See was that so hard? about time :up:
Printable View
See was that so hard? about time :up:
nice cdawall^^ :)
damn oh well it was worth a shot 1800 CL8 isn't bad and i really haven't tried higher clocks or lower timings yet
so far this is the best i can POST at
http://img.techpowerup.org/090530/Capture033.jpg
UPDATE
tested up to 2.1v its not 32m stable
Hey GUys,
Very nice thread.. just wanted to help add my results to the database. here is one I just posted.. i will try to get a few more entries in here later.
I hope I am doing this right, if not.. please let me know:
TiTON|900Mhz | Phenom X4 955@5625 | 6-7-7-20 1T | 2.2v | 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix 2000 CL9 | Micron D9GTS | MSI 790FX-GD80 | 790FX
http://www.ironmods.com/ForumImages/...Mhz_4200NB.jpg
- Ton
tition very impressive clocks man:up:
@TiTON: Is the cpu on LN2 or on cascade?
Nice clocks btw!
indeed.. impressive on cpu AND ram^^
Hey guys, thanks for the compliments :)
The CPU was on LN2. I was working on tweaking the NB and Mem speed. Trying to get those things squared away, before I push Cpu & GPU :)
- Ton
Here is some additional results that I posted on the MSI GD70 thread. Its some memory performance, that would be good for the database:
CPU on Phase, Air on Ram
TiTON| 956Mhz | Phenom X4 955@4302 | 9-11-11-29 1T | 2.3v | 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix 2000 CL9 | Micron D9GTS | MSI 790FX-GD80 | 790FX
http://www.ironmods.com/ForumImages/...M_956_Cas9.jpg
TiTON| 952Mhz | Phenom X4 955@4283 | 7-7-7-20 1T | 2.3v | 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix 2000 CL9 | Micron D9GTS | MSI 790FX-GD80 | 790FX
http://www.ironmods.com/ForumImages/...M_952_Cas7.jpg
- Ton
titon, good job :up:
will we see 1000 soon? :D
my D9 833 MHz 6-6-6-18 2.1V
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=577862
:P
whats the highest anyone has gotten on elpida non-hyper
this is what i'm at right now no testing for 32m as of yet but its @1.64v
http://img.techpowerup.org/090604/Capture034930.jpg
i was bored today so i decided to play with my ram a lil @ cas 7
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/5926/90080881.png
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/6117/13210298.png
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/2157/29102613.png
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/2340/21446358.png
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/38/64171593.png
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/6149/41735042.png
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/8922/75204606.png
msimax |932.0Mhz | x4 955 4994mhz | 7-6-6-15 1T | 2.2v | 2x1GB crucial DR3-2000 CL9 | d9gts | GB GA-MA790FXT-UD5P | 790FX | Link
http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/5749/17925002.png
msimax, 932 cas7 is nice result (16min is not bad either, super efficiency) :) I see that triton uses cas7 with the same memory. Your timings look so close to cas6 :P
If I remember right, you did try crucial 1800 too? 1800 and 2000 share same chips or binned separately?
very nice result^^
OCZ Reaper 1664 @1.9V
955BE 3848MHz @1.472V NB 2704MHz@1.3V
http://www.abload.de/thumb/ramocp3x2.jpg
Msimax how come on the bios your using its dated 06/25/09 for the F3k.
When on gigabyte webpage its dated 05/22/09 for the F3k!
Because we are beta testing some additions to the bios we requested......
However f3l is quite capable as well in fact better IMO ( http://www.techreaction.net/forums/showthread.php?t=712 ) so the additions have no benefit whatsoever and just complicate things for users who have no clue what the settings do......
Thanx chew! Just wondered seems strange with different dates and not diffrent bios codes!