nice
Printable View
nice
As I promised here’s a picture of the “odd one” :)
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7...sizeru6.th.jpg
Unfortunately I simply can not find enough time to play with it right now (Christmas death lines are killing me). I’ve only plug it to check out compatibility. Motherboard did recognized him as 2.5 GHz part with correct name 4800, although you can’t choose half multi in the BIOS. The multi that BIOS is setting is 12x.
Also I do have here one Windsor 4600, but as I say I don’t have tame to run any of those Brisbanes on 2.4 GHz to compare them with Windsor. To all mine knowledge AMD only improved C1 state, and the rest of the CPU is intact from the performance enhancements point of view. So I didn’t bother wasting precious time on that… maybe next week.
You're supposed to block some of those numbers out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
Perkam
Hi,
please start a superpi 1m run :)
Did on the 5000+, but then again, it’s not like it’s stolen, or some NDA engineering sample. So I decided to go on naked… there’s nothing to be a shame of :DQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
NEdjo, comon man, we can see you're online! photoshop taking awhile? jk :p keep the results coming!
Sorry guys, nothing more till the next week. Don’t’ think that 3DMark 06 is particularly interested. ‘cos I’ve used 1950Pro, which is not the champion of speed.
Although it’s interesting to see that in WinRAR Windsor 2.4 GHz beats Brisbane 2.6 GHz! Reason is that in case of Windsor memory I working in full 800MHz, and in case of Brisbane 740MHz. WinRAR is so memory dependent.
Photoshop, DivX, FarCray is irrelevant ‘cos I use mine own bench material, so is not replicable…
You’ve seen most important stuff – OC, and the lowest working, and fully stable voltage on default frequency.
you have a multimeter to test that vcore as some have already suggested? seems weird that someone who gets their hands on this chip would only have air cooling available to them :(
good morning and... NEXT WEEK?!?!?!
Why is it wierd??He got it to quick bench it for his IT mag.,not to torture the thing with water cooling...We saw what we wanted,it OCs well on good air cooling,and with time it will only get better.Quote:
Originally Posted by XFxGeforced
Why? These chips ARE SUPPOSED TO BE RELEASED!!Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
IE: there's no NDA on them & they don't seem to be ES's!!
Therefore, why hide them. Unless AMD has been trying to hide a RELEASED product!!
How about setting it to nice round 3Ghz. So we can get some comparison results from 90nm X2's @ 3Ghz vs Conroe @ 3Ghz, etc..
I'm stupid.... i need some nice bar graphs!!
Well I do have job you know. Fortunately it’s related to the hottest hardware, but then again there’s much more hardware to cover beside Brisbane (FX 74, Cors Dominator, Gainward 8800GTS, TwinMOS Twister, ASUS P5B-E Plus…) and there’s so little time. And oh yes I almost forgot friends, family, and girlfriend :)Quote:
Originally Posted by FLMJIGGY
As a member of this community I know how much we all wanted to see how high could Brisbane go and I used opportunity to share mine findings with you guys. I would personally would love to get more busy with these CPU’s but I can’t
And yes info about where to find these CPU’s. In Serbia… yeah I know it's kind a hard to believe, but it’s a truth. What I’ve got are samples for media, but official distributors will get them in a few days.
In most of the days it’s hard to live over here, but sometimes Christmas comes before seventy of January ;)
Lucky youQuote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
Lucky us
Thanks for sharing
less talke more benchmarke
Why are these not out yet though? I thought they were supposed to be released ages ago.
OK!Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I love this one. It's a simple multitasking scenario. It has two parts: gaming and professional.
First I fire up DivX compression in Xmpeg, and then start NetTimedemo in Q4, or in the second case scripted action in Photoshop with bunch of filters. At the end I write down fps in Q4, and in the case of Photoshop time (in sec) needed for action to finish.
With Brisbane @ 2.6 GHz (DDR2-740) I'm getting 68.4 fps in Q4 Nettimedemo, and in Photoshop 90.2 sec
After overclocking @ 3.1 GHz (DDR2-1033) Q4 is pushing 82.5fps, and Photoshop 75.2.
No need to tell you that we're looking for the lowest Photoshop score, and the highest Q4.
I've used similar methodology for Kentsfield and FX74 testing, and results are quite interesting, and excellent illustration of the bottlenecks, and the benefits of those opposite approaches
been done before ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisf6969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
Hi,
please can u bench:
SuperPI 1M & 32M, 3DMark 2006 CPU Score, Cinebench and 3DMark 2001.
Thx :)
I dont get it...
He gets an early chip and does nothing with it??
Heck give me the chip and ill bench the ass out of it and show the world!!
No offence but i think they chose the wrong guy to give the early chip to!
you know there are people out there who have a life and not a computer:slapass: , be glad he provides us with some info, more details will come later when retail chips are available;) , also from users who have some more decent cooling:fact: .Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocolipse
so far it looks like amd achieved their goals: less power draw and possibility to clock chips higher at the same volts. now wait till they move SiGe further to 65nm:slobber:
Well just seems that some people who overclock would get a chip too :( I mean it's already been paper launched.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
But We are your friends and family :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
~Mike
so who's the girlfriend :xQuote:
Originally Posted by arisythila