ASUS 2900XT Benchin begins

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-13-2007, 05:48 AM
dinos22

kick arse :up:
09-13-2007, 06:00 AM
elmor

Blitz Extreme is fast, and with X38 we will get an additional boost. 36k next! :D
09-13-2007, 06:08 AM
dinos22

surprised he hasn't used his X38 board
maybe he was showing off the powa of the Blitz board first :D

extremely impressive and i am sure it would have been even nicer with high FSB chip......Jason need a 600MHz FSB to compete here heh

Elmor how much of a boost are we talking about or are you going to have to be quiet until 24th :D
09-13-2007, 06:20 AM
Trox

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

surprised he hasn't used his X38 board
maybe he was showing off the powa of the Blitz board first :D

extremely impressive and i am sure it would have been even nicer with high FSB chip......Jason need a 600MHz FSB to compete here heh

Elmor how much of a boost are we talking about or are you going to have to be quiet until 24th :D

I bet he is already benching on X38, is just time to see the results ^^.

Nice 35k Kinc, 36k soon
09-13-2007, 07:59 AM
Kinc

Thank you guys :)

there is more left in this cpu. Have to order new caps so i can mod this extreme for higher cpu clock freq. This chip can do about 460 fsb on blitz with high clock freq.

But know im of to china to visit gigabyte and test their x38 dq6 :)

/Kinc on cell
09-13-2007, 08:38 AM
Lane-k

Nice, congratz, 35K is history now..

Gigabyte.. hummm.. good test so..
09-13-2007, 08:57 AM
blossa

I hope you will have fun in China and that you give 3D06 a run with that chip. ;)

Congratz!!
09-13-2007, 09:57 AM
Gautam

:eek2: WTG Marcus!
09-13-2007, 10:40 AM
Marioace

jejej congrats marc ;)

the magic touch has returns :D
09-14-2007, 04:47 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1Day

Great benching :shocked: fantastic to see 35K go down - would love to see a bit more detail of the set up used. I know you can not share the GPU bios that the select few get but share the settings that you have on those cards. Clock speed / mem frequency and all importantly the voltages used. Surely those are not NDA as well. :clap: :clap: After you hard time in Germany I am pleased to see how strong you bounced back from that adversity.:yepp:

Cards are running only 1000/980MHz with 1.4Vgpu and default voltages for memory. Cpu is running on ~1.84V (need cap mod for it to scale with more voltage). Memory is running on 2.04V 1:2 7-6-5-15 1T TRFC=40. Perf lvl is at 7 for safe runs. Perf. lvl 6 works and will provide about 100 points for next runs.
09-14-2007, 05:10 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Cards are running only 1000/980MHz with 1.4Vgpu and default voltages for memory. Cpu is running on ~1.84V (need cap mod for it to scale with more voltage). Memory is running on 2.04V 1:2 7-6-5-15 1T TRFC=40. Perf lvl is at 7 for safe runs. Perf. lvl 6 works and will provide about 100 points for next runs.

what?
core at 1000 and you take down 35K :shocked:

can you PLS take that CPU of yours to china and give that Gigabyte board a hard time with monster vcore to see how it compares to Asus :clap:
09-14-2007, 06:10 PM
KTE

Marcus bro, congrats! :D

Fully deserving :clap:
09-14-2007, 11:49 PM
1Day

Thank you for your reply - much appreciated.
09-16-2007, 05:59 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

what?
core at 1000 and you take down 35K :shocked:

can you PLS take that CPU of yours to china and give that Gigabyte board a hard time with monster vcore to see how it compares to Asus :clap:

Yes the PCIE bandwidth is a big bottleneck so higher clocks dont help that much on p35.

Ive tested the cpu on the X38 DQ6 and I was stunned by how good it performs and clocks. 5500MHz for 05 wont be a problem and Crossfire on X38is very good. Will have som runs on that motherboard when I'm home again :D

I also have Maximus waiting at home wich is going to be tested very soon.
09-20-2007, 08:19 AM
Kinc

HD2900XT Crossfire runing 1120/960MHz on Maximus Formula X38 with 5.1GHz QX6850. X38 helps crossfire perf. alot!

http://www.kinc.se/03.png
09-20-2007, 08:44 AM
krullet

nicely done marcus..

i didnt think that the ati cards were this strong in 03
09-20-2007, 10:59 AM
Scimitar

50 MHz lower core clock than your published run yet all GPU limited tests are faster. Nice!
09-20-2007, 11:14 AM
elmor

So as expected nice boost in graphics demanding tests with X38 :) Can't wait to see what can be done in 05+06.

dinos22 and trox: No X38 for me yet...
09-20-2007, 02:45 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Ive tested the cpu on the X38 DQ6 and I was stunned by how good it performs and clocks. 5500MHz for 05 wont be a problem and Crossfire on X38is very good. Will have som runs on that motherboard when I'm home again :D

:cool:
LOL wonder why people haven't used previous gigabytes
09-20-2007, 02:46 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by elmor

So as expected nice boost in graphics demanding tests with X38 :) Can't wait to see what can be done in 05+06.

dinos22 and trox: No X38 for me yet...

won't be long after seeing what the potential is i'm sure
plus you're the crazy one around here with all that monster vcore you like to give your CPUs :p:
09-22-2007, 11:40 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by elmor

So as expected nice boost in graphics demanding tests with X38 :) Can't wait to see what can be done in 05+06.

I have tested 05 and there is a very nice boost in gt3 of about 6-9 fps depending on cpu clock. For 06 gt2 and gt3 gets a boost. Ofc not that big in gt2 but gt3 is around 5 fps!

I wont be running more on QX6850 now ;)
09-23-2007, 12:07 AM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I wont be running more on QX6850 now ;)

Sounds like somebody received something, a "new" York in his mail :p:
09-23-2007, 05:16 AM
rra

Well done on 35k great to see MMmm no more QX6850 this sounds worth waiting for enjoy .:D
09-25-2007, 07:08 AM
Kinc

Just a little test. Not very exciting, but the score is pretty good for the clock I think :)

http://www.kinc.se/york.png
09-25-2007, 07:23 AM
Slay0r

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Just a little test. Not very exciting, but the score is pretty good for the clock I think :)

http://www.kinc.se/york.png

hoho new toys :up:

/waits for 6g 3D
09-25-2007, 07:33 AM
harleybro

Very interesting when is the chip going to see some extreme cooling? :D
09-25-2007, 07:59 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by harleybro

Very interesting when is the chip going to see some extreme cooling? :D

This chip wont see any extreme cooling. Waiting for the "real" one :)
09-25-2007, 08:25 AM
Trox

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

This chip wont see any extreme cooling. Waiting for the "real" one :)

:D :D :D :D I want to see some action from you and see ruby on the top of the ORB.
I hope you get the "real" one soon.
09-25-2007, 12:19 PM
BenchZowner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

This chip wont see any extreme cooling. Waiting for the "real" one :)

Happy birthday ( a tad late, sorry ).
Hmm nice to see you having some new toys after the "Deutschland bad luck" :)
09-25-2007, 01:06 PM
Kane

1 Attachment(s)

Just about the same my Yorkfield. Air cooled, but seems like I hit a FSB wall on this CPU. Performance @ 3.2GHz pretty much equals an 3.4GHz Kentsfield.
09-25-2007, 09:43 PM
KTE

Nice :up:

Intel official pre-production bench results released around March gave a figure of 4569 2k6 CPU for a 3GHz Yorkfield - and that looks to be pretty much close.
09-26-2007, 04:45 PM
Kinc

First day with Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Pretty powerfull chip no doubt :D

http://kinc.se/37k.png

http://kinc.se/27k5.png

http://kinc.se/5600.png
09-26-2007, 04:54 PM
filmbot

:eek:

I see another round of battling between you guys coming soon :D
09-26-2007, 04:56 PM
Gautam

lol,...now that's what I call cheating. :D

That power is just siiiiicck. :slobber:

Hows it clock and whats the cold bug like?
09-26-2007, 04:57 PM
jimmyz

couple of new wr's , can't wait to see what the next few months will bring! thanks Kinc.
09-26-2007, 05:08 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

lol,...now that's what I call cheating. :D

That power is just siiiiicck. :slobber:

Hows it clock and whats the cold bug like?

There is alot left in this chip. It scales so good with voltage. But I have some power problem when running quad core. Might be my good old 850W Silverstone that is giving up, since the rigg just power down under the cpu test. 5300-5400 should be doable for quad.

Coldbug is around -140C in windows. But it won't post colder than -120C.

Gonna focus on 28k for 06 tomorrow.
09-26-2007, 05:16 PM
krullet

awsome marcus,

this is a really nice chip,

and the results they are crazy.., keep em coming
09-26-2007, 06:17 PM
dinos22

very nice

can you try pushing the FSB more with lower multi
09-26-2007, 06:43 PM
G H Z

Nice kinc, those results do look pretty sick :up:
09-26-2007, 06:55 PM
KTE

Great going kinc!

Around 467 x 12 and you'll break 8sec for sure. Maybe with even less. :D
09-26-2007, 08:47 PM
wa77ss

Wow.....I didn't realize these 45NM chips were so fast until now....!!
09-26-2007, 08:47 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

very nice

can you try pushing the FSB more with lower multi

Im gonna try a p35 board. Cant run high FSB for some reason over ~5GHz.
09-26-2007, 09:03 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Im gonna try a p35 board. Cant rub hihg FSB for some reason over ~5GHz.

interesting

looking forward to some figures :up:
09-26-2007, 11:29 PM
gandalfone

Great....gooood chip

Congratz

To futuremark 3d05.............."CPU Name Intel Pentium III 5439 MHz" :rofl:
09-27-2007, 12:14 AM
metro.cl

More Benchs please!!!!
09-27-2007, 12:19 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by metro.cl

More Benchs please!!!!

I think it is time for some 3dmark 01 again :)
09-27-2007, 12:35 AM
kemo

Congrats Kinc , what clocks you are running on the cards ?
09-27-2007, 12:58 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by kemo6600

Congrats Kinc , what clocks you are running on the cards ?

For 05 1160/980MHz.
For 06 1120/980MHz.
09-27-2007, 01:12 AM
Nordling

Congrats Kinc, What maximal frequency of the processor when all 4Core are active?
09-27-2007, 01:12 AM
MusicIsMyLife

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I think it is time for some 3dmark 01 again :)

:clap:

Congratulation on your new Scores. :up:
09-27-2007, 01:17 AM
hipro5

Holly Smokes man!....... :eek:
09-27-2007, 01:23 AM
Harshal

45nm Sweetness :D
Congrats and Good Luck for 28K, Kinc :)
09-27-2007, 01:33 AM
Zannema

Impressive clock Kinc, then new chip it's :shocked:
09-27-2007, 01:42 AM
M3kk

Tried OC with air/h2o ?
09-27-2007, 01:45 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3kk

Tried OC with air/h2o ?

Yes it can do ~4.15GHz quad core on air.

More info here: http://www.nordichardware.com/news,6863.html
09-27-2007, 02:47 AM
Slay0r

excellent scores out of that chip Kinc :eek: keep it up
09-27-2007, 03:42 AM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I think it is time for some 3dmark 01 again :)

very very good idea :D

congrats on teh results man ;)
09-27-2007, 03:56 AM
M3kk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Yes it can do ~4.15GHz quad core on air.

More info here: http://www.nordichardware.com/news,6863.html

Thanks , looking good :).
Its B1 or that "Stepping 4" reported by CPU-Z is the real stepping?
09-27-2007, 03:57 AM
Scimitar

Awesome job!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I think it is time for some 3dmark 01 again :)

Also try for 300k in AM3.
09-27-2007, 04:14 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3kk

Thanks , looking good :).
Its B1 or that "Stepping 4" reported by CPU-Z is the real stepping?

Yes it is B1. Same stepping as fugger used at IDF.
09-27-2007, 04:25 AM
GLENBOY

hiya kinc on a side note hows the asus maximus formula doing as i am torn between the formula ddr2 or ddr3 extreme one , any insight

cheers
09-27-2007, 04:35 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLENBOY

hiya kinc on a side note hows the asus maximus formula doing as i am torn between the formula ddr2 or ddr3 extreme one , any insight

cheers

It is great. Gives you 2.3V for the cpu and ALOT of volts for the rest of the things you might wanna play around with. It clocks the cpu and memory high. Very good intreface for setting memory timings. Cooling is great, I love that they have separated the heatpipes between mosfets and the chipset. And ofc Crossfire perf is the best I've seen.
09-27-2007, 04:50 AM
GLENBOY

you can't say fairer than that, what would you say the performance difference between the ddr3 and ddr2 board 1-2% something like that i fancy the extreme board but it would mean dumping by old friends corsair cas3's and sinking some serious dosh into some ddr3 ram which if the performance difference isn't massive between them the formula edition would be a more economic choice
09-27-2007, 04:53 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLENBOY

you can't say fairer than that, what would you say the performance difference between the ddr3 and ddr2 board 1-2% something like that i fancy the extreme board but it would mean dumping by old friends corsair cas3's and sinking some serious dosh into some ddr3 ram which if the performance difference isn't massive between them the formula edition would be a more economic choice

Yes perf difference between Micron DDR2 and DDR3 is pretty big. But I wouldnt say that it is worth spending the cash for a new set of DDR3 at this point if you have a pair of good DDR2. Unless you are running alot of 3DMark 05 ;) DDR3 rocks in 3DMark 05.
09-27-2007, 05:55 AM
GLENBOY

thanks kinc yes i think ddr3 is the way to go but currently its so darn expensive even for non hi performance ddr3 atm
09-27-2007, 06:26 AM
harleybro

Nice to see the "real one" storm right in. Congrats on the insane scores! :up:
09-27-2007, 06:55 AM
blossa

That CPU looks 'ok'. ;) Actually I am VERY impressed of how much you gained with it. I do think there are plenty of WRs that are going to be broken this autumn.
09-27-2007, 07:33 AM
dpa

The pi is just sick.. its no use for kentsfield anymore. Yorkfield here I come!!
09-27-2007, 08:30 AM
massman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I think it is time for some 3dmark 01 again :)

:D

That's the one bench I'm waiting for :D
09-27-2007, 09:52 AM
zakelwe

Holy Moly that 05 is impressive.

Excellent work Kinc, yes we all want to see what a 45nm does on 2001. Please spend a little time with this.

I would think 03 would be pretty good as well even with Ati not being favoured of course in this bench.

Hey, although this is a 3D benching area that SuperPi 2D test is pretty good also :up: Bet you were blown away by that session ?

:toast: :toast:

Regards

Andy
09-27-2007, 10:23 AM
nachthymnen

Wow!!!:eek:
Not bad start Kinc!!!:shocked: :clap:
Incredible scores!!!
You're not CPU limited!!:p:
Congratz!:clap:
09-27-2007, 10:31 AM
Godmaster

That's Xtreme Kinc!
Bravo! Very nice result & very nice sys
:clap: :clap:

Soon 28k + 300k + 7,9sec? :p:
09-27-2007, 10:46 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godmaster

That's Xtreme Kinc!
Bravo! Very nice result & very nice sys
:clap: :clap:

Soon 28k + 300k + 7,9sec? :p:

110k '01?:D
09-27-2007, 12:12 PM
Sampsa

Great scores Kinc! Looking forward for next weekend ;)

I wont' start new thread for this, but just started my own Radeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire benches with QX6850 and Asus Blitz Formula. CPU with dryice cooling and graphic cards with stock cooling, 3DMark06 23677. Managed to overtake Fugger and gprhellas:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3179247
09-27-2007, 12:16 PM
JacKz5o

Nice benching :D
09-27-2007, 12:48 PM
NH|Delph1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sampsa

Great scores Kinc! Looking forward for next weekend ;)

I wont' start new thread for this, but just started my own Radeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire benches with QX6850 and Asus Blitz Formula. CPU with dryice cooling and graphic cards with stock cooling, 3DMark06 23677. Managed to overtake Fugger and gprhellas:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3179247

One week to go, looking forward to shaking your hand :toast:

//Andreas
09-28-2007, 02:24 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachthymnen

Wow!!!:eek:
Not bad start Kinc!!!:shocked: :clap:
Incredible scores!!!
You're not CPU limited!!:p:
Congratz!:clap:

You can never get to much CPU perf. I want more :D
09-28-2007, 03:14 AM
dpa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

You can never get to much CPU perf. I want more :D

exactly!
09-28-2007, 12:45 PM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

You can never get to much CPU perf. I want more :D

Hehe:p:
For me it will be ok:D
Have you tried 3d'01 and Aquamark?
I'm curious to see the results:)
09-29-2007, 05:13 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachthymnen

Hehe:p:
For me it will be ok:D
Have you tried 3d'01 and Aquamark?
I'm curious to see the results:)

I wont be posting anymore for a while now but I see that I forgot to post the Aquamark score here. Done with 2900XT Crossfire.

http://www.kinc.se/300k.png
09-29-2007, 05:45 AM
eva2000

wow congrats Kinc 301k :eek:
09-29-2007, 05:53 AM
gandalfone

Over 300!!

:clap:

Great

was it 2 or 4 core??
Frequency??
voltage??
:D
09-29-2007, 06:02 AM
blossa

Really nice AM3!! :D Great!
09-29-2007, 06:28 AM
nachthymnen

Uh!!!:shocked:
301K!!!:eek:
Not bad!!!:D
09-29-2007, 07:23 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by gandalfone

Over 300!!

:clap:

Great

was it 2 or 4 core??
Frequency??
voltage??
:D

2 cores. 5400MHz. 1.82V.
09-29-2007, 08:01 AM
massman

No 3dmark01? :(
09-29-2007, 08:22 AM
harleybro

Would really love to see the 01. That AM3 score is Insane!!! Congrats on breaking 300K! :up:
09-29-2007, 12:22 PM
most_wanted

Congrats Kinc...IMPRESSIVE score with 2900XT :eek: :toast:
09-30-2007, 01:21 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by harleybro

Would really love to see the 01. That AM3 score is Insane!!! Congrats on breaking 300K! :up:

Have to wait until the release of the chip for more results.
09-30-2007, 01:25 AM
nachthymnen

Kinc, the '06 cpu score it's not a little bit "low"?
It's for the low FSB?:confused:
09-30-2007, 01:34 AM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachthymnen

Kinc, the '06 cpu score it's not a little bit "low"?
It's for the low FSB?:confused:

Because it is with ATI cards. With NV that would have been close to 8700.
09-30-2007, 02:12 AM
BeardyMan

ok marcus since you can't publish result, you can still hint us :D
how many digits for 01?
09-30-2007, 03:45 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Because it is with ATI cards. With NV that would have been close to 8700.

Uh, I didn't know this:rolleyes: :)
Tks for your explanation:)
09-30-2007, 12:13 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachthymnen

Uh, I didn't know this:rolleyes: :)
Tks for your explanation:)

It's kinda strange you think there should be no differnce since it is a cpu-test. The extra perf for NV came with 158.22 if I remeber correctly. The driver wich removed alot of cpu overhead for NV.
09-30-2007, 03:10 PM
Gautam

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

Have to wait until the release of the chip for more results.

Reckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard. ;) (No, I don't mean myself)
09-30-2007, 07:19 PM
KTE

Nice find Marcus! Interesting... choice of card affects CPU score. Not just a CPU score after all. :)
09-30-2007, 08:49 PM
Kinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Reckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard. ;) (No, I don't mean myself)

Just ignore it if you are running 65nm. The reason for these 3dmark scores to be published at this point at all is just to fill in some gaps on what this cpu can do in 3DMark. I myself were running QX6850 just last night on Striker Extreme for some Ultra SLI in 01 and 03. Will continue today. I had completly forgot what a pain in the ass 680i can be :)
10-01-2007, 12:33 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kinc

I myself were running QX6850 just last night on Striker Extreme for some Ultra SLI in 01 and 03. Will continue today. I had completly forgot what a pain in the ass 680i can be :)

:D :D
10-04-2007, 08:55 AM
Sampsa

Small improvement, 24283 points and spot #10 in 3DMark06 Hall of Fame:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3267528
10-04-2007, 09:01 AM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Reckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard. ;) (No, I don't mean myself)

That's always the case :)
Don't see why the scores should be removed that are absolutely great :D

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 PM.

XtremeSystems