You're guys pushing like crazy :clap:
I will contribute my AIR scores hopefully this weekend but they will be far cry from what you can do with a bit of water and ice :D
Printable View
You're guys pushing like crazy :clap:
I will contribute my AIR scores hopefully this weekend but they will be far cry from what you can do with a bit of water and ice :D
Thanks you are not to shabby yourself:up::up:Quote:
Originally Posted by theoldtimer
It's an M4A79XTD EVO with BIOS 2001Quote:
Originally Posted by theoldtimer
I will probably replace it with a Crosshair IV or an 890FXA-UD5/7, but I need money for that.
I was wondering which one you were using. I was looking for some kind pattern in the turbo mode disabling problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse
Well, not super exciting, but my personal best. I finally broke 24000 with a single 5850
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/1090T/4.2-3000NB-3d06.jpg
I post this result just for giggles :ROTF:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13846669
Sorry for no SS but it was first run just to see 3D stability with high NB speed and it scored EXACTLY 22000 points! How awesome :D
That is pretty neat man :up:
Never been over 4ghz before, this is a pretty badass chip. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13858368
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4080/423x48701gb.jpg
Well I discovered that in Windows 7 I can set the multiplier higher than 20X in AOD (it wouldn't in XP)
I ran 3dmark06 at 4.3GHz (2.6NB), with 1 x 5870 at 1100/1280
Problem is I can't make the result public for some reason:
http://sites.google.com/site/apokalipse/3dmark06ORB.png
http://sites.google.com/site/apokali...mark06ORB2.png
Also, the CPU didn't throttle back to 1600MHz in the middle of the CPU tests like it was doing before.
It could just be because of the lower temps (it's night, plus I have a 45cm fan blowing on it from next to the window), but I'm not sure.
AMD 1090T
Total Score – 29,095
SM2.0 Score: 10,099
SM3.0 Score: 15,063
CPU Score: 8,168
AMD Phenom II 1090Tbe @ 4.730GHz
Asus Crosshair III Mobo
4GB (2GBx2) Corsair GT DDR3 @ 1760MHz
2X ATI 4870X2’s CrossfireX @ 795/1005
Catalyst 9.12 (hot-fix) Windows Vista 32-bit
I submitted the score to the Orb but it won’t let me make it public, I’ve been having that trouble lately.:shrug: I did get a SS this time though.:up:
We both are having the same problem with the Orb Apokalipse:(
Chilled water cooling CPU only
http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/i...corethuban.jpg
Holy popcorn old, that is one awesome score man!
Cant wait to pop my second 5870 in again to run some 06. I'm waiting for a connector between both waterblocks as the difference between the pci-e slots is different on this board, so i need a different size connector.
Come on Zeus! Throw the best one in there and clock the heck out of it...
I just wanna see the GPU scores to be honest.
awsome run there man:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by theoldtimer
Thanks Zeus, yeah I’d like to see your numbers in 06 with two of the 5870’s. I need to upgrade my 4870x2’s soon as I’m testing under somewhat of a handicap compared to the 5870 and 5970’s.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Here's a preety close compare for you guys. Stock clocks.
http://chew.ln2cooling.com/qdig-file...a-ud7%2010.jpg
you continue to amaze.......thats awsome!Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
What cooling were you using for the CPU to get it to 4.7GHz?Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Thanks chew*, gives me something to shoot for. No way i will see 4.7G though. I bet that was single stage cooling,no?
single stage ancient phase, with this chip likely comparable to oldtimers water chiller which likely has more capacity. I'm probably colder off load but equivalent at load. I'ts only tuned for 150w heat dump, i'm easily at 300w heat dump atm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse
yeah, I didn't think it would have been heaps better than a good watercooling system. Otherwise you would have probably got 5GHz+
What could you get if temperatures were ~20ºC idle, ~30ºC load?
That's about what I get with my 1090T, but my board is holding me back.
I can probably valid over 5 gig and maybe a pi 1m on 1 core but thats about it, I just find it kinda pointless to show testing on that the more cores that are added.Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse
at 30C i am hitting like 4387 through 06.
Very close to 26K single card:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...singlecard.png
4.5G 3d looks promising for plain water. :)
yah not bad at all, I imagine if i had more capacity and a better block I could do better.....2x 120mm thin rad is not enough for these chips, seems to me capacity is what will help these chips out alot more.
I tried XP again and got this:
http://sites.google.com/site/apokalipse/3dmark06.PNG
But it wouldn't submit:
http://sites.google.com/site/apokali...sionfailed.PNG
I've saved the .3dr file so I hope I can submit it later
*edit*
well it wouldn't submit at all, so I ran again this time at 4389MHz
http://sites.google.com/site/apokalipse/25k.PNG
It was submited to ORB, but still can't make it public.
http://sites.google.com/site/apokalipse/25KORB1.PNG
http://sites.google.com/site/apokalipse/25KORB2.PNG
Ahh, bit higher nothing major on video this time though
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7q-QSQsCvA
heres the compare
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13869681