C'mon GAR,give us some numbers plx!
Printable View
C'mon GAR,give us some numbers plx!
I would like to know numbers too, but am also interested in if there are any waterblocks currently available that fit the GTX280.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreak86
http://tcmagazine.com/comments.php?s...=20024&catid=2
take a look m8
The MCW60 fits everything! :D Even if it doesn't fit it would be easy to make a plate to make it fit and I'm sure swiftech will release a plate when its released...Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreak86
Yeah, I saw that a while back. Hopefully some stuff like this starts to hit the shelves soon after release.Quote:
Originally Posted by cptkoulis
give us numbers or give us death!
http://www.imagehost.ro/pict/08211400484c2168ad54b.jpg
Just saw this at VR-Zone, which got it from http://we.pcinlife.com/viewthread.php?tid=946259&page=1
Doesn't look as good as promised in 3D06. I only hope that real-world gaming benches pop-out soon :)
Lets start a collection to pay someone to break NDA. I'll donate $100.
I doubt that will ever happenQuote:
Originally Posted by natty
You should think you will win 100$ if you just wait 'till the 17th :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by natty
Is there any air cooling heatsinks already on the market that fits the GTX 280?
AFAIK no, there isn't any.Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac MM
really depends on the mounting holes, if they line up with anything from the past (like how the 8800gt lined up fairly well with the 7900gt but not 8800gtx), then perhaps you can get it to work, but it should have a pretty good stock cooler because of the large die size, I doubt you'll find better short of paying ~$50 for something like an hr 03 uber extreme gtx 280 edition or whatever thermalright plans to make
please, i had a hard enough time making it to the 7thQuote:
Originally Posted by Luka_Aveiro
I wont have any time to put on any graphs, or take crazy pictures, which i will soon, but i will tell you this, crysis is fully playable at 1920x1200 dx10 very high, but without AA, with AA its still playable but i choose without AA to have a smoother game....this is on vista x64 with my rig in my sig. cpu at 3.6ghz 450fsb, memory at 1:2 at 1800
meh, according to many reviews, without any aa dx10 crysis doesn't really tax your gfx all that much more than dx9 crysis, and playable is up to the user's discretion. you don't need graphs, numbers are just fine
if by not taxing it much more than DX9 High you mean 15FPS less then you would be right. i remember at CES 2008 Nvidia had a TRI-SLI demo with 3 8800 ultra's and ran crysis on very high at 1920x1200 with no AA and it was unplayable. most PC's can't handle crysis at 1920x1200 on DX9 high not to mention very high. im still waiting for official review thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by AliG
a review by[h] showed only a 2 FPS difference, but that was for medium, but I doubt medium ---> high would cause that big of a difference
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==
:up::clap: thanks man:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by GAR
P.S: I will always believe you :p:
to that website that posted thatQuote:
Originally Posted by AnXioZ
i am free to teach u some highschool maths and knock some sense in ure calculation..
y doesnt anybody noticed the percentages are way off
he is talking the difference between High and VERY high. which is allot bigger then 2FPS. you can run High DX9, High DX10 and VERY High DX10. the difference between high DX9 and High DX10 is about 3-5 FPS (my own testing) and the difference between High DX10 and VERY high DX10 is about 10-15FPS last time i checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by AliG
NDA lifts up 16.6! Not 17.6!
For 100 bucks i can tell everything ....
there is this one for water cooling, http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...p?t=188698:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
That's a waterblock, not a heatsink ( obviously )Quote:
Originally Posted by Atal
Japan IT Media website today brings us the CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH test result of NVIDIA next generation flagship -GeForce GTX 280 Graphics Card.
According to IT Media said, NVIDIA and an anonymous motherboard manufacturer hold a secret presentation to show the performance of GTX 280 outside the Computex 2008.
The visitors said that the demonstration room is very dim lighting. In addition to show the performance of GTX 280 graphics card, the secret presentation also shown parts of the motherboards which are compatible with GTX 280, they simply had been placed on the windowsill of the room.
IT Media site had the opportunity to run GPU-Z, CPU-Z and Crysis Benchmark on the GTX 280 demo system. From the photos, we can clearly see that NVIDIA GTX 280 presentation system used Intel Core 2 Quad four-core processor, the frequency is 2.66GHz, the Crysis Benchmark with 1920 x1200 VeryHigh settings indicated that the average fps of GTX 280 graphics card reached 36.81!
source