Well, but nice clock anyways. Strange that you needed -3c to make it work, thought it ad a pretty nice coldbug!Quote:
Originally Posted by gianni-gt
Waiting for results!!!
Well, but nice clock anyways. Strange that you needed -3c to make it work, thought it ad a pretty nice coldbug!Quote:
Originally Posted by gianni-gt
Waiting for results!!!
ok here are our s939 scores:
fx-55 san diego 1.840v -88 => 3748mhz => sucker
fx-53 clawhammer 1.936v -125 => 3937mhz => WR
opteron 154 1.888v -3 => 3952mhz => 3rd
opti156 1.888v -18 => 3984mhz => WR
fx-55 clawhammer 1.778v -104 => 4014mhz => WR
for the wr's there will be a validation, like i said.
what about promised AXP scores?
nice scores :)
k7 @3.5ghz... ;)
i don't know the scores anymore... because we benched a lot of socket a cpus in a very short time. unrockbar has to send me the specs again. will post it asap.
Great stuff!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by gianni-gt
...what stepping is that FX55 SD btw? Looks terrible! I've got one that can do 100mhz more at 40c higher temps and 0.1v less than that one:confused:
Is the FX55 Clawhammer a CAA2C, btw?
sandiego was 0516wpmw... and yes the FX-55 was the CAA2C. very cool stuff with coldness. we needed exactly -156°C on the tube, at -157°C the board don't recognize the cpu anymore. :D so we are three people on that run. Besi was the man on the tube with LN2. stunned_guy pressed F7 and me moved the regulator in clockgen. :) team-work.
That FX-55 Clawhammer was not an CAA2C it was an AAA2C 0435 UPAW ;)
That FX-55 0516 suc.ks very hard :(
I tested this Opteron 154 at home but with 1.55 vcore i had only -2c so I will need LN2.
I have modded my board again now i hope to get some better temps with all cpus...
That Opteron 185 didnt goes very high with DICE at the session i got around 100 mhz less than i got at home....have to try it again.
Article from the session on bastel-gianni.ch
If you understand german, it's even more funny!
I am waiting for the rest of your results :)
nice action guys...
very good article bro, good work :clap:
Well done, giant :D
sent the validation files now to mr. cpuz... i think we will get the valis this week.
Great to finally get the validations! One more WR in the hands of the wicked 939 trio:p: (fx55 clawhammer)
Btw, got a 4000+ CAAXC 0432UPMW (you SHOULD recognize the stepping!:D)
Hoping to get the 4000+ Clawhammer WR, it's at 3600mhz atm.:)
My new FX60 passed through customs on friday, too. Hopefully, it'll be good enough to break the WR as well (3875 mhz). Aaaaalmost the EXACT same batch # as my 154:p: So I have high hopes for it:D
Aaaargh... I wanna bench NOW!!!:( But no cooling and no board:p:
That 4000+ should rocks I think. I search also for this cpu. I had one 4000+ clawhammer in the past but could only test it under single stage for 3524 mhz...under ln2 it should break that 3.6 ghz.
I have a feeling that the 3500+ Clawhammer record might be harder than teh 4000+. Only 70 mhz less, and with 11 multi instead of 12 you need quite a bit higher temps I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by stunned_guy
I remember I ALMOST got an FX55 AAAXC 0434UPMW once... still wonder if that one would've made it all the way to 4 ghz... Unfortunately, FX55's have suddnely become VERY popular, quite a few went for like 200 bucks on us ebay lately:p: I'm glad I bought all my chips for less than half of that ridicolus price:D
btw: we killed my WR 4000+ SanDiego... it's a dual-core now. :D the DIE is splitted in the middle. :)
destroyed all athlons XP :D i have approximately 200 athlon XPs :D
and oldest tualatin on the way.. <i own oldest core 2 duo, K8 and tualatin> :)
Haha:D How the heck did you do that?Quote:
Originally Posted by gianni-gt
Reminds me of my poor, delidded 3800+ venice (which was even better than the one I got to 386x mhz...). Tried to run it with no Ceramique on the die. No boot, and after a little while it was very clear that a part of the core was loose:p:
Still my worst OC experience:shakes: And I've ruined 2 Venus mobos + God knows what:rolleyes:
well the storry was that: on my wr run back in the days i could boot with only 1.74v. so i've desided to try it with an copper-pot. the temps were better, means i gave more vcore... no problem till 1.9v... then the system powered off and didn't start anymore. but the cpu had not a good day anyway.. because the max i've reached was 3830mhz (you know wr is 3941mhz)... after that power off... we removed the pot and stunned_guy mounted a hs on the chip... power on, and there was the sound "knack"...
ohhhh man look at that!!! it's a quad-core!!!!! :horse:
http://octs.ripping.org/sandiego_quad.jpg
Nice split but sorry for the killing action :(
@ Knut
I got 2 days ago an FX-55 SD for 60 euro :banana: Its not the best stepping but for ln2 it schould do 3.9 Ghz. Its an 0520 RPMW...i had this one a while ago could prime it to 3.5 ghz without hs.
oh man i love the guys from cpu-z!!! our wr's validated :D strike!!!
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/361007.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=361007
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/361010.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=361010
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/361008.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=361008
Nice WR's, but the FX53 WR is a bit... weird, because of the HIGH HTT:D
400+ mhz - wth!
hehe of course the htt is correct but the clock should be 7866mhz... hahahaha
will be corrected