interesting pictures, since they are officially shipping the mobile parts this comes with no surprise. The E2 is however something i didn't expect to be there yet....Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadamia
Printable View
interesting pictures, since they are officially shipping the mobile parts this comes with no surprise. The E2 is however something i didn't expect to be there yet....Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadamia
no, i cant see the pics ur posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadamia
http://img6.imagebanana.com/img/5f1945z5/Capture.JPG
I had to click the link to see the pics (only padlock pics would show up) and then afterward, they popped up in Macadamia's postQuote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
HP Pavilion dv6-6110 590euros
15.6" A6-3410MX 1.6Ghz/2.3Ghz Turbo (quad-core)
6GB DDR3
500GB HDD
HD6520M + HD6750M CF
Win7 Home Premium 64bit
http://www.passiontec.de/_fenster.ph...&affId=1376965
Delivery in late june.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nintendork
Nice anyway. :)
that would be a very nice config for that price, the only thing bad on this is the screen res.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nintendork
15.6" 1366x768, i don't find it a problem. 16" start 1600x900 but with this "small screens" do it really matter high res? For web browsing can be difficult to read, 17-18" 1600x900 seems more reasonable.
I prefer 100x if instead or more resolution they choose high quality LCD-LED screens.
I'm hoping for a redress of the 13" E350 laptops, maybe their forray into the Intel CULV market.
1366x768 is like looking throught a key hole, a lot of scrolling up and down.
It's ok on a 12", but on a 15" it's and utter joke.
The laptop market is so weird, lots of cheap models with discrete graphics I don't care about, but it's so hard to find higher resolution.
Last year I checked if Asus had a 15.6" model with higher resolution, but I couldn't find a single one.
so with digitimes releasing these prices, I feel one can now accurately guess bulldozer's performance:
http://www.techpowerup.com/img/11-05-23/121a.jpg
the quad core bulldozer will be more expensive than 2500k. and I feel like the unique features on either side cancel each other out (onboard video versus ecc support)
I'd say that means bulldozer will, in fact, be slightly faster than sandy bridge. clap clap.
the high price of the quad to me sounds like low threaded workloads are still dictating prices these days, and since the TDP is 95w for all core counts (4/6/8 excluding the 8130P), im thinking the quad is going to be a few hundred mhz faster than the others, making it a great gaming cpu.
so 30 bucks premium for the unlocked 8core vs the locked one... :(
in the central EU we have a difference of 10euros between the locked 2600 and the unlocked 2600k SB.
how comes AMD wants to charge 30 bucks just so the cpu is unlocked:down:...do the Bulldozer oc that that good:confused:...so that you basically have to have the unlocked one
Is unlocked even needed for a air cooled machine, when you've got those high multipliers?
Let's say stock speed is 18 x 200 MHz, a 50 % overclock would be 18 x 300 = 5400 MHz. I doubt you can go higher on air.. :D
AAbenson, all FX processors are unlocked. And even then, you should be able to overclock any of these processors, regardless of locked or unlocked multipliers.
so you will keep posting this overview in everythread ? :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by bamtan2
FAKE OVERVIEW
Why fake if I may ask?Quote:
Originally Posted by duploxxx
i thought FX just means the BD chips, and the P was if its unlockedQuote:
Originally Posted by richierich
From link http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/rea...msgid=27393140Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
"All the four Zambezi processors will come as Black Edition parts, meaning they feature an unlocked multiplier for higher overclocking headroom."
Why would an unlocked model have 30w higher TDP if it was just unlocked? I think I read that the P-model is a higher clock and/or turbo.
because it also comes higher clocked. like 1055T vs 1090T, huge price difference, because it was unlocked and faster
whats the point of the P in there when they could have just called it the FX-8130, its not like thuban where the extra 5 at the end would mean faster turbo, since P and non P models have the same boost range. so the only thing i see P meaning is that its more power hungry
P for POWAA!!!! :p:
No one but the people at AMD truly know what the "P" differentiates right now. All top level Bulldozer FX processors are unlocked.
High leakage part, maybe? Like TWKR. Could explain the TDP.Quote:
Originally Posted by EniGmA1987
And was there some official confirmation of all FX CPUs being unlocked? O.o
The P is most likely for Performance, Power or some other funny word :PQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
The situation is the same with the Llano SKU's, anything with a "P" as a suffix has 100W TDP and not 65W.
short answer: NOQuote:
Originally Posted by Smartidiot89
who says the Liano SKU's are with a P?? oh yeah the fake chart does, i think it's time to make a new XLS, this time lets add "C" from crap.
based on fudzilla info :DQuote:
Originally Posted by richierich