FERMI Benchmarked?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-14-2009, 07:42 AM
DelaMaris

Fake or not, we need competition... badly.
12-14-2009, 08:32 AM
Vit^pr0n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

Here is one more for the road...

Larrabee unleashed to the public.

http://i50.tinypic.com/sfar2c.jpg

I just felt this needed a bump for extra attention. This is significant news yet it has mostly gone ignored for the last page!

Can't wait for Larrabee!
12-14-2009, 08:32 AM
skugpezz

http://media.vivanews.com/images/200...idia_corp_.jpg
12-14-2009, 08:34 AM
WeeMaan

Nordichardware says it's fake, according to their sources.

http://www.nordichardware.se/nyhet,17011.html
(swedish)
12-14-2009, 08:36 AM
WeeMaan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n

I just felt this needed a bump for extra attention. This is significant news yet it has mostly gone ignored for the last page!

Can't wait for Larrabee!

You do realise it was a joke right? :D
12-14-2009, 08:42 AM
Neuromancer

IF these were real leaks, just like with anything released by a company you DO NOT compare it to the opposition. What you would do is compare it to the 295. Since you know they are not going to post bad scores of their own hardware

Taking that into consideration it peforms what about 30-40% better than a 295.

With most review sites using updated drivers now, I am seeing plenty of results where the 5970 DOUBLES 295 performance. Not 30-40% 100%!

Now before any ATI guys go shouting from the roof tops that 5970 is king and still will be in 6 months... these 300 series are speculation ATM, until someone actually has them in hand and can bench them, it is all FUD. 300 series could double 295 performance as well.

LOL at the larry benchmark :)
12-14-2009, 09:01 AM
Shadov

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neuromancer

LOL at the larry benchmark :)

Actually I prefer this one! :ROTF:

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/173/1long20006.jpg
12-14-2009, 09:13 AM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadov

Actually I prefer this one! :ROTF:

http://www.in4.pl/ima_news/2009/1_long_20006.jpg

http://www.in4.pl/ima_news/2009/2_long_20006.jpg

Your pic and link doesn't work.
12-14-2009, 09:38 AM
Aerwidh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadov

Actually I prefer this one! :ROTF:

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/173/1long20006.jpg

S3 doing a slightly unexpected comeback, coming from out of the blue and kicking everyone's butt? :rofl:
12-14-2009, 09:39 AM
kadozer

Biggest clue that this is fake if you were to look at a glance: GeForce GTX 300

They will be calling it GF100 sorry to burst your bubble (anyone that bought into this).
12-14-2009, 09:43 AM
FischOderAal

Quote:

Originally Posted by kadozer

Biggest clue that this is fake if you were to look at a glance: GeForce GTX 300

They will be calling it GF100 sorry to burst your bubble (anyone that bought into this).

Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310 :confused:
12-14-2009, 09:57 AM
vietthanhpro

close this thread !
12-14-2009, 10:05 AM
kurt124

Quote:

Originally Posted by vietthanhpro

close this thread !

Why?????:confused:
12-14-2009, 10:06 AM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by vietthanhpro

close this thread !

All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,:idea: people must like this thread.
12-14-2009, 10:11 AM
kurt124

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,:idea: people must like this thread.

+1:up:
12-14-2009, 10:16 AM
Neuromancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by kadozer

Biggest clue that this is fake if you were to look at a glance: GeForce GTX 300

They will be calling it GF100 sorry to burst your bubble (anyone that bought into this).

umm....

Quote:

Originally Posted by FischOderAal

Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310 :confused:

:up:

At least simple people are not confused with ATIs codenames Being all large conifers :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,:idea: people must like this thread.

:up::up: (+2)
12-14-2009, 10:37 AM
Aaronage

It wouldn't surprise me to find that Stanbony and R3APERvsTYETREE of YouTube created those benchmarks.

Huge Nvidia fanboys, they posted the fake Fermi benchmarks that appeared before 5870's launch and the word screw :banana::banana::banana::banana: up :)
12-14-2009, 10:50 AM
Solus Corvus

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

This is the post I was referencing to. And when I said it "looks legit", I was referring to the fact that the FC2 performance figures on the 5970 were in fact accurate in real life, and that the graphs do appear as they are from Nvidia.

In fact, saying they look legitimate is still a perfectly acceptable statement, even now, because they do in fact look legitimate. Whether or not they actually are is a different story.

Except that you wouldn't have to hope or wonder about the legitimacy of these graphs if you actually had a source. :rolleyes:
12-14-2009, 10:52 AM
kadozer

Quote:

Originally Posted by FischOderAal

Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310 :confused:

Yes you are right I made a mistake but its not 'gtx' anymore. Anyone under NDA or if the person made that should have known Nvidia officially said they are moving away from GTX name. Its internal GF100 and and speculated to be called GT 380 /GT 360 by nvidia focus members on couple forums.
12-14-2009, 11:13 AM
NapalmV5

if the benches arent real then whys amd preparing 5890/5990 for fermi arrival ??

no need for them spend time/resources for pointless releases

theyll need pumped up 5890/5990 for fermi arrival
12-14-2009, 11:18 AM
G0ldBr1ck

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

if the benches arent real then whys amd preparing 5890/5990 for fermi arrival ??

no need for them spend time/resources for pointless releases

theyll need pumped up 5890/5990 for fermi arrival

Umm, because like everyone else they know that Fermi will be faster than 5870 or there would be no point in even launching it.

not because AMD thinks this bench is real :cool:
12-14-2009, 11:20 AM
kemo

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeeMaan

Nordichardware says it's fake, according to their sources.

http://www.nordichardware.se/nyhet,17011.html
(swedish)

Yeah , the source said GTX380 Performance is much higher :D:p::rolleyes:
12-14-2009, 11:23 AM
initialised

OCUK got in trouble last year for leaking i7 975 and 4890 numbers (which I verified). So if these come from OCUK (they are a reasonable sized PC/Component shop) so it is feasible that they have one in for testing. However, I will wait and see until I have a card on my bench or at least more reliable sources.
12-14-2009, 11:26 AM
ajaidev

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

if the benches arent real then whys amd preparing 5890/5990 for fermi arrival ??

no need for them spend time/resources for pointless releases

theyll need pumped up 5890/5990 for fermi arrival

If benchs aren't real that does not mean fermi will not beat the 5870/5970, it just means that the benchs shown are not real.

Fermi has the potential to beat 5870... ATi is simply covering their bases, if fermi is faster than 5870, 5890 may come close to fermi and if its faster than 5970, 5990 maybe the replay.

Quote:

Originally Posted by initialised

OCUK got in trouble last year for leaking i7 975 and 4890 numbers (which I verified). So if these come from OCUK (they are a reasonable sized PC/Component shop) so it is feasible that they have one in for testing. However, I will wait and see until I have a card on my bench or at least more reliable sources.

But this time the OCUK forum member has total of 12 posts...!!!
12-14-2009, 11:30 AM
Alous

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

Of course that would be a possibility. But if that is the case, the user certainly did a good job mimicking the exact layout Nvidia uses for their official PR slides. It could really go either way, but my personal opinion would be that there is more evidence suggesting it is real than not.

What I'd really like to know is more information on the user who originally posted these and what their connection with Nvidia is. Perhaps NDA has been breached?

So you have access to the real benchmarks, I see?

LOOOL :rofl: I fell off my chair when reading this LOOL :rofl:
How come that guy is still in those forums lol Hes believing that the guy named "successful troll" has some internal relations with nVidia LOL And hes believing in that guys name LOL Do you dream about the guy in your avatar or its you?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page