we need the RAM across the board to be 400mhz 3-3-3
I say this is a victory for AMD with tighter RAM it should be right up there with eh new c2ds in performance/clock.
Printable View
we need the RAM across the board to be 400mhz 3-3-3
I say this is a victory for AMD with tighter RAM it should be right up there with eh new c2ds in performance/clock.
3DMark06 CPU is not affected by memory bandwidth/latency. Faster memory is not going to make up for the clearly weaker K10 core.Quote:
Originally Posted by xlink
GP9600 3DMark06 10840 | Core 2300mhz , HT/NB Speed 1800mhzQuote:
Originally Posted by tictac
yes,the platforma already set to Unganed Mode
you can oc and try 3GHz test!even it's server platform
ok, Cinebench R10 tst coming soonQuote:
Originally Posted by accord99
on what platform? last time I checked K8 was memory sensative in general and I'm willing to bet that K10 will be even more so when you factor in the fact that it has twice the cores and as such needs twice the memory bandwidth.Quote:
Originally Posted by accord99
On every platform. A 3GHz Clovertown scores higher than a 2.93GHz Kentsfield on 3DMark06 CPU despite being paired with FB-DIMMs and about a 2.5% difference between DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 and DDR2-533 5-5-5-15 for a FX-62Quote:
Originally Posted by xlink
Cool, Cinebench 10 is not really affected by memory bandwith/timings so it will be a good test to see the pure 'grunt' or IPC of both cores. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
While you're at it, can you also test PCMark05? That'd be great. :up:
You're kidding right...? I'm not even going to try and write a rebuttal.Quote:
Originally Posted by xlink
LOL. And with a brand spanking new BIOS and new stepping, we will see it outperform Penryn and match Nehalem. :up: :rofl: :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129
Seriously though, I do believe Phenom will get a sizeable boost jumping up to DDR2-1066, probably around 5% on average, perhaps 10% in apps heavy on bandwith.
No probs, Yer you cant win either way huhQuote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon84
Please why is it so hard to keep AMD vs Intel threads unbiased, let go of your feelings and try to look it from an objective way. If forums were more objective rather than subjective, there would be a lot less flamebaiting.
Objecticism (or how you call it in english) + logic are my best friends, but that's a whole different story. :D
Here's a hint: don't ask yourself what do you think about it, compare it to the other products instead and comment on basis on that.
Thank you for that benchmark.Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
I assume this cpu is not an ES. What stepping is it? I heard the lower clocked modells are not B2's.
well atleast now there is a choice from amd. it may not be as quick as the high ends but it comes with a nice price for those who would rather have it. i hope this helps amd get back some of the mainstream market.
plus this will help me beat my cousins computer which is all i want te he he :D
isn't the mainstream where AMD makes all of it's profit now? You mean take back some of the enthusiast market?Quote:
Originally Posted by knightwolf654
AMD RD790 ref mobo shows B2,that's what i knowQuote:
Originally Posted by justapost
:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
Uhm strange so they start shipping B2's even at lower clocks. I thought the higher TDP for the 2.4 GHz version is an being an B1/BA issue.:shrug:
Just to clarify, you used an retail 9600 version at stock clock and not the 2.0 GHz ES sample overclocked to 2.3 GHz?:confused:
It's overclock up to 3 GHz ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by justapost
And B2 core is around since some time:
http://www.dailytech.com/Stumbling+i...rticle8804.htm
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3092Quote:
But why stop at BA or B1. The 2.5 GHz samples featured on AnandTech's second article are of the newest roadmapped spin; revision B2. When Shimpi made the inference that the 2.5 GHz Opterons would be the closest thing to Phenom, he was hardly exaggerating. AMD's current roadmaps peg the the B2 stepping launch for Opteron and Phenom as mid-Q4 2007.
:shrug:
okay，retail 9600 test coming soon。。。。Quote:
Originally Posted by justapost
i have said that ES is no peformance different compare with retail.
user ES just for OC.....3GHz is not easy to ....
^Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
It's that test i'm talking about. Here the NB Speed is at 1800 GHz. Was this just an CPUz issue? Then why does the latest Cinebench10 results still show 1600 GHz NB speed.
Also he talkes about using GP9600 instead of GP9000 (used for the 2.0 GHz ES in previous tests), so i thought maybe they have non ES also.
Yeah, but i read a news a week or so ago that B2 will be used for >=2.4GHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by nemrod
Unfortunately I do not find that news. :shrug:
No need for another run, i just want to know the stepping of the GP9600, if it's not the ES you used for all the benchmarks at 3.0 GHz. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
EDIT: Would be nice to compare it agains Q6600 (~pricing) as you seem to run the retail test already.:up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by expreview
Where can we download CPU-Z 1.41.4?
google his your friend but better ask directly to Franck:Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dower
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/member.php?u=8645