looks legit, but can't call it legit unless he's using version 1.26 of CPUZ.
that version is easy to cheat on.
Printable View
looks legit, but can't call it legit unless he's using version 1.26 of CPUZ.
that version is easy to cheat on.
looks good to me, it passed.
:banana: time to flash to 1.36 and get +18.3% vcoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
Thanks.
check this one plz, I think it's patched :
http://home.scarlet.be/~bralou/superpi.JPG
this should be his correct score :
http://home.scarlet.be/~bralou/superpi2.JPG
Dumo and Kristos :
both your screenshots look OK. But as Kunaak said before, it would be better to use version 1.26.
hmm odd, I wonder where he got those 2 seconds from when he's running at the exact same clockspeeds...
And mine too...
What... ? very amazing that u can run with haft-multi show on Core Center ? Which way ? ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
from a guy in a french o/c forum
http://nvforce.chez.tiscali.fr//untitled2.JPG
Yours looks ok too.Quote:
Originally Posted by aristidis
Nice oc, BTW.
Looks ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogotop
the guy who made the screenshot say to me it was under win64 and he set 10*255 in the bios and cpuz report it as 5*510......this guy are not know to be a cheater but if you can verify that
thx
It might be a little bug when using CPU-Z under WinXP 64-bit.
Perhaps you can ask the guy if this happens at each setting. If so, can you post some other screenshots?
If the problem persisits, he can also report this "bug" to the author of CPU-Z.
Just to prove to myself and a few others!
http://img25.exs.cx/img25/9544/XP-M25002714GHz.jpg
Just hope you can see the numbers you need. :shrug:
First post in here after lurking for a bit, Nice forum Ive picked up heas in here :) ANyway can you check mine for me alot dont beleive
http://users.tpg.com.au/adslp5px/Pics/cpu2600.jpg
DarkForce and Kentixx :
Both your checksums seem ok.
But can you take a screenie with CPU-Z version 1.26? Just to be sure.
And welcome to Xtreme to both of you. :welcome:
verify this plz
http://torny.altervista.org/DSC002451.JPG :)
Looks OK too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud125
Nice oc, BTW.
And Welcome to Xtreme. :welcome:
thx :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiler
Peltier with Winchester rulezz :banana:
ah can u post me a screen of cpuz near my screen plz :)
this my cpuz screenshot,please analyse this :)
http://photos2.flickr.com/2367707_ac605b5b27_o.jpg
and this my best OC result
http://photos2.flickr.com/1381176_7396b32a28_o.jpg
hard to verify a cpu-z screen without a visible checksum ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dimasdw
and you should upgrade to cpu-z 1.26, because 1.24 can be fooled
eh..what is checksum (sory for my bad english)Quote:
Originally Posted by burnout
anyway this my cpuz screnshot with cpu-z 1.26
http://photos2.flickr.com/2368293_69a2ce1982_o.jpg