oooo i just suddenly got confussed about HTT, that's your FSB times the HT multiplier right? as in 1x-5x?Quote:
Originally Posted by harpyboy
Printable View
oooo i just suddenly got confussed about HTT, that's your FSB times the HT multiplier right? as in 1x-5x?Quote:
Originally Posted by harpyboy
I have HTT3x(max. 360Mhz)=1080Mhz ?
Normally i've HTT3x(200Mhz)=600Mhz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boble76
Hi Boble is there a reason why your using the 8x multi? more stable ? Did you test out the other multis and dividers with the 3700+ any problems with any you tried?
Regards
The only reason was that I wanted to know how many Mhz thia "HTT" will go.
360-365Mhz seems to be max.
I've test some Multis-7x-8x-9x-10x-11x and dividers (133-150*-166-200 offcourse) and all of them works just fine.
11x250Mhz 1:1 2-2-2-5-7-0
10x305Mhz (166 divider)
9x334Mhz (150*divider) ;)
8x360Mhz (133 divider)
I am really surprised with this motherboard.It's stable and likes BH5. :wiggle:
Memtest86 doesn't support my new board (k8n diamond) and isn't giving me the correct errors that i should be getting, cos right now i'm running my hynix DDR400 (2 years old) at 240MHZ 1T!! and memtest sez i don't get any errors, but my games still crash like they would if i had mem errors
what other programs are there that are as good as memtest?
i used memtest cos you could boot up into dos with it...
Try MemTest for windows... I've got 1 stick of Twinmos 512mb with Winbond UTT on it... doesn't error in dos but errors like mad when I test it in windows...Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTheDinosaur
And the stick is definitely faulty, that's for sure ;)
Edit: I read this quote and I have the same problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett
I have a little problem:
I have redline UTT to 260 error free memtest. Always 2-2-2-5
And I have a 3200+ Spaw who do 2900mhz.
Have MSI NEO2 with 1.8mod bios
260*10 any problem with 200/200 divider
260*10 with 166/200 divider, no problem too
BUT
More than 260 (memory limit, with 3.5v) no boot with divider 166/200
275*10 (for example) dont boot with divider 166/200
What´s the problem? With others memories I can boot 2900 with 166/200, but they are not UTT, and they are 2.5-3-3
I need some help, please
some boards wont boot above 3.4-3.5v if you using a ddr booster (quite likely) then boot at 3.4v then after you get the post beep turn the voltage up. works fine up to 4v.
Murdok from msi-forum.de said the following:
The problem is the TRFC Timing Value drops from 14 to lower in 166 Memory divider. You can check it with A64 tweaker.
So if any bios guru could do something about it...
Wait for the new Neo2 bios to come out, it's very likely they are going to include advanced memory timing options in the bios, such as TRFC. :)
nope.. can't do anything until MSI releases new BIOS with these options.. which they will according to CD1986....Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett
try to boot with 200/200 divider or 100/200 divider.. which most likely will boot .. then in windows adjust ur HTT using clockgen .. and timing using A64T.... i chose to boot with 100/200 divider... this way i can set my HTT to max... and no need worri about setting them in clockgen....
multiplier is set to 3, I think. I have only IDE drives.Quote:
Originally Posted by harpyboy
I think, its my Ram. I will test it more. Ram is set to 166 in Bios, maybe I should try 133 ;)
Anyone know if thier is a beta version of this bios out, i've seen some screen shots of it, Im dieing to test it.
me too...Quote:
Originally Posted by 4rory
I have tried with A64 tweaker .31 and it´s all OK. I´m runing stable 286x10 183/200 divisor ---> 260 FSB 2-2-2 with my redline XP4000 @ 3.45v on booster (I´ll do viomod 3.3) apply with tweaker startup.
I set in bios divisor 100/200 :D
Thanks guys :toast:
And I wait new bios too :banana:
so where do i get a membooster? do you have to make one ureself?
you like solder it unto the mobo right?
dude.. this is wat u r looking for..Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTheDinosaur
link
Im having problems with higher fsb on my k8n2 and venice 3000+
My winchester 3000+ did 280 1:1, but my venice cant get over 265.
When i use the 166 devider i cant get past 230 on the memory.
When I am the 100 (1:2 ) devider i can get my htt to 340, so the cpu and the chipset doesnt seem to be the problem. Does my venice have a bad memory controller or it the problem bios related?
I have tried the 1,37mod, 1,8mod and the newest official 1,8 bios.
Thanks for any suggestions
My specs:
Msi K8N P2
Venice 3000+
2x Corsair xms 4000 512mb
XFX Geforce 6800le (16x1,6vp)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Espen
I have the same issues with my 3700 + and crucial ballistix. But other people have had no problem at all. MSI did say that the new cores are not fully surported in the current bios so i think that means certain configurations of dividers with memory is flakey. Hopefully these issues will be solved in the new bios.
many people has issues like that.. including myself...Quote:
Originally Posted by Espen
run it at max htt as u can... with 100 divider... boot into windows then use A64 tweaker to adjust ur timing... (u can find out ur RAM timing by boot first with 200 divider and running A64 tweaker)... then jus set ur ram timing according with the divider u wan..
this is something new... since i thought always that it was K8N neo2 plat giving the problem that when divider are used... trf and trcf lowered themselves that some RAM won't be able to support..... does K8N apply this timing accordiing to A64 mem controller ? since espen mentioned it works on his winnie.....
Yes but even setting trf and trcf back to 1:1 values doesnt stabalise some systems there is an issue with the new cores and some memory modules with the current bios. Im hoping its to do with the 1T 2T command not showing as ive heard setting it in bios is more stable than setting it in windows and i have been unable to set it in bios because of the missing function.
I have a question, is it not possible to get over 1.450 vcore without using the percentage boost?
I've been testing all night and have finally gotten to 2.8
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=22991
although my temp isn't very great (low 40's idle/high 40's load) with my vcore being around 1.536-1.552
any suggestions to get to 2.8 with a lower vcore would be appreciated
Recently I've flashed with the latest 1.8 BIOS.
I would like to know if I should enable/disable these following options:
- DRAM DRIVE STRENGTH
- SYSTEM BIOS CACHEABLE
- AGP SIDEBAND ADRESS
Thanks in advance,
hombre.
Drive strength - set to "normal" unless you are overclocking and have TCCD memory, in which case set it to "weak"Quote:
Originally Posted by Hombre
System bios cacheable - set to "disabled"
AGP Sideband address - usually ok to set as "enabled"