Great!! !thank you!!
Printable View
Great!! !thank you!!
[QUOTE=The Coolest]Some would say it could be a problem with the mount or a thermal compound destribution issue.
QUOTE]
i) And they would probably be wrong.......!!!
When idling the cpu is not under 0% load...at least core 0 isn't.
ii) In the same way that 2 cpus tested in the same rig will vary in core temp. so 2 cores on the same chip may also.
iii) it could be the thermal compound distibution, but this is very very unlikely to say the least
Where can you download the new version?
Same place, same link. In the first post
Retarded question, but I have to ask. Is "Tjunction" the max temperature that the CPU the program is running on is meant to handle?
I'm not sure what the limits are on the core 2 duo so far. It's even more confusing when software temp sensors using the motherboard give me 33c for the CPU and this program gives me 46c at the same level of load.
Tjunction is the max temp before the CPU starts throttling I think... Or before the CPU shuts itself down.
Thanks for the update on this. ;)
So this means I have all the way until 85c on the e6400 before I should back down? I'm up to 71c right now at full load - is this pushing it? I'm using aircoling before I receive the rest of my watercooling stuff.
Well, The Coolest just answered these questions a few posts back (#164 actually) :
TCaseMax is different from Tjunction.
TCaseMax refers to the maximum temperature between the CPU (core or IHS, depending on config) and the heatsink.
TjunctionMax refers to the maximum temperature between the CPU core and the PCB of the CPU.
That is why its a much higher number than the TCaseMax.
Can you upload the program on rapidshare please?
I can't access your site .
I havent read the entire thread, but has anyone tested the latest Core Temp with a Kentsfield? All temperature readings seems really low (I am overclocked at 3.2ghz and all 4 cores are under full load with temsp under 38???)
Omar, go to overclockers.ru
ea6gka , i had the same problem with my setup (opteron 165) but...Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
i had this problem with my hyper6 hs only, when i check for a while its stock hs i saw -of course- higher tems but the diversion between the cores' temps was minimal 1-2 C at max) , so.. i assume it has to do with the increased weight of my hs , which "presses" the bottom part of the cpu (suppose there is the core0 ?:P)
Exellent Program. I used it to figure out why my x2 would not OC. core 1 was 7c hotter than core 0 that was pushing core 1 to around 52-55c under load at even a mild OC.
I took the lid off, and the temp plumeted but core1 is still aound 5c hotter at all times than core0. I'm using a DD TDX and AS5 (very thin layer). Anyone else have an amd dual core with a temp spread of 5 to 7c at all times??
Just scan through this thread you'll notice that you're not alone.
Guys i have question , is that possible?
I am using QX6700 & Tuniq Tower?
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/8876/tempdf9.jpg
There's a bug in CoreTemp 0.94. For me, with E6600ES at stock speeds, it shows frequency as 2400MHz, which is correct, but it's displayed as 6x400MHz, which is wrong, as I have my CPU at default FSB and multi.
.93 does it too but i think all of them do itQuote:
Originally Posted by Alexandrus
wow... used it for the first time today... and i must be doing something right... cause the cpu core temp was way lower than i expected!
another mirror for CoreTemp v0.94 :
http://www.persianpcshop.com/CoreTemp94.zip
That's not a bug. Disable EIST and then run Core Temp again and that should correct the core clock display problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexandrus
They fixed the tray icon. Only if it allowed to show the temp in tray...
that would be lovely :DQuote:
Originally Posted by JoeBar
Thanks, finally a version that not give me a "application must be closed" error when CPU is loaded :D
is it accurate for QX6700?? i mean i am on water and it gives me 60C idle.....