Quote:
Originally Posted by //mAr
like I said earlier, too soon to tell.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by //mAr
like I said earlier, too soon to tell.
i bought the Plain Twinmos PC3200 256MB on october
but they dont have that 2 dimple
only manage to run it @ 234MHz 2.5-3-3-11 1T with 2.5V
3.2V still no go.. maybe i should try 3.5V that time... my bad :slap:
Week 9 2004 Chip :(
Better get the newer Chip :toast:
tictac it seems that newer stepping have the UTT chips!Quote:
Originally Posted by tictac
for all you intel guys my DIMMs were tested today over hipro5's house and im sure he will post real soon :D
how does bandwidth compare at stock speeds between bh-x and ch-x? anybody know?
not where i liveQuote:
Originally Posted by MrQ3W
2 Dimple = Winbond Chip :)
by the way the mems got burned for 8 hourse memtest#5 @3.5V and they remained unusually cool (tornado fan on them).They don't get hot at all!
How about 3.8V :)
Dare to try? :slap:
lol ... booster got crazy ... was testing them for 4 hours at 4V ... nothing happend, (RAM still ok ... even then mem was absolutely cool!!!)Quote:
Originally Posted by tictac
although above 3.5V-3.6V nothing better happens!
(you should see the look in my face when i saw 4.0 in the boosters led)
If it just stuck there below 250MHz
then it is CH5 then :(
Sounds like a bad excuse to stay spoiled.Quote:
Originally Posted by Playful_Buffalo
Working your way towards something you want is so much more satisfying and rewarding to boot.
Anyway back on topic does anyone know why they are called Winbond UTT, are these just relabeled CH-5 or what?
sounds alot like my CH-5....Quote:
Originally Posted by esdee
Tictac, my Ch-5 scaled pretty well. Its also one of the first batches 0321 or so. It did 255mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.4v but at 258 it needed 3.8v!
some kind of magical wall for Ch-5 :(
Winbond UTT.... those are just blank dies. Ch-5 is tested to 200mhz, UTT is untested so its like CH-X.... u can have crap chips in them and also good ones..
@TIC TAC
thats funny i also have 2 256mb sticks of the simple pc3200 twinmos
and mine maxed out at exactly same speed as yours 234 - 2,5-3-3-8
done on simple 2,8v
Burn them in, I had 2x 256mb sticks that did 250ish 2.5-3-3-8 after being run w. 2.9V for about 6 months. Those were the ones sold during the latter 2003 of course, after winbond and before mtec I think.
good new tictac ... they are not ch5, they can do 2-2-2-5 on intel with pretty high FSB 1:1... i must be doing smth wrong on a64 ...Quote:
Originally Posted by tictac
I know that this has already been asked but would you mind sharing the info written on those chips in the KVR, such as the date and the Kingston codes? I have a 2x256 set of KVR with chips that look very much like the M.tec, including the dimples and other physical markings and am wondering if they are the right ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by //mAr
They are still in the box and I would prefer to not open them if they are anything other than these Winbond chips.
Anybody have this information? I am not at home or I would post the information from the set that I have. I do remember that they have a "U" near or at the end of the last line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Yea and there useing "Brainpower 808" PCB's.. I'm
gonna try a stick too :D
EDIT: @//mAr... Thanks for the link... http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/T.../SpeedPremium/
EDIT#2 @ trans am...Just ordered one from your link ;)
i got some 50D chips too :)
0409D
TMD7608F8EF50D
it wont boot up at 200 fsb 2-2-2-5 @ 2.8v :( it can do 237 with 2.5-3-3-7 timings 2.8v, (cpu cooler stop me)
someone help me to get 2-2-2-5 timings @ 200 ? i have a 80mm fan blowing some fresh air over it.
edit: for everyday use i have 2-3-3-6 timings @ 2.65 or 2,7v
Anyone willing to try the 512 stick? Sounds pretty tempting.
Could it be because you on intel and everyone whos been posting these good results is on amd?Quote:
Originally Posted by the_n00b<:o)
That and i thought intel liked cas 2.5 better than 2 anyway...
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSANTHRAX
Quote:
Originally Posted by esdee
i think he needs more volts :)
yeah TwinMOS memory need proper burn in for quite sometimes to perform well :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by MrQ3W
they are not properly burnin in factory :rolleyes: :slap:
hipro used his DDR maximizer, i hope it hasn't anything to do with the fact i was using a booster, because i might have to visit his labs with my black uniform midnight and steal it! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
gonna check later.. but heres the cpu-z spd table..Quote:
Originally Posted by µnrealneo²
maybe I will buy a booster, but I dont know if it works on my is7-e
:stick:
does it do 2-3-2-5 at 200mhz?
the 3 being ras-cas.
Hi,
Just read this thread and i have unearthed my old twinmos 256mb chips. Stepping is:
03254
TMD7608F8E50D
Ill test them a little later, but they do have the two dimples on each chip. does that mean they are winbond?