Well being 64 bit it helps my WCG score. Also, I have noticed that it is a little more stable and has more services disabled by default than XP x64 which makes it better on resources.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bail_w
Printable View
Well being 64 bit it helps my WCG score. Also, I have noticed that it is a little more stable and has more services disabled by default than XP x64 which makes it better on resources.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bail_w
This is weird, I've reinstalled Vista, without installing SP1, and now I get these scores:Quote:
Originally Posted by Durkadurka
08.04.2008 08:47:46||Benchmark results:
08.04.2008 08:47:46|| Number of CPUs: 4
08.04.2008 08:47:46|| 4036 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
08.04.2008 08:47:46|| 11675 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
08.04.2008 08:47:46||Resuming computation
Less Floating Point and a dungload more of Integer.
My results:
4/8/2008 8:52:29 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/8/2008 8:52:29 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
4/8/2008 8:53:00 AM||Benchmark results:
4/8/2008 8:53:00 AM|| Number of CPUs: 1
4/8/2008 8:53:00 AM|| 1465 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/8/2008 8:53:00 AM|| 2946 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/8/2008 8:53:02 AM||Resuming computation
Q6600 @ 3.47Ghz (385x9), 4Gb RAM @ 770 Mhz, Vista HP x64 (SP1), BOINC v5.10.30
EllerCode:8/04/2008 11:11:25 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
8/04/2008 11:11:26 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
8/04/2008 11:11:56 PM||Benchmark results:
8/04/2008 11:11:56 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
8/04/2008 11:11:56 PM|| 3282 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8/04/2008 11:11:56 PM|| 9042 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
8/04/2008 11:11:57 PM||Resuming computation
2.04.2008 11:33:16||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz [x86 Family 15 Model 6 Stepping 5] [fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx]
8.04.2008 11:53:59||Running CPU benchmarks
8.04.2008 11:53:59||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
8.04.2008 11:55:01||Benchmark results:
8.04.2008 11:55:01|| Number of CPUs: 2
8.04.2008 11:55:01|| 1411 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8.04.2008 11:55:01|| 2141 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
8.04.2008 11:55:02||Resuming computation
Q9550 @ 3.40GHz, Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit
Indeed better than my previous E6600. :p:Quote:
4/16/2008 8:11:33 PM||Benchmark results:
4/16/2008 8:11:33 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
4/16/2008 8:11:33 PM|| 3445 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/16/2008 8:11:33 PM|| 9515 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/16/2008 8:11:34 PM||Resuming computation
X3350 @ 3.6ghz (450x8), Windows XP x64
a little bit better than my Q6600 @ the same clock. After observing this rig on WCG website for more than a week, I notice the output is just about the same (with Q6600).. maybe a little more (very little).Code:4/16/2008 7:28:12 PM||Benchmark results:
4/16/2008 7:28:12 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
4/16/2008 7:28:12 PM|| 3680 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/16/2008 7:28:12 PM|| 11168 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Thanks for the information. That's why I am staying with Q6600 G0 for now.Quote:
Originally Posted by VietOZ
DDTUNG:cool:
I've noticed with all things being equal, mem timings, fsb, cpu multi, that my ip35 pro scores slightly better than msi 780i.
no problem boss, Q6600 G0 is still the way to go for now .. :up: specially with the recent price cuts. My 2 new X3350 are going to be here tommorrow. I'm gonna replace the B3s with those and one of the B3 is going to replace my last C2D. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by DDTUNG
Time to get some harpers :p:
I've replaced quite a few B3s with G0s as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by VietOZ
Looks like you are expanding your farm again. Keep it up, just don't get too close.:D
DDTUNG:cool:
So Victor what becomes of these reject B3s? Inquiring mobos would like to know... ;)
I wouldn't call them rejects.Quote:
Originally Posted by WrigleyVillain
Some have been sold to XS WCG members, some on eBay, and some in Hong Kong to other buyers.
DDTUNG:cool:
P4 630 @ 3.6, Vista x64:
4/17/2008 10:15:51 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2008 10:15:51 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
4/17/2008 10:15:51 PM|| 1445 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2008 10:15:51 PM|| 4503 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
my quad - q6600 @ 3.6ghz
4/17/2008 5:17:41 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2008 5:17:41 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
4/17/2008 5:17:41 PM|| 3410 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2008 5:17:41 PM|| 10613 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Yeah, even though these 45nm quads consume WAY less power at the same clocks. I just found out today that my Q6600 drains 270W alone with prime smallFFT running at 4Ghz.. and that's only 1,45V Vcore :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by DDTUNG
How is that chips vcore so low at 4ghz. ='[
I'm at 1.504v (real) for 3.6.. o_o
It's because it draws more ampere at the same volts than any other Q6600 I've ever seen.
Let me explain that to you: Every Intel CPU, given the same type and stepping, has the same TDP (thermal design power).
This means that every G0 Q6600 draws up to 95W at its stock rated speed and voltage.
Now, as you may know, these chips all have different Vids (=stock Vcore) - a high Vid for a Q6600 would be 1,325V for example, while a low vid would be 1,225 (like mine).
So how is it that my chip uses the same amount of power as another chip with a higher vid? Simple, it draws more amperes to reach its designated wattage.
As you may know, you can calculate the CPU's (or any, really) power needs with a simple formula (P=U*I, P being the power measured in watts, U being the voltage measured in volts and I being the current measured in amperes).
So in order to reach those 95W, my chip drains about 77,5A at stock (95W=1,225V*77,5A) while the chip with a 1,325V VID drains only 71,7A.
As you increase the clockspeed and voltage, these differences become larger and larger, and while low Vid CPUs often use less Vcore for the same clockspeed than high Vid chips and are therefore often called "better" OC chips, they often drain even more ampere and genereate more heat than any high Vid chip.
Mine draws about 270W (186A!) at 4Ghz when running prime smallFFT, that's the kind of heat you can't just compensate with a true ;)
haha my VID is 1.3250v
my luck that i get a sucky chip
Your chip isn't neccessarily a sucky one. For instance, you could already run into temp problems with my chip @3,6Ghz, even though it only needs 1,32V I'm already hitting 60C+ coretemp, and that is under water.
What BOINC version are you guys using for these? I had to go back to Karl's last post to find one mentioned.
I'm in the mid 50s with my TRUE at full load. Might go lower if I had a real TIM and not this cheap stuff. I'd like to go for 3.8ghz but my board has a huge FSB hole from what I'm seeing.
I use 5.10.45 windows x64 ver.Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
See - so your Q6600 might never be able to handle 4Ghz or more 24/7, but you can get your 3,6Ghz easily. Mine would burn out instantly if it was aircooled :D
What are you running that CPU at? 3.6? 3.8? 240? (lemme know how if you are, k.)Quote:
Originally Posted by loonym
Yes, 9x400 3600 with both this rig in my sig and an ip35 pro.
Thanks ;)
That's why I'm trying to replace those B3 with the 45nm and hopefully I still can cut down my electric bill a little :DQuote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Just finish replace a couple of rigs.
Before
1. P35-DS3R / Q6600 G0 @ 3.5ghz Vcore = 1.38v
2. P5B Deluxe / Q6600 B3 @ 3.3ghz Vcore = 1.36v
After
1. P35-DS3R / X3350 45nm @ 3.4ghz Vcore= 1.22v (I dont wanna go higher)
2. P5B-deluxe /Q6600 G0 (took the B3 out) @ 3.6ghz Vcore = 1.41v
Hopefully I can save some power and the clock speed is also up some :D
Asus (p35) p5k/EPU with a q9300 running at 2,775Ghz, ram Dominators running at 888 Mhz Ver 5.10.45 vista x64 sp1
18.04.2008 15:29:08||Benchmark results:
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| Number of CPUs: 4
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| 2804 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| 8141 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
how long it takes a Celeron 600mhz with 256mb ram to return 1 result:
http://hotimg15.fotki.com/a/127_0/0_1/Untitled.jpg
I'll add this here:
Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 8
3266 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9281 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Dual e5430's at 3.2ghz (8x400) on D5400XS. Kingston ValueRam DDR2-800 CAS 5 FB-DIMMS.
BOINC Ver 6.1.0 on Vista Business X64.
:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen
Asus Striker Extreeme 1303 Q6600 9x 333 for 3.0 4gig xms2 6400c4 4-4-4-12
4/24/2008 7:19:08 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/24/2008 7:19:09 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
4/24/2008 7:19:40 PM||Benchmark results:
4/24/2008 7:19:40 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
4/24/2008 7:19:40 PM|| 2869 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/24/2008 7:19:40 PM|| 7996 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/24/2008 7:19:41 PM||Resuming computation
Just bumped to 3.8GHz from daily 3.4GHz.
EDIT: The load temp. is 57-57-51-51. :up:
Q9550 on air, Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit
Will the SP1 improve the result? If so, I'll install it.Quote:
12/31/2005 11:12:07 PM||Benchmark results:
12/31/2005 11:12:07 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
12/31/2005 11:12:07 PM|| 3861 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12/31/2005 11:12:07 PM|| 10582 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
12/31/2005 11:12:22 PM||Resuming computation
Which BOINC version are you running, Ashaf?
Okay, I just installed SP1. No results have been improved.
I am running BOINC 5.10.45 64-bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
dual quad harpertown X5482
default speed of 3200/12mb/1600
win2K3 server ent 64 bit
5/6/2008 10:13:27 PM||Benchmark results:
5/6/2008 10:13:27 PM|| Number of CPUs: 8
5/6/2008 10:13:27 PM|| 3245 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/6/2008 10:13:27 PM|| 9502 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/11/2008 5:07:57 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/11/2008 5:07:58 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/11/2008 5:08:29 AM||Benchmark results:
5/11/2008 5:08:29 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/11/2008 5:08:29 AM|| 4094 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/11/2008 5:08:29 AM|| 11871 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/11/2008 5:08:30 AM||Resuming computation
5/11/2008 5:19:15 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/11/2008 5:19:16 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/11/2008 5:19:47 PM||Benchmark results:
5/11/2008 5:19:47 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/11/2008 5:19:47 PM|| 3509 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/11/2008 5:19:47 PM|| 6569 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/11/2008 5:19:48 PM||Resuming computation
Windows Vista Ultimate x64
BOINC Client 5.10.45
http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/3295/wcghk9.jpg
Thought I'll give an update :). Goodness... I hate the DTS on my CPU. So messed up. Maybe I should get myself an IR Temperature Sensor and build a tripod for it so it can overhang the cpu so I can just ignore these programs >_>. Pity for Intel.
Btw nice stats on that xeon loonym :D
11/05/2008 11:45:00||Running CPU benchmarks
11/05/2008 11:45:00||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
11/05/2008 11:45:33||Benchmark results:
11/05/2008 11:45:33|| Number of CPUs: 4
11/05/2008 11:45:33|| 3354 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11/05/2008 11:45:33|| 7357 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
11/05/2008 11:45:35||Resuming computation
Windows XP Pro SP2 32bit
Boinc 5.10.30
just installed ubuntu 64bit and got a nice increase in dhrystone over XP 64bit
XP 64bit gave me (and can be seen on page 10):
2056 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5200 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Sun 11 May 2008 07:55:36 PM EDT||Starting BOINC client version 5.10.45 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Sun 11 May 2008 07:55:36 PM EDT||Processor: 2 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
Sun 11 May 2008 07:55:36 PM EDT||OS: Linux: 2.6.24-16-generic
Sun 11 May 2008 07:55:36 PM EDT||Memory: 3.87 GB physical, 4.58 GB virtual
Sun 11 May 2008 07:55:36 PM EDT||Disk: 106.36 GB total, 98.56 GB free
Sun 11 May 2008 08:08:42 PM EDT||Benchmark results:
Sun 11 May 2008 08:08:42 PM EDT|| Number of CPUs: 2
Sun 11 May 2008 08:08:42 PM EDT|| 1983 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Sun 11 May 2008 08:08:42 PM EDT|| 5989 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
E8400 @ 4ghz on Rampage Formula w/2x2gb @ 534mhz 5-5-5-15
5/14/2008 11:14:21 PM||Starting BOINC client version 5.10.45 for windows_x86_64
5/14/2008 11:14:21 PM||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6]
5/14/2008 11:14:21 PM||OS: Microsoft Windows Vista: , Service Pack 1, (06.00.6001.00)
5/14/2008 11:14:21 PM||Memory: 4.00 GB physical, 8.19 GB virtual
5/14/2008 11:14:21 PM||Disk: 63.42 GB total, 32.69 GB free
5/14/2008 11:15:26 PM||Benchmark results:
5/14/2008 11:15:26 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/14/2008 11:15:26 PM|| 4051 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/14/2008 11:15:26 PM|| 10801 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/14/2008 11:15:27 PM||Resuming computation
i'm not real satisfied with the benchmark results.... i feel like i'm sacrificing too much performance for stability :-\
i really don't want to put water on this system though
BOINC 5.10.20 E8500 @ 4.2Ghz. WinXP 32bit.
15/05/2008 08:29:20||Suspending computation - user request
15/05/2008 08:29:38||Running CPU benchmarks
15/05/2008 08:30:09||Benchmark results:
15/05/2008 08:30:09|| Number of CPUs: 2
15/05/2008 08:30:09|| 4326 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
15/05/2008 08:30:09|| 9167 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
15/05/2008 08:30:39||Running CPU benchmarks
15/05/2008 08:31:10||Benchmark results:
15/05/2008 08:31:10|| Number of CPUs: 2
15/05/2008 08:31:10|| 4375 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
15/05/2008 08:31:10|| 9266 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
15/05/2008 08:31:17||Running CPU benchmarks
15/05/2008 08:31:48||Benchmark results:
15/05/2008 08:31:48|| Number of CPUs: 2
15/05/2008 08:31:48|| 4387 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
15/05/2008 08:31:48|| 9162 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
XP 32bit. :rolleyes:
Clocks have since gone up to 4.6Ghz :up:
28.05.08 10:26:20||Starting BOINC client version 5.10.45 for windows_intelx86
28.05.08 10:26:20||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 13]
28.05.08 10:26:20||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
28.05.08 10:43:37||Running CPU benchmarks
28.05.08 10:43:37||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
28.05.08 10:44:08||Benchmark results:
28.05.08 10:44:08|| Number of CPUs: 2
28.05.08 10:44:08|| 2933 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
28.05.08 10:44:08|| 6698 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
28.05.08 10:44:10||Resuming computation
e2180 @ 3GHz
ip35 pro
2GB ddr2
Damn riptide, you got a killer chip there. Just be careful with the volts though... over 1,45V is really critical with 45nm. You supercoolin' that one?
28-5-2008 17:51:08|| 3621 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
28-5-2008 17:51:08|| 11177 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz
G.Skill pc8000 @ 1015Mhz 5-5-5-15
5.10.45 / XP64
Very nice results v0dka!
Another Q6600 @3.8 for comparison.
5/28/2008 11:20:59 AM 3614 floating point MIPS (Whetstonte) per CPU
5/28/2008 11:20:59 AM 11208 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Everything in sig
3866 floating point MIPS (Whetstone)
10581 integer MIPS (Dhrystone)
Anyone keeping record of who the top dog is ?
Just out of curiosity and bragging rights for someone else lol.
Very nice setup there :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by TouGe
Thank You, I appreciate it:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by loonym
No I don't. Its average at best. Reaches a wall at about 4.5 - 4.66Ghz. Full load and about -30C and I need a hugh increase in vcore to get over it. An increase I ain't rpepared to do... just yet ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Theres guys hitting my speed with Grade-A water on better chips.
X3350 @ 3.5ghz 1.26v (8x440)
P5K-DLX Wifi/AP @ 0603
4x1GB FP-C4 667mhz @ 880mhz 5-5-5-20-2T
WinXP-64, Boinc 5.10.45
5/28/2008 8:50:24 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/28/2008 8:50:25 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/28/2008 8:50:56 PM||Benchmark results:
5/28/2008 8:50:56 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/28/2008 8:50:56 PM|| 3551 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/28/2008 8:50:56 PM|| 10307 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
--------------------------------------------------------------------
X3350 @ 3.6ghz 1.31v (8x449)
P5K-DLX Wifi/AP @ 0812
4x1GB FP-C4 667mhz @ 900mhz 5-5-5-20-2T
WinXP-64, Boinc 5.10.45
5/28/2008 10:02:49 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/28/2008 10:02:49 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/28/2008 10:03:20 PM||Benchmark results:
5/28/2008 10:03:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/28/2008 10:03:20 PM|| 3619 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/28/2008 10:03:20 PM|| 10504 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
So clock for clock Penryn scores slightly better on the Whetstone than Kentsfield?
Ah ok, you're right. Not that great for a SS cooled chip.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
I got one killer E8500 here, runs 3,8Ghz at 1,15V... passive cooled :cool:
Yes that's right, it's a system w/o a single fan. Passive watercooling with a watertemp of approx 50C :D
Gotta try that one under my SS... if I only had the time ^^
Just got my Kentsfied rig together. Currently running @ stock speeds, but I will OC later.
Results:
Number of CPUs: 4
2358 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5346 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Do these seem OK for a Q6600 @ stock?
If it's 32-bit yes, otherwise it's a little slow.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] NetburstXE
Yeah, it's 32 bit. The only OS I had was a 32 bit copy of Windows XP Professional. I didn't have room in my budget to get a quad as well as a copy of Windows XP Professional 64 bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Martijn
You can get a test-install of XP x64 for free, it runs half a year or so. After that, you can still "activate" it - one way or the other... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] NetburstXE
How?Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Erm... search the M$ download page? It's there somewhere, I downloaded it several times already. xD
Finally, one them arrived,:D:up:.
Asus P5NT-Deluxe(780i), reapers 5-5-5-15 at 1066, and Q9450 at 3.2Ghz, vista x64 sp1, boinc versoin 5.10.45.
31.05.2008 23:15:08||Benchmark results:
31.05.2008 23:15:08|| Number of CPUs: 4
31.05.2008 23:15:08|| 3242 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
31.05.2008 23:15:08|| 9336 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
31.05.2008 23:15:09||Resuming computation
I can't find it. Can you give me a link?Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
Does anyone know or could try what a q8200 would get in boinc benchmark?
Someone have some results from the q9000 series?
:D:D I am just curious, gotta hold off Jcool somehow:ROTF::ROTF::rofl::up:
A q9300, running stock 2.5Ghz with 2gc ram 1000 on a g35 boinc client 6.2.18 with Vista 64 sp1 will do
20.08.2008 17:14:20||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2008 17:14:51||Benchmark results:
20.08.2008 17:14:51|| Number of CPUs: 4
20.08.2008 17:14:51|| 2532 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
20.08.2008 17:14:51|| 7582 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
20.08.2008 17:14:52||Resuming computation
A q9450, running at 3ghz, with 2gb 1050 on a 780i, boinc client 6.2.18 vista 64 sp1 will do
20.08.2008 17:23:11||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2008 17:23:42||Benchmark results:
20.08.2008 17:23:42|| Number of CPUs: 4
20.08.2008 17:23:42|| 3020 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
20.08.2008 17:23:42|| 8887 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
20.08.2008 17:23:43||Resuming computation
my new x2 2.8Ghz , 4gig 800@CL5, 790GX(them new stuff), 6.2.18 vista 64 sp1 (still running stock, please not the hammer! I will "fix" it by next week :D)
19.9.2008 00:42:33||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
19.9.2008 00:43:04||Benchmark results:
19.9.2008 00:43:04|| Number of CPUs: 2
19.9.2008 00:43:04|| 2588 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
19.9.2008 00:43:04|| 5268 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
19.9.2008 00:43:05||Resuming computation
kinda small upgrade so far versus my antique 2.4Ghz Barton 2300/4000 on WinXP 6.2.15
Edit: Goodnight! :)
Of-Ghost: imo, that seems a little low but maybe that just because its running on vista. i'm running an x2 @ 2.5ghz and my dhrystone is 5353. also i'm running 5.10.45 version of Boinc manager and my ram is 4x 1gb cas4.
i look forward to seeing results once its OCed :up:
small update @3.0GHz and 750 CL4, still figuring out the dividerīs. I miss my K7 fsb divider :(
22.9.2008 15:33:58||Benchmark results:
22.9.2008 15:33:58|| Number of CPUs: 2
22.9.2008 15:33:58|| 2785 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
22.9.2008 15:33:58|| 6737 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
22.9.2008 15:33:59||Resuming computation
The q9650 I got going the other day, @ 4ghz, vista64:
10/1/2008 8:18:51 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
10/1/2008 8:18:52 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
10/1/2008 8:19:23 AM||Benchmark results:
10/1/2008 8:19:23 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
10/1/2008 8:19:23 AM|| 4140 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10/1/2008 8:19:23 AM|| 12007 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
10/1/2008 8:19:24 AM||Resuming computation
I can probably take this a little higher after I decide where it's going to live and get it off the kitchen table. :D
Loonym, is that Vista Home, Business, Ultimate, Tofu or ?? and which version of BOINC did you bench it with?
edit: Just saw you sig ... Vista Ultimate 64 then?
Yeah ultimate and boinc 6.2.19
On those numbers that machine is good for about 22k daily. ;)
X2 3800+ @ 3100mhz, 2GB DDR @ 250mhz, Vista x64 Home Premium SP1, BOINC v6.3.12
9/27/2008 7:32:49 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
9/27/2008 7:33:20 PM||Benchmark results:
9/27/2008 7:33:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
9/27/2008 7:33:20 PM|| 2918 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9/27/2008 7:33:20 PM|| 7437 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
9/27/2008 7:33:21 PM||Resuming computation
Benchies should be higher on Vista, esp. x64.:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by 64dragon
Which Vista, hawkeyefan? Home? Premium? Ultimate? Raspberry? Tofu?
Home Premium:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
edited post:D
Hang on ... you got a 2GHz chip running at 3.1? Nicely done!
Yeah, it's on air but naked. I turn it down to 3.0Ghz for crunching as it takes too much voltage to run stable at that speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
Naked ... you took off the IHS I take it? I tried that with my Opty 185. Couldn't get the HS to mount. Retainer wouldn't take up the slack. (s939). Ended up putting it back on, but got better temps than before anyway (old compound under the IHS had dried out).
Yep. Only works with certain heatsinks though. Thermaltake BigTyphoon works with stock hardware.:yepp: Even have it mounted in a normal upright case (typhoon is horizontal) which most people warn against.Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
Works like a charm.:D
Q6600 @3ghz, 1.32 vcore 32bit Vista home
10/1/2008 8:18:28 PM||Benchmark results:
10/1/2008 8:18:28 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
10/1/2008 8:18:28 PM|| 2910 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10/1/2008 8:18:28 PM|| 6385 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Is that Home Basic or Home Premium? And which BOINC version?
Nice cpu Andy. Mine starts puking a little after 470fsb unless I really crank the volts. But hey, the price was right! :D
Edited for idiocy:ROTF::rofl:
hawkeyefan, that question was actually for Malcontent re THIS POST ... I got yours. ;) Thanks.
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/D_oh.jpg
:para::para::para::am::para::para::wasntme:
I haven't been lucky to ever buy what I'd consider to be a cherry cpu. I do have an x3360 that I consider to be outstanding though. I got it direct from intel through rma. Really got me thinking that I should kill a couple of my less desirables if that's what they're going to send me back. :D
From another thread:
6.3.12
# of CPUs: 8
3934 FPU
12107 Integer
That's my X5450's at 430x9=3870Mhz, XP x64 SP2.
That enough for 40k/d?
Ya, seeing that beast in action was too much for me, too.
I already succumbed to the plan of building a 2nd one, maybe even a 3rd. Having 2 pairs of unused Harpertown CPUs lying around doesn't help with that either :shakes:
Here's how I'm running now:
Windows Xp 64
5.10.45
QX9650 @ 3.8GHz (9.5x400)
http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/m...83-41-22PM.jpg
Just shy or 45k in theory. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
How do you even calculate that? :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by D_A
That's nice, TouGe, but what version of Windows and of BOINC? And what is the chip running at?Quote:
Originally Posted by TouGe
I'll give you the formula I use, which I got from this forum as it happens.Quote:
Originally Posted by jcool
(Dhrystone + Whetstone) x 0.05 times the number of cores times 7 (to get from BOINC points to WCG points)
mmh okay.. let's see what it can do in reality, but I think it's not that far off (since it cached 120k WCG in 2,5 days)
Well when I add up all the machines in my own collection and run the math it works out pretty well. Of course we're still at the mercy of the validation quorum, so it's only an approximate guide to what a machine COULD do if it was granted everything it claimed AND it runs 100% 24/7.