Early testing with X1950XTX with everything on air. Tower 120 on the 6700.
http://www.nordichardware.com/images/15900_alt.jpg
The current oc-tools is limiting the memclock, 1143MHz is max.
Printable View
Early testing with X1950XTX with everything on air. Tower 120 on the 6700.
http://www.nordichardware.com/images/15900_alt.jpg
The current oc-tools is limiting the memclock, 1143MHz is max.
Wow, spanks my card pretty bad, I don't think those clocks would work for stable gaming though. If they are I would be tempted to sell my card for 200 and pick up a 1950 for 200 more:p: I would have the card on water so maybe...
niceee :D
how's oc score hehe ( edit... nvm it is oc already )
Will be interesting to see what the GDDR4 chips can do with added voltage and cooling.
1143MHz is on default voltage :DQuote:
Originally Posted by rodman
nice score:)
now go for something colder and we all like new tool for higher mem oc:D
Oh I almost forgot, one other thing you will like:
http://www.kinc.se/nodamnbugftw.jpg
No Coldbug :)
Don't mind the clocks, waiting for the new ATItool before maxing it out.
why i feel not gain too much with x1900xtx , how about 3D06?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
thats really nice :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
Great news,thanks:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
Because the oc-tool algorithm for the mem losens the timings badly :( There are people working to solve the problem. Still there is a nice gain VS a aircooled X1900XTX.Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
Please do a 3D06 for us :)
well..... as i know.... G80 is much stronger than x1950 for now....
also... if 7950GX2 counts as one card.... it is better than x1950 too...
hey... but DI / LN2 on X1950 and not for 7950 lol
btw. i feel 3.9G C2D should hold up to 15000 3Dmak06 and about 30000 3Dmark05.... damn we need X1950 CF or Q-SLi heheheh
Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
^^Sorry but you are incorrect the 7950 does have 2 cards and uses 2 cores. I am not sure where you are basing your information from but its simply not correct. ATI has not followed suit on a dual core solution yet (bringing it to market). It's not simply better then 1950 its only a dual GPU that's better. If you want to make a comparison you have to look at the efficiency between the 2. To be honest if the 1950xtx does keep pace with a dual GPU 7950 its obvious that the x1950xtx is more efficient.
I will, be back later with the results. I will also try the 6.8 in 05 instead of the early driver I used. 6.8 has some perf increase in it. Wanna brake 16k all on air :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
heheh yeah 2 core but use pci-e slot so i count it as one card. to me i don't care it is 2 core 4 core, as long as it gives better score.. that is what important to me. x1950 is targeting at the high end place right? if can't beats 7950 then that is bad..... as i know R600 is delay also.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
but good thing is x1950 can do DI / LN2 and ram can do much higher with voltage pump in heheee(kinc show us 2.3v come on i can't wait to see 1300 / 2600 hehe)
no so more largely differentiated to a overclocked X1900XTX :rolleyes:
core duo yonah @3.1ghz and a 1900xtx 750/850 @7.1k you have 7.5k with this c2d and a X1950 ~400points :lol:
That is not impossible but there is no oc tool that can set over 1143MHz atm. Over 1143 the performence drops to about 10fps.Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
Looks like a fun card to bench with a nice jump over X1900, in CF these cards are gonna score big. The missing coldbug is worth every penny.
oh woow really? basiclly not enough voltage...... hummmQuote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
then..... vmod vmod heheeee
i will ask xV for how they did it
Your not getting me. The voltage is at 1.9V for 1143MHz. I could set 2.48V but the problem is in the algorithm for the clock, the clockgen gets "corrupted" over 1143MHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
oh i see... finally i got you nowQuote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
might be someone lies to me lol
but i will check what tool they used
-73C nice!
looking very good there :D
Kinc, could u test 01 nature? im interesting in new GDD4:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
i think not far, new oc tool release out, hope it will solve the issues
Tested with another cascade. -92 in atitool is all good :)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
poor card already freezing it's caps off hehe
where's the X1950CF ? :D
just noticed ati tool reporting 960A :eek: LOL
Only got a XTX. Will have to buy a master later on.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Hmm :(
Doesnt seem like x1950XTX is worth buying...
what is this, 6-8% performance increase?
maybe not,waitting new oc tool:)Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
btw, $↓499 worth that
I'm sure like that ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
That is :
http://hlperson.com/mt/archives/Great%20News.jpg
:D
Yeah but, the romour, I know its only romour but still... That R600 is too hit the streets within 2006, and that sure as hell has alot of more power :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
Maybe macci had a quiet word ?
:D
Regards
Andy
very nice done kinc :)
16k on air is very fine,you most go for some extreme air in winter to :D
he is watching :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
;)Quote:
Last Activity: Today 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jort
My admiration for macci knows no bounds so I am glad he is still watching over us all from on high.
For the last 5 years there has been 4 people who have really been at the front and Sami is one of them. :toast:
Regards
Andy
ATI Vendor Supplied Radeon X1950XTX Benchmarks Leaked
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3727
Whats default VGPU on X1950XTX?
1.55V set for Benchs?
raiden
same as X1900XTXQuote:
Originally Posted by Raiden Zero
cant wait to see you and crotale for some CF with these.
k, thx.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marioace
so the only question left is if it was 1.55v set or just the program reporting wrong vgpu...
raiden
reviews of the X1950xtx I do hope that Wiz is able to tighten up the mem a bit. You might see a nice boost in performance IMO.
Very nice Kinc :toast: I hope scores and OC will improve with better OC tools, course i hit 16,6k in 05 with E6600ES 4ghz and XTX 813/980 :) :toast:
Very nice result. I'm anxious to see results with a proper overclocking utility. :D
Great news, this puts ATI back in the game :woot: , 90k '01 & 30k '05 are getting closer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
what's the clock of cpu?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
i've 15268marks with my xfx 7950gx2 xxx (default) + opteron 170 @ 3000mhz
[]
Wow, thanks for this preview, i cant wait until they get a good oc tool working...
Makes me mad i just bought a 1900xt...
For 200 bones.. why would you be :p:
Nice. 16k on AIR, and a very low overclock. 3.00GHz memory coming soon? ;)
Nice clocks Kinc, every time I see this I think of myself this is half of my last name :P
Impressive I cant wait for my GX2 to get here so I can run it on 165 @ 2.9 and then on my conroe rig soon to come :P
Have you tried setting only voltages with WinClk and changing clocks using ati tool beta 14. It won't show temps but you should be able to set any clock and it will keep tight timingsQuote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
Yeah good point. :p:
Beta 14 doesnt work for GDDR4 :(Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
rev2, you might have got an xt but its half the price of this card with similar performance overclocked :D.
hi there kinc , respect according to samsung the chips are good for 2400 on mem (1200mhz+)so i think in someones hands like yourself they'll be more in them once ati tool or whoever sorts the clocking tool out should be good
so what does that make the mem chips? .4ns?
0.9nsQuote:
Originally Posted by tvdang7
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/GI...0%20XTX/12.JPG