Damn tough crowd...Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathReborn
1CPU: 3747
X4 CPU 13003 :)
Open GL: 6388:)
Printable View
Damn tough crowd...Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathReborn
1CPU: 3747
X4 CPU 13003 :)
Open GL: 6388:)
Don't worry, some day your cpu will grow up, have a baby and then with a 2 cpu board you can play here!:ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
( Yes, another friend that I can tease!)
lol only if your power supply grows up too ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
PCP+C 610W silencer..Have one on each clover machine for the last 8 months.Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
No issues at all..:D
how many hard drives and what's the graphics card?Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
These are pure crunchers..single 80 gig HD and a cheapo ATI X550 vid.Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
One does have a complete Swiftech H20-220 water cooling kit so it handles the pump,6-120mm fans and a 92mm fan in addition to the HD.
http://www.xtremesystems.com/modules...wcontent&id=48
Both machines show a rock solid 12.1 on the +12 line in bios and they are at 100% load 24/7..
nice, i shall try those when i get some spare time.Quote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
i wonder whats going on to not boot over 3.2 ghz(altough i havent tried as i should), should i raise memory voltage togheter with cpu frequency? im not an expert at that, maybe i should, because i am keeping same 2.1v for any cpu frequency i try.
i raised timings to 4-4-4-7 instead of 4-4-3-5, but i have no idea about if i have to change memory voltage aswell.
Dunno if this is correct tho.
thank you
Gave it a go in xp64.
Attachment 63006
Much faster than vista.
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b7...resultsx64.jpg
Vista x64
Vista sure eats the Opengl results. I'm having a fun time trying to figure out my new system, as what may be benchmark loop stable is not proving SMP folding stable.
nice score, interesting that at same speed, you got over 12k and i got 11.2k i guess...maybe 64 bits OS that much quicker?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dainas
i was using Windows xp 32
Yeah that is pretty wierd, but plausible as cinebench does have a native x64 version. x64 sure is not doing me any favours in the graphical department though :lol2:Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
I've lowered my clocks down to 3,105/345 as my ram does not seem to be able to handle 850 at stock timings indefinitely. Will replace those results soon.
the 64bit version wins in the cpu area while xp wins in opengl... just check the two that I posted.
But under Win XP x64 you have both brilliant rendering speed and normal OpenGL performance ;) !Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
I like xp x64.. too bad it doesn't have DX10.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
does xp 64 has any stability difference comparing to its 32 bit version? Because when i had p4 631, i couldnt boot at 4.1 ghz on Xp 64, and could do it easily (yet not too stable) on 32bit...Quote:
Originally Posted by safan80
QX6850 440x10 1.65v
Corsair DD3 7-7-7-15-1t @ 1760Mhz 2.25v
http://fugger.netfirms.com/Corsairddr3/cinebench.jpg
Yes, it is based on Windows 2003 server kernel and thats the major difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by veilsidebr
Better in memory management, more stable in use (when system is rock stable), much quicker in loading, can use NUMA properly, etc... The only drawback is driver support from some manufactures :down:
Nice, i always used it but had no idea how good it was on the track. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
I shall format and install xp64 immediatelly, as soon as my fautly HD be replaced.
One more try and a little flex of my GTX:D
Attachment 63251
64bit run @ 4.7Ghz
Ill post up the 32bit compare at the exact same speed and timing.