Printable View
still under nda, can't post anything more
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/8800gtsg92.PNG
3dmark06 default
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/3d0602.jpg
under XHD 1600P 2560x1600
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/g92gts/3d0601.jpg
thought: AA lover please use RV670 XD
Interesting, thanks for the heads up :up:
No NDA for me :)
Very first run no time for anything else yet.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/8800GTS.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/3DMark06.jpg
no nda for me either but it causes problem to whoever gave it to you :)Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
i still want to get more card later :)
I bought the card :)
is the gddr3 killing it at high res? The ATi cards aren't very good at AA as it is... What's going on there?
Ryan
whoever sell it has problem XDQuote:
Originally Posted by T_M
jk. if you buy it that is good to post anything. but for me i need to protect who gave it to me :D
yeah understood guess.
Nvidia won't come after anyone. They are not stubborn, they know that all these prereleased scores cause chatter which in turn will cause massive sales.
Here is your comparable gts vs my gt, though your cpu scores are higher.
I am running a x3210 at 3520mhz and your q9650 is running at 3640mhz.
I then clocked my gt at exactly the same specs 650-972-1625
Below is the result details of your submitted project.
Main Test Results
8800GT 3DMark Score 14138 3DMarks
8800GTS 3DMark Score 14743 3DMarks
8800GT SM 2.0 Score 5815 Marks
8800GTS SM 2.0 Score 6013 Marks
8800GT SM 3.0 Score 5551 Marks
8800GTS SM 3.0 Score 5741 Marks
8800GT Cpu Score 5503 Marks
8800GTS Cpu Score 6015 Marks
8800Gt Scores
8800Gts Scores
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 47.637 FPS (gt)
1 - Return to Proxycon 49.491 FPS (gts)
2 - Firefly Forest 49.286 FPS (gt)
2 - Firefly Forest 50.73 FPS (gts)
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.824 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.995 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.657 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.901 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 52.856 FPS (gt)
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 55.368 FPS (gts)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 58.16 FPS (gt)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 59.44 FPS (gts)
can we have some tests at normal speed cpus please?
Normal?
Like the 3.6GHz in my post above?
yes versus the 4.4 ghz in the first post. cant we just have a stock test for once?
TM anyway you can lower your cpu clock and get closer to the 5500 06-3dmark cpu score so we can compare?
I think the qx is 5% faster at same core (3520mhz - 5% = 3344mhz)
Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
Sorry, I had a great laugh out of this. These two things are completely at odds with one another.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Intersting results though....
denny i want one HD3970 , its a new card??? :D :D
serious: nice tests
:up:
Me wants! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Too bad 3dmark06 scores do not reflect the actual performance of these cards at all anymore...
QFMTQuote:
Originally Posted by IcY18
I guess i am not that up-to-date on the acronyms...Quote:
Originally Posted by nzbleach
Not sure if i need to back up my claim or nod in agreement.
Well QFT is "quoted for truth" so use your imagination as to what the M stands for...my sense is he is strongly agreeing to say the least... :p:
(and your statement was correct so...)
Thanks for the info.
I still don't get it :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by WrigleyVillain
and i always thought QFT meant "quite f*cking true",lol. :D
so QFMT is adding the word "majorly". :p:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/30003D06.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/33003D06.jpg
Now for some real testing :rolleyes:
Looks like it needs high resolutions to start pulling much from the GT.
Buddy of mine walked up to the Fry's counter w/ 3 of the XFX in hand and got owned by the NDA. They were on the flippn' shelf too. :( Oh yes, $399.
i dont get it the 3870 is slower than the 2900 in your results denny?
on the tweaktown 8800gts g92 review from last week the 3870 beats the 2900 and the 8800gts g92 doesnt stick out that much compared to the 8800gt.
could it be the higher cpu speed?
did you notice that the g92 8800gts scales better with higher cpu clocks?
and the 3870... did you maybe use older drivers or was the 2900 a 1gb version or oced or something?
hmmmm
My max clocks so far with stock air, delta blowing into fan, 25C ambient.
Pretty sure this is my max for stock.
(My RAM speed is reported incorrectly in memset)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...253DMark06.jpg
Not true! Believe me, i got a warning before from Nvidia, for posting a picture one week before the launch date.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx
I didnt get any warning posting some pictures of GTSes two days ago :)
[QUOTE=T_M;2614476]My max clocks so far with stock air, delta blowing into fan, 25C ambient.
Pretty sure this is my max for stock.
(My RAM speed is reported incorrectly in memset)[QUOTE=T_M;
nice tim
wow its a runner
what is stock volts?
point me to the read points :P
from the 8800gt thread i know where to find vGPU read, but not vMem
edit: vGPU = 1.188V idle, ~1.237V loaded (ATItool)
Wow, those are nice specs.
I know with the volt mods a few people have been able to get the gt to around 2050 shader and 820+ core, but not memory.
Those memory scores are fantastic, they must use another model of ram for the gts cards.
Almost 18k on a single card, thats amazing, especially on air! :up:
I'm only assuming that $299 is a pipedream at this point.
Right before christmas and the holidays, comes the new gts model, let the price gouging begin!! :cussing:
Is it possible for you to run lightmark at the top specs like you mentioned?
Thanks!
Lightmark download
http://dee.cz/lightsmark/
Sorry no time for a non-scoring benchmark (hwbot).
vMEM = 2.029V idle
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by T_M
thanks
i think this card might have a good chance to run 900 on air with some volts no?
i'd say so.
Working on mods tonight
nice scores Tim :)
could you manage the fan speed? i cant :( its fixed around 25% and the card its crazy hot at load...
i can show only this till tuesday...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/7...defaultml1.png
Thanks.
Yeah i can set to 100%, using nVidia Control Panel each bootup.
And also could only overclock after i "agreed" to the to the disclaimer in the control panel.
Temps made quite a difference to my overclockability and 100% fan speed saved me 5C+ on idle, and running the forced intake delta fan lowered my idle temps by a further 3C+.
its interesting, my Control Panel didnt let me manage it agree or not, the "dot" stays in "automatic fan control" :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
what version did you use? yep and wich driver?
my temps are now 60C idle and 70C load with a sunon fan next to the card, but its crap that the fan in the card almost stand...
QFT is "quoted for truth."
Thanks for the benchmarks, OP ;)
YF 4G 8800GTS SLI default
3D06 20K
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/G92-3D06.JPG
oooh 670 default GPU
despite how everyone criticizes this card, it's great.
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/12...hts/index.html
single 8800gts beats 3850cf apparently:doh:
in games particularly with AA and AF turned on.
http://images.tweaktown.com/imageban...g92oc_g_16.gif
http://images.tweaktown.com/imageban...g92oc_g_14.gif
..yet another example of the irrelevance of 3d06. most ingame scores show single 8800gts in front, but 3850 cf is a close contender.
i'd suppose 3870 cf would be a clear winner tho.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
Denny's GPU also is 670.;)
Maybe we receive oc version.:D
my gpu is 675, its oc version :)Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
nice result Andre :)
Sick of 3d mark results, they mean nada. Want to see some game benchs!! Not too long neways.
If there is a 1024mb GT on it's way, then I'm sure a 1024mb GTS G92 is also on it's way.
1024mb on a 256bit membus = Crazy
My XFX 8800GTS arrived today, short test with stock cooler...
http://www.abload.de/img/3dmark06-02.1wa4.jpg
my card has 1.20v 3D voltage (measured with DMM)
Impressive performance for only using a dual core cpu.
1.31V idle - 1.397V highest load in GT2
Stock cooler
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../181013D06.jpg
stock voltage (1.20v 3D), card watercooled with EK Waterblock. Diver @ default...
http://www.abload.de/img/3dmark06-04dro.jpg
Can you bench that with a game? I would love to see how that translates into REAL WORLD performance please. Maybe Crysis or World in Conflict...
Cooling certainly made a difference there Crisch :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
Not bad!!
almost same score as 8800GT but with Quad-core @ 3780mhz , however with 8800GT only 700/950Mhz
8800GT (700/950) + Q6600 @ 3780mhz
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/248...ccpivgali3.jpg
:up:
1.36V idle - 1.458V max load - Stock Air
(note 860 core is same as 870 core)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../182933D06.jpg
18,293! - you gotta be happy with that!
You'd think so, but no :D
Expect to see much more ;)
TM thats amazing, 18k on a single card.
What is holding the core/shader back.. is it the temps or voltage?
What kind of temps are you getting?
I got 13200 in 06 at default clocks.(670/1675/972) ..E6700@3600..
vgpu : idle 1,168v , vmem: 1,98v
vGPU ~1.27v idle / ~1.32-1.33v load
http://www.abload.de/img/3dmark06-0590h.png
Btw, every who want to use Rivatuner with 8800GTS G92 must add "G92 = 600h" in the RivaTuner.cfg :)
http://www.abload.de/img/rivatunera96.png
Great work thanks Crisch!
And nice water clocks there for the volts.
At 1.36V idle on stock air 100%, i get 38C idle in 24C room ambients.
here is some funny test results :D
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/crysis_01.jpg http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/crysis_02.jpg
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/cod4_0.jpg http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/cod4_1.jpg
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/et_01.jpg http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/et_02.jpg
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/wic_01.jpg http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/wic_02.jpg
Those results make no sense at all, I call it BS!!
nice work Denny :clap:
and nice find Crisch, thanks for share :)
ive picked up today another card, and it could easy 840mhz for 3dmark at stock :D by the way i can tell now, its BFG OC edition.
It's like NV's drivers activate/deactivate the sp's randomly. :D NDA's up today or tomrrow, right?
so does this card outperform the GTX?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=169059
Performance is rather pathetic for the price actually
how about you go get a card and test it, show results to me :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tranceaddict
and plus they need to fix driver when AA enable soon :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx
i think my driver (from evga package CD) is too old ....
Guys, this GPU runs REALLY cool!
Stock heatsink at 1.52-1.54V load in 3DMark'06 GT1 + GT2:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../loadtemps.jpg
I don't mean to knock the gts cards at all, I just am saying the difference is so tiny in the games.
I think this is the most fair way to go about it.
Download the newest drivers in xp (169.21)
How about you lower your cpu to 3344, which is the equivalent to my quad at 3520, since yours is a penryn and 5% faster at the same speed as mine.
Then overclock your 8800gts to the highest it can go, I will do the same with my gt and then lets run the same game benchmarks.
This way we are benching the max on both cards with generally the same cpu core and see the difference in the two. Don't get me wrong, If I felt it was worth the difference, I would send my card in to upgrade tomorrow.\
So far the benchmarks I have seen outside of 06-3dmark, shows very little difference between the gt and gts... But most of these have their cores/shader overclocked at small amounts.
Now these benchmarks aren't showing xtremeforums the comparison between a max gts and gt. Thats really what I want to see.
Watercooled :)
Here is a crysis gpu benchmark thread that I started
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=165411
Here is an interesting result I found in the Hardware Canucks review.
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...512/GTS-14.jpg
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...512/GTS-16.jpg
:eek:
19k should be a piece of cake on air ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx
1.45V idle - 1.585V at max load GT2
Stock cooler and LOD 5
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-1585Vload.jpg
3DMark'01 with only tweak being LOD 5 throughout and rerun CL
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../824993D01.jpg
nice results again Tim :) here are my yesterday's results:
Wolfdale watercooled, GTS stock, no mods
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/7808/gts2xzk0.jpg
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1...9xtwinzea7.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/3...0xtwinzku4.png
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/7...3xtwinzey2.png
Can anyone help me to get overclocking to work on my 8800GTS 512.
Here's the link where I provided all the details:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=169131
Thanks in advance !
If I could only get the cpu score up a bit. Anyway they clock very well, this is all air (inc cpu.), stock fan no mods.
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8316/17478mk5.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
For COD4, and ETQW, 8800GTS AA problem solove after i change to windows XP
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/cod4_4aa1.jpg
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/etqw_8aa1.jpg
For WIC, I made mistake. 8800GT was under 4AA not 16AA. that is why original 8800GT AA score is higher than 8800GTS (8800GTS was under 16AA)
sorry for the mistake
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/8800gtsg92/wic_03.jpg
Have you got the GTS's max and min frames mixed up there?
yeah your ram speed should be 908mhz.great scores but your processor helps a lot man -- 7200+ cpu score on 3dmark is crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
according to 3dmark2006 calculator by M3kk u would have scored 15k with my cpu oced. (its quite nice actually :ROTF: )
908MHz? I dont think so. Actually its about 580MHz.
I dont know why but when i raise the shader to like 1950 and run 3dmark06 it just freezes on the snow test.I hope this is not my max.I am using an evga 8800gts 512.Can someone tell me what i should increase.
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5493/maxsf3.jpg
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5...8b3577f294.jpg
If you havent already, the easiest way to find out is use Rivatuner (must mod the .cfg file) to independently overclock the core and the shader.
That way you can just OC the shader to find out if that is the cause.
alo everyone
here is my first results with a Gigabyte card so far, iŽll make more tests soon because this is not the limit clocks for sure.
the benches were on VISTA and of course has alot of you know the results in XP they are a bit more higher (normaly more or less 800\1000 marks depends of the system).
System Used in all tests:
Asus P5K-E @ 0503
Q6600 @ 3800mhz 9x422
TG Elite 4x1GB @ DDR845
Gigabyte 8800GTS 512MB stock
Windosw Vista Ultimate 32bits
Forceware 169.21
http://www.hdd.pt/images//10374478103Dmark05default.jpgQuote:
3DMARK 2005 e 2006 default clocks - GPU-650mhz MEM-1945mhz SHADERS-1625mhz
http://www.hdd.pt/images//13725544713Dmark06default.jpg
http://www.hdd.pt/images//13579557573Dmark05OC.jpgQuote:
3DMARK 2005 e 2006 Max OC Stable - GPU-810mhz MEM-2050mhz SHADERS-2050mhz
http://www.hdd.pt/images//10483095533Dmark06OC.jpg
By the way since there isenŽt results of Crysis yet and of course is one of the resons for people to buy this GTS, here it is some tests that i made.
System Used:
Asus P5K-E @ 0503
Q6600 @ 3800mhz 9x422
TG Elite 4x1GB @ DDR845
Gigabyte 8800GTS 512MB stock
Windows Vista Ultimate 32bits
Nvidia Forceware 169.21 beta
MEDIUM 0XAA - 69,00 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1298236337mediumnoAA.jpg
MEDIUM 8XAA SHADERS HIGH - 40,59 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1023946281...aders_high.jpg
HIGH 0XAA - 39,33 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1351840526highnoAA.jpg
HIGH 8XAA - 30,84 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1218225911high8xAA.jpg
VERY HIGH 0XAA - 21,17 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1300956878veryhighnoAA.jpg
VERY HIGH 8XAA - 15,05 FPS
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1127959001veryhigh8xAA.jpg
http://www.hdd.pt/images//1200524288grafico.png
**** in medium resolution the aplication automaticaly put the Shaders in HIGH when turning on AntiAlising
That looks like a great little app. Got a link to it so I can try it? :D
Edit: Never mind. Found it!
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1791
yes is the Crysis CPU benchmark but graphic version instead of the DOS mode.
Excellent clocks with stock air ! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by fornowagain
Can you tell us the card temperatures from rivatuner ? idle & load ???
TY.
i suggest play game and using fraps is better idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by theonlybabyface
NO LODQuote:
Originally Posted by T_M
1.4v load :)
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/350buc...0gts_oc_06.PNG
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
here, 3dmark06 19K for you :) (with LOD enable)
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/350bucks/8800gts_19k.PNG
here is 3d2001 85k with LOD
http://www.iax-tech.com/video/350bucks/8800gts_85k.PNG
So it looks like with the overclocking ability of these cards, they easily outperform the old GTX, huh?
alo
i dont understand how most of you have so higher clocks on the GPU, mine just freezes if passing over 815\820mhz. using stock coolers?
is just a normal card limitation or there any tricks? :p:
thanks
My scores. I need a 45nm Quad ;)
Windows XP
E6850 8x425 MHz
Graka: Defaultfan @ 100%; No Mods
2003:
http://pics.mwirths.de/pics/thumb/88...3_820_1100.jpg
2005:
http://pics.mwirths.de/pics/thumb/88...5_830_1100.jpg
2006:
http://pics.mwirths.de/pics/thumb/88...6_820_1100.jpg
No tricks :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jpcastro
Did you set fan speed to 100%?
These cards are far better than GTX, and in fact i would go out on a limb and say better than Ultra under extreme clocks.
BTW, here's my latest (1080/2700/1107) and not the max for sure:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/T_M/21355.jpg
Vry nice core :eek:
Still on air?
DI this time if i remember right :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Evil
I would have thought the temps (right hand side) would be a hint :P
Yes, DICE