http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/78d...3c6b85866d.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/view/9168c50...c3d1855ae6.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by cezar
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/03d...e5f0d19fe0.jpg
Several sources have stated that 10-23-12 is the official Vishera announcement day in the U.S. We will know soon as I expect all the major PC hardware review sites had their benching done a week or more ago.
I'm expecting ~10-15% improvement over Zambezi just as AMD's roadmap shows. That's a decent step forward in performance without a node drop and with the FX-8350 priced right around $200 USD in the Colonies, Vishera should be a good time for many.
welcome amdforme lol nice name
Depending on reviews I will be getting a Vishera.
Any reason to get an 8350 over an 8320?
Danke, Danke ! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by tbone8ty
Too early to know. The first shipments may be well binned meaning potentially less ability to OC the 8320, but that's purely speculation until enough people test both models to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by sequoia464
I heard someone say somewhere that AMD FX "Bulldozer" are binned through a combo of worst core and TDP. While this shouldn't be taken for fact...Quote:
Originally Posted by sequoia464
It would make sense to me, since worst cores can be as bad as Phenom II clock wise, and the better cores on a die can sometimes reach well over 5 GHz air/8 GHz LN2.
There is a lot of inconsistency in the CPUs, most blame it on the GloFo 32nm process, but in reality it is a combo of complex/radically new design and the process...
Which is why intel has a tick/tock strategy, make sure the old one works before changing things completely...
Also related to NVIDIA's problems had with GTX 400 series.
i will probably be getting the 8350
because my 8120 the 7th or 8th core always seems to fail first
I see on my slide date is 12:00 22 Oct 2012. They don't left ant info about timezone.Quote:
Originally Posted by cezar
Thanks :) So if it's Texas then it will be 2 AM, October 23 in Japan, and 7 PM, October 22 in Europe - nice :)Quote:
Originally Posted by hiepgia
Just a few more hours .......:D
4 more hours entering 23/10/2012.
In Europe NDA lifts 10/23 6:00 am, and now is 10/22 3 pm, still 15 hours of waiting
The natives are getting anxious... :up:
GMT+8 here, 30 minutes more to 23rd-Oct-2012Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
time t-12 hours till launch, i can tell you what you want to know about, no screenies, but i have 8350 tested
power consumption vs 8150?Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Cinebench at max stable (3hrs+ prime95 blend) clocks
tbone8ty power consumption vs 8150?
+1
i have "review kit" from AMD, i think with good binned cpu by AMD. Power consumption is on par/few watts higher then 8150 in prime95. Overclocking on same voltage level as 8150 is 100 Mhz better.
That kind of destroys AMD's hoped for 15% power reduction claims, or am I missing something?Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
15% power reduction Or 15 % better performance clock to clock.Quote:
Originally Posted by sequoia464
Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
Any power consumption advertised by AMD is going to be taken at Stock obviously
Once OCed, its probably just as bad (if not worse) than an 8150. Look at Trinity when its loaded (CPU only), same process...
There is nothing said about 15 percents better power consumption, but 15 percents better efficiency. And it is better, perf/watt ratio is better (10 percents)
Welcome :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDforME
You are from Germany? (Judging from that "Danke")