ATi is going to have a BIG problem if this is true, they won't have anything to counter Fermi GX2 even if they make a 5990 or something like that...
Printable View
ATi is going to have a BIG problem if this is true, they won't have anything to counter Fermi GX2 even if they make a 5990 or something like that...
Looks legit to me. In the one you posted the 5970 gets 78.3fps in FC2 at 1920x1200 with 8xAA. In the Nvidia slide it gets 77fps with the same settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadov
I'd love for it to be legit. But something is nagging at me, telling me that if it was. NV would have shipped some cards out by now for some preview results at sites.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
On the other hand even if it's the same as ATI cards or slightly better it's something I might buy depending on pwoer usage and size.
As another poster has already mentioned, just because the ATI results seem to be realistic, it doesnt mean that the fermi results are true as well. Wouldn't you expect the person that created this chart (assuming its fake), to at least use some of his brain and put down the correct numbers for the ATI cards?
All this does is build peoples' hopes so high only to get crushed into a thousand pieces when Fermi is released.
Of course that would be a possibility. But if that is the case, the user certainly did a good job mimicking the exact layout Nvidia uses for their official PR slides. It could really go either way, but my personal opinion would be that there is more evidence suggesting it is real than not.Quote:
Originally Posted by h0bbes
What I'd really like to know is more information on the user who originally posted these and what their connection with Nvidia is. Perhaps NDA has been breached?
So you have access to the real benchmarks, I see?Quote:
Originally Posted by kadozer
I just wonder about the prices. GeForce cards were always more expensive than equivalent Radeons, so if HD5890 costs 500 eur, GTX 360 will cost like 700 eur...
I'd love for it to be real as well. Unfortunately it's not. Although it's a new architecture, it was built around GPGPU. This isn't like the G80. I just don't see the performance jump in gaming to be this big. If it were, Nvidia would be boasting about it and not just its GPGPU performance which we already know is going to be great.
There's no connection. It was posted by a troll. Read page 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Anyone can make a slide like nvidia if given enough time, which this poster had.
Also, judging by your posts on this board and others, you said yourself Nvidia is not going to make the same mistake in pricing as last gen. With these kinds of performance numbers, I'd find it hard to believe Nvidia would price their cards that way. Heck, with these numbers they could price it at $700, which you said yourself was not going to happen.
Haha, no. Nvidia's PR slides: %50 bar length difference for %5 performance difference. Not like this. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by 003
Exactly alike? Lol. Go ahead and find some nvidia slides for us that look like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Are you suggesting that these results are similar to those of your "NDA source"?Quote:
What I'd really like to know is more information on the user who originally posted these and what their connection with Nvidia is. Perhaps NDA has been breached?
Believing these slides is most likely going to let you down when the real cards come out. If you had more realistic expectations for the card then you probably won't be let down by the actual results.Quote:
So you have access to the real benchmarks, I see?
nVidia's trick to stop people buying AMD?
It's just nvidia's way of putting off ppl buying ATI for upcoming holidays. :D
I dont think these are nvidia's slides though. Some troll dude made them.Quote:
Originally Posted by haylui
Doesn't matter fake or legit or trick,
the real thing we know it's faster than 5870, but how much faster
The only concern me is the price , release the dam price chart would you nvidia
Aw, shame some idiot made it. Oh well, here's wishful thinking. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by icecpu
*And then crickets from 003's corner.*
Here is a hint. If you had an NDA source and have seen the performance as you'd claimed then you wouldn't have to wonder if it was an NDA breach. You could tell us straight up if these numbers are real without putting your source at risk.
I had to lol @ this pic :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by LinkinParkBoy
And it's too big to fit in the trash can, lol.
Will be fun to bump this in a few months. I actually love saying I told you so.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
I think we should all bookmark/save his posts so we can run him out of these forums once and for all :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by kadozer
He is annoying lol, especially his claims to have a NDA source lol. Fermi could be great, but that won't validate his claim to having any kind of 2nd or 3rd hand insider information.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n
Guru3D Hilbert Hagedoorn obviously knew the slides are fake so why does he use a forum post by NVIDIA fanboy as news, obviously getting the hits is more important to him than credible news.
Maybe somebody should post at GURU3D forum some ATI HD 5890 slides with awesome performance beating GTX380 and see if Hilbert will use it as news.
The reason is, I believe the ATI fanboys deserve at least the same excitement as the NVIDIA fanboys are getting from the NVIDIA fake slides in this thread, so why not post some fakes for them.
If you only could... supply here in europe is anemic... and cards sell for 400-500€ :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by haylui
I was lucky that i scored my Powercolor LCS for only 420€... price gouging right now is insane... you pay the same price i did, for a plain vanilla HD5870.
If supply is still that low next year i might can sell my card for more then i bought it. :ROTF: