ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series discussion

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-10-2008, 04:17 PM
G0ldBr1ck

ah ha, thought it looked familiar but it was dated today so wasnt sure.
06-10-2008, 04:28 PM
Dragy2k

time to give OBR a break....im waiting as much as every1 else on here for new cards to come out, but things change NDA's get pushed back and brought forwards..sometimes at the last minute.....so i say lay off!!
maybe we need an IQ test before new members join :yepp::brick:
06-10-2008, 04:37 PM
waver_01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Menhir

no it sounds that he just talked bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: and explained it with AMD said "..."

but yeah my 4870X2 works great and without microstuttering because of one shared memory controller and shared memory :D dont need this slow thing of 4850

..you have the X2 already?

for real?
06-10-2008, 04:37 PM
lapdog

If I had these cards I would bench them and then maybe post results. One thing I would not do it say "I'm gona...", I'd just do it. Beware of anyone just out to stir pot.
06-10-2008, 04:39 PM
natty

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragy2k

time to give OBR a break....im waiting as much as every1 else on here for new cards to come out, but things change NDA's get pushed back and brought forwards..sometimes at the last minute.....so i say lay off!!
maybe we need an IQ test before new members join :yepp::brick:

as soon as he pays for his crimes then we'll give him a break
06-10-2008, 04:42 PM
Lu(ky

Yeah OBR does this ALL THE TIME.. He did this on the Asus S2E and everybody was all over his leg :hump: humping him. Then he bailed just like now then the real man "pmp" came into the thread and finished the job that OBR started. And you guys defending him STOP already. If he willing to OPEN his mouth all the time which is often then he should be a man and finish what he started. :slapass:
06-10-2008, 04:48 PM
fornowagain

Lol, almost funny.

http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37881-135.html

Quote:

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT and ATI Radeon 4870 get a 225 watt TDP

With PCI Express slot providing 75 watts of juice and the motherboard another 75 watts, there is a theoretical supply of up to 225 watts. That is quite a jump in the sub-$300 segment and it makes you wonder what the reasons may be, but we are certain that overclockers won't mind. One of key limitations for the extreme overclocking of the previous generation parts was the fact that the cards (3850, 3870, 8800GT, 8800GTS512) had only one power connector.

And the reason why ATI was so popular with overclockers was the fact that you could tell the motherboard to supply 150 watts, and ATI's 3870 would eat 150 watts from the motherboard (total: 75 watts + 150 watts = 225W). With two power connectors in place for the 4850 and 4870, overclockers do not need any hacks to get access to 225 watts. In fact, the 4870 will top out at 300 watts (150 watts from the motherboard, 75+75W from connectors). The 9800GT will be restricted to 225 watts (75 watts from the motherboard)
06-10-2008, 04:50 PM
SimBy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Menhir

no it sounds that he just talked bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: and explained it with AMD said "..."

but yeah my 4870X2 works great and without microstuttering because of one shared memory controller and shared memory :D dont need this slow thing of 4850

Mine too.
06-10-2008, 05:00 PM
STaRGaZeR

Quote:

Originally Posted by fornowagain

Lol, almost funny.

http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37881-135.html

That guy is retarded or something? Please read the article :lol:
06-10-2008, 05:02 PM
SoulsCollective

Well that was a disappointment. Good thing I saved those pics.

/subscribe.
06-10-2008, 05:22 PM
Knight

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulsCollective

Well that was a disappointment. Good thing I saved those pics.

/subscribe.

Do you mind PM'ing the pictures to me? I think I missed them. :(
06-10-2008, 05:30 PM
natty

re-host them so we can all see
06-10-2008, 05:31 PM
003

Me as well, please.
06-10-2008, 05:46 PM
SoulsCollective

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.
06-10-2008, 05:49 PM
natty

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulsCollective

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.

party pooper
06-10-2008, 05:54 PM
disruptfam

lolcats
06-10-2008, 05:56 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knight

Do you mind PM'ing the pictures to me? I think I missed them. :(

you missed out on nothing

just the (very clear and professional looking) picture of the back of a pcb

all white background, it looked like a picture from a hardware site and not someones home
06-10-2008, 05:57 PM
zerazax

Since he says he works for a magazine, its possible he took it at the office where they'd probably have those kinds of places anyways? (or just find a really white table lol)
06-10-2008, 06:08 PM
003

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulsCollective

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?
06-10-2008, 06:13 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?

I did too, are you going to call the police on us for doing nothing wrong?
:rofl:
06-10-2008, 06:13 PM
Jethro

I cant believe OBR spams that he has a card in GIANT capital letters says that he will post benchmarks as soon as he get drivers and then withdraws like a lil girl when the rubber meets the road. Way to go attention slut. Grumble, grumble... Meh friggin tease, i can wait man, no worries just dont expect any sort of credence to be given to your future post OBR.
06-10-2008, 06:15 PM
LowRun

Wow :eek: Been out a few hours and look what we have right here. The usual suspect strikes again, what a shame :sick:
06-10-2008, 06:20 PM
003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

I did too, are you going to call the police on us for doing nothing wrong?
:rofl:

No, all I'm saying is, don't go around saying you can't privately give them to other people when technically you shouldn't have them either. I personally don't care that you have them, just wanted to point out the flaw in the argument of "they're not mine to give". :yepp:
06-10-2008, 06:22 PM
SoulsCollective

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?

There's a difference between posting something to the public domain, thereby giving everyone else permission to view it, and re-posting those images after the original poster has removed them and signified that the license given out to view them initially has now been revoked. There is no requirement on me to delete my copies of the images, but I cannot in good faith repost them.

As was said above, you're not missing much.
06-10-2008, 06:27 PM
GoldenTiger

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulsCollective

There's a difference between posting something to the public domain, thereby giving everyone else permission to view it, and re-posting those images after the original poster has removed them and signified that the license given out to view them initially has now been revoked. There is no requirement on me to delete my copies of the images, but I cannot in good faith repost them.

As was said above, you're not missing much.

You can't revoke a public domain license ;). I respect your decision not to hand them out, but don't try to claim morals = the law = the reason you're not :).

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page