SUXXXXXXXX :D
is that a 939 cpu or am2? manta was am2 right?

well am2 is damn cheap now, ill go ahead and buy a couple of am2 cpus and an am2 board i think. just dont have the time this month, but february might work...

the thing is, if this is mfg rech related, all cpus and gpus will have this issue sooner or later.
if its imc related, then intel will have this issue as well soon.
if its temp probe related intel might have this issue as well soon.

so either way so lets try to find workarounds or ways to improve coldbugs now and not wait until all new hardware is coldbugged and we dont know what to do about it! :D

stevil thanks, @work atm, will have a look at this later when im home.

Just to make sure ? So am I to understand this as AMD set the coldbug on purpous ? Now THAT WOULD BE STUPID :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

hmmm that thread is huge... mind pointing out a particular site to me, dont really want to read through the past 20 pages that came up after i last read it :D

---

It's a funny thread. ;)

Basically most chips with a CB and "some" which don't have one to -30C, extremely rare something goes beneath that. Now if they'd just bought any off the shelf and said "no CB" then I might have thought that as valid, but cherry picking one out of 1000s for no CB to sub -5C isn't exactly any good at showing CPU SKUs without a CB.

I mean this, this, this, this and all these in green are mainly close to or subzero (depending on which temp sensor you look at).

I'm sure guys there like fredyama went through tons of chips to find one without CB to get those MHz/cooling and even still, it was only the QX sorta FX chips or one or two odd Opties and X2. At 65nm G2, 5000+ BE seems to love cold to -20-15C IHS region though.

Problem with those A64/AM2s was, they were sensitive to heat/voltage and thus could scale better under water/DICE than air usually. That doesn't look like Phenom since 1.2V gets you the same as 1.7V while temps are kept sub40C i.e. design/process/material problems. nFET leakage and performance is the hardest to enhance in CPUs, C2/Penryn chips are very improved and best in this department mainly and yet K10 is 40% worse than C2 in this leakage/perf alone. This'll decide MHz/volt/heat/power level to a major level as well as the current you can feed through the chips (K10 limited to 110A total cores/20AIMC).

Quote:

---

kte, so you think it does have to do with the mfg process after all?

---

Can never be sure, but that's what the signs around now show. SOI. :(

I mean, my K10 sensors stopped working since I tried for a CB. -14/15C IHS was fine but it read 0C on all cores (tcase) and 14C hottest internal (tjunction).

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/1209/cbtp4.th.png

Since then all my cores are stuck at 0C now but the main one I need (tjunction) still reads right. However, even at those temps it made no difference to oc, so no point. If CB existed because of a thermal protection circuitry monitoring these sensors values within the cores, they'd have shut down my system the minute I drop temps on it. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu

Just to make sure ? So am I to understand this as AMD set the coldbug on purpous ? Now THAT WOULD BE STUPID :p

---

no, at least not intentionally.

kte... intel apparently limits the current that can go through their chips, do you know if amd does the same? cause the lower the temp the higher the current right? maybe it triggers some sort of an overcurrent protection?

i still dont think its mfg process...
its design or temp monitoring, im sure... :D

Yep, AMD does the same with current limits. 110A for K10 AM2+ and AM3 cores and 20A to the IMC. This is the peak limit.

Not sure if any OCP trigger is activated which causes CB... if it did, why would it occur on some and not other CPUs? :D
And why would it occur at a low current?
It depends on what the values for VID registers are, different P-States enable a different current to the core and IMC AFAIK.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

Yep, AMD does the same with current limits. 110A for K10 AM2+ and AM3 cores and 20A to the IMC. This is the peak limit.

Not sure if any OCP trigger is activated which causes CB... if it did, why would it occur on some and not other CPUs? :D
And why would it occur at a low current?
It depends on what the values for VID registers are, different P-States enable a different current to the core and IMC AFAIK.

---

every cpu draws a slightly different amount of current...
you think the current is actively changed when the cpu shifts pstates?
i always thought the current cant be controlled...

nah its 939 saaya......and i had 3 chips no coldbug.....all were LDBHE, although i did cherry pick these for that exact code....I wasn't picky once i found them with that code......

The one i still have was the best of them all....I lost my 3.0 gig 24/7 stable chip on grouper, wife shut the pc off and not the mach 1..........needless to say when she turned it back on the next day there was a fire in the PWM area and the chip screamed ohhhhhhhnoooooooooeeess.......

As you can see at -31c it was still cranking.......and cold boot temps were colder.......problem was my homemade DI tube just couldn't get any colder....http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...51&postcount=4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

every cpu draws a slightly different amount of current...
you think the current is actively changed when the cpu shifts pstates?
i always thought the current cant be controlled...

---

True.
Locked usually but for the unlocked Phenom BE models. 9500/9600 at 1.25VID draws 18.9A per core, lower is even lower and if you increase VID (P-States) you'll see a massive jump at the same VCore from 105W idling to 330W idling at the same MHz. :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

nah its 939 saaya......and i had 3 chips no coldbug.....all were LDBHE, although i did cherry pick these for that exact code....I wasn't picky once i found them with that code......

The one i still have was the best of them all....I lost my 3.0 gig 24/7 stable chip on grouper, wife shut the pc off and not the mach 1..........needless to say when she turned it back on the next day there was a fire in the PWM area and the chip screamed ohhhhhhhnoooooooooeeess.......

As you can see at -31c it was still cranking.......and cold boot temps were colder.......problem was my homemade DI tube just couldn't get any colder....http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...51&postcount=4

---

Sounds like an honest mistake. Hope you didn't yell at her.:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2long4u

Sounds like an honest mistake. Hope you didn't yell at her.:eek:

---

Nah she meant well, she felt bad afterward.....I't was my main rig but no biggie.......I've done worse intentionally to my rigs......

sorry for not reading the entire thread in case someone mentioned this but in my experience with AMD the cold bug was directly related the HTT and you could "cheat" the level of bug by lowering HTT

i don't see how that would be a temp sensor issue on K8 :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

Can never be sure, but that's what the signs around now show. SOI. :(

---

If SOI is broken, why can Power hit 5ghz with seemingly no problems?

I've got no idea why AMD are having process issues but if IBM can get SOI to 5+ghz then it seems to me that isn't the problem.
Although I can't recall if IBM are using high K.

dino i kinda disproved the high htt theory on manta......350 x 4 multi.......and 300 x 5 multi..........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aussie FX

If SOI is broken, why can Power hit 5ghz with seemingly no problems?

I've got no idea why AMD are having process issues but if IBM can get SOI to 5+ghz then it seems to me that isn't the problem.
Although I can't recall if IBM are using high K.

---

IDK about that chips design and material selection because I haven't studied it, never needed to, so I can't speak for that and each IC is very different despite it using the same design process. However SOI isn't broken in itself, but it does have material and implementational limitations with the current properties of the chemicals used in K10. They can enhance these properties and get far lower current leakage in the "on" and "off" states, higher drive current and better transistor performance throughout, which will give you better MHz at lower power/temps/volts idle and load. One of these methods is to employ a relatively thin high-k dialectric/metal gate CMOS which is exactly what they've been working on with IBM and for the above specified reason.

There's a two things:
a) a design/material frequency and current limit
b) something which causes coldbugs

The first you can't address, only AMD can.
The second you maybe can address.. if you knew what it was. :p: (hence the thread)

And yeah saaya, what you said is true. As it gets colder, there is much less resistance and more voltage actually gets to the cores, which also affects current leakage as it decreases drastically and more is then provided to the cores. There is a massive difference with the amount of current leakage in cold/hot temps, like 40x at 50C compared to 0C, if not more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

dino i kinda disproved the high htt theory on manta......350 x 4 multi.......and 300 x 5 multi..........

---

BH chips were known not to coldbug at all chew*
you know that S7 did a lot of work on this and could not cold bug those sons of :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:es even at -95C or whatever the temp was again

I know, remember I started the thread on them :) but if we compare a BH chip not known to coldbug to a non BH chip............I bet saaya could figure it out....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

nah its 939 saaya......and i had 3 chips no coldbug.....all were LDBHE, although i did cherry pick these for that exact code....I wasn't picky once i found them with that code......

The one i still have was the best of them all....I lost my 3.0 gig 24/7 stable chip on grouper, wife shut the pc off and not the mach 1..........needless to say when she turned it back on the next day there was a fire in the PWM area and the chip screamed ohhhhhhhnoooooooooeeess.......

As you can see at -31c it was still cranking.......and cold boot temps were colder.......problem was my homemade DI tube just couldn't get any colder....http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...51&postcount=4

---

ouch! :(
no coldbug at all?
awesome!
did you notice anything else?
did the temperature probe work the same as on other cpus?
what about memory speed at low temps?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

True.
Locked usually but for the unlocked Phenom BE models. 9500/9600 at 1.25VID draws 18.9A per core, lower is even lower and if you increase VID (P-States) you'll see a massive jump at the same VCore from 105W idling to 330W idling at the same MHz. :eek:

---

you think the current is "unlocked" for the BE cpus? :confused:
that... sounds weird... so basically there is an overcurrent protection but its... disabled for BE cpus?

your idle power jumped up to 330W????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

sorry for not reading the entire thread in case someone mentioned this but in my experience with AMD the cold bug was directly related the HTT and you could "cheat" the level of bug by lowering HTT

i don't see how that would be a temp sensor issue on K8 :confused:

---

for some people lowering the mem speed helped, for others it didnt afaik...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

I know, remember I started the thread on them :) but if we compare a BH chip not known to coldbug to a non BH chip............I bet saaya could figure it out....

---

pheew... dont think i could figure it out :D
id need compressor cooling dry ice or ln2, and i dont have the money for compressor cooling atm, i dont have a pot and i live at the edge of a rather small city in germany so getting dry ice or ln2 wont be easy... :/

i think KTE would be better at researching why your cpu doesnt coldbug.
maybe i can digg up some amd contacts to find out why this stepping doesnt coldbug.

how does it oc compared to other steppings? with aircooling and rather stock voltage i mean?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

for some people lowering the mem speed helped, for others it didnt afaik...

---

my tccd ram did not run well in cold
only bh5 sticks from corsair did
ocz ones were bad

^^Yep. 74A to 110A allowed choosable with VID values IMO.

330W AC would be like 277W DC on that system from 84W DC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

my tccd ram did not run well in cold
only bh5 sticks from corsair did
ocz ones were bad

---

hmmm so the drive strength changed under low temps and the mem didnt work that well anymore... or was it the actual mem getting cold and then not working well?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

^^Yep. 74A to 110A allowed choosable with VID values IMO.

---

well when you up the vcore you the current increases as well right? are you sure you can actually select how much current can flow through the cpu and its not just a sideeffect of increased vcore?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KTE

330W AC would be like 277W DC on that system from 84W DC.

---

wha? :confused:
power consumption?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

hmmm so the drive strength changed under low temps and the mem didnt work that well anymore... or was it the actual mem getting cold and then not working well?

---

just couldn't get the rig stable with TCCD ram i had from G.Skill and CH-UTT from OCZ but older school corsair BH5 was find and benched just as it did on air

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

well when you up the vcore you the current increases as well right? are you sure you can actually select how much current can flow through the cpu and its not just a sideeffect of increased vcore?

---

Officially those are the allowed amp tolerances on released Phenom CPUs and you can find the amp values in various MSRs connected directly to VIDs. You can also increase the VID to 1.55 on Phenom BEs and that gives you 1.45xV-1.9xVcore possible.

For the above power test run, voltages were kept the same. ;)

Quote:

---

wha? :confused:
power consumption?

---

Yep.

memory speed was not impaired due to cold temps saaya, it was impaired period due to premature bios.....whether on stock cooler or cold.....

I'm sure on a dfi it would be more compatible with memory at high speeds cold.

Temps appeared to read the same as any other cpu.

For -31 I was using a 2 1/2" copper tube with an endcap soldered on and an old swiftech waterblock pin fin base soldered in the endcap......so -31C loaded at 1.6v seemed realistic........as my DI tube wasn't that efficient....

Here's some interesting info also.......My chip that is dead died once before.......Poor insulation and not enough dielectic grease resulted in a failed OC under phase and no post.....I tossed the chip under a stock heatsink and the memory controller was on the fritz and bios was reporting single channel only as well as memtest......on top of that it was taking 2 minutes to boot bios.......I hit it with 1.7v to end its misery and primed it.....

It crashed, I figured it was over. PC rebooted and memory controller was back online dual channel and all....My guess is whatever transistor or connection was severed inside the chip was reconnected during exposure to extremely high volts/temps.......

lol, freaky stuff we discuss here hahaha
literally torturing cpus until they die and then resurrect them with high volts :lol:

its AAALLLIIIIVEEEE :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

lol, freaky stuff we discuss here hahaha
literally torturing cpus until they die and then resurrect them with high volts :lol:

its AAALLLIIIIVEEEE :lol:

---

haha now that you mentioned it it reminded me of the gayol commercial where they had the yellow dude on the stretcher, we can rebuild him we can make it faster mwahahahaha.... :rofl: anyway let me know if you want to borrow this chip for your studies.......I promise i didn't toture it.......well maybe just a little.......

I promise it wasn't any worse than my recent ventures pushing a Q6600 to 3350 on stock heatsink :D