I saw this benchmark in the news section http://www.maxon.net/pages/download/cinebench_d.html Some of us posted there but it should be here.
My vid card was at 765/1127 on this run.
Attachment 63283
Printable View
I saw this benchmark in the news section http://www.maxon.net/pages/download/cinebench_d.html Some of us posted there but it should be here.
My vid card was at 765/1127 on this run.
Attachment 63283
Looks like no one wants to run cinebench. Xtreme?
Give me a second to stop Folding and I will post one up :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
Hmmm it won't run. Not sure what the issue is. I am running XP Pro SP2 2bit.
32bit xp vs x64 vista cpu is a qx6700 @ 3.608Ghz
64 bit os really makes a difference.
Just had a little play, will do more of an overclock later as this system is limited by the psu :(
Spec in sig.
EDIT... oops ... will try
Had another stab at it, not greatly improved :(
Need a better mobo and need to add more volts to my memory and cpus :(
It's a start I suppose...
System:
- Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 L725A903 7/31/07 pack date G0
- CPU cooling = Swiftech G4 Storm/Thermochill 120.3/MCP655
- NB chipset cooling = Radiical Chipset Block/Corsair Cool single 120mm fan Rad/MCP350
- Asus Blitz Extreme 0804 bios
- 128MB Gainward FX5200 PCI
- 2x1GB OCZ PC3-14400 Platinum - DDR3-1800 rated at 8-8-8-27 at 1.9v
- 500GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA on SATA1 Port
- LiteOn 165H DVD Burner
- Sony FDD
- 1KW OCZ ProXStream
- WinXP Pro SP2
Cinebench R10
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...nebenchr10.png
Old PC now brother in law's.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...CB10-BILPC.jpg
My PC
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...10-Opty170.png
PC In Smoking Section AKA Garage
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...0-AthlonXP.png
I didn't run my HTPC, laptop or other computer around the house.
Stock @TR Ultra 120 eXtreme + SilverStone FM-121 @ AS5 @ 20ºC Ambiente
VGA Stock 743-1656
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8...tockhq8.th.jpg
4.0ghz is great for a B3, could you run this benchmark at that speed?Quote:
Originally Posted by BND|MOD
this weekend i'll try. but i don't believe that be possible as soon as i mount a watercooling systemQuote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
The OpenGL benchmark in CineBench10 behaves very odd. If I run it twice in a row I get different results. Starting with 62xx and then a 42xx score. If I run another OpenGL app/benchmark or simply just opens the nVidia control panel and then run cinebench10 the OpenGL score is in the 42xx range. cinebench9.5 nor any other benchmark I have run, behave in this way it's only cinebench10. The only way for me to get a 62xx score is to re-boot and then run cinebench10 before running any other graphics app. Closing and re-opening cinebench10 doesn't help either it still scores 42xx. I have tried different drivers but with the same result. Unigine's sancturary demo (http://unigine.com) gives consistent results in it's OpenGL benchmak so I have no idea what's going on with cinebench10.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toysoldier
Try running the OpenGL test once, then run all.
Thank you :) It now scores 6824 in the OpenGL test.Quote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
I also tried running the OpenGL test 4 times in a row and it scored as follows
4626 ~ 6264 ~ 6814 and finally 6823.
Do you know the reason for this behavior ?
Aaargh still cannot get it to run...
watercooling @ 25°C
http://maxicrash.free.fr/QX6850%20ES...%20(Large).PNG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toysoldier
No I just noticed that it works. :up:
Dual Clovertowns (X5340) @ 3092MHz
Server 2003 x64
http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/9...nch3092xe3.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
Could you run the single test as well as the multi so we can see the multi proc speed up. Good score.:up:
Single and multi-processor tests at 3157MHz
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3...nch3157nh5.jpg
22,564:hrhr:Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=12
I haven't pushed the system yet.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Please do..:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
remember, I'm using the same 9 multi...:D
22,479
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/2...3258fc8.th.jpg
I think I can go higher.:)
:up: So can I..a Little..:DQuote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
Mine was at 3258 also..I think I can squeak out 3271mhz..
What I need to do is lap and volt mod the chips then I think I can get close to 3600..
http://www.gigafiles.co.uk/files/122/cine10.jpg
Not great, but decent performance out of the x1800xt
btw, cpu is at 3.4 during the bench, took the shot after it stepped back lol (hence 2.5Ghz in CPU-Z)
Looks great to me for an x1800xt.
I was pleasantly surprised at the gfx score myself
Anyone else having trouble running CineBench 10 on their rig? I cannot get it to run at all...
what OS? I'm on win2K3 server and it works fine..Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
I went back to XP SP2 after DRM issues with Vista made DiRT unplayable (and for a few extra points in Fmark lol) and it makes no sense. Cinebench 9 runs fine...using the irg in the sig with CF. I am really curious to see how the CF performs too--could it be a 2900 CF issue?Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Then I'm not sure..I'm assuming DXDIAG is turned "on"..I ran into that issue in 2K3 but I think it's on by default in XP..Logged in as admin I assume..Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
Check properties on the exe and see if there's issues there.
Thanks I will see if I can figure this out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner
what does gfx have to do with this BM??
is there any diffrence in 2gb or 4gb on x64
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdavis
The second part of the benchmark (animation) is rendered on the GPU.
2gb or 4gb, are you referring to this benchmark, or in general? If you're referring to this bench, no difference at all, its not that big.
If you're referring to in general, you're off topic.
But the difference wouldbe, you have more ram, more virtual address & physical address space for your applications to work with.
right just the open glQuote:
Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner
yeah i ran it with 4gb and there was no diff in this bench
sound of xtreme crickets
Now running on Win64 and yet 3.15 ghz.
11.2 k(win32) against 12.6k(win 64).
OpenGL score was 6800 against 7000.
rock stable settings, for 24/7.
http://img474.imageshack.us/img474/5...enchtz8.th.jpg
just another thing, but after installing vista 64 ultimate, i decided to take a run at Lost planet dx10 demo and with my GTS and 3.1 ghz(same specs as in the pic) and max graphs 1600x1200 i could just do average of 14 fps! lol
is this normal or am i very bad at this score? I thought i'd get a nice fps average, but 14 fps?!?!?! lol
24/7 settings
Harpertown X5482 @3560mhz.. WinXP 64bit
Supermicro X7DWA-N MB
4x2 gig DDR2-800FBDimms(Transcend)
Now you got me interested... 26K....nice
Here's all the benches I've run in the CB database. Highest was a little over 22K at 3ghz on the ST rig
http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/7554/22ksg2.jpg
Then you might like this..Remember, stock volts as this supermicro board doesn't have the adjustments that the ST board has in the bios..Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
Oh yea, all on crappy stock Intel non heatpipe copper heatsinks, with a little help from a 12" turbine fan blowing in..:D
X3360 @ 3900, IP35_Pro, XP64
Here's my results with my 24/7 settings.
http://i25.tinypic.com/2eej89e.jpg
I'm pushing the envelope on this beast!:up:
everyday clocks for me....looks OK I guess.
Here's mine, regular OS, untweaked system:
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...94a4a8b0ca.jpg
any tweaks for CPU Rendering Test??? thx :up:
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/531/20143469hc1.jpg
there's mine with my 3ghz q6600.
i love cinebench, the variation i was getting between my scores from multiple runs was like 0.037%, which is why i think it's the best cpu bench out now.
q6600@ 3,3ghz 4gb ram
im coming for you movieman :D
all air
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/6044/95241614os3.jpg
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...ntitled-13.png
What one is R10 and what one is R11 lol.... hehe.
ahh i see.. lol will post R11 in a bit..
heres my R11 :D
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/7320/38410405gx7.jpg
something is wrong with your R11, You have no render background O_o
There is no way those high scores are correct for a quad core. Am I missing something?
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/4728/30481ckb6.jpg
That's with 8 cores at 4.1ghz
Nice score CD. They're using a different release. R11 in R10 clothes, 'cheat scores'.
lol thats what i got when i slipstreamed r11 @ r10.. of course wrongly.. though thats the r11 renderQuote:
Originally Posted by Warboy
you want link to the r10/r11 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
idk about 'cheat scores' if they would release an official r11 cinebench.. scores should be pretty much the same..Quote:
Originally Posted by loonym
my r11 render score is @ x2.27 from r10 render
And here's mine, just to annoy C_D :D
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...CB10_X5450.jpg
Oh yeah guys, using the R11 renderer doesn't count, you know that, don't you ;)
CB11 will use a different, more advanced sample image so you can't say you already got CB11. Be men and lose to our server-grade hardware :p:
4g at 0,07v
that server hardware sure looks sexy :lol: :D
Bwahahahahaa
Wish I had room in my sig ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Haha, yeah, CPU-Z still can't get that right. It's 1,21V idle/1,17V load actually :shocked: :D :up:
@C_D: :wasntme: :toast:
Wow nice VID. Man you are so close to being pwned....just don't move...
hey, you and jcool.. This is MY app..Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
Get the hell out of there!:rofl:
Time to get to work and own you both! :hrhr
measly 30K huh? Time to bump the bar some.:up:
You can try and beat me all you want :D
If you do, I'll just be forced to make that damned VID pin mod. Can you beat 460x9? :D
Cmon Dave....blow the dust off that ST and get benching...
I think he might be too busy with Nelly arriving and all :D
yeah, i havent heard from him for a few days... he must be benching nonstop :lol:
beleive it or not I think I can beat 4140..:devil"Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Soon pal,very soon..Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid
:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
I don't doubt you can beat 4140Mhz Dave.. but seeing as my 4020Mhz with high FSB beats C_Ds 4100Mhz run, you'd need a lot more than 4140Mhz to beat 460x9 :hrhr:
Yeah what's up with that? Why come Skulltrail can't jack the bus?
Because Intel did something wrong with ST.. maybe Dr.Who? knows what exactly went wrong there ;)
I know, who ever said I was going to limit myself to a measly 4140..:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
There is a potential for me of 10x438 as the ST buss maxxes at 438..
Call it 4350 as a theoritical max.
That might just be enough to "get'cha":D
I'd be surprised if you can get any higher than FSB 420, but we'll see. ;)
yes we will.. Hey, anyone seen stevil around?Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
I need to ask him where he bought his dry ice..:wasntme:
This one's for Napalm.. and Dave, of course. Especially Dave :p:
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...finalX5450.jpg
1,27V Vcore :up:
FSB limit :shakes:
LOL sweet! :)
Someone give me 5460's or even 5470's please... That would prolly kill some real high scores.
jcool that just freckin showing off
i Love it
edit just add my quad here should really push it harder
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...lmcwade/43.jpg
this is on a tyan 5000xl whit 4x1gb kingstone.later i whil post a pic of my two 5080 xeons on the same bord
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&pictureid=313
Oh crap. I might as well pull my score off my sig now...
Good work. Great CPU too...wow...low VID
QX9770 @ 4.37GHz didn't think it was to bad for a single quad.....
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/3...0437mw5.th.jpghttp://img504.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
so here ar my 5080 cpu's
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&pictureid=314
And here's my Nehalem scores