s7e9h3n,
Thanks as always for posting your "previews" here. You go out of your way to show us what many of us would otherwise not get a chance at seeing and your findings are always appreciated! :)
Printable View
s7e9h3n,
Thanks as always for posting your "previews" here. You go out of your way to show us what many of us would otherwise not get a chance at seeing and your findings are always appreciated! :)
agreed. i would like to know too ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
As expected this is JH-E6 chip (dual-core with disabled core), not a classic SH8 single core.
Where did you find that information, its intriguing.
God damn you people are asshats. What is the matter with you. Look under Stevens name. He is an XIP. He is an XIP because he brings us exclusive first looks of upcoming AMD cpu's and runs these chips to the max so that we can see how well these chips will clock. And what does he get for all his troubles? People telling him how :banana::banana::banana::banana:ty his results are. I'm not saying you have to say something positive but how about something constructive. If you have nothing constructive to say then how about you take your hands off the keyboard.
I second that, bigtime! Stephen has access to these chips wayy before we can buy 'em(he brought us the orignal Sandy and Venice cores), and then he catches flak for it. I'm not saying every post in the thread needs to be filled with glowing adoration for stephen and his chips, but IMO each member SHOULD tell him thanks for taking time out of his day to run these tests just for us. Then feel free to make any constructive comments or comparisons you wish.Quote:
Originally Posted by chunkylover77
As for negative comments, go ahead and trash his chip all you want if you can post a verified cpu-z screen of YOUR E6 San Diego running at over 3.5 Ghz. Oh wait, you don't have one, and neither does anyone else. That's the entire point of this thread.
@Stephen - Thanks for posting your results up for us man. I hope you will continue to share all of this advanced info with us in the future. You rock! :toast:
@All the flamers, trolls, and thread crappers that have posted here: You all suck at life and should probably just give up.
Sorry if this was harsh, but ppl just need to be smarter about posting here. Here's a smiley to make it all better. :hump:
Damn. Wrong one. Lets try this: :)
Thanks for your hard work previewing the E6 San Diego, s7e9h3n. Setting up phase cooling just for your xs fellowship is a true gift.
Hint: Now, if someone could do a full preview of the dual-core s939 Opteron, that would be awesome. ;) :toast:
s7e9h3n, what was you 24/7 stable Mhz and voltage with this SD4000+? Thanks.
Thanks so much for the preview, I hope these cores don't end up in the Opteron 1xx line.....
I would like to update this thread, here in a few days or in the following week, I will have this cpu and i will be testing it and using it on Water for benching and 24/7 purposes, I believe the cooling I will be using I believe Stephen hasnt tried yet.
Hello,
What a funny thread this has turned out to be. At first it was constructive criticism/comments, then some people got brave and started posting things that do not belong on any hobby-ist forum, then s7ephen got pissed (not uncalled for , considering the posts), the certain unconstructive people were in a way hushed and everyone seeing s7ephen can potentially get mad started posting super-nice and/or sweet words of encouragement.:rolleyes:
Had quite a nice laugh actually, anyways nice results with not that overclockable of a cpu, but the only way well see its potential is when it gets naked...:toast:
BTW: S7ephen you seem to have quite many connections with computer hardware companies: could you explain this to me, http://fab51.com/cpu/guide/opn-s754.html , are we to expect SD cores on s754 as well?:fact:
Thanks
[ZIZI]
I have to admit I was a bit sceptical when I saw that line in your signature.Quote:
Originally Posted in [ZIZI]'s signature
Kingston ValueRam BH-6@276 2-2-2-6 @3.2 v
I assume that ram was tested in this thread here?
Your attachment from that thread.
In case you haven't heard, A64 memcontroller cannot handle non-integer multipliers. Using one leads to a nasty lower-than-would-appear memory frequency. This is because A64 on die memctrl forms the mem freq using a formula that does not allow non-integer multipliers/dividers. If a half multiplier is used, the final mem divider is the next integer larger than the divider shown in cpu-z mem tab.
Not a single software out there is able to notice this... :(
->
Your BH-6 did not actually run @ 268MHz (nor 276 like your sig says) 3.2V but 254.9MHz:
Your CPU MHz:
9.5 x 268.33MHz = 2549MHz
Your DRAM freq:
2549MHz / 10 = 254.9MHz
□
@ largon: thanks for the info, i never knew that before. i try to stay away from non-integer multi's, but now i have a reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
Well largon, i have noticed this when overclocking with clockgen, but it wouldnt show up all the time, it is quite a nasty bug...and no that is not the one i am refering to...to help sooth your sceptical mind :D i will dig up the ol; bh-6 and do some benching (lost every single piece of data in a crazy power surge to the hard drive...my fault) ill try and post the results as soon as i have time (its exam time at my university), but frankly i dont even see it as an achievement, it is a single sided 256mb stick in single channel.......not exactly the toughest memory to overclock...:fact:
Thanks
[ZIZI]