He he ye both are fine bits of silicone & although she really wouldn’t have to ask twice!!! Its Roselyn Sanchez that makes my tyres squeal!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by crossg
Printable View
He he ye both are fine bits of silicone & although she really wouldn’t have to ask twice!!! Its Roselyn Sanchez that makes my tyres squeal!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by crossg
Funny you should mention tyres...........ever since I went out with her she's been texting me non stop about having a puncture:shrug::idea:Quote:
Originally Posted by C-N
LinX must be running on screenshot.
And please fill the necessary details about your rig.
Not to mention that your clock is too low to join...
Read the OP.
Hope mine's alright further up because I'm soon to submit another oneQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
Batch number is L042B076 as before
It's perfect! :up:
Do i get free dental plan if i join the club?
Yeah, sure. Come to Russia, I'll fix you up with my dremel, no problem. :p:
Guys, what is the estimated life expectancy of those chips running 24/7 @ 1.56 Volts (being speced at max 1.38)?
Soya
Was I missing anything on my submission?Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1507
looks shopped...
44.5GFlops at 4.5ghz with 6c/12t? Sorry, but he should be pulling 80+ easy. I pull over 80GFlops at 4.2ghz with 6c/12t on my i7 970.
will the first post be updated sometime ?
I'm really busy right now, I'll do what I can. Tomorrow, perhaps.
Sorry.
okido, i understand. no probl. only want to know that the thread WILL be updated sometime.. no time limit :D
i7 980x Batch 3041B300
Gigabyte X58 UD7 Rev 1.0
6GB OCZ Platinum PC3 12800
WC: Apogee XT + BlackIce GTX360 + Ultrakzes 3.000 RPM
http://i1139.photobucket.com/albums/...nx21passos.jpg
http://i1139.photobucket.com/albums/...LynxFinish.jpg
:)
I had similar probs with my 980x............Quote:
Originally Posted by zoson
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=262
I then loaded up "diagnostic mode" on the desktop and got a bit better
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=272
When you say "shopped" do you mean that you can doctor your run in "Photoshop"? I hope not:shakes::down:
That's exactly what I'm saying.Quote:
Originally Posted by newhit
What's the diagnostic mode?
And if it is not shopped. It's pitiful. My Q9650 got more than 45gflops at 4ghz.
4.2ghz: 79gflops. lots of stuff open too.
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...79gflplinx.jpg
4.5ghz isn't 4.5ghz unless it performs like 4.5ghz.
Oh I see, the msconfig diagnostic mode... wow... so many services starting that it tanks your performance? How can you guys even call your pc's stable if your chip is wasting so many cycles that LinX can't stress the whole chip/ram?
10 mins :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by soya_crack
Oh and about that 4.5GHz 45GFLOPS submission, have a look at the load on Realtemp in the running screen, ~53%. Unless he took that screeny right as it was calculating the output of the current loop that would indicate why he has very low GFLOPS and also probably why it actually passed at 4.5GHz with 1.312v.
:D approx. 15 min.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
Only with high end water cooling :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron_Vie
or phase :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
Ok I don't want to drag this out further, but I think this needs addressing. Firstly we acknowledge your point about the fact that ultimate stability is essentially unable to be proven as you would have to run the application/suite of applications indefinitely and even then you would say after 5 years be 'only' 5 years (insert application name here) stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinchy
Secondly, there seems to be a bit of language interpretation getting in the way here. You made the comment that an individual could say their machine is 'able to run 20 passes of LinX without error' and you then said an individual could not say their machine is '20 pass LinX stable'. I can tell you, and I am most certainly not being patronizing in any way here, that those 2 statements in english mean the same thing. '20 pass' is the qualifier to the statement 'LinX stable'. 'LinX stable' as a claim is only an absolute if it is not qualified by the number of passes, and when it is, it means it is only x passes LinX stable. All of us are only making the qualified and limited statement that our machines can run LinX at >/= 4.5GHz for 20 or more passes without error. We are most certainly not claiming absolute stability nor trying to achieve it.
Zalbard chose 20 passes at max mem settings because its hard to do, but not incredibly hard, and it takes a short enough amount of time for people to want to have a go. It's the perfect idea and requirements for a club so us guys can just have a bit of fun with the thousands of dollars worth of gear we all own and admire each others achievements.
I hope this clears things up for you.
That is awesome :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed
There are a few of them on the result page in the first post. RRunner just posted his, which is obviously not credible due to the load discrepancy. I was talking about the submission from the user 'Decky.'Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
Methinks the soap box is welded on too tight :)Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK