Some of the results:p:
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...winner-is.html
Printable View
Some of the results:p:
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...winner-is.html
Go Jaan :clap: :up:
And now the event we're all waiting for; massman takes the setup puts it under LN2 and takes the 01 WR with it. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
SuperPi
1. Chech Republic
2. Belgium
3. Estonia & Latvia
3DMark 2001 SE
1. Turkey
2. Belgium
3. Norway
More detailes later.. request them from hicookie :)
Congratz to winners!
Rumor has it, somebody called Intel HQ and ordered a 6.5GHz LGA1156 Gulftown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
All we know is he's called Massman and he was definitely asking for trouble ( not more beer :p: ) when he promised to break the 3D Mark2001SE WR on P55.
:D
So overall winners are Team Belgium? Congrats to all the guys that competed, I'm sure it was frustrating with the CPU clock limits :p:
consistency rules the day , GO GO Belgium :D
Congratulations to Team Belgium!
My cograts to team belgium :up:
Hey guys, show us some pics :D
Cotgrats to winners!
Congrats Team Belgium :up::up:
Some people just can't take a hint.Quote:
Originally Posted by JAT
I tried telling you this wasn't the place to have your arguements with SF3D but you just couldn't let it go.
Ok, you read what I said and you ignored it.
It was your decision to do so.
Gautam banned you for a week over this.
I'm making it permanent.
Xs is not and will not be a place for people to bring arguements of this nature to .
Now some personal thoughts:
Time for you to grow up and realise in the big picture of life your missing this one Gigabyte tournament is a tiny thing.
I also want you to consider this:
After seeing your posts here do you think anyone will ever invite you anywhere?
Thanks for reading.
It was me Dave, not Ashraf.
You know what's funny is, in your absence, I was known as the hardass and you as the merciful one. :p:
I just saw that and came to edit my post..:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Yes yes Belgium at the top ! :D
so small country but so many talent :)
Way to go team Belgium :up:
But I don't understand why they didn't win the 01 round, with Massman's mad P55/01 skills :p::D
Sure that's the way ! Congratz to our belgian friends :clap: ...but where are you stoping at mates ? :up:
Is there a full ranking with all teams?
Nicely done Team Belgium :up:
Congrats Team Belgium and all the winners:up:
Was a really really good competition guys, really good, I enjoyed meeting everybody, we had alot of fun, unfortunately our misfortune is related to Hicookie didnt do his job well; I specifically asked for him to wear a miniskirt and be our cheerleader, he failed doing so, I was deeply in sorrow :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Nah back to reality, our 32M result at DK, no5 at 9 min 8.465? (right???)
it was made from 9-9-9-24 timings, using these I was completely satisfied by our time!
ONE thing for the record; YES, we did use MAXMEM=666
Well done guys! Is anywhere a complete list of all scores with the relative ranking of this competition???
Alex
thanks dino! I had a blast down there!! final score was 80791 I believe.. close to Belgium :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
It was more frustating with our bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: cpu block limit to around 200Mhz ... with normal VTT :DQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
BTW i m just arrive home , and it was a nice event :cool:
there was no overall category , 32m and 3dmark01 were separate competitions , two champions (czech and turkey) were crowned (:D) etc
trouff and hwbot - please fix : 3rd place in 32m was taken by Jaan and Sam , not Octopus and Sam
Yes please I ask the same :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Delex
It was really nice to meet you guys. Congrats to the winners:up:
Congratz to the winners and to Gigabyte for a flawless event
Thanks all for the nice comments BUT
there is no overal champion lol.... it's only a king ( and if you will see the pictures a queen lol ) per round...
How it went for team belgium :
Preliminary test : First bootup and tests with the UD6 (F3 bios) high PCI-E possible, high Bclock but we had to flash to F5D... lost some of the bclock and PCI-E freq... but decided to not backflash.
Pi32mb run was run at 220 Block bootup ( 222 didn't boot, so we used setfsb to up, looking for the last 40Mhz ) 1.42Vcore, 1.66VTT, rams at 2220 C8-9-8-22 1.9volts ( we didn't have these rams for pretests so we were on unknown grounds)
We were aiming for 9 min 5 secs ( pretests at home with 210bclock rams at 2100C8-9-8-22 ( OCZ Blades ) we got 9 min 9 flat. After we found a working Bclock ( upping the VTT in the red zone did the trick ) we could start the tweaking... Sadly for us we found out too late that the Kingstons did even 7-9-7-22 at 1.86Vdimm. Our last run ( completed out of time ) was already 1.3 Secs faster (2/3 down the test) than our best time... so we estimated it to end at 9min 4secs or something... Still not enough to beat OBR's team score
Round 2: we kept running 222Bclock, upped PCI-E to 115Mhz and started GPU testing the card was stable at 800GPU, Shaders had to be kept at 1600mhz otherwise immediate freezes would occur. We did our first run, took the screenshot and tried to retest Car Low... but the System crashed each time...
Looking for a solution we lowered GPU clocks : to no avail, Bclock 220 then, no go for a rerun. Loosening timings, nothing really helped... Due to the numerous BSOD's, freezes the Windows OS was getting sort of borked and in the end not even the Intel frequency tool would maximise... Really annoying as we didn't have the time to do a restore via the ghost program...
I had heaps of fun, was nice talking and drinkingwith you guys
till next time
Any pictures to share with us? :up:
Our 3rd team member ( dutch press guy ) will do a review on the event, I'll ask Danny for some piccies as Massman's camera had some issues.
But I think trouffman will beat me to it :)
it would be nice to hear from winners then
i am really confused how OBR and hey managed to beat the competition by such huge margins..........
also i am a bit surprised that the superpi times were a bit out......they should have been around 9m flat mark if you guys did in fact have 1100 on RAM
can someone tell us what submitings you guys were running, how did you prep the OS....
I think some people forgot to setup D3D Overrider :D
dont forget that given os'es were jam-packed with drivers and you had to have an intel frequency tool and cpu tweaker open at all times (even during a 32m and 01 runs)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
in know that of course hehQuote:
Originally Posted by proxis
they did have some time to prep the OSes
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Well, I do not know about SuperPi, but I do know why the guys from Turkey won with such a big margin :)
They were running 222, 2220 8-9-8, and they really tweaked the 2k1 runs, so the results is almost perfect. We were running almost same specs with them (222, 2220, 8-9-7-20, tRRD 3) and we were having some....nice fps (ask hey and tosuner_mc, that saw what we were pulling there), but we did 3 horrible mistakes:
1 - we played it all or nothing, and in the end it was nothing.
2 - we didn't get the hint when the tests would random fail after 4-5 runs, and we would not take the BCLK 1-2 MHZ lower like Belgium did. We were such egomaniac stupid bastards that when we have seen hey's fps and our fps we were 100% sure that we will win the 2k1 with 82k. We were so sure about that, that we didn't even realise our problem was with BCLK not VGA, so we wasted all the time trying to find the sweetspot for the VGA. We could boot at 222, we could run 32M with tighter sub-latencies then 2k1, we would pass any test if run separately, we would pass lobbies, nature and CH, but we would ALWAYS fail at the beggining og DH or CL if run in "tweaked" order!!!!!!
3 - we DID NOT try the oldest fkin trick in the book. We didn't try letting 2-3 minutes cool down breaks between runs.
Regarding SuperPI, we were just stupid. We wasted most of the time trying to run 235 BCLK. When we realised we cannot do it, we wasted more time tightening the latencies on the ram. After that we had a run (9.15), after that we had another run with copy wazza (shaving 5 seconds, so 9.10.3 smth), and when we should have bring in the heavy system tweaks and shave 3-4more seconds, out time was up.
So, from my point of view, even if usually we have bad luck in this sort of competitions, this time it had NOTHING to do with luck. We were just stupid and inefficient, so we deserved to achieve nothing.
But enough about us. I REALLY want to congratulate Czech and Turkish for their result, they really played a GREAT game. They were far in front if everybody and they did an extraordinary work! I know how hey and tosuner won in 2k1, I do not know yet what OBR used in Pi32M, but I am really curious , because it worked great.
Also, BIG congrats to the Belgium team, you guys really played a very intelligent game, and you deserve all the credit for that. Also, my respect for Norway and their 2k1 performance, and for Latvia and Estonia for their PI32M performance.
All my respect and my congratulations for everybody in this competition, everybody worked hard and played nice. Also, BIG congrats to Gigabyte, this was an extraordinary event and I am proud that we took part of this.
Thank you for this great experience everybody!!!
And do not forget, the party is in 7081, Romania's room (at least we didn't suck at that :D:D:D )
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...8&d=1256637911
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...9&d=1256637911
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...0&d=1256637911
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...1&d=1256637911
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...2&d=1256637911
http://lab501.ro/forum/attachment.ph...3&d=1256637942
shame man
was really cheering on for you on the IRC heheheh
That's it man, turn the knife around, I deserve that :(
But thank you for the support bro, I know you believed in us!
i think what a good OC event needs is the following
1 hour morning test so everything runs ok bla bla bla and then function (during which everyone could prep the setups and occasionally get interrupted) and 5 hours for the competition for say two rounds with official timetable...say 3d first, superpi second but you are allowed to go back and rebench the first round and submit any time you like.........this is what MOA was supposed to have but they kept changing their minds....that was just a perfect format imo
in this timeframe you have time to check the components, prep them for subzero, prep the OS and also quickly speedbin your board/RAM/GFX..........
i reckon baring bad luck this would be very close to a perfect kinda comp format where it would be luck and skill spread more evenly and make things even closer/more exciting
I hope they do more contests like this around the world. I'd love an all air contest...not even I'd be able to kill hardware then!
Congratz to ALL OCers and to Gigabyte for a flawless event
It wasn't perfect tweaking competition - but still very good :) (for example not all CPUs hit 222 BCLK and so on ...)
Paris city of love ... and overclockres doing what they love best
You ware GREAT
Good work, Captain Jinx :p: :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Hi all!
First I have to apologize, that one of my comments to solid have made such a huge mess in here. Sorry!
I will soon send e-mail to bulldog, solid and puunakki, cause they are the ones who have been misleaded in the beginning. I have nothing to do with selections and I heard the whole story in Paris, so I can tell more about that to these guys. It is nothing, that needs to be talked in here and there is only few misunderstandings in there. Or, so I believe.
I have never had problems in Finnish forums, but of course you cannot please everyone. So it is totally understandable, that some people in Finland might feel abandoned sometimes. I hope those guys would remember that you have to do a lot of work to get where you are. But that is it, no more this off topic here. If someone have something to ask or say, there is always possibility to send PM's to me. I usually answer to all of them.
Then some talk about competition itself:
Competition was very interesting and different. Level of it was really high, even we were so limited by frequencys.
Too bad we lost our 01, because of some weird D3D overrider issue. Luckily we found out the issue with elmors help after the competition, so it is not that frustrating.
Good work Gigabyte! Thanks to Kristina, Phillip and all the other GB crew!
Corrected, thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by proxis
I hope everybody arrived fine and enjoyed the last days. I went through my photos (>400) and I`ll upload some pictures later then of course. Unfortunately my cold is getting worse, so I really have to rest now. :( I need a Lido nurse! :rofl:
@Gigabyte: Thank you very much & special Thx to Kristina! :up:
Once Hicookie puts up the official screenshots all the timings will be reveilled, belgium team maybe messed up by running TRFC too high ( 88 ), our last non official run with TRFC sub 80 nibbled off easily close to 2 secs of our official time... ( inexperience with the ram, I pretested with Hypers and thought we got the 6gb PC1600C8 kit from Kingston : FAIL lol )Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Rumour is that OBR and co ran really loose timings (read C10-10-10-...) Maybe this allowed them to get away with a really low RTL value ( we couldn't touch ours in the bios, as that would result in a no post or an infinite loop ) I was nicely surprised by them rams as my previous K rams weren't that performant (read OC potential :D)
Thx Bernice and Sibren from Gigabyte Holland for having me. Massman to support my snooooooooooooooring during the short sleeps we had in our superexpensive hotel rooms...
Really nice to have met you guys, especially Petri aka the viking giant impressed me :up:... Looking forward to all the piccies...
Good luck Monica in Paris !!
If there's a next time for me, I'm going for Monstru's beer (again)
Oops!Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanzo
We couldn't really get our tweaking skills out as during the 70 minute competition we were able to run the complete benchmark twice. 80806 and 80860, but with a poor Car Low. If I estimate correctly (judging by the optimal subtest scores we had already), we could have come close to the Turkish first score of 81499, but their second one was a display of absolute skill.
It will be interesting to see the subtest details, because we can all learn from this competition!!
By the way, the reason why we came in second twice was because I was mocking the Polish team for being twice in all competition. As Chaos said: "What comes around, goes around" :D
Basic preperpations we used:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
- Pagefie to slave partition (512-512)
- LSC + two other reg tweaks (remove pagefile and something I forgot)
- Maxmem to 615
- Manual copy-waza with folder of 600+ MB
- d:/ -> d:/folder (two times- Disable most services (only event log - RPC - shell hardware detection)
- d:/folder cut to c:/
- c:/folder copy to d:/
- Best ratio was 543/547
- Set theme to olive (doesn't change that much, IMHO)
- LOD=4.6 + D3D
- Run order: CH-N-LH-DH-LL-DL-CL
Hardware configuration:
- Boot at 220, 222 didn't work, and setfsb up to 221.9x18 to have not over 4GHz.
- Enable three cores. 0/1 for 32M and 2 for applications as Intel Frequency Tool and CPU-Tweaker (which had to be running during the 32M run)
- Memory 2:10 1.9V 7-9-7-22, TRFC=88 (77 also worked in last run), TRRD=4 or 5. Of course B2B to 0 and RTL by auto (couldn't be changed because no boot; around 52, I think)
- VGA: 800/1600/1350 in Riva; something like 775/1584/1350 real.
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Impressive work as always my friend!
Huge congrats to massman and Leeghoofd! :up:
Pretty much same... A few changes from us:Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
LOD 4.8, MAXMEM=666 order; DL-CL-LL-CH-DH-LH-PAUSE-N, 805/1610/1250 (didnt have time for finding gfx ram - rund order we experienced as only stable for our clocks for some reason...)
... surprise, we forgot D3D (yea, live is stressed, especially with bad start)
Automatic CW, 16K filesize 384MB, CDT enabled
PF disabled..
LSC, all other left flat, estimated wasnt worth doing with our very limited time (Gain not worth considering time consumption)
- Removed windows apps (WMP, MSN etc.)
- Boot ini, sorry Gigabyte, but really, EasyTune6 and launch with registry :shakes:
PS: Next year, really, we need a decent screwdriver, we COULDNT unmount gfx cooler during prep time to change thermalpaste....
Oh and I was suprised no one used the CPU fan for cooling graphics during 01SE, was indeed possible
Once again, really enjoyed meeting you guys, dispite Pieter, really, pierced my heart to loose... I have to get you really drunk at AOCM ;-P
EDIT: 4.8 for nature, think others were 3, cant remember... We couldnt bring laptop, and we experienced some was higher in 4 range, others in 2 range, so just took something in between
Where were you when the lights went out in Paris City ?Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
We were still partying :ROTF:
ps : don't tell my wife :)
so what ICs do you guys think they were
i was under the impression they were BBSE
lol 88 TRFC.............i'm sure you could have done low 60s if you tried more :p
what RTL were you on?
settings timings looser will not let you set tighter RTL....it must have been something else that allowed them to run tighter RTL....IF that was the case.....but running cas10 would have killed his efficiency big time no matter what clocks...it's gotta be something else that allowed him
what about other subtimings....yeah let us know what else you set in bios or what you left on auto whatever is easier
u got rid of maxmem for 3d right?
did you guys do any pretesting for run order? unusual order there from both
Great results Massman, have somebody full results? or where finished Slovak editors team?
We had zero experience with these rams and were already shocked they did over 2200mhz... 2D dunno if we could have gone lower then eg 70, for 3D loosening TRFC was the only way to keep it sort of stable... System was really degrading at the end... !! BUT no burned sockets !!
Await the cookie screens Dino... cpu tweaker reveals it all (I think :p)
This sounds very wrong; With BerniceQuote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Roy and Bernice were funny as hell : - )
But I believe you were with same crowd as me tuesday evening, monday I cant remember, apart from; YES you were at Monstru room :yepp:
Oh and searching for Bernice on facebook, her pictures and Mads (Danish guy) videos from our parties must get online :ROTF:
Everybody was; WTF when Roy bit off the nose of Kingston logo :rofl:
Must be something like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Btw, for reference: 2200 CL7-9-7 was stable, 2200 CL9-8-8 was not !
TRFC was quite tricky, I think low 70 was already pushing it. But, remember no one had tested these memory sticks before. No one even know the exact memory IC type, so it's very difficult to find optimum settings for the memory :).Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Luckily Thomas told me he was running 2000CL7, so we decided to test lower timings.
RTL was around 52 I think.
Hicookie will post the results of top3 or top5 and those screenshots will contain subtiming details.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
3DMark01 has proven to be quite tricky on P55 again; you will see from the screenshots that higher doesn't always equal better.
No, this one was chosen during the competition, but it looks a lot like the run order I used in previous sessions.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
There's no such thing as 'usual run order' as it varies from setup to setup or even from session to session. I just check what tests are harder to get stable or which will improve the most from being run first. CH has some 'high' runs sometimes, so I run it first.
I didn't see you in the nipple biting contest lol. In the same room ( don't even recall the room nr) where you still there when we had the Ira event on tuesday ? !! luckily the Viking infantry saved us !!Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
yes , for us, run to 2200 was impossible because our cpu was too weak in bclock. RAM ran fine to 2000Mhz 7-6-5-18-60 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
Another great event from Gigabyte :D
We were crippled in 32m because of 210 bclock and rams were not really stable there either running 8-9-8 2100. Final result was 9m11s, had a much better run that'd have hit around 9m8s but crashed. I think the theory about trfc making the difference is wrong cause we were running it at 70 and 65.
Higher timings and lower RTL is possible, but we were running 49 and did not have really good performance and ram timings should cripple alot. We need hicookie to publish the screenshots to find this one out.
01 was in great need of ram and uncore as well but I think we finished 5th there which is decent below teams as Turkey, Belgium and Norway ;) GFX was at 740/1630/1370 in riva.
You see, what you need is decent press backing. You and ME4ME have won 100% of the events I've attended as press. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by elmor
Thanks to Gigabyte (Kristina & hicookie) for inviting us to TweaKING competition. This was very nice and a little bit different kind of oc-competition. Also it was nice to meet everyone (some people once again) :up:
Team Finland Spi32M score (4th):
Our CPU booted and worked easily with 222 MHz BCLK. First we used one multiplier smaller memory ratio (DDR3-888) with 7-8-7-18-74 1T timings but time was 7 min 10,844 sec. Then we switched to DDR3-2220 memory setting and gained couple more seconds. We also tried 235 MHz base clock but were not successfull, maybe with more time. Anyway 70 minutes went FAST and we managed to do four full runs.
http://plaza.fi/s/f/editor/images/gb...and_spi32m.JPG
CPU: 18 x 222 MHz: vcore 1,4V, vtt 1,5V
MEM: DDR3-2220 9-9-9-24-82 1T 1,76V
Tweaks: Pagefile to slave partition (512-512), LSC, Maxmem to 618, OCX Copy-waza, Disable most services, set theme to Silver, language bar tweak, disabled VGA, real time, affinity to two cores.
One "problem" in competition:
Instead of CPU-Z Gigabyte demanded everyone using Intel Frequency Display utility which IS UNFORTUNATELY NOT very accurate. For example our 3996 MHz CPU frequency was being displayed as 4000 MHz. I don't know if for example 4004 MHz and more was being shown as 4000 MHz as well..
Thanx to Gigabyte for having another great contest :up:
Elmor and me were struggeling a bit with the bclock, and couldn't run as high as some other people did. Because of that, we were forced to run lower uncore. But i guess we can't compain about anything, because some people (Pt1t) had even worse bclocks.
however, the most results were really close to eachother, and the contest was very pleasant :)
I'll try to put up some pictures soon too
hi all guys; we just arrived home, because too high internet prices at the hotel i am just writing..
Firstly and most importantly; i had great time! not because i win or loose but having really good time with old and new friends; i never change this to any winning possition or sth.
And very very congrats the all buddies i know all are good tweakers but some time lucks cant be with you like us in 32m :))
let me write one by one
first one is 32M
i dont know if you checked our 32M scores :) it is 9m 19sec :rofl: how can we have such a sucks score ?? here is the answer CPUTweaker was not working and we couldnt realise it cause it shows setting up is ok but not really setting up :( because we dont use cpuz at that contest we didnt run cpuz so we never thought that is possible :( so our real mem timings was such 8-15-15-31-..subs are also as high as auto from bios gives..
first we thought some sevices may caused that so even we ghost the system back but we never realised the problem; okay we are guilty cause i was setting only cas from bios but here we had an unknown memory so that shoul be normal guys..:shakes:
well this is our bad luck in superpi 32m (we were easyly capable of 9m 8sec with 9-10-10 timings at home ;) even at that setup without any tweak we get 9m 17sec,, check our 9m 19sec on the event :)) )
In case on 3DMARK01
it is not a great results we got there :) my romanian friends know it :D let me just tell what i got at home at 211blck 121pcie vga@750-1587-1380, i was able to do 812xx; at 222bclck 125pci vga@750-1587-1380 with bad mem timingscas9-10 etc, i was able to do 81624. so in that contest we ran at 222bclkc 126pcie, vga@760-(1590to1625)-1338 we got 81590 :up: it was not easy to let system see ssd at this pcie :) so not a good score :up:
i am really sorry that our romanian friends couldnt run their system in 3d; cause their vga was better than ours and i believe it was gonna be really good buddy challenge :)
also thomas s unable to pass 200bclk cpu; petri and sampsa s d3d problem and i had thought that was a vga mem problem...and all guys that have such problems..
with all my respects..
hey
and of course thanks to gigabyte for such an event ;)
For Bclock, i found how to boot (not even 32M stable) with 222Block :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ME4ME
But i think Cpu did not support that more than 5min ... because it needed 1.8V VTT :rolleyes:
Yea, some work for BIOS team on the BIOS, if selecting ONE setting manually in BIOS, such as CAS, of which you cant change in OS, all other timings are being :banana::banana::banana::banana:ed....Quote:
Originally Posted by hey
We also didnt notice this in good time, was our reason for running flat; 9-9-9-24 (Auto)
We couldnt get past 111 PCI-e :shrug:
Hmm, dispite 210 vs. 211, you would have been no1 in 01SE, but Im impressed that the judge accepted that since only rule of event was 4000mhz, not 4000.1... you ran 4009mhz
Roy (UK guy) stated this as being of very high importance on the stage.
Once again hey, as I said in Paris, VERY VERY impressive run :up: You suprised me alot, especially for not kicking my ass when I said "hey hey" :D
Yeh, you was the one who was spamming it :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
crazy speaker, UK guy is Rui, not Roy :D
finally get back home, had extra night with hi Cookie and estonian friends (N i'm NOT gay ^^')
Really really tired, and had like 80 minutes of "real vidéos" to capture / edit / publish !
That was a very great event, especially for us french guys, as that's the real first time something is held in our country !
I didn't had that much time to speak with you all about tweaks you used, etc, but tried my best to have a little chat with everyone, as it's so many people in the same time, that's really great to see you all and share some beers together.
Special thanks to GIGABYTE (kevin, christophe, wil from france, and also Hi Cookie, kristina and bernice for the parties )
I can bet this is only the beginning and "warm up" for next year events such as GOOC 2010 and other OC / Tweaking competition.
Even my real real real bad luck the last few days (broke to many thing, windows on my car, destroy 1 webcam, almost killed my laptop etc....) that was nice and hope to be a part of this kind of event next time !
Last : special cheers to the norway guys that manage to stay at our table with BUNCH of french-press guys in the LIDO, drinking all the red wine... (we ended up to 9 bottles for our table... with few people not drinking ^^)
Great event, and lots off fun, was great meeting you all.The night/morning fun was exeptional. Hihi the ira event like someone called it :)
Hope to meet you all again sometime.
Et mon trépied ? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Trouffman
Hey guys,
was great to meet all of you there!
Unfortunatly our i5-750 does not like VTT about 1.6V (no boot) and so we are not able to run BCLK 220+
We run 210.4x19 with 2:10 and 8-9-6-20 1T
same with the VGA I think we where the only guys there GFX not hit more than 720 MHz... :(
but the Olympic spirit is all what counts ;)
hope to see all of you soon!
Haha I'm using that. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by K404
And nice work everyone. Even still it seemed like luck was a bit of a factor and clearly everyone tried to tweak hard.
I am NOT an Overclocker, but EDITOR! If massman said how can compete some unknown Power User from forum with "BIG" OC names. I wanted to prove is it possible.
I had only two free days for preparation, i chose SuperPi for that and :banana::banana::banana::banana:ed up for 3D01. Used Ci5-750 + Asus P557P LE (very cheap mobo) + Corsairs 2000 C7. I didnot tested whole event setup before.
We did some known OS, registry tweaks + SPI Tweaker (no manual waza).
- diagnostic boot
- largeCache
Pagefile 512/512 on D:
Waza 560, 128k, no CDT or IV
Settings: 210 BCLK (9-9-9-24-1+ trfc 74) 2100 MHz MEMs, CPU at 3990 MHz time was 9,03.
Our system can pass 32M at 221 BCLK (booted from bios), 2210 MHz Mems at (10-9-9-9-31-1) but score was worst - 9,04 (was stable for 3d01 too)
Dinos: hey man, i can beat you every day i wants ... you can choose a test and we will se who has a magic and ho can only talking about it (YEAH, this is a challenge!!)
Here we go again....
OBR I still have no idea how you beat us all with rams running way tighter timings, but congratz dude, well done
Just a tip here though: Just keep ya remarks a bit on a lower less arrogant level though :p Don't attack people or challenge them in this way... not good for ya own popularityQuote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Hey used 222x18 = 4000 in the competition. I was standing next to their screen when they finished one of their runs. Nothing suspicious in there.Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
This mistake / misunderstanding is fixed now hopefully :up:
Thanks, but i think YOU are a real winners, great scores in both test ...
we have to wait for screens, i dont remember whole timings settings
PS, Leeghoofd, i didnot start in that arrogant style ... but Dinos
Hey guys,
I was also wondering about the speed of the czech SPi Run, but we sitting right back of them and we have a look at all what they does...
I not find anything special, no cheating but a very very good performance for the Clocks what they had.
At least I kissed them beautifull girls, i was already happy with that :D (don't tell my girl though :p)Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Too bad Gigabyte didn't foresee two medals per team... the crown thing was a bit gayish to me :p
Yeap me misreading!Quote:
Originally Posted by SF3D
Hey man, I tweaked the system, not my reading skills :rofl:
Picture update! :)
If you want to see all of my pictures from the competition at a higher resolution, please have a look here: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,69...enchmark/News/ (including summary in German)
Later I will upload a few photos of Paris sightseeing, too. :cool:
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270777_gigabyte_twea3ejw.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270783_gigabyte_tweadhju.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270892_gigabyte_tweajdah.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270923_gigabyte_twea4cox.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270952_gigabyte_tweamg4i.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa270971_gigabyte_tweanhqf.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa271006_gigabyte_tweajh6u.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa271031_gigabyte_tweafdqy.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/pa271082_gigabyte_tweaud1w.jpg
Great pics !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperhorn
Hyperhorn, dude, I didnt know it was you, had no idea about your name :-/
By any chance, can you upload the pics to rapidshare of transfer them to me somehow? :-)
Then you should become one :p:.Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
I'm trying to figure out what went wrong. 3 seconds is quite a lot given the settings you used ...
Luckily I have this setup at home LOL
so bad you have some stuff hidden on your CPU-tweaker screen OBR ;)
(i'm checking + uploading the screenshots from every teams \o/ )
Here you go, some of my pictures:
LINK TO ALBUM
for those who want to download, at the left side on the following page, there is a "Download this album" buttom ;)
check: main page
You already forgot my name Henry... unbelievable :p
I don't know either person in this photo, but it cracked me up, the way the queen is looking at her king :D
http://i33.tinypic.com/116neqg.jpg
and you can see her nipples :rofl:
Rofl Obr
now you mention it, i really can't remember your real name :p: As far as i know you, your just Leeghoofd :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Albrecht... come on, spell it.... it's A... L... B...R...E...C...H....T... :D
i read all my posts againQuote:
Originally Posted by OBR
dont get upset man take my comments light hearted and i did congratulate you of course as well..............you were in a company of some very good 32M tweakers.......it wasnt really a reflection on you....just surprise.....
i remember you....you were part of MOA....next time i see you i buy beers ok ....btw who is who in that photo :D
:up:
hey Leeghoofd so that's you with massman....so you're an old dog too :D hahahah.......:up: :rofl:
oh i was talking about this photo that i saw on OCX
http://img1.abload.de/img/_mg_0927v0uk.jpg
I just posted this article; http://www.techsweden.org/artikel/qu...tweaking-2009/
It has like ~75 pictures and it's in Swedish.
Guy in middle is Raymond, Thomas is the one in the right side (Thomas @ Production Manager, Raymond was the BIOS guy)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriller
EDIT; Ihhh, M.Beier
here we go : I got some delay because was in need to modify / orgnaise some stuff before to gave you the correct link :p
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...-tweaking-2009
Sooooo :D you can embed all the pics directly if you want !
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...scores-spi.png
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...ores-3dm01.png
your subtimings were pretty loose................Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
what i am finding surprising is that Sam from Latvia was slower than both of you guys considering that he had better timings and actually ran wazza (top runner didnt from comments unless he did OCXTweaker CDT run which can sometimes be faster if the OS is right).........UNLESS he was just unstable at the frequency he ram either with bus or RAM
this OS must be been really weird :confused: and is the only thing i can think of here......running diagnostic mode in superpi will usually take a hit on superpi as well unless as i said this OS is just outside norm :shrug:....it could have been so weird to actually improve times ROFL....
have a look at subtimings from top 3 runners...massman's run with the right bios selected subs would have been a few seconds quicker easy but it's hard to be smart in a competition with a limited time frame and unknown RAM itodally understand that and was in a similar situation.........
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...i-9-03-469.png
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...pi-9.6.047.png
http://www.overclocking-tv.com/blog/...spi-906907.png
I thought CPU Tweaker was there, so we all could see the memory timings? No?
there is another shot with full CPU tweaker, i gave to Flash TWO screens
superpi_czech_rep + mem_settings_czech_rep ... ask Hicookie for both screens!
i will check flash disk when crystal is back.Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
i think im not glade to see participant try to hide some information
and not full cputweaker page, but i also need to respect our judge and
overclocker they have right to keep their " own tweakings".
from my side, over the event is very busy.
but i only can sure and check each results and every loopings in
super pi is normal, not use setfsb during pi calculating.
so i think czech's pi loops are great, just very fast than we can image.
as i told at my previous post we re getting 9m 8sec with 222x18 9-13-13-25 at home so with tighter timings and our the tweaks that we used, sub9m 03sec were possible for us but running at 211 and 9-9-9 etc i think i cant get that score especially at diagnostic mode (it is always slower for us) so so so however you guys tweak the system should be very very good:up: but please all you guys dont argue as editor-poweruser-xtreme ocer etc .. because most of us are already all of these :D
i will add photos as soon as i get them from my friend :up:
i wasnt arguing at all if you were referring to me
i just want to understand what made the difference thats all heh :)
We did one last suicide run, though we knew we weren't gonna make it in time(as the previous attempt errored) with 7-9-7-something and TRFC around 77. The time was far better ( around low 9 min 4 ) but still not good enough to get below 9 min 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
The next day we started to realise we forgot some tweaks. I have an excuse as I'm an old dog :rofl: Pj does not :ROTF:
But it was mega fun to meet most of you clockign gods. But maybe next time all crews hang out together... There's still loads of you I don't even have the faintest clue what ya tag or real name is !!!
It might actually be the intel freq tool. Everyone had it running full size and I see OBR is running it smaller size.