I don't see 6GB on it...
Printable View
I don't see 6GB on it...
I remember this card Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 TOXIC came with 6GBQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
http://media.bestofmicro.com/L/9/349...n%20Gaming.png
http://img.hexus.net/v2/graphics_car...06GB/Power.png
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Sapphire/H...er_maximum.gif
Of course I do not compare here the Power Consumption of this card and say the GTX 780 will come with the same Power Consumption, but i put the pictures as an example
May come with 6GB and may not, Do not forget that tesla K20X card (GK110) come with 6GB and the TDP Was 235W (8pin-6pin)Quote:
I don't see 6GB on it...
I'm not talking about it fitting the TDP ( which will be higher than the K20X's, but still under 300W, a fair 25W shy AFAIK ), but about the 6GB VRAM capacity exclusively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
All good things come in 3s ;)
8-10W per GB as far as I know.
I just wanted to add a +1 to that, for what it's worth.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
JPEG images have a single layer of pixel data. The pictures you linked to magically bringing out data that literally doesn't exist are faked "CSI MAGIC ENHANCE!!!!" stills :). I don't know if the actual score is real or not, but the supposed "reveal" is complete bull.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
Thank you GoldenTiger for the Information:)
But having a much faster consumer flagship card than the competition helps to sell the rest of the product line via the halo effect. Consumer parts can also consume more power, and don't need to be as stable. It's not necessarily "cherry picking," but don't be surprised if Titan comes out with moderately faster specs than K20-X.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darakian
Calm your titties everyone. This is going to be very similar to the K20X in terms of specs, obviously, higher clocks and probably less RAM than some K20X configs.
From what I'm hearing, it should be SIGNIFICANTLY faster than a K10/GTX690 in terms of compute capabilities, which would be huge for a lot of different applications.
Apparently, NVIDIA just sent a bunch of Titan cards to websites and blogs... so we should see reviews/leaks real soon.
It will be named GTX780Ti, will be 899$ with a TDP of 225W and 6 gig ram.
GTX780 will be based on Titan but with 4 gig of ram and there will be a 2 gig version.
Anyway we'll see real soon.
(rubs hands together) (Mr. burns voice) Ex-cellent....Quote:
Originally Posted by vitchilo
i cant wait for the announcement
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/9667/66972171.jpg
I don't like that low TDP. Lower energy consumption is going to lead to lower clocks and lower performance. And if this card is highly restricted, it will honestly a waste of such a potentially monserous card.
Agreed, though the flip side is perhaps it'll OC monstrously if it's artificially clocked low to fit within the TDP but easily capable of more? (trying to find a silver lining LOL).Quote:
Originally Posted by tajoh111
Good to know, thanks! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by vitchilo
So GTX780 will basically be a cut down version of Titan?
Where do you hear that ?Quote:
Originally Posted by vitchilo
TDP is not that low IMO and 4GB/2GB for GTX780 seems weird for a GK110 thing ...
wow nice :up:Quote:
Apparently, NVIDIA just sent a bunch of Titan cards to websites and blogs... so we should see reviews/leaks real soon.
It will be named GTX780Ti, will be 899$ with a TDP of 225W and 6 gig ram.
GTX780 will be based on Titan but with 4 gig of ram and there will be a 2 gig version.
Anyway we'll see real soon.
Sounds implausible. Cut down a 384bit interface to 256bit to accomodate 2/4 GB? Don't think so.
My guess:
14/15 SMX, 850 MHz base clock, 930 MHz turbo clock
384bit, 6GB 6Gbps memory
275W TDP
Name "Geforce Titan"
source please?Quote:
Originally Posted by vitchilo
lies, lies, and more lies. lots of lies here
Rage3D.Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
However, from experience, I can tell you that NEITHER AMD nor NVIDIA typically send NDA products out more than two weeks before launch. 1 week is usually the norm. That goes doubly for ultra high end products like the GTX 690.
This allows companies to properly control information from the sites which typically leak like a sieve.
Some other things that should be mentioned.
- Many sites (including that Tom's article) continually repeat the BS which WCCF posted. The 3DMark screenshot has been proven fake time and again yet certain publications refuse to check their information before posting.
- The so-called "pictures" of Titan are obviously Tesla parts and don't belong under the GeForce brand. Again, sites are propagating misleading information in an effort to boost their pageviews.
Hi, good morning. you have not received anything about this VGAQuote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Article dated from the 31 Jan. allready discussed some pages ago. Still just a repost of of what WCC have write anyway. Not like i care about it .Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
WCCFTech is just a relay with chinese forums and Titan pictures was a false interpretation by some guys here :Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
They never said that's the first pics of Titan card. The problem is not really WCCFTech but what people do with it.Quote:
Oh and incase you want to know what the Tesla K20X actually looks like than see the following pictures (courtesy of Chiphell forums)
250w TDP most likely.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
They don't, necessarily, have to cut the interface down to 256bit to have 2/4GB.
250W seems a bit low for a card named Titan. I would suspect they go all out. Not 375W or so, but a little more than 250W.Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
You're right regarding the interface, but doesn't that lead to performance problems? Clamshell mode - a certain part of the memory will have a much slower bandwidth than the rest.
The next 18 days is going to be painful.
:(
How do we know it is the 25th?
Isn't it unusual for reviewers to get samples this early? Usually they get cards 1-2 weeks before launch.
Nope they have memory controllers that each handle 64bit, Titan will have two more memory controllers than the 256bit part.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Usually there is a correlation between memory controllers and the amount of memory used on a card.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconyu
384bit=3GB/6GB with 12/24 chips
If you want to use 4GB with a 384bit interface, there will be performance problems if the last GB is addressed, because it is not full bandwidth. 2GB on a 384bit interface doesn't make sense either. Either you have 1.5GB full speed and 512MB at lower speed or you have 1/3 of your memory controller doing nothing, consuming energy.
Bus width and memory size have traditionally been matched but its been more the the standard than a rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
It's similar to running a set of say 2gb dimms and a set of 1gb dimms on your mb, its not pretty sounding but functionally it will work fine as long as the different memory can operate within the same spec.
In the end you pay for the performance level of the card relative to the competition for the most part. Even if there is some performance penalty due to the memory configuration you still buy the card for its actual performance.
Ah sorry, I only read your part of the conversation, I also don't think Nvidia will use 384bit for 2/4gb of ram. For me the logical choices are either 3gb or 256bit, anything else is just silly, and 384bit makes the PCB more expensive. It's just messy, and I can't think of an elegant solution for that situation, if AMD can offer 3gb cards so can nvidia.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Woot! Interesting leak...March release huh?
And 780ti, makes sense. GTX285 all over again-.
Not al leak, just crap. People posting 50x the K20x Specifications won't get you anywhere. Desktop parts will be clocked higher than these.
What a load of crap...
big crap :banana::banana::banana::banana: :D
Every single site ( may I say crappy site ? :D ) wants its moment of fame...
With nVIDIA's aggressiveness towards leaks and things a reviewer does and they do not appreciate, what makes you think that anybody would like to sacrifice his sample-income by spilling the beans ?
Regarding the samples, who verified that some people have received a sample already ? A guy posting on rage3d or any forum in general ?
You do realize that it could be any1, heck, it could be me with a second account :D
I know some allready have there cards ;). But yeah we all have to wait for the release date.
I'm just saying.
And yes, I too have a confirmed "owner" ;)
Anyway people, it's not going to be long, and it's characteristics and performance won't change no matter how much you speculate, argue, or whatever.
The editor of ht4u.net stated yesterday that he again didn't receive a sample from Nvidia (Nvidia didn't provide the GTX680 to them). Now why would he say that unless he knew his colleagues at other sites did in fact receive samples already? The picture is coming together.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
I thought I had confirmed that already ( that reviewers and not reviewers have samples already )Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
I misunderstood, sorry :)
Hopefully we'll get some leaks during the weekend.
Im seriously affraid the rumor mills will just continue again for some week...Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Maybe not?
First listing, 975 Euro in Denmark. 6GB seems confirmed:
http://www.proshop.dk/Grafikkort/ASU...5-2394804.html
Nice find, pre tax translates to about 900usd.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
nice :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Added it to cart, got this: Leveringsstatus: Bestilt, forventet p? lager d. 18-02-2013
Let's hope the price drops a bit, 975 is quite steep. 800 would be okay.
Why would NVIDIA launch a product on a federal holiday in the States? The 18th is President's Day.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
The claims are getting more and more ridiculous it seems. "Confirmed owners"? "I know someone who has a card"? Come on now.
Does sound a bit ridiculous to me... (the 18th). I was just copy-pasta'ing what the cart claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
GeForce Titan like a president....
GeForce Titan......BIG DOOOGG:D
After seeing a few specs being thrown about I figured I should share this:
Big ? is though, if the already available gk20x/gk110 is the same chip as the gf110...Code:K20x K20
Stream Processors 2688 2496
Core Clock 732MHz 706MHz
Memory Clock 5.2GHz GDDR5 5.2GHz GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 384-bit 320-bit
VRAM 6GB 5GB
Single Precision 3.95 TFLOPS 3.52 TFLOPS
Double Precision 1.31 TFLOPS (1/3) 1.17 TFLOPS (1/3)
Transistor Count 7.1B 7.1B
TDP 235W 225W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture Kepler Kepler
ROP 48 48?
TMU 240 224?
Dynamic Parallelism
Hyper-Q
Grid Management Unit
NVIDIA GPUDirect
Improved L2 Cache
I'm guessing it is, it's just weird though that the geforce card comes out after the quadro variant, it's strange because normally it's always vice versa.
The 680 really seems that it was a mid range card all this time ^^, at least to me it seems it was.
I totally wasted a bunch of money on the lightning 680 when I should of just waited it out just a few more months.
Ohwell, gonna be needing the new one now since the 680 pukes with AO or SGSSAA, or 3d vision (can't really game much at all with 3d vision's performance being 1/2 to 1/4 the speed of normal).
ues these specs fits a card that is the true successor of 580
I call shinaniganz on the 235W claim... Minimum 250W for a 550mm2 chip.
Remember that these cards aren't going to make use of tessellators or anything else that is only used in a graphics pipeline, as well as being clocked somewhat conservatively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
I have not heard anywhere that Titan will be cut off from its GPGPU/tesslator portions like the 680, in fact I heard the opposite? That the card will bring way more compute power to the table to beat 7970 on that end as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by hurleybird
It would be stupid move for NV to have 580 beat the crap out of next two generations in gpgpu..
Ah, my bad. I thought you were talking about K20X.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
it has already been reported here?
http://www.overclockers.ru/hardnews/...nchmarkov.html
The card in the pic is a K-series part, not a GeForce product.Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
All the info is old and has already been proven wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
New blurred pic on WCCFtech ....
:/
It's another fake, Nvidia doesn't use such VRMs. Looks like Zotac or MSI Lightning (possibly heavily photoshopped, but maybe not... I found a few similar looking PCB shots already :p:).Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
That picture looks terrible lol...Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
-PB
Yeah my first thought was it looked like a Lightning, not that I would know ... Imagine Nvidia turned to MSI to design it .... never happenQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
:D
me Today 07:35 PM
you Today 08:12 PM
too late :D
Your link doesn't work, his does. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
That is a lot more believable score, which makes me think that it is correct.
lol :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
60% faster than the 680...yikes.
Does someone have a direct link for this image from pconline?
;)Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
http://diy.pconline.com.cn/317/3177824.html
Thx. But googlish translation of the text below the picture says that it's just a prognosis.
Whats with the range? This one seems as a more likely possibly score.
so finally this graph becomes true :)
http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/...es-Surface.png
"Of course, Echigo-listed graphics applications run points on 3DMark such will have different "optimization," We expect the GTX Titan 3DMark 11 run points will go to the 5300."
is not a real result, but estimate.
Your image was blocked. Thanks for the link.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
It better beat the 680 by at least 40% since it is 1.87x bigger chip.
More CCs in the GK11x's with exactly the same die sizes? I don't think so?.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea deluxe
Come on. For $899 we must stick to high expectations guys !!! It doesn't make sense to settle for "realistic" figures. I sure have HIGH expectation in terms of 100% better than GTX 680 for this $900 TITAN. Let them disappointing me, its expensive so it should not disappoint. For this money you get GTX 690, obviously has to be around that performance - anything lower is a disappointment.
ps: To be more precise, this is exactly what im expecting:
http://boxofficebuz.com/content/news...news_full.jpeg
I want SAVAGE performance !!!
Because you think peoples on Nvidia will have do a benchmark slide knowing the card will have never been released ... because GK 100 is not the GK110 ( or Nvidia have change his way of working and releasing x110 chips before x100 ))Quote:
Originally Posted by kromosto
i really don't understand what you are saying :) good or bad or neutral :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
You know me it is allways neutral .Quote:
Originally Posted by kromosto
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/9ec46ac...7a771b6556.jpg
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/203...e_GTX_880.html
Added yesterday on TPU
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/
Interesting database. Thanks TPU ! :up:
So it's the next node, it about the same size and only 1,500m transistor gain?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
They have GTX780, Titan and GTX880 with release dates there, lol. I think that can be considered trolling. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
That's interesting, there are GTX 7xx listings too. :confused: Wonder if it's just put there for fun or if it's accidentally posted?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Could be trolling as zalbard guessed.... late in the year radeon models listed as well.
NVIDIA GT 700 Series Kepler 28nm/ Release: 1Q/2Q 2013
NVIDIA GT 800 Series Maxwell 20nm/ Release: ?Q 2014
It's easy:up:
That's the GTX 900...Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Seriously now, Maxwell GPU, with the K20X specs ? Really bad trolling attempt tell 'em.
GEFORCE Titan picture fake!
http://www.arabpcworld.com/images/20...CB-APCW-01.jpg
http://www.arabpcworld.com/images/20...Titan-FACK.jpg
translate.google
http://www.arabpcworld.com/?p=26291Quote:
We had all seen late last week the first picture was about it for the PCB your card GEFORCE Titan where the site, which put the first picture exclusively work crystallized be full and the outlets of the card until even the remaining vision is clear contents, consisting of PCB and the focus was on image the GPU and left a clear and written GK110!
If the audit and the opening image of the PAL GPU find Dear reader that the word GK110 modified manually professionally severe but which revealed it is the site of videocardz when easing crystal on the image became clear milestones the PCB a little and was sudden that's modified fully is the basis of image for PCB card GTX285 has been edited Alfaz Bauer added 3 won in return for only 6 MOSFET circuits instead of 9 in addition to the type of the traditional Amoosvi on the PCB and that you did not use NVIDIA a long time ago! In addition sockets 6 +8 instead of 6 +6! In addition to reducing the number of segments of the existing Memory and modify them with the lifting of the metal cover PAL Ocean GPU.
Not forget planning PAL Ocean GPU decree white is Mtzabak them completely with GTX285 in addition to slot 2Pin next to power outlets.
Department of Energy are quite similar in terms of the number and distribution of Alkpastorz especially Alkpastor next to the ports of DVI Port, which was concealed in this way so as not found out is the PCB.
This must be noted that these fake or Fake
K20X doesn't have 2880/240/64 512-bit bus and Maxwell may also include project Denver CPUs.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
All I know is that TPU has GeForce Titan ("780Ti" term edited 2 days ago, identical specs) since months and, finally, they are maybe right. We will know soon. :yepp:
I'm not that fluent in googlish, could someone please paraphrase what they're saying?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
all I want to say that the picture of (GEFORCE Titan) which was published a week ago is a fake one, as you can see above the similarity with the GTX285 picture is obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
I think if someone wrote on a cake GTX780 some of you will believe it....
What !?, where is this cake you speak of?Quote:
Originally Posted by kuroikenshi
How many candles does it have?