Printable View
I was under the impression a 125w chip was a 125w chip regardless to the number of cores thus a 125w quad core that uses 1.35v stock and 1.55v overclocked would output the same heat as a 125 hexa core in the same scenarioQuote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
You forget that 1090T is 125W, but with 1.28V stock voltage (or at least that's mine). If you get 955 at 3.2GHz but with decreases voltage to 1.28V it won't be 125W anymore.
Well, there are differencies, Thuban core is improved over Deneb, same as C3 over C2, but you get the point. Or..am I wrong?
Your kinda hitting and missing what I was saying all I meant was a 125w chip won't put out extra heat in comparison to other 125w chips regardless to the number of cores. Look at tdp calculators nowhere does it ask number of cores just stock vs overclocked speed/volts so a 6 core won't heat different than a 4 core.Quote:
Originally Posted by I.nfraR.ed
As for the 965 that's not the same as a 1090t it is a 125w 3.4ghz part vs a 125w 3.2ghz part. A 955 125w with the same default voltage would raise tdp the same as its 1090t counterpart
Here's mine, I could get it to 4.2, but that required 1.53v. Not gonna push my luck on that one.
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
* CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1010BPMW
* CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.485V
* CPU Multiplier: 20x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2600 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR2 1066Mhz
* RAM Timings: 5-5-5-15-2T
* RAM Configuration: 4 x 2GB
* RAM vDIMM: 2.00v
* Motherboard: ASUS M4A79 Deluxe
* Chipset/Socket: 790FX + SB750, AM2
* Cooling: Prolimatech Megahalems w/ Scythe GentleTphoon 1850rpm Push/Pull
* Temps: 30C Idle / 54C Load
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
wheres your stability testing?Quote:
Originally Posted by SicKlown42012
Titan: yours 4656Mhz is stable?!!!
suicide validation onlyQuote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
cpu 4.2ghz nb 3ghz 12 hours prime stable, 3rd place on stable chart:p:........maybe with better cpu 4.3ghz-4.4ghz.
Im waiting to see much better results from better cpu steppings. Hope its not only good for high superpi. There should be a few more people with better stable overclocks than me but it still hasnt show up?
hi all, i need to make a choice what is better i7 920 at 4000mhz or phenom ii x6 1090t at 4000mhz? i have to buy now thx :)
get x6 :)
why? give me motivations plz thx
A little reading around this AMD section should do.... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by jacopo1403
Here is mine, hope 2½h Prime is enough?
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013CPDW
CPU Frequency: 4144 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.488 - 1.536V (idle-load)
CPU Multiplier: 14x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2664 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 296 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1578
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX + SB850
Cooling: Water (Corsair Hydro H50 PnP)
Temps: 31C Idle / 63C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Ambient temp 22-23 C
http://www.sweclockers.com/image/gal...nal&k=7f7c96c5
How would a Scythe Mugen 2B work with an X6-1055T? I've got an AM2+ board that ought to get a BIOS update soon for Thuban, and $200 for 6 cores seems worthwhile, over $100 for 4 cores and a lot of missing cache.
I dont understand......theres no standard here for stability. Theres people on the stable list that only did 1 hour prime this is not really going to help people.
i'll keep you posted on that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobsama
Prior to May 1st, there was no established standard for stability. I simply trusted people to be both honest and accurate. Someone had mentioned that I should formalize the definition so as to be more meaningful to those interpreting the charts, and I agreed. All new entries from that point (post #56+ / page 3) have proven themselves as stable via 8+ hours of y-cruncher, OCCT, LinX, Prime95, IBT, etc. I have also on occasion accepted reasonable alternatives to that requirement such as a couple days of WCG with no invalid workunits. All new submissions not providing such proof get marked as "untested" until they do even if the poster marked it as stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Titan7171
My point is that there is certainly some credibility to the "stable" classification.
---
@nex_73: I'll need you to run it over night some time (8+ hours). I know it's kind of stiff, but it's just barely enough to provide a reasonable assurance of total stability.
@Particle: Sure, no problem. Will probably do it tonight anyway...
In the overclocking chart, some 1055T's have a multi different from 14x. Is this just a typo or something else going on?
Locked chips are allowed to use multipliers lower than their maximum. Seeing some entries like 12x isn't really that weird.
Correction to my post #180:
My stepping is CCBBE CB 1013CPDW, not 1013CDPW.
not to clutter this thread, but is the 1090T worth the $100 over the 1055T?
I know you have a better chance of higher clocks, but it seems lie most posting are around the same clocks no matter which chip, performance should be the same at same given clock speed
$100 for less stress on you, your mobo and memory? Sure, why not. The 1055T can clock almost as high; limiting factors being what I've just mentioned ;).
+1 ..Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
Its well worth it for the person that isnt so OC friendly with Hardware, Especially if your Hardware isnt up to it too.
(Like NOT HTT Clockable)
y-cruncher is crunchin away
I'm taking this in the opposite direction and seeing how low of a voltage I can run stock at. Ran all night at 1.200V. Trying 1.150V now.
What clocks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
8h Prime95 - for post #212
Think some of the temps reported in the list are for core not for cpu...?
http://www.sweclockers.com/image/gal...nal&k=60407b9d
Updated.
---
Default clocks--2800 MHz. No turbo since that has its own VID.
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
* CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1010 MPMW
* CPU Frequency: 4366 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.465V
* CPU Multiplier: 20.5x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2769 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 213 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1704 Mhz
* RAM Timings: 6-6-6-20-32 1T
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.71V
* Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair III
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790FX + SB750
* Cooling: Water ( 10celsius)
* Temps: 15C Idle / 34C Load
* Operating System: Windows XP
* 32/64-Bit: 32
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
http://i9.aijaa.com/t/00712/6199042.t.jpg
http://i7.aijaa.com/t/00856/6199036.t.jpg
Crippled by crosshair bios 1602 and waiting for update + win 7
-edit updated correct nb speed.
Updated.
1055 down to 1.100V now. 1.150V looked stable.
What clockspeed, Particle?Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
You must have missed it as I did once reply to your question. This is for stock with turbo disabled. Turbo is off because it has its own VID entirely. I'm trying to see how much voltage one of these things can drop while doing stock speed.
Ok cool. I assume you're using y-cruncher to determine your stability? For some reason Prime95 blend finds errors quickly; y-cruncher cannot.
Really? You're having better luck with Prime? I've actually been meaning to test all the various ones on Thuban. I've so far played with y-cruncher, Prime95, and OCCT.
Yeah it finds errors quickly, I don't know if it has to do with round off checking or what. But the blend option finds memory instability quickly.
Failed at 1.100V. Looks like 1.150V is the ticket for my wafer. That's pretty impressive though.
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3937/captureap.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Quick OC, just tested with Cinebench R10 and R11.5, will test stability and max OC when I have the time
1.4xx VCore (will check later in bios, I forgot VCore in Windows is bugged)
Stock NBCore
Ok, here's update to my previous entry
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1010MPMW
- CPU Frequency: 4267 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.44V
- CPU Multiplier: 18.5x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 3229 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 230 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1845
- RAM Timings: 6-6-5-17-1T
- RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
- RAM vDIMM: 1.69V
- Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD Pro/USB3
- Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
- Cooling: Water (EK Supreme HF)
- Temps: 31C Idle / 54C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
I hope 8 hours of Prime Blend is enough.
vCore idles at 1.416V and fluctuating between 1.44 and 1.452V on load and you see what value is set to (1.403125V), lol.
I'm writing 1.44V, since it seems that almost everyone writes the value which vCore is set to, not the load one.
HT is fluctuating, too, but most of the time it's around 230, regardless the fact I've set it to 228MHz.
Actually, after 8 hours of Blend, C'n'Q is disabled again...
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/891...blend8h.th.png
And here's a screen with 700% memtest from a previous run, didn't wait it untill 1000% reached. The HT seems to be 1 MHz down on that particular screen, 'cause of the fluctuation.
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1...test700.th.png
How the whole system performs in Everest bandwidth test:
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7128/cachemem247.png
Other bios settings
NB Voltage: 1.38V
VDDA Voltage: 2.74375V
HT Voltage: 1.35V
SB Voltage: 1.20V
NB1.8 Voltage: 1.8V
I'm not sure if all of them and their increased values were needed, but that are the settings atm.
I see another 1010MPMW in the table, very good cpu frequency, even if it's on 32bit and chilled water, they seem good :)
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/1184940.png
Here are my settings, stability not tested yest apart from Cinebench 10 and 11.5
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU Stepping: 1012APAW
- CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.451V
- CPU Multiplier: 16x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 2500 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 250 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1667
- RAM Timings: 7-8-7-24-2T
- RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
- RAM vDIMM: 1.51V
- Motherboard: MSI 890GXM G65
- Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
- Cooling: Water (DTek Fuzion V2)
- Temps: 31C Idle / --C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
That's because they stress different parts of the CPU more than others.
prime95 and Linpack (which includes linx and IBT) stress the CPU and execution units the most.
y-cruncher and HyperPi (nearly all the pi-based programs) stress the memory controller and cache more than the execution units.
That's why sometimes prime95 and linpack will fail instantly and y-cruncher won't. And sometimes y-cruncher will fail before prime95 and linpack.
It depends which part of the system (CPU or memory/IO) is more unstable.
As for as temperature goes, linpack seems to run the hottest on Core 2 and K10 if it is tuned correctly. (because it is just THAT well optimized)
But the exact opposite is true on Core i7 when HT is enabled. y-cruncher runs the hottest simply because HT allows it to use both integer and floating-point units at the same time (thus stressing everything).
I bet core damage will get even higher :DQuote:
Originally Posted by poke349
http://damage.vigilantesoftware.com/
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
Then lemme rephrase:
Of the ones I've used: (namely: prime95, linpack, y-cruncher, and OCCT)
y-cruncher runs hottest on Core i7 when HT is on.
This does sound like a very interesting program. I'll try it later (when my i7 rig finishes its current task - which will take a few more days).
From my experience, pure CPU/execution unit programs don't produce the most heat. That's because the execution units are only a small portion of the processor.
To achieve maximum heat, you need the right balance of computation, memory access, and branching to be able to stress every single portion of the processor simultaneously. (execution units, branch prediction, instruction reorderer, cache, memory controller, etc...)
So far, I have yet to see a single program that can do this. I'll see if core damage can do it. :D
Hi,Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
If I understand correctly you find a stable combination at 1055T 2.8GHz stock and 1.150V Vcore. How much of temperature decrease under full load versus standard core voltage ?
At 1.15V, full load is about the same as 1.35V's idle. (~23C) That's about -10 or -15 or so degrees.Quote:
Originally Posted by zhadoom
Thanks for the info.
Have you tested wattage using a Kill-a-watt or similar device and compared stock voltage power draw vs 1.15V also? That would be something interesting, as it may make this an excellent choice for an all-round HTPC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Perhaps also with Turbo on and off? Turbo voltage appears to be relative to core voltage, not just a fixed value (despite what the BIOSes/AMD release info on most major review sites state). I could be completely wrong here, but increasing voltage with turbo on seemed to increase turbo voltage when turbo was active also.
Here's mine, just got my ram from rma so had finally the time to test stability. I had ran Prime95 blend at custom to finish each FFT length test at only one minute and finished all test in just under one hour and still going as I'm writing this.
Last time i tested prime with my x6 (3 weeks ago) fried my board running at 4.2GHz at 1.575v, i guess i was feeding too much volts trying to find stability on which the problem might have been my ram.
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T BE
- CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011BPMW
- CPU Frequency: 4050 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.44V
- CPU Multiplier: 13.5x
- CPU Turbo: 4350 MHz 1.54v
- CPU NB Speed: 2700 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
- RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-1T
- RAM Configuration: 4 x 2GB
- RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
- Motherboard: MSI 790FX-GD70
- Chipset/Socket: 790FX + SB750, AM3
- Cooling: Water (Enzotech Luna Rev.A + TFC Monsta 420/360)
- Temps: 23C Idle / 40C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
From the screenshot, my idle temps shows 33c but actually it's about 23c as i ran hwmonitor after i ran prime ;) lame excuse
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/5421/primex62.jpg
Need an update for the 1055T
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/CrossHair...55t-Stable.jpg
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1015DPMW
CPU Frequency: 4117.8 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.53V
CPU Multiplier: 13.5x CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2440 MHz
CPU NB vCore: auto
HT Ref Speed: 305 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1626 mhz
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-2T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.67V
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV
Chipset/Socket: 890fX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Water, non chilled
Temps: 23C Idle / 42C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Updated. No, I haven't tested wall power, but I can do so if you wish. I do have a watt meter. What kind of configuration are you interested in? I'll have to use a discrete GPU as this isn't a GX board, which would probably be what you'd use in an actual HTPC. I can test it with any combination of the following you'd like:
- (2 Max) Radeon HD 5850 OC
- Radeon 4850
- Radeon 3870
- GeForce 8400 GS
---
@ridney: I'll need 8+ hours for the stable chart. For now you're on untested.
Maybe time to put in the first post that people should NOT report the core temperatures, it's the CPU temperature that are interesting...
Some posts here where they are at damaging levels +62C at the CPU (cpu temp approx core temps + 13C !)
Don't want people to fry their cpu:s...
Edit: Maybe also ask people to write down full load voltage instead of idle voltage....
My Updated OC :)
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011APMW
- CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.393v (BIOS) -- ~1.415v (Prime95 full load)
- CPU Multiplier: 20x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 2000 MHz (1.125v)
- HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1333
- RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-2T
- RAM Configuration: 4 x 2GB
- RAM vDIMM: 1.55V
- Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
- Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
- Cooling: Air (Prolimatek Megahalems); 322W Peak Power Consumption Prime95 Full Load (~300W average)
- Temps: Everest: Idle (CPU 38C; Cores 20C) -- Load (CPU 69C; Cores 49C)
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable (Prime95 x64: Blend; 9h 39m)
SS :up:
My stable entry. RAM is a bit weak... I'll work on it later when I try for 3900mhz stable.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CPDW
CPU Frequency: 3808 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.387V
CPU Multiplier: 14x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2448MHz
HT Ref Speed: 272 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1451
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
Motherboard: MSI 890GXM-G65
Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Xigmatek HDT-S1283 + Yate Loon Medium
Temps: 30c idle, 52c load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Any configuration would be fine - just interested to see stock clock/voltage vs undervolted on stock clock. I know ramping voltage upwards exponentially increases power usage...Only do it if you feel like it/have time, no pressure :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Particle
a few days... you disappoint me...Quote:
Originally Posted by poke349
Today is so much cooler, so close to suicide 4.4GHz Cinebench 11.5
Why? Is it wrong to do something that takes more than a week?Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
I do it all the time. (And I usually can't pause in the middle of it.)
It finished early this morning. So here are my results:
Core i7 (HT on):
Core Damage: 73 - 74C
y-cruncher: 71 - 72C
prime95: 70 - 71C
IBT (Linpack): 69 - 71C
So yes, Core Damage does what it says.
My hope would be that he was simply being sarcastic. I think we all appreciate your work. After all, he could test them all himself if his need were that pertinent.
--
Did that HTPC simulation run that was requested. At 2800 MHz using a VID of 1.15V, full system power from the wall was 253W during OCCT. 28.5C load temp. Full system power from the wall during idle was 174W at the same frequency and VID. Idle power could be reduced by having CnQ running, but it doesn't work properly for Thuban on this motherboard yet. Also note that I had a Radeon HD 5850 OC installed as the graphics adapter which will pull as much power idle as a traditional HTPC's GPU probably would at full load: 25W or so. I ran it with one SSD for booting and one HDD for storage as might be found in a mainstream HTPC. The SSD's contribution to power draw would be nearly insignificant, so just discard that if you don't think an SSD is commonplace for an HTPC. The point was primarily to get a mechanical mass storage drive in there.
meh... I'm a lot better at spotting sarcasm face-to-face than online. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
My first X6... :D
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1012APMW
CPU Frequency: 4130 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.4625v (BIOS)
CPU Multiplier: 14x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2655 MHz (1.20v)
HT Ref Speed: 295 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1575
RAM Timings: 7-8-7-18-30 1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.475V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Custom Water
Temps: PC Probe / Tcase Idle 28c, End of run 48c
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable (Prime Blend/33 Minutes, your call :))
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...lendStable.png
I'll leave it up to you as to whether you wan't to call it Stable or not Particle... I've killed a few boards in the past with extended stress runs and I don't really want to fry my new gear... :p:
Is that all you got Dave lol.....:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
A very sweet upgrade from my E6600. :clap:
I'm having trouble going over 3.9GHz, but will keep trying.
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
- CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013CPMW
- CPU Frequency: 3900 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.456V
- CPU Multiplier: 13x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 2400 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
- RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
- RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
- RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H
- Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
- Cooling: Air (Noctua NH-D14)
- Temps: 28C Idle / 45C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
scbl - I also upgraded from an E6600... some of the best $400 I've ever spent.
That chip is looking pretty hot, Daveburt. You've got yourself a real gem there if it's stable.
I've color-coded the overclock charts. Green = stable, yellow = untested, and red = unstable. Let me know what you guys think. I believe it helps make the charts more easily readable.
thanks. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by poke349
I would have tested my self but I don't have my Phenom II 940 in my board or a six core 1090T/1055T to test, I'm on my valcano Phenom X4 9850 BE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
I do appreciate seeing the I7 tested on that thanks, seems to make the most heat in a cpu, once I get a 1090T will be using it too. :)
I like, one thing though... Can we get the user name on the left side? I like to see everyones results and I have to keep scrolling to see the same and back to view the score :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Not a big deal, just thought I'd mentioned it, great job on the charts:up:
I have a request.
Can someone please try OCCT:linpack at 4.0Ghz or more? I see a lot of Prime Blend, but in my experience OCCT stability is harder to achieve. I've had CPUs that prime for hours and coundn't resist 15 minutes of OCCT.
Nice to see the X6 runs with the DDR2 crowd if you dont want to upgrade your entire box. I dont think I need the current volts for the current clock. I'll work on that and NB speeds later. All update once they change. (I didn't take a screen of my ram timings, let me know if thats a requirement and I can make another prime run.)
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1012APMW
CPU Frequency: 4027 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.500V
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2215 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 201 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR2-1066
RAM Timings: 5-6-6-20-2T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 2.1V
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790X + SB750 (EDIT: 790X, not FX, my bad)
Cooling: TRUE 120
Temps: 25C Idle / 53C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
http://home.comcast.net/~clamarr/8ho...able_prime.jpg
The 4004 number I have on the chart actually was tested with OCCT for eight hours, but not using the linpack method. Linkpack wasn't achieving 100% load.
--
As for names on the left, I agree. I have to scroll back and forth quite a bit myself. I'm not sure if I made column order modular or not in the software--I'll have to try it and see what happens.
Edit: Looks like I did. Let's see how people like the left-handed names.
Here ya go. Did it for a little over the time requested. Seems it goes in a loop of sorts where it ramps up to 100% load and then restarts the loop of whatever it does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi64
(ambient temps are a little cooler today, so all the temps are a tad bit lower then before.)
http://home.comcast.net/~clamarr/lin...T_run_4Ghz.jpg
Thanks Ruckus! :D
Can you test for 1 hour, please?
Now it's better :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
I have a suggestion too, to obtain a shorter table... how about to supress some columns (I'm thinking of "HT Mult" -almost blank-; "+Mhz/+mV"; or including "Bitness" with "OS": x64, x32... and supressing "Professional" hehe).
Anyone notice the trends for 1055 vs 1090 on +MHz/+mV? The 1090s seem to be providing better results in terms of frequency gains per extra millivolt applied. The statistic takes base frequency into account. Of the stable results, 1090s seem to be offering about 10MHz per extra millivolt. 1055s seem to average around 8MHz per extra millivolt.
@PetNorth: +MHz/+mV is pretty important, but I like the other ideas.
Thanks, much appreciated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
I hadn't paid attention to this portion of the chart yet. Interesting though. I will throw in the 1090T and see if I can up the stable chart.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Keep in mind the mobo and cooling too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
My 1090T is eating up to 1.62 at 4.2ghz and 2.8ghz NB @ 1.265v on prime95 on a H50 at ~53c on the mobo in sig.
As reported by cpuz and hwmonitor which I consider the standard for ocing.
Funny, I've used OCCT Linpack for testing stability before on overclocks and it would show stable. I then tried Prime95 on the same OCs and they would fail. Is it because it's not @ 100% load all the time?
Just 40 mins of Prime blend so not considered stable but good enough for me.
Please put under untested.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1012DPMW
CPU Frequency: 4216 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.47V bios
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2949 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 210 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR1685
RAM Timings: 6-6-5-18-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula - bios 0801
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890X + SB850
Cooling: Water Heatkiller 3.0
Temps: 16ºC Idle / 35ºC Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 40 mins Prime blend -- untested
Ambient temp: 22ºC
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../Prime4216.png
nice Zeus
Sure, Linpack is running. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi64
Here ya go Andi64.
http://home.comcast.net/~clamarr/lin...Ghz_60mins.jpg
Anyone else try IntelBurn Test and get an odd noise!!?!?!?!?
If you run a stress test and get a noise, it's almost surely power related--chokes or whatnot.
I guess these pretty little graphs OCCT makes show the usage better.
http://home.comcast.net/~clamarr/201...14h59-CPU1.png
Thanks Ruckus!! I really really appreciate it! It's really nice to see 1Hs+ of Linpack running at 4025Mhz!
I'm waiting for a pair of 1055T, one for me, and one for a friend... we want to hit 4.0Ghz stable.
My build:
Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H
Phenom II X6 1055T with TRUE
GSKill ECO DDR3-1600 7-8-7-24
I'll post some results as soon as we have them. We are in Argentina, so it's going to take some days :(
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011APMW
CPU Frequency: 4000 Mhz
CPU vCore: 1.39V Bios (1.41V when loaded Prime95)
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2600 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 2200 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR800
RAM Timings: 5-5-5-15-1T
RAM Configuration: 8 GB (4 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.96V
Motherboard: Foxconn A79A-S Bios D28 Beta :up:
Chipset/Socket: AM2+, 790FX + SB750
Cooling: Air - Kingwin XT-1264
Temps: 22ºC Idle / 56ºC Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 8+ hours Prime blend -- Tested
Ambient temp: 24C
Full Load
Idle after Prime Run (notice no downclock of cores unlike Asus M3N-HT Deluxe :down:)
Idle
i like the charts particle, it looks more interesting
I agree ridney! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by ridney
Particle: You could probably compact it a little more by just showing the model# of the chip (drop the "Phenom II X6" verbage)...
Just a suggestion, since it seems a little redundant based on the thread title. ;)
BTW: Thanks for the kind words concerning my chip, I really haven't had alot of time testing it yet.
For some wierd reason setting HTRef >295 in bios is still giving me fits, even when everything else is lowered to the point where it should be out of the equation... :shakes:
seems i have found the max for this chip. not a good batch as i need lots of volts to get this thing up there.. my NB is hot on this board, when i get time i will re-seat it...
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013CPMW
CPU Frequency: 4004 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.58V bios
CPU Multiplier: 14x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2002 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR1524
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-20-2T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.8V yes the mushkin ram XMP-1600 is 1.8v
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H - bios F7c
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
Cooling: DTek water block
Temps: 24ºC Idle / 48ºC Load
Operating System: WinXP SP3
32/64-Bit: 32
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 5hrs 34 mins Prime blend
http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/5254/oc8.jpg
nunchucka your coretemp says you running 1.4 volts on the cpu and cpu says 1.58 volts ? bugs everywhere right now :/Quote:
Originally Posted by nunchucka
thats not a bug afaik, coretemp just shows the VID (as set in factory from AMD, to reach the default 6x2.8GHz) of the cpu, the 1.58v are the real volts he needed to achieve the 4GHz.
The VID is what core temp reads, CPU-Z reads bios voltage settings, This is what it does on my CorssHair IV as well. Core temp also reads max Turbo addtion regardless of actual voltage setting. It also does this when using Offset for voltage.Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
No, because I just downloaded Core Temp and it shows the same voltage as CPU-Z for me.
@polizei: than you have not altered the voltage in the bios: is it still on auto?
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011MPMW
CPU Frequency: 4197 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.55 idle 1.62v load
CPU Multiplier: 18x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2796 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 233 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR1555
RAM Timings: 7-7-7-19 T1 unganged
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.55v
Motherboard: DFI LP Jr 790GX M3H5
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790GX + SB750
Cooling: H50
Temps: 28ºC Idle / 55ºC Load
Operating System: Win7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested/Stable [your pick] 35 mins Prime blend and IntelBurn at the same time
ugh,
can't wait to join you guys!
i have 1055t + MSI 890FXA-GD70 + g.skill 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 + corsair H50 in the mail. will be posting with results later in the week.
:eek: four years wait before your first post :sofa: shy much? :D
LOL dalearyous. Welcome :)
One quick question:
How are people able to change the multiplier for their 1055t? I thought it was supposed to be locked.
Edit: Wow, registered ~7 years ago... first post :P .
yeah i don't remember creating an account, i came to the site, wanted to post and my normal username worked.
it is locked. only when you turn on Turbo, it can jump from 14x to 16.5x as far as i know.Quote:
Originally Posted by seiferoth10
Here's one with a multiplier of 13: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=261
And another with 13.5: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=247
There's others, but those are what I found in a very quick search.