Thanks, I make test today ! :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Lodewijk
Printable View
Thanks, I make test today ! :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Lodewijk
I have install new bios F3a but the resulst is ... :(
Already the same problem when I overclock with Conroe E6600 (step 4)
- 9 x 266 Vcore origine : ok
- 9 x 300 Vcore origine : faill :mad:
http://www.overclex.net/data/images/news/3362_1_img.jpg
For the moment, the max fsb is (in XP) 8 x 380MHz (1.55v and +0.30 for chipset)
But when I reboot, black screen somes secondes, reboot, black screen somes secondes, reboot, ... :mad:
I must make a clear CMOS !
lol, bro, you sound like professional reviewer gradually:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by guess2098
YES :D
E6600 (step4) at 4060MHz with 1.55v (prommy - 30°C), it's better that Asus P5W (max 9 x 445 with 1.70v)
http://users.skynet.be/fb331210/4060-cpu-z.jpg
Have you tested this bios ? because I have a question :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Lodewijk
CornerJack are you hitting this via Bios or software?
Fisrt overclocking via bios : 9 x 350MHz | +0.3 chipset | 1.58vcore and in XP, I use EasyTune to have 9 x 455MHz :DQuote:
Originally Posted by BottomsUp
Today, I make test with Clockgen...
Nice results so far. :toast:
Is insulation tricky on this board because of the heatsinks surrounding the socket? Have you got any pics of your insulation?
For information of prommy : http://www.overclex.net/overclocking...eurs/MOD-MACH1Quote:
Originally Posted by Kesnel
And with the QD6 and the new overclocking !
http://users.skynet.be/fb331210/banc1.jpg
http://users.skynet.be/fb331210/4230.jpg
Good job ;)
what is the Max bootable ?
Its the DQ-6 man.. not the QD-6 :P.
Correct it :P.
Really good job though :).
For the moment 475MHz x 9 (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=107597)Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenfrag
But I overclocked since the bios :( because EasyTune don't support a vcore > 1.6v (crash in XP).
Yesterday, I have tested ClockGen (compatible with DQ6) but impossible to use the soft :confused: I make new tests today.
Yes :DQuote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
you first had the E6700 cpu now the E6600 one?
I finished the tests with E6600 step4.
For the moment, I prefer not to exceed 1.8v
I have, with ClockGen (thank you Franck) still which been able to increase the frequency a little but which not been able to validate !
http://users.skynet.be/fb331210/4347.jpg
And I believe that with a better cooling of the CPU and chipset, I will have been able to validate them.
Here, just a photograph of the screen :D
http://users.skynet.be/fb331210/4387.jpg
Now... E6700 step5 :D
CornerJack, can you verify the 7950GX2 problem, where it apparently is only running at half speed? I wonder if Gigabyte is aware of this?
nice job cornerjack.
Even with F3a BIOS, E6600 and E6700 FSB are limited for me.
Still testing.
update:
F3a BIOS let me get to 445mhz FSB * 9 = 4005mhz on E6600
Cant boot higher than 400mhz FSB, then use the gigabyte clockgen program to crank it up.
Not bad! Going for more :)
please test with 7950GX2 and explain the results with it
Ok, tomorrow I make test with the 7950 ;)
Benny - thanks so much for sharing the Bios ( and emailing me the earlier one as well!!!)Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Lodewijk
F3 seems an improvement 1:1 divider appears to run properly now for me and max bootable is 450FSB on a Intel 661 ( 12X multi ). Not sure if the CPU is the culprit for FSB ( but have a feeling not ).
Unfortunately I can still only boot once into bios with 450FSB - next reboot always fails to post so far. I'll have to try 440...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CornerJack
Looking forward to the results of your 7950GX2 tests.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazz
can't get mine to run on F3 unfotunately either ( at least not with BOTH GPUs )
YES ! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mikeguava
Bios F3a and drivers 91.31
http://www.overclex.net/data/images/.../3dmarksli.jpg
Wonderful to see that the DQ6 and 7950 are running, however that result looks too low to me..my 4400+ and 7950 at stock are getting 7337 in 3dmark06.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=349219
I would have thought the E6700 would have been a hell of a lot higher :confused:
looks like PCI-E went down to 8X as well :-(
more good news on my front, able to take it up to 475 on the DQ6 via Gigabyte software. Kinda ran into a small wall at 4275mhz, didnt have time to mess with FSB voltage much.
NB gets HOT!
Seems like a real winner.