Printable View
Word does travel fast. I was working taking a call and after the call I was gonna place and order but they were all sold out of the 512mb sticks!!! ahhaha funny... Guess Ill wait until the new shipment arrives now...thanks again transam for your wonderful test...
ohhha and ESDEE too you guys ROCK!!!!
Keep checking, a little while ago they were showing the 256 sticks as sold out and now they are back in stock. Same thing might happen with the 512.
I guess maybe they have to send someone out to the warehouse to do a count or something???
That or they have one hell of a re-supply system.
as long as there's enough for me, everything's ok
how good does this ram work at lower voltages? say 2.85
^dont waste your time.
Then what about 3.2V?
3.2 might get you somewhere, but you need something closer to a stable 3.4 to make this fly, if not, id stick with tccd.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ht=BH-5+legendQuote:
Originally Posted by enzoR
Quote:
AH-6 180nm
BH-6 166nm
CH-6 166nm
AH-5 (doesnt exist?)
BH-5 150nm
CH-5 130nm
BH-4 130nm
both, bh5 and bh6 oc to amazing speeds of 300mhz and more with very high vdimm voltage (4v+). the newest and last winbond ic is the ch-5, its a "crippled" bh5. the design was simplified to reduce the production costs yet again, unfortunatly it reduced the performence of those chips a bit, even though the newest ch5 chips seem to be able to run at 2-2-2 as well, their performence is still lower than bh5 or bh6 running at 2-2-2 timings.
this is not CH-5, and CH-5 is not the same as BH-5, else it would perform the same, or better because of the smaller process. this is a new design imo, i am thinking this because of a few things..
#1 the voltage wall people are hitting
#2 the terrible performance at default voltages
#3 the fact that its performing much better then CH-5...
I just hope if the results are good that we don't end up w/ crap sticks. LOL. It always manages to happen to me. ;)
Yeah me 2 :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by cardnut99668
yeah its definetly more risky without ocz's testing, something tells me these are somehow different then ocz's IC's though, just look at how well they are doing on intel compared to VX.
:toast: :toast: to trans am !!!
nice pair you have there man! one more of these sticks and you will have 270MHz @ 2-2-2-5
im glad that you verified my findings! :toast:
:) Happy Hunting & Good Luck on the chips :)
Lucky ..... Mr TwinMOS :)
Esdee, how long have you had this theory about the UTT blank? I have been hearing rumours all over the place right around the same time ocz released vx. I heard here and other forums some very vague info about Twinmos and some names like Winbond and Infineon and really inexpensive ram that does 2-2-2 @240mhz+ at crazy volts. I called all of the 3 aforementioned companies on the phone. I've been holding off on the Twinmos for a while because they said they were going to be using the winbond utt on the newer speed premium. I figured waiting would allow some time for the older stock to clear. It looks like it was worth the wait. I just hope ocz doesn't get pissed off about this. Who knows? maybe it's just a coincidence that it performs like VX and ocz uses something completely different? I don't have those round circles on my ocz vx, so either ocz found a way to hide the circles during fab. or it's just different ics altogether. The point is both companies have great ram that does 2-2-2 timings at high speeds and we have everything to gain. I wonder how that dude feels who bough my Mushkin level II Bh-5 on ebay that only did 2-2-2@235mhz for $360 feels when he finds out about this? :D
I'm sure they feel the impact
Lucky TwinMOS :)
Anybody in SE Asia can get the TwinMOS Speed Premium here... :)
Dual-Ch PC3200 512MB 256MBx2 (Speed Premium)- Singapore Dollar 155.00
Dual-Ch PC3200 1GB 512MBx2 (Speed Premium)- Singapore Dollar 299.00
http://www.twinmos.com.sg/ebuy/prodV...p?idproduct=91
http://www.hardwarezoom.com/viewcont...D=228&PageNo=9
interesting review. I wonder if I would have same results if I used 2.8v like in the review. I wonder if they would have better results if they pumped 3.5v into those during their testing.
Are you sure man? Week 46 looks pretty current to me. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Firefoxx
aha - so its the speed premiums with the good chips? figures, they are totally sold out. 256/512, whatever. boo...
Why would you worry about OCZ being pissed? After all, weren't you among the first ten to buy retail VX? You have no obligations to them do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
As for the circles...you've stated that yours don't have the "dimples" but no one else has made that comment. The picture of the OCZ VX that was in one of the other threads had the dimples...I wonder why yours don't. Does anyone else have OCZ VX without dimples/circles (or with for that matter)?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=22041&stc=1
ignore "thumbnail", use link.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefa_Madness
link no worky..
Yeah, I know. I've spent the last 10-15 minutes doing it over and over. I'm tired so I'm going to quit trying. It was just that picture of the OCZ VX module showing the chips with the dimples.
edit:
OK, got the link to "work" even though its not the intended way.
i want 2*512 ...this newegg's link ?
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProduc...218-062&depa=1
?
*sevant*
Anyone else notice that trans am's chips are TMD7608F8E44D while the original poster's was TMD 7608F8E50D? Is this a major difference?
Another thing I noticed was that chips that had a 4 after the date (i.e. 04514, 04464) did better than ones with a D. Again does this matter? I am just a lurker that likes finding patterns in things
*/sevant??*
Otherwise great!!! I just need to find a 939 board that has a high Vdimm adjustment like the DFi 754 board (4.0v with new bios and slight boost of 3.3v rail :slobber: )
44D = 4,4ns
:)
They turning ON Winbond BH4 Machine?
nah they got rid of the BH machines