Those Pro/Evo/Deluxe got same 12phase ???
Printable View
Those Pro/Evo/Deluxe got same 12phase ???
One multiplier for all cores vs letting you set multipliers individually per core.
Also when using one multiplier for all cores, it can be controlled in Windows.
Intel states 1.52v. There's a big discussion on whether this is safe. It sure sounds like A LOT. I wouldnt go over 80c.
Blue jumper near the green LED in the bottom.
http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/r...oard-PCI-E.jpg
"Intel states 1.52v. There's a big discussion on whether this is safe. It sure sounds like A LOT. I wouldnt go over 80c."
This is false: Intel doesn't state the safe voltage at all. 1.52V is just the maximum voltage the new VID encoding can represent. An explanation follows below if you care.
VID is encoded in a byte, whose 8 bits can represent 2^8 = 256 different values. One value (all bits unset) is reserved for a null or invalid voltage. The first of the 255 remaining values decodes to 0.25V. The next 254 5mV increments sum up to an extra 254 * 5 = 1.27V. Therefore, the range of representable (not deemed safe or qualified by Intel in another way) values is 0.25 - 1.52V.
Judging by what i've seen temps wise i'd probably say up to 1.4v is safe for 24/7 ... for a quick bench/overclocking test anything goes really as long as you accept the risks and the temps are under 80-85 ish max ...
Did you guys do a fresh install of Windows 7 ? got a setup that I'm happy with and need to understand any difficulties with trying to use it with the new motherboard and chip. Thank You!
Just pulled the trigger on the ASUS P8P67 Deluxe with a 2600K.. I wanted to buy the GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD5 board but not in stock at MicroCenter.. So I decided Asus never fails me.. Just got done installing H20 on CPU up all night, going to bed have to go back to work Sunday night :(
This is normal, it will downclock when not under load.
I was tempted to try not reinstalling, but I did a fresh Win7 HP 64 install anyway as I had found hit-and-miss results through google. It seems it may look to work OK but then have lots of little issues/glitches/inconsistencies that aren't really readily apparrent. So, I'd say reinstall :).
Sbb can you pm me your exact settings in BIOS?? I have pretty similar setup and was wondering if u guys like prime 95 for testing ? Imo its an unlikely event that your system will be pushed that far.. to each his own tho :) Sbb that is impressive oc for that voltage
Not sure why Speed step is causing issues, Here is why I turn it off. It's supossed to reduce clock and core voltages (power saving feature) but when OCing from bios, Core voltage only drops slightly as compared to stock clocks where core voltage really drops.
Do you guys run the hardest test in prime95 or the 2nd strongest to test stability ?
Tried to find out how VRM frequency affects oc.
Starting with VRM freq = Auto.
I went to an oc of 5ghz and with volt where Prime95 would fail after 2-3 tests. (Linx would pass).
Reboot and set VRM=350. Prime95 still failed after 2-3 tests.
Set 400, still fail, 450 still failed.
Am I going about this the wrong way?
Asus rep on VRM:
VRM Frequency change to 350 – this value will allow for scaling to 50+ multi without issues
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=265398
DeadmanX, I use the Small ffts. It should do fine for max stress testing cpu.
I just upgraded from an IP35 PRO and didn't reinstall windows.
Just remove all usb devices from your PC to help the process and put the asus CD in the PC so windows can locate most drivers.
Manually from the CD you may have to run the Bluetooth driver and the intel management software (I did)
Same... no reason not to leave them on that I know of, runs cooler during low use and draws less power for no loss whatsoever, during light/idle usage.
Yeah, I gather it works but there's a lot of possible underlying glitches... for some reason my external slim USB DVD burner can't read the DVD that came with the motherboard, either... had to find the drivers on Asus site once I reinstalled Win7 for things like the NIC, using a laptop then putting them on a thumb drive.
This is all over:
Sandybridge maximum safe voltages
Core Voltage - Not recommended too exceed 1.38v, doing so could kill the CPU, we therefor recommend a range of 1.325-1.350v if overclocking.
Memory Voltage - Intel recommend 1.50v plus/minus 5% which means upto 1.58v is the safe recommended limit. In our testing we have found 1.65v has caused no issues.
BCLK Base Clock - This is strictly a NO, anyone using base clock overclocking could/will cause damange to CPU/Mainboard. (Set manually to 100)
PLL Voltage - Do not exceed 1.9v!!
Processor - Basically we recommend customers not to exceed 1.35v to play it safe, all our bundles are set at 1.3250v or lower, any competitors offering bundles above 4.6GHz you should be enquiring as to what voltage they are using as we believe anything over 1.38v will limit CPU lifespan and anything over 1.42v will likely kill the CPU or severely limit its lifespan.
Memory - Intel recommend 1.50v plus/minus 5% which means 1.60v is the ideal safe maximum, but we have found in our testing all 1.65v memory is fine. We have also found most new 1.65v like Corsair XMS3 will run at its rated timings with just 1.50-1.55v which is well within Intel specifications. So people upgrading to Sandybridge you can still use your old DDR3, but we do recommend you run it at 1.60v or less. We are shipping most of our bundles which feature Corsair XMS at 1.50v-1.55v at rated timings. We've also discussed with Asus and MSI regarding voltages for memory and they also confirm in their testing 1.65v caused no issues with reliability.
Base Clock - To put it simple if you value the life of your components, do not overclock using base clock!
PLL Voltage - Again do not exceed 1.9v!
Don't know where it comes from or how official it might be...