I understand your point. I guess I'd just refer you to your sig and replace the word "Physics" with "HTT". :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Flox
Printable View
I understand your point. I guess I'd just refer you to your sig and replace the word "Physics" with "HTT". :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Flox
yeah but that under reports vdimm in windows... and i test in memtest86+ v1.26 first before booting into windows hehQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
i came, i saw, and it didn't boot....
HI
mi Englisg are poor
i have lan party nf3 ut 250gB
AND....
have athlon64 2800+ Newcastle
my HTT only stable at 240 mhz,
my memos --> Corsair XMS3200c2
PSU buttferfly 480 watts
try to overclock but worst results
anyone can help me?
i would say get a stronger psu. i had that POS and it was terrible. the 12v line would drop under load like .5v. and that was only running a 2400xp, infinity,fx5200 and one hdd. id say get a quality psu.
Do you get the "detecting array" message or is it no post at all?Quote:
Originally Posted by p4z1f1st
Why do you need the Booster if the Beta BIOS supposedly will go 4.0v with a 3.3 rail mod?Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
They're not trying to impress you. There are plenty of high power A64 that do not run 1:1. And aside from that, learing about your board/chip capabilities is a good thing. It's called testing, maybe you should try some.Quote:
Originally Posted by flox
I get that message whenever I try and go above 209Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
always no boot.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Ehehe finished a Superpi at 340FSB 1:1 with bad result.
But it worked =)
*Edit added one with better timings and 294FSB *
Nice going - maybe Flox will be happy with the 1:1 part. :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubermann
Little hard to read the text on your attachment, but the timings look a little loose. ;)
A little ? They are very loose (3-4-4-8) and its T2.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyBeard
But funny =)
(floxs girls coming to me now tihihihi)
Might be, but hey, it's running 340!! :slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyBear
I wouldn't mind running loose timings at 340, it still gives enough bandwidth for 2 computers! :D
Now let's hope it's enough to satisfy Flox. :D
Nice going Uber! :toast:
A bug ?
If i put anything else then "1" at Write cas latency in bios it wont boot, and i have to reset cmos.
Looking at bigtoes bios suggestion for running this ram stable at 600 wont work on this comp.
Tried beta and "release" bios.
Was 294 still @2T?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubermann
What is the 2T setting? What is the performance difference. But what I read is you should enable it only if you have a CG stepping 64-Bit. Can someone enlighten me on this setting?
CPC=enable(1t) or Disable(2t) 2t is slower clock per clock, but in alot of cases allows for greater overclock. usually using 1t can be a real hold up when OCing 2x512 modules(but some have had succeded with 2x512+1t)Quote:
Originally Posted by ugp
it also greatly reduces bandwith effecency on A64
if you have a CO rev CPU you may only use CPC enable(1T) because a CO's memory controller doesnt support CPC disable(2T).
If you have a CG rev CPU you may use either 1t or 2t. :cool:
-Jess-
294 is with 1T
2T sucks big time =)
Uber, what's the max stable with your OCZ plat.rev2 with 1T?
With stable i mean SuperPi 1M or PiFast stable.
I'm gonna get me some and hope to run 315x8 1:1 3-4-4-10 timings. :cool:
Same here. I got some more testing and stuff to do but if anyone gets a chance, please put in bug forum of DFI-street :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ubermann
Thanks mikee (going back to making memory sinks for EB-3700 and TCCD)
Got 250 x 10 @ 3.1 Vdimm in memtest all day. (BH-5 2-2-2-6), got some settings to lay out later....
It works with setting it to "auto" or "1".
Sitting and doing prime, really boring but im currently able to boot windows with 310FSB 6multi , CPC on and Cas 2.5 and 4837m/sec with sandra.
Only changing 1 setting every boot now, think i booted windows 200 times with this board already.
Just a quick question on this motherboard. I just received mine. I read in a few posts back they dfi was delaying the mobo a bit to add better components. Im not sure if it said anything in particular about capacitors, but I was wondering if they replaced caps. Mine has generic caps all around the socket. Did DFI issue a new board with rubicon caps? Thanks, cant wait to get to the fun
KGZ - chemi-cons. Thats what they are & there better or as good than rubicons ( atleast I was told they where). This is whats on my board anyway. If yours is diff let us know. You have to look real close to see the markings.
Jess1313
Somthing more i figured out, Dram drive strenght and Write cas latency has something to do with each other.Quote:
Originally Posted by mad mikee
If they are set at some setting you get dectecting drive array.
But what that setting is i dont really know yet.
Like level 2 drive and write cas 1 wont boot.
Anyone know anything about this ?
Dont remember if 5x multi put autodivider.
CPC Off
3-4-4 timings
Dram 3.1V
360FSB 1:1
Stable enought for running paint.exe =)