Well, 7GHz 24/7 seems a little extreme to me, but I've never had any personal experience with a high end Phenom II chip.
I'll just say, I'd expect these to clock really well (obviously)!
Printable View
whos says that this thing wil clock higher?
perhaps more cores , perhaps more and faster cache.. perhaps smaller procedee..
Do u seen some CPU at 6GHz 24/7 :D? LN2 and much, much barrels :rofl:
Extreme OC isnt for 24/7, but for records and stability behind benchmark.
24/7 is for AIR/ Water etc and 4.2-4.3GHz with watter 24/7 is real with retails Phenom II 955 BE. I mean, its possible about 5GHz 24/7 with watter for TWKR edition.
FlanK3r: Source?
The system that guy was gonna try it on is a watercooled unit isn't it? so if its over 5gees on water and goes public, I'm on one like a fly on poop.
but all people are not overclockers and 965 is possible...I mean, 965 will be new revision C3.
it better be possible, deneb is supposedly the top chip for desktops for another 18 months according to some slides i remember seeing a few months back
These appeared yesterday on AMD's Flickr site:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2432/...01c2a2ce5a.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3383/...7c39d6efe5.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3369/...3ebd60cf_b.jpg
:up:
I really want one :(
Even if just for the case :p:
NDA lift should be tomorrow as far as I know (July 1st). It was in that blogger's post a week or so ago.
I really think they should sell these chips, otherwise I think it's a pretty bad stunt. Would be better to show it as ES and make some noize at a PR event with LHe/LN2. I mean, why the fancy box and geeky name if it's not going to be released to market (even though in extremely small quantities and high price). Am very interested in seeing how they perform though.
Some sites will be giving these away.
http://www.tomshardware.com/pictures...enom-twkr.html
I apologize if this has been posted already but do take a look :D:yepp:
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1009/1/
Legit Reviews dated today...
Some overclocking results..
When i've read the first lines and i saw the cpuz pictures i remained shocked:mad: This is more a bad joke in my opinion from Amd a 2ghz stock frecuency Deneb at 1.44v? I don't uderstand anything... What it's the point of this "Tweaker":confused: It reach 100-200Mhz more on air than 955 and 5.9 ghz on LN2 may be with real overclockers 6.5-7ghz??? .. So why it's "exclusive" , "not for sale' it's just a "haf step forward than 955" and i even bet that there 955 as good at this tweaker.. I'm profundly deceptioned about this, this "Tweaker operation" it's more a market strategy to gain share in overclockers team but hey i prefer an E8600@6.5ghz with 3.33ghz stock low vid than this in my opinion patetic 2GHZ 1.44v which was presented like holly grall and induced the opinion of meny people that started to think that it can do 5ghz 24/7 on air and is highly binned and so on...
http://www.legitreviews.com/images/r...stock_cpuz.jpg
http://www.legitreviews.com/images/r...09/4000ghz.jpg
http://www.legitreviews.com/images/r...-CPUz-6583.jpgQuote:
We were able to reach 4.0GHz on the AMD Phenom II X4 TWKR 42 processor with the XIGMATEK HDT-S1283 air cooled heat sink. This is an improvement of 100MHz on air, but we had to bump the voltage up to 1.46V rather than the 1.45V used to max out the Phenom II 955 processor. Basically, the processor was able to run another 0.1V more CPU Core Voltage which was good enough to reach an extra 100MHz. During our interview with AMD they said a 100MHz overclock was expected on air and that is exactly what we saw.
next are at neoseeker, tomshw, overclocksclub, hothardware, techwarelabs etc :)
http://www.dailytech.com/AMD+Gives+A...ticle15558.htm
sorry if this has been posted
For those that dont make it to the AMD section........ http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=228418
Well, now you're just being silly. Sure, I was expecting a bit more than 100-200MHz bump in clocks but how could you be disappointed by the stock clock? It's not for sale nor is it intended to be run @ stock. If they wanted to it's pretty easy to imagine these chips would do 3GHz at that voltage (they did, 4,0GHz to be exact).
*facepalm* You do have eyes, right? 4 Ghz stable @ 1.45v, 6.6 Ghz QUAD CORE not DUAL CORE. It is highly binned, it's high leakage, and meant for LN2 or Liquid Helium.
The above post is an epic fail.
I'm glad you like E8600's. They are great dual-core CPU's. Overclock well, and don't make too much heat. When you realize that 4 is greater than 2 I'd be glad to think you make sense.
tom's twkr give away: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...test,2352.html
:)
AMD Phenom II TWKR Black Edition Reviews
http://hothardware.com/Articles/AMD-...-Edition-TWKR/
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1009/1/
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha..._black_review/
http://www.tomshardware.com/pictures...enom-twkr.html
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...n_cpu_preview/
Lots of reviews for something you can not get... :)
Just to make things a bit clearer....
From what i read, i found some really logical words...
AndQuote:
If you look closely at the TWKR-edition's heatspreader, you'll see AMD Phenom II 42, TWKR Black Edition, Not for Sale. There is no serial number or any other identification marker. This is because the chip is offered “as-is,” and not covered by AMD's product warranty due to the increased heat and expected shorter life they're destined to live.
So this would be a nice answer as to why these are not widely availabe. They are not for your everyday use! , and everyone that thinks why these chips are sent to "some" and not to you, then you should really reconsider the purpose of this special edition chip.Quote:
The fact that these chips are high leakage components actually makes them undesireable as retail processors. Whereas AMD's flagship Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition falls within AMD's specified thermal limits, these TWKR-edition CPUs do not. They draw more power, generate more heat, and run less efficiently than the chips that AMD sells. The hardcore overclocking community isn't really concerned about efficiency or heat, though. Rather, they're looking for sheer performance, which leads to record-setting benchmark results. This is why AMD's TWKR is so attractive for extreme overclockers and not average users, or even overclockers cooling with air.
Oye, I am not sure if it was kingpins intentions, but that freeze frame courtesy of AMD is showing everyone what a kingpin pot looks like inside, something I remember kingpin not being too pleased about.
100 in quantity? They might as well given these diamond heatspreaders with gold pins.
So anyone put one under xtreme cold yet Liquid Helium?
Seems like these chips are the ones that would have been RMA'd if someone actually got these.
You don't get it i sad that this 42tweaker is just a little bit better than some 955 that can do 4ghz 1.45v-1.50v and also 6.5-6.6ghz it's nothing new i mean 955 had reached that frecuency....Quote:
*facepalm* You do have eyes, right? 4 Ghz stable @ 1.45v, 6.6 Ghz QUAD CORE not DUAL CORE. It is highly binned, it's high leakage, and meant for LN2 or Liquid Helium.
The above post is an epic fail.
I'm glad you like E8600's. They are great dual-core CPU's. Overclock well, and don't make too much heat. When you realize that 4 is greater than 2 I'd be glad to think you make sense.
So this limited launch "not for sale" it's just marketing...
"Regular" users will be able to get 125W 965BE while the LN2 OCers will try to get leaky 42twkr .This way AMD covered both sides.And who's to say 965BE won't clock close to twkr? Twkr owners just have a bit better chances to reach 7GHz on Ln2/Lhe than those with 955/965.
:down: for revealing the new kingpin pot internals... at least you cant see the bottom :rolleyes:
So the TWKR chips have better oc capability compared to the 965be?
So I guess the Phenom FX will be @ 1.35-1.4v @ 4ghz.:D
The problem PII is warmth, PII like cold at AIR (and not only with AIR) ---> with this C2 revision is 4GHz topmodel unreal...I mean, max 3.6GHz clock model, not more.
How good would AMD start selling if they made a Phenom FX? Thats pretty much what the Black Edition's are, the replacement for the FX moniker. At least, thats what I cam up with in my mind.
If AMD really wanted to I'm sure they could start mass producing 3.6-3.8 Ghz "FX" chips, I mean if you look at how much they pushed frequencies on the Athlon X2 's I don't know why not. All the 6400+'s were cherry picked, if they did the same here they could have a 3.6 Ghz part on the market.
There are a lot of current AMD chips out there now that can hit 3.6 on stock voltage, albeit with no OC room without more voltage from there. Give them some more time and a new revision C3 or Dx or whatever and I think we'll start seeing them on the market. The 945 got scrapped by the 955 at launch because they had the silicon to do it. For them to really start moving chips they need to get OEM's to start buying the Phenom II's instead of the older phenom I's and then things will get rolling again.
AMD TWKR BE: Phenom II 42 - 6GHz+
http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews.php?reviewid=806
AMD Overclocking-Event: Phenom II - 7GHz+
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,68...king-CPU/News/
Any other site, onethreehill? Website is blocked on my university till night time.
You don't really have to go far.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...228525&page=11
Old thread, but new TWKR test :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06y2Py6qX-s
Can you ask him to OC A 1100T for the next amd legendary hardware vid, should be able to get close to 1k cb since Fx gets like 850.
Gamers Nexus didn't do it justice @ all,no northbridge clocking w/low hertz on the cores like wtf ?
Do not worry, its no issue for me. I have still have in my colection Crosshair IV + 1090T + 1100T and GSkill RAM :)