Quote:
Originally Posted by chad
Great news then :up:... lowest vid I saw in a Q9550 was like 1.2125
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad
Great news then :up:... lowest vid I saw in a Q9550 was like 1.2125
It's not the lowest.
My L847C219 is 1.2375 VID by the way. Still dialing in the voltages for 4Ghz :)
Ok guys here it is...Quote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
L847CO70
VID: 1.175
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/1177/1175good.th.jpg
Well, reinstalling windows 7 now. Stupid raids.
Ended up getting the p5q turbo. I actually really like it so far! A lot better than the p5k in my server.
Also, chad, I know i'm not overclocking but my vid still dropped with speedstep turned off. I had to run a load to get a reliable number. Even then it changed every few seconds.
Hell when I was screwing with the crappy settings with the 750i I was able to start and run with a .9 something voltage!
If you want to know the vid use realtemp, it shows both min and max so theres no guessing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoss331
Here is the real temp numbers. I am going to be selling this chip, since I will not be able to take full advantage of what it will offer under Phase or Ln2.
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/1897/realtempa.th.jpg
:slobber: too bad you are going to sell it man.Quote:
Originally Posted by chad
Im looking into a UD3P as I type this. My Biostar P45 does not like quads:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
Just got everything in and setup.
No clue how stable it is yet, I have no clue what i'm doing haha. I'm running intelburntest.
http://ludehawk.com/gallery/crap/q9550_40ghz.jpg
Nice Stock VID Guys
Mine Quad VID 1.2 In Core Temp
I Got UD3R Soon
hi there here is my Q9550. VID = 1.0875v
http://i29.tinypic.com/vdg4jk.jpg
a little oc :
http://i29.tinypic.com/11so5fa.jpg
My SETUP :
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 E0 @ 3.9GHz 1.23v
Motherboard: DFI LANParty UT P45-T2RS
Memory: Team Xtreem Dark PC8500 4GB Kit @ DDR2-1200 2.2v
Graphics Card: Manli GeForce GTX 295 1792MB GDDR3
Display: ViewSonic VX2835wm 28" Full HD WUXGA LCD Monitor
Audio: Xonar+Totem Mite-C+Denon AVR-2500+Energy ESW-8
Storage: 2X WD Raptor 74GB WD740ADFD @ RAID 0+WD Caviar 1TB
Optical Storage: ASUS DRW-2014L1T LightScribe DVDRW 20X SATA
HSF/Cooling: Xigmatek Thor's Hammer + Xigmatek XLF-F1253
Casing/PSU: iCute Super18-4GA-BB + Corsair HX750W
OS: Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP2
24/7 :D
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/52/cpuv.png
P5Q-Deluxe 2201
vCore 1.5250v (LLC)
PLL: 1.58v
FSB Term.: 1.40v
vDimm: 2.04v
MCH: 1.42v
:up:
Do you mind posting up all of your other settings, what's auto what isn't. That vcore seems a little insane though. Is that the only way you could get it stable... i'm running the p5q turbo and want a vcore that wont melt something! =pQuote:
Originally Posted by 8800's@over
running @ 4GHz vcore @ BIOS 1.28v :
http://i26.tinypic.com/2cs8dxw.jpg
http://i27.tinypic.com/21kb8rr.jpg
a little update :
http://i28.tinypic.com/124yayt.jpg
Mines a 1.200 vid EO stepping, thinking of selling my current s775 kit and moving to i7.
http://img9.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=...221h59cpu1.png
I'm very happy of succeeding 3h of OCCT.
377*8.5 was stable with a very low vcore but 400*8 wasn't, I thought that the northbridge and the FSB were the cause, I set 1.26V for vnb and vtt, and 1.225 vcore (1.20V via cpuz and 1.17V load).
Ambiant T° : 27°C.
@magnum
there's No Picture showing up on your imageshack shot link...
fixed
Finnaly Bought Giga EP45-UD3R Today And Come To Me Tommorow+PSU 785 Watt Green
Cant Wait For End Of Week For Testing :D
Hey all, I'm planning on grabbing a Q9550 from my local microcenter and wanted to know if its possible to hit 4ghz with a P5Q-E (chipset rev. A2, if that matters)?
My validation :
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=669234
As C1E is enabled, I had to run cinebench to get the real frequency, so this is the vcore under load (1.17V), whereas the idle vcore is around 1.20V.
I expect that many people will say that 3h of OCCT ain't enough, but for a use like mine, I think that 3h is enough.
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/qehs...cbcc104813.png
you should have know problem booting up at 4.0ghz but you have to work to keep it stable..when you go to micro center ask the saleman to see if they all are the same batch numbers and how many he has pick a good 1 and please post your batch number and born on date for us..me and CincyRob on here got the same batch number and everything cause there was 13 left of the same at the time at are local micro center here in Cinncinnati..I wanna see if your store and my store got the same batch numbers by chance or close to it :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by aiya
you should have the C1E disabled to get the correct freguency along with the CIET Function also or you will be throttled..i believe a test with intelburentest willQuote:
Originally Posted by lordmagnum
clear you of a stable chip if you pass the test after words run it thru a few hours of Orthos that's what..i do and Sandra to check my (mips) hey magnum
you should be sitting on 3.9 like me but it did take me some volts to get it stable there..I gotta work on lowering it down some best of luck my friend :up:
hey best of luck with the board you got.hey can you post a link to that PSU you are talking about getting also?Quote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
Thanks
Q9550/Maximus II Formula
http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/f...r/MII_4GHZ.jpg
bigwill 68 => How many hours of Intel BurnTest do you advise to check it well ?
intelburntest is a 1 time test of stress ,Stress it at the highest level of 1 number of times to run it 5 times watch your temps RealTemp & Core temp after words run Orthos about 7 to 8 hours a normal work shift to see if it passes alsoQuote:
Originally Posted by lordmagnum
here's my results from me passing intelburntest
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4555/cpu39.jpg
as you can see my temps got high as in the 70's under stress test passed 5 out 5
the arrows point to the key areas that you need to keep a eye on
then i closed inteburntest a tested under Orthos for 8 hours..i went to bed
Tanx M8Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwill68
That's Link About My PSU >>>> LiNk
:up:
@ViViD
Thanks :up: reading up on it now:yepp:
Just 280 sec ? Is It engough for IntelBurnTest ?
biwill => I notice that the tj.Max read by coretemp is 105°C, Shouldn't It be 100°C ?
Can I use prime95 instead of Orthos ?
Anyway, when my overclock was not stable, the unstability was due to chipset/fsb, so, as OCCT is more stressful for memory, I don't think that running Orthos or Prime95 is better.
I've run both Intelburntest (5 times) and Prime95 (8K for 5 hours), and everything works. But should I run intelburntest on Windows 7 64 bits because I've 4 Go whereas XP 32 bits uses only 3.2.
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/dsfgh-2f97d6dc64.bmp
here's mine from few weeks back when just got the corsiar h50, temps have improved since added new fans :)
http://www.mirr.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/cool.jpg
IBT stress's alot more than any other stress test out there. it dont take long for IBT to see/find out if things are ok. you can change the amount of test it runs. 5-10 times is more than enough. its not a long drawn out process.Quote:
Originally Posted by lordmagnum
BigWill.
im done over there at that other site. them idiots can have the show and put out bad info. tired of stupidity. people want good info sound advice, not some one sided point of view....
hey guys, Intel Burn Test has found an unstability while running on Windows 7 64 bits, whereas It hasn't found any while running on Windows XP 32 bits.
i havent looked into it much but im thinking it might not be setup for Windows 7 as of yet.
Stability tests in 64 bit are harder to pass than in 32 bit and if your going to run prime you need to run more than just the 8K test.
8K is good at testing the CPU, I've run OCCT for 3h to check the memory. But at the stock speed, IntelBT has succeeded on W7 64, whereas, at 3.4GHz (with 1.28V for the vnb and vtt) with only 2048Mo, it has found an unstability within less than 1 minute. With XP 32, 2047 Mo is fine.
If your wanting to test the cpu run small fft not just the 8k test, running a single test set is not very helpful.
How many minutes should I set ? I want the test to run for 5 h.
I've tried 7*400 (2.8GHz), still failing. Whereas, 8.5*333 is fine. Even with 1.26V vnb and vtt it fails IBT.
give us some info on mobo, ram , bios settings used...
I wanna reach 3.4 GHz (I have a P5Q-E with the last bios, Q9550 E0 VID 1.25V, 2*2048Mo PC8500 GSkill PK) with these following settings :
Multi : 8.5
FSB : 400
RAM : 1066 (5-5-5-15)
Vcore : 1.225 (LLC disabled)
Ram voltage : 2.1V
Vnb : 1.26V
Vfsb (or vtt) : 1.26V
Vsb : 1.1V (stock)
Vpcie : stock
CPU Margin Enhancement : Optimized
EIST : enabled
C1E : enabled
C-states : disabled
T-junction : enabled
Intel Virtualization (or something like this) : enabled
I've run OCCT for 3H, Prime95 8k for 5H, IBT 5 times, all of these tests have succeeded (on XP 32 bits). But IBT fails on Seven 64.
I'm going crazy, I'm gonna eat my keyboard if this hell carries on.
Ever thought IBT could be the problem ? we have discovered several issues when runningthe latest version with 4-8 threads (S775 and S1366) very high and max memory setting... is/was a shall program as LinX and co all passed. No idea if AgentGod already updated it...
Try LinX and check again ... I run a Hyperpi32mb (4threads) if that passes I'm already pretty confident it's sort of stable for 24/7 ops for the rams...
ok, thanks for helping I'm going to try Linx and SuperPi, how many times should I run LinX ?
Try Hyperpi , not superpi mate... and run it with 4 instances 32MB... for Linx set max ram and run 10 instances, more than sufficient... no need to pound ya hardware during hours and hours...
im doing a little tinkering went into bios played around with some setting trying to get my ram to run closer to 1066about 920 is the best i can do to keep them stable.went and put things back to normal and forgot and left OC at only 3.61ghz.. no biggy but i ran LinX for the first time. never used it before . this is what i got. is this good bad???? not sure as to how to read it.
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Cincrob/LinX.png
I've reached about 17 min 30 sec in hyperpi, does It work on Seven 64 as well as other OS ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
I'm going to run LinX.
I've run LinX (max memory) 20 times but It has failed. I've set the vcore at 1.23V and It has succeeded.
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/azqe...85718ce447.jpg
Power consumption : 213W.
My cooling system is a Zalman CNPS9700, I think of bying a Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme (or True Black 120 ?), should I keep my money ?
how can you tell it failed? your post looks like mine does? does that mean mine has failed also?
He failed until he set vcore higher.Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyrob
Neither of the screens failed, it says in the blue bar at the top of the program:
Finished Without Errors in xxmin xxseconds :up:
hey guys, what are all the good VID's and batch numbers with the Q9550's. the E0's. I've done lots of reading on what I have, the Q9650. but I just built a rig for a friend and I installed a Q9550 E0. it's a L847C Batch and I got lucky and got a 1.18 VID I think, Win 7 is loading right now. It showed 1.15 in BIOS, but in MIT page it read 1.18v set to auto, so I'm thinking thats the vdroop and I've got a 1.18 VID. and it's idling at 28c so looks like it's a solid chip.
I have it under a UD3L so we'll see. I'll run tests in a while. but if it's an amazing chip, I'll take it for myself and replace it. haha!
Thanks for any info on VID info for these Q9550's. or are all the E0's basically good OC'ers just like all the Q9650's are?
The one im using is a 1.200 vid, batch no, L844C01, currently clocked at 3.8ghz on 1.21875v in bios, 1.200 idle and 1.216 at load.
I've run IBT again, and, I has succeeded ! I've installed chipset drivers for W7, today, I'm gonna try to lower the voltages.
Also, I'm thinking I might need to do a reseat of my Cooler.
I got the Xig Dark Knight, the S-1283V and Installed it with the stock fan, and some MX-2 and my Q9550 is sitting at stock voltage of 1.1875v and stock speed and my temps are 39, 40, 40, 35 and I'm in the desert so they will drop when it gets colder, it's 79F inside the house. Almost 80. So thats what. 26c
I'm thinking at stock speeds it should be more around 33c idle, but then load is more important right, maybe I should try with less MX-2, or go back to my Shin Etsu
Those temps look good to me. almost dead on mine. i have 41, 38, 38, 40. and my room temp is around 79f also. i have the OCZ Vendetta 2 on top of my CPU ive had it on for a couple weeks and ihave seen a big drop in load temps the longer it is on. at first running IBT i hit 68c and 63c on pr95. on IBT now im barely hitting 601c and on PR95 54c it max. i wouldnt change out the cooler just yet. let it work its magic for a week or so.Quote:
Originally Posted by xguntherc
i have had my Q9550 for a few weeks now maybe 3. here is my Batch
#L846B715
i have it running at 3.83ghz(yup i got a hemi) had it at 4.01? but not stable due to my ram. ive seen this batch and the L847C's oc real well.
EDIT:
Sweet HAF. thats next once i get my new mobo...lol
ya.. but see yours is running my same temps with 1.26v and overclocked to 3.8 Ghz, mine is stock.. 2.83 Ghz. my 3.0 Ghz Q9650 ran cooler than this.. and does at 4.0 Ghz with a TRUE.
I think it was the mount, and the wait a few weeks only matters when the Thermal paste needs to cure, like AS5, but I used MX-2 and it doesn't have a cure time, but I'm thinking I'm going to try out my Shin Etsu again as it's working perfect on my sig rig under the GTZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by xguntherc
good point there didnt take into the fact your not OC'd yet..lol guess i should have kept my mouth shut...lol
i didnt use AS5 this time. tried some of the OCZ freeze. i think it along the same lines as the MX-2 ive been told it dont need the cure time like AS5. IMHO i think after some run time they all preform better.
well I do agree that after a little run time all tim performs a little better, This is of course because the Thermal Paste gets heated up, and cooled down, and do this a few times. Run prime, then shut off the PC. after a week or 2. it's melted and cooled over and over and it gets into all the microscopic cracks and stuff of that sort.
After a few runs it spreads better and probably gets better temps, but whatever. and the Sticker on the bottom of the Dark Knight left tons if VERY sticky residue on the bottom of the Cooler, I was worried and not even 91% alcohol would remove it, I ended up using goo-gone, and my fingernails to get it off. So at least it's looking ok.
Stock speed, stock voltage, Q9550 with Dark Knight 25 Mins of Prime95 I'm sitting around 51c on first 3 cores, and 46 on last.. little high for stock speed load temps
What's your VID ?
Guys, I've run many stress tests ("Prime95 small FFTs, OCCT, IntelBT, LinX"), I don't want to run all of theses tests whenever I try others settings. So, what are the useless tests among the last ones quoted ?
I've tried to try 5 times IBT again, with 1.225V and it has worked ! I've tried 1.2125V, and It have still worked. Afterward, I've run LinX 20 times, It has succeed. All of these tests have run on Windows 7 64. Weird, for 1.225V, even LinX has failed, I've just installed the drivers of the chipset, lan, and audio. Perhaps, I can still lower the vcore, but don't want to run tests again.
My news settings :
Vcore : 1.2125V (LLC still disabled, 1.18V idle, 1.16V load)
Vnb : 1.22V
Vfsb : 1.22V
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=676275
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/ssfhhhh-43ba524a88.bmp
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/dfghjds-90585c3799.bmp
http://www.noelshack.com/up/aaa/sdfg...7bea1e5094.jpg
Should I run OCCT or Prime to check well the stability ?
Try OCCT large data set test/ prime large test a couple of hours for MCH/CPU/Ram stability-Quote:
Originally Posted by lordmagnum
Memtest for MCH/Ram stability-
Quote:
Originally Posted by xguntherc
My L847C219 is doing 4.1Ghz with 1.29v load 24/7 on the UD3P (with 8GB installed too.) So it seems to be pretty solid, but my vid is 1.2375 so quite a bit higher than the one your friend got.
OCCT for 3H has succeeded, I has run on XP 32 because, sometime ago, I've run OCCT on W7 64 and It didn't find any unstability, while on XP 32, It did.Quote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
I think that installing the chipset drivers for Windows 7 has solved my problems.
Ok I just got mine at MC and I got the L847C219 that Tool got but, mine has a VID of 1.225 as you see in my screen shot below. I just plopped her in didn't have to clear my CMOS or anything but, I had to tweak the 8 multiplier that my Q9450 had to 8.5 and turned up the voltage one notch to 1.3v to be safe and saved and booted right into to windows!! What What!. I sold my old Q9450 for $120 on Ebay today. Very happy. I don't honestly think my MB can push any further then 480 but, I will mess around later after stability testing it. My temps are super low!
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9647/newtoy.png
nice one! enjoy it :DQuote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
Update for my Epeen. :p:
485 x 8.5 = 4122.87GHZ
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=677719
+ MY 2 4870 1GB Cards in crossfire @ 860 / 925 1.34v
+ 3DVantage = 17520 :up:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1361969
I just wonder if my P45 Chipset is bottle necking now or not :rofl:. I seen a few people in here that live around me, any one have a X48 Chipset to test with me? I seen a really good write up at some site where dude compared X48 with P45 and two 4870 cards and the P45 came out ahead but, I might be pushing the limit a little more then that guy was. I would have to find it again to see what he was clocked at with the cards and CPU.
Maybe I was wrong about my MB. I am on 490FSB and just tested 485 stable.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=677815
Edit: Take that back I don't think it was stable I think it was just acting stable. I honestly think this motherboard is holding me back at 480ish FSB wise. I fought with this thing that whole time changing this and tweaking that in the BIOS and it seemed as if the more I slowed down the motherboard the little more stable it would act.
well i was trying to tinker a little more... yea i know im at my max right now wit hthis mem. but i have to try..loljust wont do much of anything over 425fsb. putting mem at 850mhz so that s where im running at now. ran all the norm test passed fine. running prime95 now and it is only showing 1 core???? do i have a setting wrong or the wrong version for a C2Q?
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...ob/prime95.png
i thought i got a version of prime95 from here that worked for me. just dont know where i got it at and where i saved it..lol
yup i found it..lol
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...prime95C2Q.png
also heres a shot of LinX
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...00910-20AM.png
i dropped it down to 3.61ghz 425fsb no sence in burning up the mem i do have..lol
Hi All
Finally Got The PSU And Giga EP45
And Now Time To Test For Few Minute Take This:
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/682757.png
More Test Comming Soon :D
I've tried : Vcore 1.20V (instead of 1.2125), VTT 1.20V (insteal of 1.24V), 10 times of IBT (max memory), 20 times of Linx (max memory as well) have succeeded. I'm sure OCCT for 3h will succeed but I don't want to run it, don't wanna waste my time.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=683878
(idle : ~1.16V)
What is it with this motherboard spanking these quads so well? I have a more exspensive motherboard and can't even touch that much FSB. I will have to get one of these if these things push FSB like this man. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
This Mobo It's Amazing For My Quad:shocked:
Look That::eek:
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/684295.png
Yestrday Got The PSU And Run OC In First Time OC With That Mobo And I Can Say It's Awesome For Quad
My Old Mobo DFI P45 :shakes: Very Bad For Q9550 It's Never Up 515FSB :down:
Some Test And Some Record :D
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/i18168_20.09.jpg
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/i18167_9.969.jpg
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/i18166_9.108.jpg
And Next Run Benching:rolleyes:
impressive results VIVID :clap:
keep the hard work :up:
You on water ViVid ? or Phase ?
Tanx MonzaQuote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
Keep Hard Working This Week
Benching For Sure :up:
I'm On Water Chiller Hand Made:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Me And Myself Build It:rolleyes:
Temp IDLE Around -10~-15
And Load 10~25 ;)
Q9550 L847C133
Maximus II Formula
http://i29.tinypic.com/eba729.jpg
wOW Low VID angkies
It's Nice Chip Very Well :up:
i think now i need advice to choose motherboard that can running 500x8.5 fully stable on Q9550?
can u plz tell me?
thx
My pc rebooted after 2h of OCCT, so I set the vcore at 1.2075 (about) instead of 1.20V, but I don't know If the unstability was due to VTT or Vcore. I've got to carry out testing.
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P.Quote:
Originally Posted by angkies
Best high FSB quad board. Period. :up:
the problem is, in indonesia EP45 UD3R/UD3P already discontinue :(Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
i dont know why GIGABYTE has stop production this series..
Main focus is on P55 now lads, also don't think the UD5 will ever pop up in the shops :(
very nice ViVid post some pics of your water chiller plz that would be very niceQuote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
congrats on your results :up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
Excellent Vivid.:up: Glad to see you having great success with the giga board.
Tanx M8Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
Take Shot And Put Here Soon (Today)
:up:
Tanx OC Nub I'm Glad Too For Havning This Board:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
Just got this Q9550 E0 SLB8V on morning, planned to run F@H 24/7 so I'm completely satisfied with this clock, EP45-UD3R is phased-out => I think P5Q Turbo is not a bad choice.
Cooling: T.R.U.E. single 2000rpm fan.
FPO/Batch: L848C310
Pack date: 08/04/09
CoreTemp VID: 1.2125
Now running F@H 24/7 at 450*8.5 3825Mhz with 1.2125v in BIOS, CPUZ reported 1.208v. Load temps around 60-63°C
Some Pic About My Water Chiller For andressergio :D
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/t18209_IceD.jpg
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.p...1112009157.jpg
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.p...1112009156.jpg
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.p...1112009155.jpg
OHQuote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
MY
GOD
with that toy i would take my Q9650 to heaven :D
btw i invite you to see i beat my own records on the Q9650 thread just water, i just use fresh air from the window LOL
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...97802&page=102
no words just awesome mate :clap:
Tanx M8 Your Work So Great :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
I Know You Can Do Better 8K CPU Score Wait For Your Quad:cool:
thank you m8 :up: so yours ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
Awesome job Vivid. :up:
Anyone have the Q9550 Batch L847C130 are good for OC ?
Q9550 L847C133
GA-EP45 UD3P Rev 1.1 BIOS F9
MUSCLE POWER PC8500 2x2GB
TRUX BLACK REV.C w/ ICE COOL FAN 1600rpm PUSH ONLY
SILENCER 750w
http://i30.tinypic.com/2yox1lj.jpg
4.25 @ 1.24v :up:
Nice chip.
amazing chip there and pretty hot too... what were your ambient temps?Quote:
Originally Posted by angkies
Quite often the chips that clock high with low volts run warm too.Quote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
I know, but 73 peaks at 1.24v its like :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
True that. He is in Indonesia (hot!) and running an air cooler with a single medium RPM fan though too. I'd imagine pretty high ambient.Quote:
Originally Posted by monza1412
I've just got a new q9550 E0, and it seems to be the only one here which is manufactured '09, week 22 - it's L922B945. I'm running it with an antique GB P35-DS3P and TRUE. In preliminary testing it enjoys running wPrime 1024M @ undervolted 3.5GHz. However, it seems to have one very hot core compared to others. :confused: Vid looks like it's only 1.1875v. Pics:
http://koti.mbnet.fi/cuthalu/voorumi...kellottelu.jpg
Got my Q9550 SLB8V about a month and a bit ago
EP45-UD3P + 2x2GB PC2-8800 G.skill PI
Vid 1.125
4GHz LinX stable at 1.232v
Batch: L846C034
Pics soon....