Printable View
System:
Intel Core2Duo E6400 (L625A348)
ASUS P5B nonDeluxe (modded 0509 BIOS "beta")
2x512 A-Data Elpida DDR2-800
PCI video
160GB Maxtor SATA
BlueStorm 500W (modded)
Vcore = 1.7V
Vch = 1.55V (voltmod)
Vmem = 2.3-2.5V (voltmod)
CPU: DryIce cooled (diode says -6C, but I think real is near -30C)
NB: DryIce cooled (-34C)
So far did 4402MHz: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=120541
But I`m still fighting it ... :cool:
Benches coming right up ;)
:woot:
congrats man
Uptade : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=120546
Goin` for the WR ... 27mhz left :p:
How come the validator shows "system is not fully supported" ?
It`s because of modded BIOS ? :(
1M: 11.672s
32M: coming right up ...
Wow.. Dice on the NB? Can you take a pic of your setup. Are you using a normal CPU container on teh NB, or did you fab a new one?
SAD
wow 4.4ghz from E6400 on P5B non-deluxe! ..congrats!
On the NB I`m using a smaller container (hard to say it`s a container at all - 8cm tall)
Here`s an old pic of the setup (when I was testing X6800). New setup looks about exactly the same ...
32M: 12min 05:672s
Now working on a BootMark (local benchmark) & maxMHZ suicide shot ...
:yepp: :rocker: 4474MHz :rocker: :yepp:
A NEW WORLD RECORD !!!
WR #1 - Allendale overall freq WR
WR #2 - E6400 WR
WR #3 - Allendale 1M WR
WR #4 - Allendale 32M WR
WR #5 - ASUS P5B FSB freq WR
:D :D :D :D :D
Congrats on your 5 combo WR! :D :woot:
Great job! :banana: Its nice to see that this time all parts survive :p:
TaPaKaH never show less than a top performance. Congrats mate. AIW WR, sounds good :D
Cracked 4.5GHz : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=120575 :wierd: :bday2: :hitself:
Looks like - that`s it ... tried to go over it a several times - my DDR2 can take no more ... 563MHz @ 2.45V anyway is impressive for "value RAM" :D
@4503MHz CPU was running (according to diode) @ -4C
@563MHz mobo was running @ -26C
And for bootmark install 64bit server os, that increase scoore over xp. Dont have enought volts on Vdimm? Put Di on :D
that is a WICKED OC... congrats!
:woot:
Wow,
Nice WR :)
congrats
560 on non-deluxe board and 1.55V, man that is awesome, great job :toast:
Any pics of NB DI cooling?
Congrats TapaKaH!!!! What about 3D benchs???
Niiiiiiice!! Good job!
Damn,,,very nice...that spi 1m is almost identical with a 4mb l2 at same speed:slobber:
Really nice results :toast:
TAPAKAH - good job - молодец, короче !
Не забудь у нас отписаться...
Congrats for the WR's, well deserved :toast:
WoW!!...
Great job!...
Congrats dude!.. :)
lol 5-in-1 W.R. I love it :toast: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
damn it i need one of those L625 CPUs arrrrrrrrrrrrrh
btw your 32M is slow dude have you tweaked it man cause i think you should be in 11m territory :p: :D
how did you manage to complete 32M with 105 MAXMEM :confused:
Very impressive there!! Big congats!
his 32m is actually pretty good for 965/allendale ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://afireinside.evilspork.net/AFI...o/4455-32m.JPG
Grats on the WRs man :toast:
AFI no your time is even worse LOL hahahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Show me a "fast" 32m at sub 4.5ghz on 965 please.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Oh yeah and I was running 2*512 there. I've seen you're 32m times, they're far from special.
Agreed. 12min isnt bad for a 965/allendale.Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
lol i was just messing with thread starter to shave off those 5 seconds hheheh you need to relax dudeQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
and in terms of fast or slow times i go by what's been done so far and if allendale+965 can scrape in 12m times at 4GHz........it should be on target for 11m times around 3350 without too much of a problem
32m does not scale linearly.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
you would think a X6800 @ 3.6 would pull 12s, doing it at 5ghz does not make it that much faster...
There are large diminishing returns here...
well i don't know what you've been testing if you can say that but i can tell you one thing >> SuperPI is all i bench/mess around with so i think i know a thing or two. I agree to your post to a point as there are many factors affecting the times including RAM and latency of RAM but all things equal you will roughly see the same increase and as you can see from the guy's benchmark he is right on the money for that speedQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
Great WRs TaPaKaH, that's what i call a 5 hit combo :D
I don't see maxmem=105 in his 32M run...is rather 1GB. Actually for 32M you need at least 256MB (IMO, 260MB, less kill time, not enough memory) cuz SP32M allocates something like that :p: .Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
You:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9...m08234ssx3.jpg
ME:
http://www.sspmustang.com/OT/E6600/3...2-32m-run2.JPG
I think I know a thing or two also...Your single 32m is a little slow there... :D
lol looks like testosterone is flowing a bit too hard there...sif take a 32M run that was completely untweaked against a conroe..........getting fast times takes a lot of time and testing. When i finally got the AMD cranking i had some beauties. Compare my AMD runs of 23minutes flat on 3.1GHz Opteron 146 or 2960MHz sub 24minute or even sub 21m run at 3476MHz. I bet you anything you weren't even close ;) :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
we have a 32M challenge at XS you should join the thread and compare how well you're doing :)
[EDIT] incidentaly Sierra picked on the same run HERE and i showed him that his time was slow with an inferior system right about HERE ;) :D
I dont play single core, I had an opti 146 from Vandi, but it was never opened :)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I only ran 25.xx dual pi on my FX60(~2.85, benched 1m to 3100mhz) with a 2GB kit, it is alot harder to throw down a solid 23 minute time when two cores are fighting for bandwith.
I bet your AMD rig @ 3400+ mhz was not close to my Lonely T2600 on air!
Water will be here friday, and I need to order some ram also... My conroe box is kinda apart :)
well look up the 32M challenge thread and see who participated and what the times were like and compare 32M runs of 2960 23m59; 3100 flat 23m and 3476 20m 58sQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
the guys i've benched against are all very good tweakers S7, OPB, BA, Dani just to name a few. BA is always tough to beat >>> just look at the thread and see his latest time with a mere 3.618GHz.....you will :banana::banana::banana::banana: your pants
it's the same deal with Intel which i'm new to and learning of course but clock for clock with good runs i won't sleep until i have everyone's measure as i did show in AMD benching
I have not run any single 32m runs yet :(Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I have not decided on ram either :(
lol was just looking at OPBs new RAM....looks like your time is a few minutes too slow :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
http://www.teamgroup.com.tw/onepageb...32mddr1040.jpg
sorry tapakah i am going way OT here and i'm going to hide under a rock now.........any more post should be directed to my PM on this topic :)
Holy damn thats some SuperFast Allendale times @TaPaKaH :woot:
Thanks guys :toast:
Will try to keep up the good job :)
BTW - I did not want to set the best 32M result ... I wanted to see whether system was stable or not ;)
i like your attitude :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :D :woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
Notice how he has a 2gb kit, not to mention I didnt even use realtime or maxmem! LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
The only person who needs to feel badly is you -- you called AFI and TaPaKaH out, and then you look retarded when your "uber leet 32m" is over two full minutes slower than a normal untweaked run.
If OPB wants to swing his ePenor around after he gets unbanned, good for him, but if anyone should be not posting stupid "my dad beats up your dad" posts it its you.
ok man so you're now becoming personal i showed you OPBs run and i told you to lookat the 32M challenge thread which i beat most of those top guysQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
incidentaly Sierra picked on the same run you did HERE and i showed him that his time was slow with an inferior system right about HERE ;)
I will eventually make my way up to a decent clocking conroe so i'll give you and the rest of people in the right places a challenge. If you have something to show great, i don't mind and i like competition as you can see so i suggest you sign up to 32M Challenge thread HERE and show your stuff instead of acting like a little brat. Let's do some benching NOT talking in tapakah's thread!!!
i disagree and same invitation goes to you as well. You've benched plenty of AMD CPUs including that nice Opteron 146. Join the 32M Challenge thread and put up your best runs. Let's see how good you really are :) :toast:. You and I and fhpchris have plenty of work to do to challenge top level Intel runners from what i've seenQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Very impressive TapaKaH :eek: :woot: :clap: Congrats on 5 in row WR's :toast:
oh GOD i apologise Tapakah I just realised you actually ran 5-5-5-x timings on that 1M and 32M runs :eek: that is very good indeed lol :toast:
i haven't got a decent idea what 1M is supposed to be like at those speeds but i tell you what that time looks awefully good considering others have been doing 14.xx runs close to 4GHz
OC was RAM-limited ... tried w/2:3 divider = RAM did not go over 560MHz (2.45V) :(
Should have used my ULs, but there are some compatibility issues between them and modded BIOS :(
are you able to tighten the timings to 4-4-4-12 at least for benching that is............bad luck about RAM limitation there.........mine only do 543MHz 4-4-4-9Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
tighter timings would give you a nice boost in spi if you decide to rerun it
who modded the bios and what was changed and why? also what impact did the change have pn performance comapred to 0507
w/4-4-4-12 they go no more than 501MHz :(
i seeQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
interesting you say that about fatbody chip problems i recently tested some and found they clock a lot worse on Asus than they did on Gigabyte...there was one timing in particular on Asus which on its own made a massive 60MHz different in OC at same timings and vdimm :eek: but i could still not get it equal to default timings and ram ratio and vdimm to asus..................strange :confused:
yeha man! you're the one :D one more record for our site :clap:
I talked to AFI about this pic, I think OPB ran them one at a time, and not at the same time... I want to see a midway shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
You honesly tell me that the BEST SINGLE RUN that BA does is 12.59, at 1200MHZ, yet some how, OPB runs DUAL PI only 30 seconds slower than that and over 80mhz less on ram with loose as crap subtimings?Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
You are kidding right? Show me a Midrun shot.
I am not trying to flame you here Dinos, I just want to make sure we post correct times -- Master OPB PIs faster than I will either way.
Just post this:
http://www.sspmustang.com/ot/e6600/temp.jpg
New setup - new WR
Setup:
E6300 (don`t know the stepping - it`s lapped)
ASUS P5B (modded 0509 BIOS)
2x512MB Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800
PCI video (some 2Mb)
Maxtor 160GB SATA
BlueStorm 500W (modded)
Vcore = 1.65V
Vchip = 1.61V
Vmem = 2.39V
Tcpu = -21C
Tchip = -30C
WR : 4012MHz
Still fighting it ...
Benches coming soon ...
it's just amazing to see this FSB and clock on a low-cost chip - great job :toast:
Got it 4GHz benchable :woot:
1M = 12.640s :hrhr:
Vcore = 1.65V
Vmem = 2.51V
nice!
cooling? DI ?
Yup, DI :D
BTW - new WR : 4092MHz (120% OC) :fact:
Sry, all - no 32M today - running out of DI (got just 1.8kg)
Keep pushing man :toast:
Is that DMM 1.65V?
Some guys are running 1.8-1.9V, so you might have a room to improve :p:
Yep, @4092 Vcore = 1.65V,Vchip=1.68VQuote:
Is that DMM 1.65V?
What for ? 1.7V+ is needed only when you go 4.5GHz+ (impossible w/E6300) ;) 1.65V is more than enoughQuote:
Some guys are running 1.8-1.9V, so you might have a room to improve
TaPaKaH @ Holy bravo :hehe:
Hi!Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
You beat my weekend WR:mad: , congratz;)
You superpi 1m is true? I think too fast.. Lot of people run same time with conroe.. And we get only 14,5**s..
Why it shouldn`t be true :confused:Quote:
You superpi 1m is true?
We don`t fake results here @ XS ;)
Just seen yer 1M@4GHz it`s very,very slow for that freq :( what mem.timings do you run ? did you tweak the OS ?
it was a tweaked XP for Pi, but your 1M is too fast :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
our timings was 5-5-5-15.. well here is my friends result with Conroe E6600@4051mhz cooled by h2o, you cant be faster :eek:
lol how in world did you pull off such a fast time :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
ask something easier ;) just ran @ 4GHz under DI w/tweaked`n`kastrated OS ... thats it ...Quote:
how in world did you pull off such a fast time
:confused:
lol i need more info than that ;)
We need your tweaks :P
Can you link the modded bios? CAn you take a pic of your mem settings in the bios and post it? there are a lot of new options in that bios.
btw Great overclocking TaPaKaH!
All the tweaks I remember (than can be counted to improve the 1M time)
1)pagefile usage of my OS @ idle is only 31MB (it`s a mix of WinXP & Win2003)
2)"fresh`n`clean OS
3)during the 1M run the "Explorer" was turned off
4)ran 1M several times in a row
5)tight subtimings (as in P5B BIOS) 5-35-8-8-8-8
Not safe for work ... still working on it ... will be out next weekQuote:
Can you link the modded bios?
so did you compile a mix or somethingQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
question not to me - all I know about is that it is "cutdown" version of WinXP (C:/WINDOWS ~140Mb) with a couple of files imported from Win2003Quote:
so did you compile a mix or something
It doesn`t even have such things as "Networking" and "Control Panel" :)
where can one get one of these:)Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
High FSB = lower memmory controller latency = much better ram latency.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
:)
well i've benched high FSB and not happy with some early comparisons....that's why i askedQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
>400FSB uses 1333 strap so are you saying at some point past that it magically tightens timings or?
Magic OS? :p:
dinos22:
Actually P5b has 400 strap and maybe even 467 strap :) But sure time looks very good, usually allendale is like 2s slower for 1M
You have probably seen this already
http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23803
Great job TaPaKaH! :clap:
the fun is that i've tested too with this 140MB XP :confused: , i never saw so fast 1M w/ allendale.. so i dont know how but congrats :stick: :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
pretty much that's why i'm a bit confused there.......something's up and i want to know what :DQuote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
Privet TaPaKaH!
I remember your nick from overclockers.ru
:D
So, tell us more about modding bios, do you do it yourself?
And, sure, congrats on wrs!
TaPaKaH
What SP 1M time do you get on stock or say 7x450 air cooling on that OS?
I agree that all your results are truly impressive...I do not see why is that rush,do not become personal,guys!I am totally new to this forum so go easy on me,please:slapass: :D I was able to get my E6400 Rev.B2 Stepping 6 to only 8 x 450=3600 MHz,1,525v in BIOS,Sys Mem Multi @ 2,5,which results in 1126 DDR II @ 5-5-5-20.I use GA-965P-DS3 F4E,with Super Talent DDRII 800 MHz (Micron),800 MHz@ 4-4-3-8...With Stock Intel Fan;) I have disabled in BIOS any Power Management and ports which I never use,and I have disabled the fan control so CPU FAN RPM raised from 1930 to 2400...
Wow, that is a KILLER time for an Allendale at those clocks. Competes with Conroes of the same exact speed and settings. Maybe you have 4MB chips and CPU-z is reading it wrong?
EDIT: Ummmm, your CPU-Z validations say: "SYSTEM NOT FULLY SUPPORTED"....if you have a question with what that means, click icon that says it.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=121077
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=120575#
:eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
same time as the E6600 oO (not fully optimized, but not bad...)
really strange...
http://wowgame.free.fr/Conroe%20E660...%204001Mhz.JPG
can you test your superPI at 3.6Ghz ? and 3.5Ghz ?
http://wowgame.free.fr/Conroe%20E630...3-1-resize.JPG
Not to jump to conclusions, but something does very clearly seem amiss here. I don't see any sort of OS tweaks that could possibly shave off a clean two seconds in 1M Pi, and even if such tweaks existed, the chances of them making an Allendale score precisely as a Conroe normally would doesn't seem quite plausible. Somehow that ominous note given by the CPU-Z validation appears a bit more than simply coincidental when paired up with the Pi times. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
http://www.hardwareoc.hu/upload/news...uning_wr_2.JPG
From the other 4g 6300 thread, how are you over 2 sec ahead of them at 1mhz lower fsb?
it's a mystery :rolleyes: with tweak and timings i dont think he could save 2seconds, with more L2 yes, but for cpuz the 4M Allendale is not new..Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
the only thing i can think off is this
i know that SPI runs funny occasionally so sometimes you get a larger variation on a not-so-stable PC when benching SPI 1M
second is that RAM......timings and speed are fairly high so that contributes.......but still breaking into 13s territory fair enough but 12.60:eek: is incredible :toast:
Like I said, it can't be coincidental that all his 32M and 1M times show this inconsistency. The 11.672 at 4.4GHz is also only possible with Conroe.
that`s vecause of modded BIOS ... validator doesn`t support it ... :(Quote:
Ummmm, your CPU-Z validations say: "SYSTEM NOT FULLY SUPPORTED"....
Could you do a validation and a Pi run with a regular BIOS please.
Regular BIOS has problems @ FSB500+Quote:
Could you do a validation and a Pi run with a regular BIOS please.
BTW - 1M time @ 500x7 (watercooled) on the same OS = 15.0__
If you want - give me 1day - I can compare 1M results @ 500x7(water) stockBIOS + normalOS / moddedBIOS + kastratedOS
i like the sound of that :woot: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
So, TaPaKaH, will you share the modded bios?
got the results: the thing that pumps down the time is my OS :D "cuts" about 0.5-0.6s of 1M time (average) :cool: :banana:I`ve already said - ain`t sharin` `til the work will be done`cuz i might kill yer MB ... :slap:Quote:
So, TaPaKaH, will you share the modded bios?
Thats alright, fair enough, gotta wait.
You've still got about a second to add before you're in tweaked-Allendale-league....now it's just an untweaked Conroe.Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
What exactly does the modded BIOS do? CPUz validation shouldn't freak out unless it does some really wacky stuff....
Perhaps more experienced members can help you resolve this "Unsupported" issue. And you can always add a disclaimer with your BIOS :)Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
i don't want the bios
i want to try the OS :D :D :D :D
since when does cpu-z get fussy about bioses?
He doesn't give it out even to the local guys like me :slap: So you basically got no chance :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22