Nah dunno I hope AMD get a good beastly chip out 2nd gen DX11 they have had time , let it be hot , let it be big , let it be a little pricey but if it beats 480 handsomely like as fast as 470 sli OH BOY !!!
Nah dunno I hope AMD get a good beastly chip out 2nd gen DX11 they have had time , let it be hot , let it be big , let it be a little pricey but if it beats 480 handsomely like as fast as 470 sli OH BOY !!!
The only thing screaming fail here is your post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zloyd
Quote:
Originally Posted by LinkinParkBoy
it should be written are we ready?
instead ...
yeah NVIDIA have new core:up:
GF110
GF112
GF119
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/1853/001af.png
^^ If that slide is true, it should be good. Getting sick of my GTX 480, and I'm also curious what ATI's 69xx brings as well.
512 bit 768 core @40 nm?
nvidia going for a one chip per wafer strategy?
Nvidia better pulloff AMD like magic on this 40nm node if this 768Core monster is true, amd did it on 45nm with cpus, but they have more control over the process than nvidia...
But for the moment it looks like theyre going with a move from too big core to a terribly too big core.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgk
Thus, the 6000 series...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
ROFL .... best line ive heard in this thread
btw that slide looks as fake as it can be and 2nd ... GF119 ??? LOLLQuote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
ps: it just look like more bullcrap made up by nvidia to go agains the launch of the 6k series .. get people to wait more .. its an announcement of an announcement ... good job green goblins ... good job
If I understand this chart right, the performance of 512 bit 768 core is placed between GTX 480 and 470.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
Something seams to be off, either the chart or the sepc.
all those charts that pops up all appear at a time that is obvious ... its fake .. move on ... lets stop believing those fud post please ... there is no way nvidia is so stupid to try and make something even more complex then a full 512 shader gpu ...
I got bored and poked photoshop.. :shrug:
LOL nice :P funniest version of this image as of late.
LOL are we there yet ... LOLl why cant ice cube hold that green screen
from that slide the gf110 looks like a gx2 of a gf112
Yup, and a gf112 looks like a full shader gf104Quote:
Originally Posted by zanzabar
and GF119 doesnt make sense at all ...
Sure it does, dx11 for entry level, does the 5450 make any more sense to you...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n
its the "119" that doesnt makes sense.
Do any of the code names actually make sense to anybody outside of engineering, what determines whether a particular piece of silicon has an appropriate name for that matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
yes it does make sense ... but half the memory controler memory will it not hinder the perf so much that the 5450 would be close in performance .... and price wise??? will they pull the same price as a 430minus a few $ or cut in half ????Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
still 96 shaders .. just like gt430 ... so why refresh it with half the memory controler ????? ... that's why i said it doesnt make sense
Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
bigger numbers always means better .... you must know that by now dont you???
What like a gf106, 104, or 108 should surely be faster than a gf100, or am I missing your humor...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n
EDIT: If I were to guess I would say the code names seem to coincide with product release schedule considering high end usually launches first.
Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
ahh ok ...anyway .. why make the 119 ... they allready have a 430 ... so now they want a 420 ????
nvidia pothead gpu .. ill get one if they call it 420 ... even if its crap ...
You're .... sick of the GTX480?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrono Detector