Intel X25-M G2
on mobile SB700
first AHCI, second IDE mode
Printable View
Intel X25-M G2
on mobile SB700
first AHCI, second IDE mode
@tutto-
8x30 GB vertex
LSI-9260-8i
Bah, since everyone is outclassing me, here's what a pair of lame-o patriot warp v2's does on ICH10R.. i need me a raid card, and some new ssds.
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d6...HDTACH128k.jpg
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d6...HDTUNE128k.jpg
Seriously need a raid card, and to sell one of these and get a pair of vertex.
Samsung F3 502HJ through eSATA
The large dip in the first 10 seconds is due to my anti-virus.
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/9...rksamsungh.png
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1...arksamsung.png
Fantastic drive considering it only has 16MB of cache. I was very surprised that it was much quieter than my WD Black and a lot cooler as well (I can leave it passive without it warming up, but my WD Black gets a little warm after a few minutes of usage).
http://i470.photobucket.com/albums/r..._____20_St.png Seagate Barracuda 250GB 16MB 7200rpm Raid 2+0 ( 500gb )128 stripped
pcnazz - Those are some impressive results for mechanical drives, nice work man! Cheaper, larger, and faster than my old 300GB WD VelociRaptor!
Intel X25-M 80GB G2 (FW 02HA)
Asus Maximus III Formula
SATA Mode: AHCI (enabled msachi driver after W7 install)
TRIM: Enabled and working
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4...intelssdrc.png
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/4892/crystalmark.png
Does anyone know why my HDTune READ benchmark results take so long before reaching a steady transfer rate while some get steady transfer rates right from the beginning of the benchmark (even though some of those results come from people running the same SSD HDD and same motherboard)? I assume it has something to do with the software and the fact I'm testing a SSD that has an operating system on it. I wasn't able to confirm this but some of the benchmarks I've viewed with steady transfer rates right from the beginning came from SSD's being testing outside of a Windows environment? Thanks for any help you can give guys!
(2) 150GB Raptor's in RAID 0:
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/6194/raptorx.jpg
Solidata SC-64GB (SLC) SF-1500
http://www.abload.de/img/hc_012jbjl.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hc_013jqcm.jpg
hey fear what is with the 4K QD32 on that crystal disk mark? i noticed thats an alpha build?
Intel X25-M G2 160 GB
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/5919/ssd3.jpg
8x VelociRaptors RAID5 on ARC-1231ML
http://www.dadepc.com/hd_crystal.jpg
http://www.dadepc.com/HD_benchmark2.jpg
5x WD RE3 1TB drives in Raid 6 on an Areca 1680ix-16. Note the good write numbers for a Raid 6.
Some good ol Ramdisk action
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/...oy/ramdisk.jpg
Patriot Warp V2
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/...boy/warpV2.jpg
Intel X25-E 32GB (windows 7 + AHCI)
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/5549/x25e.png
it's better to write (Seq and 512K) that Solidata SC-64GB while these specifications are 280/270 :confused:
@ tistou77
Please fill every partition full with writing (with small files - e.g. FC-Test, h2testw or Eraser (random data)).
Then delete 1GB and retry CDM 3
Finally got my four 80GB Intel x25-m SSD's today (ordered them 3 months ago) so I can post my results! 4 x Intel x25-m G2 SSD's on an XFX 780i motherboard using onboard (software) RAID0;
http://members.iinet.net.au/~michael...s_in_raid0.gif
This is with Windows 7 64-bit default storage controller driver.
The scaling of sequential write performance is great, I have run AS SSD a few times and seen over 320 MB/sec.
This fixes the low sequential write 'issue' for Intel SSD's for me.
Unfortunately the read performance doesn't scale as well as it could for 4 drives, with the 780i chipset limiting the maximum sequential read to 635 MB/sec (although that is more than 3 times more than my previous setup with two 150 GB WD Raptors, so I'm not complaining).
I was curious about the random access times and ran HDTune to get an idea (read only)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~michael...ccess_read.gif
DAMN! :D The 780i chipset is really holding things back but it doesn't matter as four x25-m's in RAID0 blow any mechanical hard drive out of the water.
I wonder how they would perform on a SATA 6 Gb/s PCI-e raid card...
Samsung F3 1TB HD103SJ
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/6...aldiskmark.jpg
2x intel SSD x25m 80Gb
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/2...elssdraid0.png
WD Caviar Blue 320 GB, 16 MB Cache, SATA II, 7200 RPM, RAID 0 (2 drives) via ICH10R
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4001/...590ea903_o.jpg
Here is my Corsair X64 after the OS install running in IDE mode.
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/k.../attox64-1.png
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/k...er/attox64.png
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/k...DtuneX64-1.png
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/k.../HDtuneX64.png
My Theory is that on a SATA6Gbps card they would perform similarly unless it was a true controller based card and not a emulated controller one like ich10r and 780i chipset raid if i'm not mistaken.
With a good card you would drop cpu utilization a ton when doing disk intensive stuff (av scan etc), overcome the bandwidth issue and probably squeeze some more IOPs across the board although probably mostly at the smallest file sizes.
2x WD Caviar Black 640GB (shortstroked) in RAID 0 on AMD's SB750 RAID Controller...CPU Use is whacked, ran it 3 times...HD Tach is completely different...(Burst is 280 MB/s, 3% CPU usage) not bad for the $150 I spent for them.
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9928/hdtuneraid0.jpg
Any faster raid-5 and raid-6 with harddisks?
3x Hitachi 7k1000.c 1TB in Raid 0 on ICH10R with 128k strip.
--Matt
I have used Maxtor and WD, and tried the new Samsung drives, no difference in overclock with any of them, since the PCI & AGP buss is locked, the hard drive should not be holding you back. Are you stuck at 200 FSB?
Quite chuffed with this little setup....helps with the game loads :)
4x software raid0 - 3x sata + 1x ide
80gb seagate barracuda 7200.7 ide
160gb maxtor 6Y160M0 sata
200gb seagate barracuda 7200.7 SATA 200822ST3200822AS sata
250gb maxtor STM3250310AS sata
*******************UPDATE************************* *
same drives / same stripe 64kb stripe on LSI 9260-4i sas/sata raid card.
http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/f...mith/after.jpg
win7 64 enterprise 7600
biostar TA790GX A3+ / sb750
am3 x4 965c3
4x2gb D9 ddr3
5850
2x64gb ocz summit 19c FW raid0 64kb on LSI 9260-4i
i'm dumping the summits for 149 ea on ebay, plus all my am3 cpus and the board and going back to intel 775 for a brief period until the new cpus and boards come out in a month or so.
-consider this my last bench with this setup.
2x Acard 9010 32GB + Areca ARC-1261ML
left with cache - right without cache
http://www.abload.de/img/hd5mitcache2r3vf.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hd5ohnecache254zh.jpg
Some 8HD X RAID0 benchmarks. Adaptec RAID 5805 controller, the HDs are Hitachi's 7K2000, P6T6 Revolution motherboard:
http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/8343/75834429.th.jpg
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/7821/80635767.th.jpg
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5787/13444127.th.jpg
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7210/26209086.th.jpg
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/6741/94519988.th.jpg
Write/read caches are on. RAID6 configuration brings similar results.
Awesome results F.E.A.R.
Areca 1231ML 2GB cache 2x Intel 160GB SSD
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/9...caarc1231v.png
Areca 1680-16 2GB cache 10x WD BLACK 1TB Raid 6
http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/4650/arc1680.png
Perc 5i 256MB cache 3x Raptor 150GB (1x VelociRaptor) raid 0
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/4757/perc5i.png
3 Hardware raid on 3 pcs
RAID 6 results (HD Tune), same config (8 X Hitachi 7K2000 & Adaptec RAID 5805 & P6T6 Revo):
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8769/raid6.jpg
7.9ms seek time, and only 2199GB, is that a partition/slice i guess. Nice systems.Quote:
Areca 1680-16 2GB cache 10x WD BLACK 1TB Raid 6
Insane. And i'm thinking what to do with my netbook and it's 50MB/s transfers lol...
Some SSD benching, A SSD Benchmark on Intel X25-M G1 FW 8822 RAID0, same Adaptec Controller:
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/732/84456694.jpg
G1 RAID0 brings the same result than a single Postville.
I've bought X25-M 80GB G2 for my Aspire One, but results were not really worth it imo. Sure boot was faster and it used less power (i got extra 1,5 hour on battery!), but programs still loaded slowly (not all but mostly) and benchmarked speed was way below what i expected. Read was hardly over 100MB/s and that's something better HDD's for aptops can pull off for half the price and 6 times larger capacity.
I've decided to buy extra RAM instead and use SuperSpeed SuperCache on it. 512MB cache to boost existing HDD should do the trick for almost no extra cost. Plus, extra RAM always helps.
9211-i8 with 7 intels
first 2 pics are 4k seq 1 queue depth for latency and 4k seq 32queue for max perfomance
senond 2 pics are 64k file seq. 32 queue depth for maximum performance.
@ Agrophel
And without cache? (AS SSD) ;)
That read below 100MB/sec shows something is wrong, I'm over 200MB/sec single drive and just shy of 600MB/sec with 3 drive RAID0 in sequential reads in crystaldiskmark.
Does the aspire have SATAI ports instead of II?
maybe try updating the chipset drives?
does it do ahci?
@ Nizzen
And HDtune?
After about 4 months of usage, still running strong:
http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/3...elssdg2130.png
4 OCZ Vertex ssd's on a LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i. Very sweet setup.
GFDuke
insane speed :up:
wow...sweet setup indead....win7 install time 2min?lol
whats mobos are u ppl using FOR THESE RAID CARDS???????????? 4x or 8x pci ex 2.0 slots are needed?
biostar engys and lsi engys told me NOT to use the 16x extra video card(XFIRE) slot on my biostar i45 mobo as it is 16x and also backwards compatble to 8x 2.0 but might wig out AND NOT officially supported or tested???
I'll answer your PM here. This is my configuration with the P6TD Revolution:
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/8629/imag0123f.th.jpg
As you can see in the picture, the GPU in the first slot (2nd disabled due to his heatsink), Adaptec 5850 controller works in the third, finally 2 X Intel Quad PT Server (PCI-e 4X) on the 4 & 5 slots.
(bad picture quality sorry).
More drives and faster controller.
8 x Fujitsu MBA3147RC 147GB 15K SAS
HighPoint RocketRAID 4320 IOP348
RAID-5, 64KB Stripe, Write-Back, Disk Cache Enabled
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/drives_small.jpg
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/rr4320/hdtune.png
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/rr4320/cdm3.png
What stripesize is that? The default 128kb? Also, do you have writeback-cache enabled? I envy your 4k @ QD1 writes. How did you get 100MB/s+? As far as I know, at queue depth 1, those shouldn't scale with raid0 (unless you're ofcourse running a stripesize of 2kb, which would kill your sequentials, if that's even possible with the ICH10R. Probably not. Anyway, very nice results! :up:Running a single x25-m 80gb at the moment, but I'll order 2 more soon. I'll post some benches then. Hopefully my 4kb writes will scale as nicely as well. Kind of weird your 4kb writes take a hit when going to the higher queue depths, though :shrug: How much do you write to the array on daily basis on average btw? Your speeds are still new-like. Is the garbage collect feature that good in Intel's SSD?
This makes me really want to go SSD... I think I need to start looking for some deals. :)
I'd really recommend 2GB or more for an honest reading. Your summits can't do 450 MB/s each.
just messin'
2x vraptors in R0 (really) short stroked.
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...g?t=1267660142
I did just got my Intel x25-M GEN2 80GB today :D
AS SSD Benchmark
2X Intel 25-M GN2 RAID0 ICH10R
http://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/mont...4298_thumb.jpg
3 Intel X25-M 80GB G2 SSD Raid-0
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1619/10958945.jpg
3x X25-M 80g in raid0 on ICH10R
acard ans9010
16gb size sata 2 interfece
well a ramdrive formed in an atom platform
so if you make it anywhere else make this number x2 :-)
x3 in the i7 platform thought
This any good for 2 drives raid 0?
Pair of X25 160's 128 stripe
http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1607/43151339.png
Here is my 2 300gb WD Raptors in raid 0 using onboard intel controler. Was using 8.6 drivers during this test.
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6...lociraptor.png
This is my 4 Super Talent Master Drives in Raid 0 (Highpoint 4320 controller)
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/868...04128gbssd.png
This is 2 Fujitsu 26Gb 10k 2.5" SAS drive using onboard sas controller in raid 0
http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/1...rkmarvellr.png
This is just a single Fujitsu 36gb 10k 2.5" sas drive using onboard sas controller
http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/1...rkfujitsum.png
Here are some ATTO of my drives
60GB Vertex Rurbo (onboard intel controller with new trim supported driver) Purchased 5 of these and will be running a Raid 0 with them on new rig for my apps/games drive
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/7...bo60gbatto.png
ATTO of the 2 300gb raptors in raid 0 (onboard intel)
http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/231...2raid0atto.png
And here is the ATTO of my 4 128GB Super Talent SSDs on the highpoint controller
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/2...vesxraid0a.png
Atto of 100gb Veretex LE drive (Onboard intel controller)
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/1...attoupdate.png
Here is the AS of my Vertex LE 100GB drive (On the onboard intel controller)
http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/745...updatedint.png
Brand New: 64 GB PCIe SSD in raid0 :D:D:D
http://www.numberworld.org/screenie_..._4_18_2010.jpg
I'll try booting on this later...
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
jk...
It's actually 16 x 4GB FB-DIMM in raid0...
jk again...
I cheated... it's just a ramdrive...
My intel x25-m G2 80gb (2 days old :P )
AS SSD:
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/2036/asssd.jpg
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/139/asssdcopy.jpg
Crystal Disc Mark 3.0 x64:
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9097/cdm30.jpg
HD TUNE:
http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2328/hdtune.jpg
How many ssd's and what controller? bit over kill :P, i know its areca but which version?
I just took 2 x Samsung F3 500GB (HD502HJ) and made my first RAID.
Decided to go for a Matrix RAID (two partitions on two drives, first two partitions = RAID 0 and second two partitions = RAID 1). Best of both worlds with only two HDDs.
RAID 0 - Write Cache Enabled
http://i26.tinypic.com/5ls5jd.png
Impressive bench but really not as big of a performance boost as I expected.
Especially since this was the bench from my previous HDD:
Transfer Rate Minimum : 31.4 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Maximum : 64.7 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Average : 58.0 MB/sec
Access Time : 16.5 ms
Burst Rate : 102.5 MB/sec
CPU Usage : -1.0%
What do those real big spike drops represent in the bench directly above??
When I didn't have 'write cache' enabled it looked really clean, here's the pre-write cache bench:
http://i28.tinypic.com/b4x1rp.png
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/493/hddtest.png
2x640gb RAID-0 64k WD Black AALS Short stroke to 80gb
onboard Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H
Write back cache enabled
My tranfers seem to be a bit low.