And it won't matter either...
Printable View
http://www.redquasar.com/forum.php?m...hread&tid=7234Quote:
Broke the news : 40% performance increase through the brush bios (As for you Believe it or not anyway, I believe)
Thanks to AnarchX from 3DCenter krew. Great digger !
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/32b4c0c...8b31f1693b.jpg
Press kit ?
I'd seen the pic before (and yeah, probably press kit since I think w1zzard probably has his now from the sound of it), but this line I just saw elsewhere after you had posted it...
"Broke the news: 40% performance increase through the brush bios "
over original GK104 which was within 5% of the 7970 previously.
What is that supposed to mean? A new BIOS boosted the perf. from prior numbers?
Huh...
EDIT And yeah, that's a very good find.
As I said in another thread:
Maybe that 40% has to do with better OC that was made possible by a better fan control?
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show....php?p=2535013
Kyle from [H] got the fact wrong that GTX 680 will be slower than Radeon HD 7970 in 3DMark 11. I think Kyle later soon will finish upcoming GTX 680 review got the impression that GTX 680 is faster than Radeon HD 7970 and will switch to GTX 680 from Radeon HD 7970.
PHK got the first benchmark numbers in for 3DMark11 confirmed GTX 680 will be faster than Radeon HD 7970.
680-> X3200~3300
(7970)-> X2700~2800
670Ti -> X2500~2600
(7950) -> X2200~2300
PHK also mentioned that GTX 680 has max TDP 195W and fan will have low noise.
Impressive if true. It will make for a very interesting round if these are on the money.
PHK doesnt say that..
does it look like PHK to you
http://bbs.expreview.com/forum.php?m...&fromuid=57445
And there my hopings to be able to buy a new GPU for 300 EUR or so or less goes finally down the drain haha, not even the slower model would be priced that low.... 350~380 EUR / $400 USD probably more like...
Based on these numbers I'd expect something like:
GTX 670 Ti ~$399 MSRP
GTX 680 499~$549 MSRP
Your rig is kinda weak then.
Attachment 124474
Not sure when 4.4ghz 2600k became weak, but uh, sure. Edit and that is with non bench settings, just normal gaming quality in driver. I am sure your extra cores provide more in 3dmark11 and the Mhz, not to mention high memory speed. Don't know what I would get with bench settings but.... my numbers seem in line with that rumor as my stock 7970 gave me the same thing. Oc was 1240c and 1550m.
low stock + better than 7970 = $699
haha
Don't feel bad Goldentiger. The six core does help and Simby score is unusually high for that speed. It actually third in the world overall on HWBOT.
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark11_...=0#interval=20
Not to mention atleast in terms of 3dmark 2011 xtreme score, it probably the most higher efficient compared to anyone else on the list in terms of score and speed of GPU AND CPU.
Your score is more inline with everyone else out there.
Has there been any new rumors about if it will stick to the 2 display limit of current individual Nvidia cards?