Printable View
Yes, the 2000 C7 are a complete tri-channel kit, the first 2200 C8 were a dual channel kit- the single green 2200 C8 stock seems to be older, SPD says 30/09, the dc-kit spd says 11/2010- maybe you are right, I havenīt had the time for extensive testing yet, but the stick does well, doing 1116 at 1,63 on first test on funcztion with memtest 86 to see if it works:)
They are all MGH-E even green PCB.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Good to know, so best shot today I would say 2133Mhz C8 for $180
I was scared that only a few of them are mgh-e
If I were to purchase a kit of the ST hypers which one should I pick?
2x of these:
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...2GB-CL7-Memory
or
1x of These
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...nel-Memory-kit
Which do you think would give me a better overclock? Have the PCB's been straightened out? I'd prefer a black PCB?
Is there a 3x 2gb that's better binned? I'm running AMD but I wouldn't mind picking up a 6gb kit if it'll net me better performance. The third stick would come in handy to when I get around to playing with an i7.
get the 2x 2GB 2200C8 http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...nel-Memory-kit
From what i've seen of folks GTX2 results they are about 25-50mhz better than super talent 2200mhz on each cas 6, 7, 8 setting at the same voltages - but for most folks price would be determining factor. 6x2GB Super Talent 2200C8 at US$650 including shipping to OZ vs 6x2GB Corsair GTX2 2250C8 at US$1,500 excluding shipping costs. Difference in price you could get a 240GB Sandforce SSD or 2x 120GB Sanforce SSDs for raid :D But if you need every ounce of performance for record breaking probably would need GTX2 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Well, maybe you are right, I havenīt had DDR3 Corsair because the performance on DDR2 was terrible and I refused to waste my money at ram which was that expensive- but as said I am very satisfied with my STT- heres a quick test, Rams are Memtest86 stable at these settings, but my IMC/Board combi limits me in windows with straght timings:(
http://www.abload.de/img/2000c7114032m163v54lz.jpg
Baby arrived
It can pass trough test 5 @ 1680Mhz C6-6-6-19-25 1.63v
or 1750Mhz 6-6-6-19-25 1.70v
Definately better then my old Dominator GT 2000 C8
http://i48.tinypic.com/9tzl79.jpg
http://i46.tinypic.com/v33fyd.jpg
Your results make me want to ...punch things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
Is that totally stable? I can do 32M and stuff at 1766.
Why? the results are about the same as yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
totally stable in memtest but windows 7 sux , I cant boot @ 1766Mhz 6-6-6-18-24 w/ 1.70v but I could @ 1840 7-7-6-19-25
But I can run cinebench @1733Mhz 1.70v w/ DMM on the IC leg, HWmonitor and bios tells me that is 1.65v (is ther any voltage loss from the VDDR RM leg to the memory IC?
*wipes sweat off forehead*Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
Great. :yepp: :rofl:
Had a feeling those clocks were stable in windows.
EDIT:
Not sure about that voltage loss thing. If your board is ov'ing by .05v I'd be concerned.
hehehe, I think our problem still beeing the IMC...Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
It's overvolting since it cames out of the box, 1.75v gives a killer 1.80v hehehehe
I'm not sure I'm measuring the right spot but it changes when I change the VDDR.
What are you able to get with CAS 7? You've got Thuban. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
I got an 790fx board also, maxxed out at 1876Mhz Cas7-7-6-19-25 1.74vQuote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
anyway my new 1095T sux, I could reach NB 3100Mhz w/ 1050T and cant get anything stable after 2900mhz w/ 1095 now... but unless I can use my ram better now.
You do mean 1090T, right? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
If you are thinking of letting either of those two go let me know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Why?
they still available at ewiz.
but I will sell one of the kits.
actually 2 of them (1 of STT and 1 of Dominator), but will be priced as gtx2, Brazilian custummer is very crude 60% !!!
Am i missing something? because 6/6/6/19 is good but my gt's can do 6/6/6/17 @ 1760??? im not sure what im seeing so special? i know these are cheap but hey..
Im at old 790fx w/ crappy 1090T IMC EPAWQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
yours are 1600 c6?
playing at cas7
http://i47.tinypic.com/zwnx5g.jpg
This is starting to get really fun
http://i50.tinypic.com/2jcuc5t.jpg
Check AMD section for some stuff I just released. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
barrel rider, nice :up: what bios? f8k?
Yes definately, f8J is a trash, F8H is better but CNQ always on, gonna revert later.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomasis
going thereQuote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
anyone try these sticks on a ud7 or ud9 perhaps running @ 1700? i wanna see how tight these can go, im guessing 6/6/6/17?
yes 1700 6.6.6 should be no problem on any board :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
I dont get it, what Dominators do you have? u told that 1760Mhz 6-6-6-17 was fine than. Wich board?
Since I donīt know an UD9 for AMD you might mean Intel- I had the 2200Cl8 on an UD5 with an i860, at 1,66V they are Memtest stable around 1750 6-6-6-16 1T with Auto subs, Performance on Turbo- need a small amount more V(about 0,02V) than my 2000 ProjectXQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
and he's trying to compare results w/ AMD? I'm preaty sure my sticks can handle much more then 2000Mhz at C7-7-7-21Mhz I'm at only 1.65v for that... sadly my IMC dont go 1mhz step forward.
Yeah thats about the same as mine.. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Problem is the UD5 is a bad low latency clocker- same as with the P45 Gigabyte ddr2 boards I had- on another board could the results be better by far- I had better cl6 results on an Asus X38 P5E3 WS Pro than on the P55 UD5 usinbg same Ram:(- but on cl8 and 9 the board and my i860 do very well, I have no problems reaching 1150 Cl8-8-8-24 1T Memtest stable around 1,66V with my 2200s, the 2000 C7 do even better;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Really bad board, only 1760 6-6-6, what a shame.
:rofl:
I'm kidding right.
I can only hit 1760 6-6-6 with 1.75v :shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
I've runned everest @ 1840Mhz 6-7-6 today w/ 1.75v... but when I saved the SS the computer restarts..Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
I can't boot 1800 6-7-6 nomatter what voltage I use...that might tell you a bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
I did a TON of subs tweaking to get where I was at for that review.
can u pass me your final settings?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
gigabyte 790fxt-ud5p has only a few settings.
I'm having trouble to make it stable at 1800 C7 :(
My bet is your gonna have to use cas 7, try 776 .. few tweaks you should be fine.. Find your Stable Clock then tweak it..
I ended up ditching the tweaking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
Your board is flaky...it's definately stable at 1800 C7 but its your board's fault.
My 890GX board had problems booting over 1800. If you boot at 1700 and inch up to 1800+ if will be fine. :shakes:
If will POST one time, boot another time, be stable the third time, become unstable the fourth. You can't help it. :mad:
My 890GX board had a cap at 1880 Mhz as well, with my Deneb CPU. My ASUS board is stable as a rock at 1900. Go figure.
Can anyone tell me how tall the heatspreader is on these sticks? In mm?
Thanks.
The whole stick is about 5cm(2inches) high-from the upper edge of the PCB to the upper side of the heatspreader fins it is about 2cm
Thanks for the quick reply, was curious as to the clearance and/or fit available with my Noctua NH-D14.Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Are the current stock of single DDR3-2200 CL8 is hypers? I bought ones for my uncle's system with Crosshair IV + 1090T. The stick isn't made in USA anymore like I bought for my systems but they look the same.
I tried getting DDR3-2000 8-8-8-24 @ 1.7v everything is on stock except CPU is at 3.75 GHz with 1.35 vcore stable up to 3.8 GHz and CPU-NB is at 1.3 vcore. Not stable even at 1.75vcore
Could you please take a photo?Quote:
Originally Posted by panzerchaos47
If they do 1600+ 6-6-6 they have to be Hyper or completely WTFBBQ magical BBSE.Quote:
Originally Posted by panzerchaos47
Thanks. I tested them at 1600 6-6-6-18 so far stable with blend prime95.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
For the picture.
I don't really have good camera to take a show but I know my old ones back is Made in USA while this is in China.
No difference with mine-I had 26GB made in USA(2000C7 and 2200 C8) and one kit that was made in china-did 1140 C8-8-8-24-1T at 1,66V-definitely Hyper;)Quote:
Originally Posted by panzerchaos47
Currently running 1950mhz 7-7-7-18 trfc 64 cr 1t at 1.64v :) great chips!
STT 2000 CL7 3x2gb Kit
My findings : 2000 CL.7.7.6.18 1T 64 @ 1.66v
http://forum.lab501.ro/attachment.ph...5&d=1280423608
http://forum.lab501.ro/attachment.ph...6&d=1280423608
http://forum.lab501.ro/attachment.ph...7&d=1280423608
http://forum.lab501.ro/attachment.ph...5&d=1280579197
Yes, the ProjectX are great rams- also work fine with me, even better than my 2200 C8 on my 1156-had to import them from the states because in germany they are not available:(- think they are good enough to deserve their own thread:D
http://www.abload.de/thumb/2000c732mc81152166vnf12.jpg
21x215@4515 DDR3-1720 6-6-6-24
http://i36.tinypic.com/wvd00i.jpg
very nice my friend :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
[QUOTE=radaja;4506712]21x215@4515 DDR3-1720 6-6-6-24
QUOTE]
nice job there bud:up:
now gimme that ram:shoot:
thanks guys.Ram is well taken care of,so is the board and HD and Cpu.
just look at all the fans all over my setup(overkillmaybe?):ROTF::rofl::ROTF:
http://i38.tinypic.com/29wa0yh.jpg
Good result- and good cooling:D- I had a kit of the 2000 Chrome Cas8 myself- look very good and run fine:up:
jesus radaja i would be scare that at nite that turns into this :rofl::rofl::rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/1691/optimuso.jpg
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
on my shiny p6t7 ws supercomputer:D
cpu 1.36 vdim 1.66v
i only ran linx for 15min:p:
wow,must be a gigabyte thing for my crappy scores?huh
everest cache and memory benchmark
http://i34.tinypic.com/24euu7s.jpg
yes the only good of ASSus is that performs better on mem :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
I'm about ready to rip my P6X58D Premium out of my main system and put it back on the bench with the W3570 and the Corsair 1000HX to test these cause the Classified just hates em. I guess the easiest thing would be to unbox the UD3R and try that but Gigabyte doesn't clock memory like Asus or EVGA.
:yepp::yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
gigabut:rofl: not gigabyte
i likin asssssus:D
ok ill give you that.ill call it gigabut when talking about my memory OC's
but for regular OCing its gigabyte,gigabyte,gigabyte:D
gigabut:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
but then i only used 1.66v:D
My ASUS board did a slightly higher CPU clock as well as a 150 Mhz higher ram clock than my gigabyte board :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
I'm not calling either a name due to my two AM2+ and AM3 gigabyte boards being xtremely solid, though the ASUS board is just as solid...:ROTF:
ASSus anyone said ? :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by zsamz_
yea both brands are great.each have their pro's and cons.ive know about the slight memory performance loss since the EP45-UD3P,Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
compared to other brands,but now im just so familiar with gigabyte's bios's that its hard to try other brands.like ive always wanted
a classified but just stress too much about whether i can relearn a new bios format:rolleyes:
just recently i tried my asus P5Q-deluxe and was lost when playing around in the bios.
i'm an assman you a butman:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
:rofl::ROTF::clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by zsamz_
Weird score their rada, im getting 38 latency about 21k read @ 4.4ghz.. at a much lower speed only 1600
well johny show us;)
still tweaking:D
lovin this board:up:
i want to see it.so your running 22x200@4400 ddr3-1600 cl6?Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
very nice:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by zsamz_
nope 21x210
got this one , not as i mentioned but its a start.. gotta find the rest!
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4282/27th2010.jpg
no 21k read there and your memory @ 1680mhz ;)
no way you gonna hit 21k read @ 1600mhz if you cant do it with 1680mhz:rolleyes:
Im sure i got another ss haha, of almost hitting 22.. i just gotta find it gahh.. i tweaked the hell out of my sub timings..
Go for it:D- maybe I should get an 1366 instead of my crappy 1156 where the IMC seems to have degraded in spite of a max of 1,3VTT and 1,74V Vdimm as I testetd some GTR:(
Not every 1156 is crappy,on my Perfect Storm Hypers 2200C8::up:Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/7...5ud620x210.png
I have an UD5 with an i860- before I had a bios crash I could run 32M 8-8-8-24 1T on Turbo above 2300 Cl8-8-8-24 at 1.66V- bios crashed at testing some Team 2200 which ran 2400 9-10-9-24 1T, at 1,66V, with 1080 Cl8-9-8:( -erased all my profiles and since then I canīt even do a 32M at 1100- so Iīm not that happy with GA and the 1156 at all;)
Here is a result before the cash- which happend with real acceptable voltages, the board and CPU never saw more than 1,3VTT as mentioned
http://www.abload.de/thumb/2000c732mc81152166vnf12.jpg
It's crash because for DDR3 2300 and above,VTT should be for sure much more then 1.3V.Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Probably so many BSOD with 0X00000124 >> Incorrect QPI/Vtt Voltage (To Much/Not Enough).
Lol- it crashed at 1080 Cl8-9-8- with settings that were stable at 7-9-7- I could run 2400 Memtest and Lix stable with my Team with 1,28VTT at 200 BCLK, all on air with decent tempertures- if I would have had a BS at that rates I would have raised the VTT- but why should I if it was stable till this moment^^?
http://www.abload.de/thumb/team1182c...-241t3gvao.jpg
Nice ss stasio, impressing score!
I requested an RMA for my 2000 C7 sticks since they won't do 2000 C7@1.65v, and my Dominator GTs prove it's not the board/CPU. Looks like they're going to do it.
hope you get a nice set in return:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An
Looks like they must have gotten all the lower bin Hyper and tried to push them into specs that they could hardly do :d
+1 hope you get an awesome kit:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An
My board is not exactly what I would call a good C7 board, but til now I have no problems- all of my eight 2000 C7 sticks are Memtest stable within the specs but of course with 1T, XMP says 2T;)- good luck with your RMA
Doubt I'll get anything back better than my GT kit, it can do 2000 7-8-7 with 1.62v BIOS set, but we'll see.
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/1884/90279243.th.jpg
:D
Poor clocking 860 (1.329v real for 3.8ghz, 1.39v for 4ghz...)
EVGA P55 Classy 200
Supertalent 2x2gb 2200 Cas 8
B2B:0 (obviously), only 1.65v.
Maybe I'll pick up another Lynnfield and really push it, this classy and this ram are capable of another 100mhz perhaps, maybe another 1gb/s read :)
3 of them: SUPERTALENT WS220UB2G8 2GB 240-pin DDR3 2200mhz 8-8-8-24
http://s001.radikal.ru/i193/1009/99/33d878c67081.jpg
very beautiful rams!!!
Dude please don't test RAMs with wPrime, it doesn't stress them AT ALL! Try SuperPi 32M ;)
guys if anyone has a spare stick or a 2x2 KIT of the Stalents with dark PCB reading Stalent PM, i have a great gift from the guys here at the forum an I7 and a X58A mobo but i just have 2x2 of this amazing mem, want to run tri channel
thanks to all
Sergio
Not a general querry about this specific kit, but which option provides more bandwith?
1720MHz 6-6-6-20
2100MHz 8-8-8-24
Download the Everest trial and find out yourself ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Erklat
I'm going to guess 2100 7-7-7-24. You should be able to hit 2000 7-7-7 which would be better than both of those.
That is the next thing I'm going to try since I settled at last with 200bclk.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
What's the general vDIMM max consensus here? I'd wish not to kill Hypers, they
ought to turn out like a viable investment in the days to come ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erklat
for me testing both 2100 is usually bit faster in synthetic benches such as Everest, however it requires more vtt so I usually just leave it at 1700+ c6.
Mine are arriving Thursday. I went with the 2133 C8 sticks.
I need some epic memory scores for Geekbench! That thing will be made or broken with memory scores.
I'm on AMD and I've pushed 1.75v through Prime95 runs, but I really wouldn't recommend even thinking about that on intel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Erklat
I'd say 1.70v.
With my IMC subzero, trying to get 2000 C7 with my JMicrons for some Pi runs, I pushed 1.88V.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
No success which is why I ordered these. Not even hitting what these will most likely hit at stock volts with that much voltage pissed me off a lot.
For benching on air, I'd try to keep it around 1.75V, 1.7V as a max for 24/7 with Intel.
Sub-zero and pushing for Pi runs is a lil different. On my setup I don't think I'd be afraid to push 1.8v in that situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by bassplayer
Nearly 1.9v is a lot though! :eek:
Iīve seen more- and on air- but I think thats crazy- at HWLuxx in germany a guy primed G-Skill Hyper at 2,06 V on 1154 Cl8 on X58, on subzero, but a friend of mine did 1082 7-7-7 with team Group D9JNM at 1,95V 32M on H55- I think I would wet my pants at these Voltages:rofl:
guys
anyone bought a single stick from ewiz of the stalents 2200 CL8 ?
this are back in stock
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=WS220UB2G8&show=p
i just want to know if they are the dark PCB as my 2x2 or green PCB
cheers
Sergio
Where does it come from!!!!
elpida is one of the biggest manufacturers of ddr3....what do you expect?
:confused: woot ?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2