Printable View
GTX 280 - $649Quote:
Originally Posted by waway625
GTX 260 - $449
HD 4870 GDDR5 - $329
9900 GTX - $299
HD 4850 - $229
9800 GT - $199
The 9900s will make sure Nvidia has something to compete with ATI in their respective price ranges :) (Technically, if prices vary enough for both cards, you could see a GTX 280 going for as much as two 4870s)
Perkam
rofl... beating sli 8800gtx/9800gtx by 30% at that res is to slow? :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
and tbh cf/sli can suck my :banana::banana::banana::banana:, i dont need placebo fps just to make my e-peen longer...
Ummm....99% of Xtreme legends buying GTX will buy two for SLI (actually most already have two in SLI :p: ).Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
What are you talking about ?? :shrug:
Perkam
37 fps is a poor result for comfortable Crysis playing.
Suppose we won't manage to play Crysis normally using usual 24-inch monitor this year
waiting for radeon 5000 and geforce 300
yes for benching.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
if i would only bench i would buy tri/quad-sli to get highes score possible, but for gaming its a placebo as long as micro-stuttering is there.
If the frame rate doesnt drop below 25fps, its perfect..Quote:
Originally Posted by MAS
25fps in Crysis feels like 50 in COD4
y2kbos
it's likely that if average fps is 37 then min fps would be less than 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kbos
The reason for this is because of how awesome the motion blur in Crysis is. We sort of "define" motion as how blurry something was travelling past us :D
Proof? *waves $100* :DQuote:
Originally Posted by OBR
afaik, only one german site made claims of microstuttering and they didnt even show evidence it happened on nvidia cards. it's weird that it's an unspoken truth now lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=47683Quote:
Originally Posted by grimREEFER
it happens on all multigpu solutions that use AFR (so everything available on the market) :p:
and sure you dont hear anything about it, nv/ati ist that dump to say they have problems with multigpu solution. Who else beside benchers would buy them?
It's basically unnoticeable even when specifically looking for it, so it doesn't affect me at all as an SLI user myself. I really couldn't care much less about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by grimREEFER
By act one do you mean the first level? If so thats fairly impressive. Won't be enough to stay playable with a single card later in the game though :( The second half of the game can be two times slower in areas.Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Ron7aldo
@ ORB
Those comments are less than reassuring. I'd assume you'd expect CF 4870s to do better in most things then right? If Ati's drivers are up to snuff and AA performance is vastly improved, this is a bad sign for the GT200. I'm hoping that info is based on more than purely Crysis.
Agreed. Been using SLI 88 GTS 512s for 6 months now and honestly can't say I noticed until everyone made a big fuss about it. To say multi gpu doesn't help though is ignorant. It isn't a placebo... People blew this micro stuttering business way out of proportion.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by grimREEFER
micro-studdering is highly exagerated
Sshhhhh!! Nobody wants to hear that scheibe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectrobozo
Also, "Assault_Harbor" is the only one benchmark you should use that would most accurately represent gameplay in Crysis. The other ones don't have active AI etc.
imagine if does RV770 are indeed much faster than GT200 then ATI
sure will have the crown in everything because we all know Crossfire scales
much better than SLI so...
I think now AMD & ATI aliance is starting to give some juice :clap:
off course if all this news confirms because makes me nausea to think nvidia
as a 600$ card wich is slower than a cheaper, cooler and faster ATI...
ORB show some bench as some pics please...
Take the doubts off, do we have a beast or just one more card?
We can only hope!Quote:
Originally Posted by MrHydes
9900GTX = G92bQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
GTX 280 = D10U
GTX 280 is on June 17th, 9900 GTX is later on.
So correct me if I'm wrong but the 9900 series card and the 280/260 series card are 2 different and not the same? 9900 series a refresh of 8800 series card that just runs and oc higher? the 280/260 is the new different gen? the 280/260 coming out on 17th of June and 9900 in July? I'm totally confused...:confused:
Yes im totally confused aswellQuote:
Originally Posted by pcdrive
9900gtx = mid range card to compete with 4850/70Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleMonkey910
it's a die shrunk 9800gtx
G280 new gen.Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleMonkey910
9900GTX same (new gen) BUT runs cooler and you dont need 1000000wattt !!!:welcome:
9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.
YES,it IS :welcome:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hu1kamania
No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Milos-stancene
wrong, the 9900gtx is a g92b card, meaning it's just a shrunken 9800gtx, same transition as 7800gtx to 7900gtx reallyQuote:
Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR