FX62 Vs Conroe E6700 at Coolaler.com

Link to results, or just speculation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by M.Beier

AMD will be ahead once 65nm A64 is launched...

---

Why ? You simply assume AMD will pull a 3.4GHz DC out of its basement just like that ?

Frankly I would be surprised if they will match the 90nm speed in the 1st few months of 2007 until yields ramp up and the process matures.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duploxxx

you will see what i mean, calculated some test i've seen and for now the difference i performance proffit is really owned by amd

conroe + 17-18% performance
k8 +31-38% performance

there goes the future

---

First of all even with less scaling factor Conroe will beat AMD on 64 bit clock-to-clock:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=101497
FX-62 3GHz
1 CPU 422*1.31 = 553

Conroe 2.7GHz
1 CPU 469*1.18 = 553

The second thing is scaling factor which depends on the used aplication. For example context C4D Shading (form Cinebench 2003) (32bit->64bit):

K8 +3-4%
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...46&postcount=1

Conroe +17-18%
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...83&postcount=1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

Imagine how much Quad SLI is limited by CPU :rolleyes: Now take 5 GHz Conroe (which is ~ 7 GHz K8). Ownage :slap:

Oh and whoever is saying that K8 will beat Conroe @ 65nm.. PURE BS. If you can use a calculator you can confirm it for yourself.

Conroe owns pure and simple. K8 got NOTHING on it @ 65nm or even at 45nm. I haven't used an Intel in my primary rig since Pentium 3 Coppermine because Intel was crap (with a notable exception of when they got ahead with Northwoods for a bit before K8 came out). Guess what? Intel is going to be ahead now and I will buying Conroe because it is -

1) Much faster (biggest jump in performance since 486->Pentium IMO)
2) Cheaper
3) Lower power consumption
4) Overclocking potential is crazy
5) WTF else do you need?

---

Have you seen swordfish??? - Well, when the hacker got 1 min to get into pentagon, he gets a special service... - Anyhow, THAT I need WHILE benching the gear :D

I wouold like to see a cinebench cpu render test comparison when these two cpus are at their max air cooling oc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kl0012

First of all even with less scaling factor Conroe will beat AMD on 64 bit clock-to-clock:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=101497
FX-62 3GHz
1 CPU 422*1.31 = 553

Conroe 2.7GHz
1 CPU 469*1.18 = 553

The second thing is scaling factor which depends on the used aplication. For example context C4D Shading (form Cinebench 2003) (32bit->64bit):

K8 +3-4%

Conroe +17-18%
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...83&postcount=1

---

ehh nice try, calculate again thast 30% not 3%...:cool:

and the other benches, thats 32 bit, yes conroe has better clock performance... try this again on 64bit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duploxxx

ehh nice try, calculate again thast 30% not 3%...:cool:

and the other benches, thats 32 bit, yes conroe has better clock performance... try this again on 64bit

---

Where exactly I did be wrong?