why I see the same video?:(
Printable View
why I see the same video?:(
Why would you assume that. It's completely undepended of each other and in some cases the CPU does OC better with low HT link, but same cant be said about low NB speed. Maybe the NB ran at the same speed, but it wouldnt have made a difference, pretty much irrelevant really:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
it is looping now, after a ati stream expert session
http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/6...ii260htkd6.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by clonez
3.64GHz, 22C Idle, it was cold today though, limit was 3.8 but that was at the same max HT as a 4200+ so probably the board not the CPU, CPU-z is misreading it as a 940, actually was a 920. Still waiting for a 940 and it's unlocked multiplier.
Nice to see the 920 clocking just as well.......thanks for the info :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by initialised
Google shopping came up with this, I couldn't get to the actual product page, price is equivalent to i7 920.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3209/...88772cff_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3096/...32954101_o.jpg
Link to vendor: http://www.google.co.uk/product_url?...hl=en&sa=title
[QUOTE
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...sman-/63-2.jpg
4 cores ... yey:)[/QUOTE]
I've looked at the video some times now especially the benching part.
The voltage set for 6,3Ghz is from what i've seen is 1,963 Volt.
When the guy sets 6,0Ghz you see shortly that he moves the mouse to core 0 and that he sets the multiplyer. the box where you can set -copy to all cores- is off. So in my view they only aply it to one core. For the move to 6,1Ghz he uses core 1 to get the clock.
All i what to say is get me some decent air benches
But nomather what i'll be getting a 940
The whole world just wants 1M Super Pi at around 3.5 or 3.8Ghz. Whoever posted that screen (@ initialised). Can you post a 1M Super pI, you have it on the desktop ! Thanks. ;)
Now we talking :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboDiv
I believe it's in the pics folder, I'll have to check the NDA first.Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboDiv
Cpu-z spefication in the picture says it's 920 :shrug: :D ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by initialised
Is this true?Quote:
Originally Posted by Koekerwauz_NL
Dont know, my AOD had this aweomse feature not to show when I selected a box or not. So it was a last minute show whether all cores were set or not:rolleyes: Seriously, my AOD on DFI board wouldnt like save anything. Couldnt even use ACC and NB clocking/Voltages:rolleyes:
Then again, BIOS is the way to go anyway:p:
[QUOTE=Koekerwauz_NL;3489963]Quote:Quote:
I've looked at the video some times now especially the benching part.
The voltage set for 6,3Ghz is from what i've seen is 1,963 Volt.
When the guy sets 6,0Ghz you see shortly that he moves the mouse to core 0 and that he sets the multiplyer. the box where you can set -copy to all cores- is off. So in my view they only aply it to one core. For the move to 6,1Ghz he uses core 1 to get the clock.
All i what to say is get me some decent air benches
But nomather what i'll be getting a 940
Holy suicidal destruct-o-core! :eek: 2v?!?? Why not just stick a molex connector in the back of the CPU socket? That's rediculous. :ROTF:
[QUOTE=T_Flight;3490140]We have been hearing about 1.9v OC's for a week now. the 3.9 on air was at 1.54 and somone that was there said the AMD guy stated that was well within Denebs safe limit. With that the 1.9 doesnt sound that rediculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koekerwauz_NL
Edit: Whats the deal with the quote buton all the sudden? broken?
check the video and see for your self.Quote:
Originally Posted by gallag
rechecked it myself it appears to be 2 cores are set
Attachment 90558
well yes he used core 0 for 6GHz and core 1 for the next step: 6,1GHz, would that mean 2 out of 4 cores where at +6Ghz?
And y did CPU-Z show the 6100Mhz after he set the core-1 multi to 6,1 GHz without changing the Core in cpu-z? or did he?
It always shows Core#0 at CPU-Z. so if he only changed Core-Multi-1 y should CPU-Z show Core#0 at 6,1GHz and not still 6,0GHz
I hope u get what i mean .. kinda hard to explain for me sry..
so maybe this was for all 4 cores? AOD bug?
Whats up with that core 3 voltage, 0.9V? 0.8V?
Ah, 800Mhz.
So can these Phenom II clock their cores independently or not?
This could be a very good thing, we could have 2 higher-clocked cores for "hard work" and 2 lower-clocked cores for backup. This way we could allow higher clocks\less heat\less consumption for the CPU and have a boost on single\dual-threaded applications.
Better that this is only having Cool'n'Quiet working independently for each core.
I would say thats a yes, The 65nm phenoms clock independently by multi's.Quote:
Originally Posted by ToTTenTranz
Get's out the damned scratchy wool mod Hat
Gentlemen;
Can we keep this friendly please and just enjoy AMD's new powerhouse whether it's 1,2 or 4 cores?
Let us all enjoy their accomplishment and learn about it as friends ok?
Yea, I know, that sounds corny as all hell but it's the truth.
Let's have some fun together and see what this beast has inside it.
Thanks for reading.
Sounds reasonable enough...this has been an exciting year with tech so far...next year might be just as fun...reasons why compition is good...Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Thank You Movieman! BTW, Enjoy the Boston show. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Way to go, please keep up the great work:clap: I've been following the thread and have gotten quite a bit out of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I'm looking forward to this launch, hopefully AMD can get some good stuff out and I can build another rig. :D