http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=5754
Printable View
It's great that they keep Cinebench alive, it's quite useful for us 3D users =)
Cool, can't remember what I got with the previous version, but with this one I scored a 1.97x multicore speed up from single to both cores on my x2 4400, from 1816 to 3585.
Well you can't compare older versions to newer ones its just like 3D Mark in a sense sort of.
BTW Glad its out, been hearing about this for a while and no release date was on it.
The scaling is very good.Seems X2s scale better than Conroe in Cinebench 10Quote:
Originally Posted by flippin_waffles
I remember Movieman looking for cinebench 10...he wanted to compare his setup vs penryn numbers out in cinebench 10...:)
Good memory!:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
Just grabbed it..
Will try this out tonight and see how the clovers do against the 45nm cpu's.
Yea, the old guy wants to beat Intels showcase machine!:rofl:
hey MM here is the thread about the 45nm V8 (penryn) scores... http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=147085Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
22,936 in rendering at 3.00ghz with 16gb of FB-dimm memory...
i want to see your numbers tonight :D
:wasntme: Only 4 gig here but we'll do our best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
Penryn is a little faster at same clock speed:
yeah.. 9% in cinebench...:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
This is the best I can do on air.,.362 on the memory, errors at 363:
Give us more!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Something to fight for ... your max OC score :D !
22,564 is it..one more mhz on the ram and I get errors..Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
That's 9x362 on 333 FBDimms and stock volts on air in a 72F room.
To beat Intels score I'd need to volt mod the cpu's or get faster memory.
Working on the memory..;)
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I'm getting 2986/5825 @3148MHz Win XP x64, but I can go over 3.2GHz on my CPU for that test so over 6000 multi is doable on aging A64 :)
I just ran on a single quad at 3.5ghz on Vista x64..
http://www.njkidxs.org/cinebench10.jpg
Slowpoke!:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
You need a dualie for this puppy pal!
Those gamers just get croaked..
Like trying to run a race with one leg vs two!:ROTF:
( Yes all, he is a friend and knows I'm just yanking his chain!)
BLAH BLAH BLAH:rofl: Hey you only beat me on one bench:p:
some Supertalent FB-Dimms like Victor Wang :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
You don't think I'm crazy enough to try and compete in SP1M do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Although you might be very surprised how well this workstation can do in super p1..
We can try wPrime if you'd like?:rofl:
http://www.wprime.net/hall.html?q=32M
Working on getting something a little faster than those..:wasntme:Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
I ran the tests and it says the my X2 scales 1.90xQuote:
Originally Posted by informal
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Two clovertown machines here, one on water, one on air.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
The chips and the memory in the air cooled one are better by a long shot.
Even at an additional 18C the air cooled machine will out do the WC machine.
It's also on a better board, EATX SM X7DAE vs the WC machines ATX X7DAL-E..
Yea, it's a beast!:D
brutal benchmark, I like it. 2.01 minutes for me.
E6550 - 7 x 533, 1.33 volts.
Oh! I can't believe that my X1950Pro(GT) is almost as fast in OGL test as your's 8800GTS :confused: To be precise 5665 on much slower CPU...Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Is Vista OGL driver so broken or simply AMD did good job improving their driver?
Well, as we all know Vista is terrible with any video benches. I could run this same setup on XP and prolly get a much better score.. 3DMark is terrible on here as well:D
I wish I knew this 12 hours ago, I was running version 9.5 last night at 4.95Ghz.
What did you get on 9.5?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Here is a lowly 6000+ @ 3.4
http://aycu33.webshots.com/image/237...1355614_rs.jpg
I like the cpu scaling, 1.94x is not bad...
Ply
here's my qx6700 at 3.6Ghz in 64bit under vista x64.
I just ran mine at 3.78ghz... Not to bad:D
http://www.njkidxs.org/cinebench-3780.jpg
Just tried 10x333..
can you say BLUESCREEN!:rofl:
vista 32Attachment 62976
Hey DengYong, what are your voltage settings?
i couldnt pass from 3.2 ghz yet, tried some voltage settings but didnt achieve succsess on reaching 3.4 or 3.6.
Vcore 1.39(reading 1.36 on everest)
1.45 on HT(reading 1.47 on everest)
Cpu VTT 1.45
Memories are @ 900 mhz, 4-4-3-6 and 2 T.
i wonder if theres something wrong with my setup, i dunno, i had to remove battery and start the system without it, to enter bios again, when tried to pass from 3.2 ghz sometimes...
Starting with battery on(and clearing cmos on all the ways) would just freeze me on the bios startup screen, but no response....
any tips on the oc setting?
see my sig for full spec:
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/3066/untitledyb5.jpg
here's mine again (qx6700 at 3.6Ghz) but this time under xp x32.
xp winsin opengl of course .
xp: 6261
vista x64: 4632
I see you remembered to close your :banana::banana::banana::banana: tabs before doing a screenshot ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
Time for a VID mod MM!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Maybe it's time to get your nicer config wet. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I think its time to get a single kentsfield:D
PWN +1 :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
I think its time i done a screeny too.. see what i can bring to this.! L)
I run that for another guy for WCG. I do a few benches on it but WCG is it's role in life. That one won't get wet unless it's something he wants to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
That's a possibilityQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC]Atomicpineapple
Why would I want to hinder myself so with only 1/2 the cores meeded to play on cinebench?:DQuote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by safan80
i like women, and you? ;)
This is what I get on my FXs.. Glad to see the AMD scales as good across 2 sockets as the Intel does across its single chip. (4 cores total)
I've got 6.5GB of non :banana::banana::banana::banana: pics of chicks and then if you add the :banana::banana::banana::banana: 30GB lol. of course the :banana::banana::banana::banana: is the first thing to go when I want more free space.Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
safan80: how nice now we know...
ontopic: Really nice results some of you got, I got like 3 minutes and something, shut it down due to anger of the long time =P
going for a Q6600 in a month :D
veilsidebr here's my volts for 3.4
cpu 1.49v actual, fsb 1.4v, spp 1.40v, mcp 1.50v, ht 1.2v
pci-e @ 130
3.5 takes about 1.55v actual
I don't do benchmarks very often I'm mainly a gamer.
QX6700 @ 3.7
Win Xp Pro 32bit. No tweaks.
I can barely read those numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
jeez Rip, do you use a magnified glass to see that?
Well they are...Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
1 CPU: 3747
x CPU: 13000
OpenGL: 6388
And yes, I used a magnifier to get those for you, lol.
Damn tough crowd...Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathReborn
1CPU: 3747
X4 CPU 13003 :)
Open GL: 6388:)
Don't worry, some day your cpu will grow up, have a baby and then with a 2 cpu board you can play here!:ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
( Yes, another friend that I can tease!)
lol only if your power supply grows up too ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
PCP+C 610W silencer..Have one on each clover machine for the last 8 months.Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
No issues at all..:D
how many hard drives and what's the graphics card?Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
These are pure crunchers..single 80 gig HD and a cheapo ATI X550 vid.Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
One does have a complete Swiftech H20-220 water cooling kit so it handles the pump,6-120mm fans and a 92mm fan in addition to the HD.
http://www.xtremesystems.com/modules...wcontent&id=48
Both machines show a rock solid 12.1 on the +12 line in bios and they are at 100% load 24/7..
nice, i shall try those when i get some spare time.Quote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
i wonder whats going on to not boot over 3.2 ghz(altough i havent tried as i should), should i raise memory voltage togheter with cpu frequency? im not an expert at that, maybe i should, because i am keeping same 2.1v for any cpu frequency i try.
i raised timings to 4-4-4-7 instead of 4-4-3-5, but i have no idea about if i have to change memory voltage aswell.
Dunno if this is correct tho.
thank you
Gave it a go in xp64.
Attachment 63006
Much faster than vista.
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b7...resultsx64.jpg
Vista x64
Vista sure eats the Opengl results. I'm having a fun time trying to figure out my new system, as what may be benchmark loop stable is not proving SMP folding stable.
nice score, interesting that at same speed, you got over 12k and i got 11.2k i guess...maybe 64 bits OS that much quicker?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dainas
i was using Windows xp 32
Yeah that is pretty wierd, but plausible as cinebench does have a native x64 version. x64 sure is not doing me any favours in the graphical department though :lol2:Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
I've lowered my clocks down to 3,105/345 as my ram does not seem to be able to handle 850 at stock timings indefinitely. Will replace those results soon.
the 64bit version wins in the cpu area while xp wins in opengl... just check the two that I posted.
But under Win XP x64 you have both brilliant rendering speed and normal OpenGL performance ;) !Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
I like xp x64.. too bad it doesn't have DX10.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
does xp 64 has any stability difference comparing to its 32 bit version? Because when i had p4 631, i couldnt boot at 4.1 ghz on Xp 64, and could do it easily (yet not too stable) on 32bit...Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
QX6850 440x10 1.65v
Corsair DD3 7-7-7-15-1t @ 1760Mhz 2.25v
http://fugger.netfirms.com/Corsairddr3/cinebench.jpg
Yes, it is based on Windows 2003 server kernel and thats the major difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
Better in memory management, more stable in use (when system is rock stable), much quicker in loading, can use NUMA properly, etc... The only drawback is driver support from some manufactures :down:
Nice, i always used it but had no idea how good it was on the track. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
I shall format and install xp64 immediatelly, as soon as my fautly HD be replaced.
One more try and a little flex of my GTX:D
Attachment 63251
64bit run @ 4.7Ghz
Ill post up the 32bit compare at the exact same speed and timing.