Yep. http://www.preiscompany.de/ddr2-4096...i-p-21749.html
Printable View
Thanks a lot Sepander, i ll have a look at the site. I hope they will be able to send in Greece.
Btw i cant understand a thing on the site, and the price of 290 euro is more than crazy tbh.
ROFL. 300 Euro is too much for DDR2.
I agree its an expensive kit. But 300 dollars in US does not translate in 300 euros. I was expecting to be in the range of 180-200 euros.
I like this memory a lot, i have replaced my transcend 1200 4x1 sticks with a set of theses. So far i have them running @ 1200 default speed with a performance level of 5. They run intel burn test stable kick ass!!!
lossened up subtimings n set memory to nominal to see if p35 can pull these babies 1300mhz
did a full pass + 1 pass of test 5 in memtest
Nice work above zsamz, do you remember what PL (performance level) you used and what voltage you were running, thanks?
G.SKILL F2-9600 plus GA-EP45-DS5, 80-mm fan - 1534Mhz 5-9-9-25 2х2gb 2.6v
http://s55.radikal.ru/i150/0811/a8/a6fd958cfb9et.jpg
Nice highgertz, lets see some everest scores on the run ??
neo mike
Only validation, recently checked GA-EP45-UD3.
Your able to run these sticks at PL 5 ? i would like to see that, i find that hard to believe
i can get them to run at 1300(1299) with pl5 default timings at 2.133 volts
wow very nice results, i cant get my xtreem teams to run a 5 at 1000mgz, impressive, that asus maxus board , what chipset is that ?
maximus formula converted to rampage formula with bios 410(have not updated to the newer 6xx bios yet). I also cleaned/remounted my north and south bridge coolers
thats impressive board and memory, i know the g.skill 9600 rocks, had no idea could run that low pl, probaly has something to with your board to. The best i can get with my board and memory is pl 7.
Has anyone picked up the ddr2-1100 version? They are literally half the price as these. I can't see myself spending $300 for a set of dd2-1200 but i can see myself spending $105 on ddr2-1100
the 1100s wont overclock for nothing, i had them and rma them, best i could get was like 1170, and that was pushing hard
Thanks for the info. I guess if I was not looking to OC hard, then the $105 price would be ok for some 1100mhz ram?
These needed 2.150 volts to get prime 95 blend stable for 12+ hours at stock clocks 1200Mhz 5 5 5 15, there was just no way around this for me.
But my system has never been so stable. The cheap ram just wasn't cutting it anymore. Happy with purchase. :D
Hello again to you. Dry ice, 2.6v 1509 MHz 6-9-9-25 EP45-UD3. Acceleration I do not like.
http://s53.radikal.ru/i140/0812/9c/8558e794f605t.jpg
At 1440Mhz 5-5-5-15 2.4v -50-56*С booted windows and super pi 1m, also at 1450.
http://i068.radikal.ru/0812/e1/a1da8256a56at.jpg
To be continued :)
Great work man, that is certainly the highest clocks I've seen with these modules (not bad for a 2 x 2GB kit)! What did you use to cool the modules, I realize you used Dry Ice but what did you use for a container (any pictures of the setup)? In anycase that is pretty amazing Highgertz, keep pushing it!
Roger_D25
Invented ghetto-glass juice RICH, soon prepare photo.
New WR :)
1545MHz 5-5-5-15 2.6v
http://s57.radikal.ru/i157/0812/9a/780207b21e39t.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=468849
I was at 1000Mhz cas4 with my last Ram. My benches were a decent amount better at 1200mhz 5 5 5 15 not to mention my system is more stable now. I wrote up a page about the gains from this Ram here. http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=...55874;
Here is something you don't see around here to often...a realisitic and usable overclock that won't degrade in two months time. it was 75F when I ran this test on air.
The first experimental model, prototype :)
http://s58.radikal.ru/i161/0901/50/0e9bc10eb76bt.jpg
And I thought you were just joking around with me regarding the "ghetto-glass juice RICH", very impressive to say the least! It must be working pretty darn good given your insane clocks on these modules, let us know when the RAM cooler will be available in retail channels! Keep pushing it man!
Got one of these kit for christmas;)
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7113/332oh3.jpg
This config donīt brings the best bandwidth but looks like the sweet spot to me.
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/5052/323pd5.jpg
Anyone know anything about this new Revision:
http://i39.tinypic.com/s2wete.jpg
Hey mate this are the ones i have...
i'm runing them 1267 PL8 / AI twister Lighter / 2,09vdimm / NB 1,45 on my Maximus 2 Formula / Q9650 4038 (475x8,5)
I can do stable on the P45 till 1200 PL7 on 2,05 vdimm on x9 multi
they're awesome i have to test more
Cheers
Sergio
i got the same ^
better/worse than the rev before ?
I donīt know, in case someone is wondering this are the same has guess2098 showed in his first post
Sorry, i meant the ones i have
Hey guys
Is it possible to run this mems on more than 2,1 for 24/7 ? say 2,15 or 2,2 ?
Sergio
too hard zsamz for the P45 and the quad...i can do 1267 on CL5 PL8 yes on x9 multi, and 1200 PL7 on 2 - 2,05 and NB 1,41 - 1,45, can't do PL6
for 1200 5-5-4-15 PL8 i managed to pass 9 LinX pass normal test failed on 10 so they need more volts on the P45
quad + 2x2GB too hard for the chipset, much easier on duals
inmo
Or maybe i will have to loose timmings, i'm just runing them 5-5-5-15 the rest auto
Thanks zsamz any tip i appreciatte
Sergio
well i have a dfi board but no p45:eek:
if i set on verry aggressive in memory pulls i wont pass memtest so i set to aggressive n i 'm good
i suggest you chek real volts with multimeter
n dont be afraid to push 1.45v on nb i'm pushing 1.55v on p35
it might be you quad stressing nb too so might be harder
when i go p45 it will be dfi again:D i dont like the performance of all the other p45 boards
for 1300mhz i set timings @ 5-5-5--15-5-56 pl8 2.06v
i dont have skews they different on my board then on p45
thanks zsamz :up: yes the quad is putting lots of stress specially at 8,5 multi, as i have issues on x9 multi and not on 8,5 i'm there...
will keep trying but yes this mems go up fine till 1300, i want them for 24/7, 1200 CL5 on PL8 at 480x8,5 gives me good bandwith
Cheers
Sergio
to make you guys feel better.. im running mine @ 2.5v
no problemo.. doesnt even get warm :up:
awesome ddr2 kit
^ lol
@ 600mhz for now.. burning in for short while
vdimm/mem speed not optimal yet
Dunno yet so far same as my old pair on the other board.
That depends on so many factors, if you are running only for DDr2 high speeds and low processor speed like 6X333 is one volt but to run 500x9 on Quads that voltage doesn't suffice.
Thats Napalm :up::up:
thanks lol :)
exactly.. chipsets/diferent rev chipsets/mobos.. all @ different vdimm
running 500x9 q9650 and mem @ 600.. rated vdimm goes out the window
500x9 q9650 @ rev A2 p45 is one reason
another.. if the kit is not able to run @ high voltage ~2.8v it goes back to manufacturer
2gb modules can sustain higher voltage than 1gb ones
2.5v no biggie.. though im not posting all this to invite you guys to run at such voltage
run vdimm you guys see fit @
run a gan over them ? :confused:
oh duh lol fan thanks zsamz
no fan on top/over them
just the air ventilated from the cpu cooler fan
runs really cool.. no need for a fan
i took temps @ raytek laser: left module @ 32-34 C right module @ 33-36 C
to the touch far from warm
lol i think i just invented another way of cooling mems :rofl:
Sorry guys i meant FAN
What are your ambient temps guys ? I have 26 to 27C
At 2,15 feels warm
I managed to put them at 1200 CL5 / PL8 / AI twisterd moderate / 2,05vdimm and NB 1,45 stable at multi 8,5
I can't do PL7 on this multi, and also can't do strong or stronger
I can run them 1200 5-5-4-15 on 2,1v but not stable on memtest, same on 1267 or more, i still can't boot on 1300 if i don't go up on PL
This are my stable 24/7 for now as i can't make the system stable at x9 multi on more than 4005mhz :O( i've been trying a month now and took me minutes to make it stable on x8,5
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/1403/capturamj3.jpg
Cheers guys :up:
will patent my GAN cooler :D
my sitcks are 26.2c my ambient is 22c no fan 2.06v
run them 5-5-5-15-5-56 endresergio
Hey Napalm,
See if you can run these GSkill9600 using Gigabyte board fsb520xmulti6 / strap 2:50 / 266 = 1300DDR2mHZ 5-5-5-15
I can't pass simple DOS memtest 1, 5 or 7 with these new pair, I haven't tested the old ones yet.
EDIT: I think you can do it whats holding me is my cpu and vtt. I can't raise them more then 1.24v because I' using stock cooler (waiting on Duniek for the Cryo-Z mount that works with this Gigabyte).
So I raised the vcore a bit and was able to pass using 1:1 strap but I know these mem can pass 1300+ at 520x6 and more... Just wanna verify what vcore and vtt you need to pass that so I don't rma these sticks without a reason.
:down:
@ Jor3lBR - no matter the voltages.. no 1300 :( even @ default no 1333 either
@ andressergio - 22-23 C
Ok Napalm thank you so much for your help.
I guess my ram isn't bad after all it's just too much stress for it at 520 fsb or higher I guess.
Probably the strap is bad too, I will use 2:40b strap I was able to run some benches at 5000Mhz with that one.
I need my Cryo mount or a good air cooler :shakes:
no 1300 on the extreme but ill try on the dq6
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7372/cachememvm9.png
Jor3lBR - Would it be of any help if I were to try running the modules at 1300 (520 x 6) or are you only interested if its on the same motherboard as yours? I've been wronging strong since getting the modules at 1203hz (266Mhz divider and 400Mhz FSB) on 2.10v but I haven't messed around much at RAM speeds above that. Iv'e got the day off so it would be easy to test out.
Hey Roger thanks for your help, I think is more board related, this board is wonderfull but stresses ram slots much more then DFI or Asus I think.
I good easily run 1300 on DFI but never past 486 fsb so I can't compare.
It's that thing about compromise, to get a Quad stable at 4500(500x9) for 24/7 on low volts they had to compromise somewhere, but memory speeds are good so I'm satisfied.
I asked Napalm because he has a Gigabyte and I was afraid my Ram's where DOA or from a bad batch.
Jor3lBR - Your very welcome, I had a feeling that it was probably more board related and that is why you asked Napalm. With that said I also agree with you 100% about comprimise, it is very rare that you can push each component to its limit because theres always a weak link so to speak.
zsamz - I also agree with you regarding DFI boards being optimized nicely for 2 x 2GB combos, from personal experience they simply seem stronger in this department over most other boards (at least all the boards I've tested).
Here's a DDR2_1176 Mhz PL8 run on the EP45-UD3P needed 2.25-2.28vdimm and 1.38vmch strap 2:40:
http://i42.tinypic.com/kaifl5.jpg
Great quad you got, but gigabyte boards produce very poor everest bandwidth, i went thru 3 gigabytes before i learned that lesson, your better off with a dfi, or asus. I have switched over to asus, and am never going back to a gigabyte board again.
I dunno what you guys are talking about, probably comparing the old Gigabytes or old bios...
Guys I got both DFI X48 and the Gigabyte UD3P in front of me here and all I can say is that the Gigabyte UD3P over performs my DFI in every single way including Bandwidth.
You cannot compare apple with oranges, DFI's runs at PL6 and Giga's PL8.
My DFI at 486fsb and 1215MhzDDR2 speed / PL6 gave me 10585Mb/S and the Gigabyte gives me 10K with PL 8 and 1166MhzDDR2 that is a HUGE difference between faster speed on DFI and PL6.
So bit per bit Gigabyte UD3 is faster then DFI or any other board to be honest.
And also Asus, DFI,MSi,Bio, etc can't generate 5095Mhz on a Quad Core not even in their wildest dreams.
This same chip on the DFI maxed out with 486fsb...
Zsam it's time to get a Gigabyte again! :ROTF::up:
to be quite honest i would not take a gigabut board for free:yepp::yepp:
i wont be no gigabut guinypig again ever
3 crap gigabut boards in 1 year is enough for my lifetime i wont even buy a gigabut usbdrive:rofl:
when i fry my ut p35 i getting the ut p45:yepp::yepp:
when i use a quad it wont be on a 775 board
dfi did drop the ball on the x38-48:(
Well i agree the ud3p is a good board, and the gigabyte boards i had were ud3p burned out in 2 days:down:, ep45t- ud3p ddr3 version totally sucked, and a ep45-ds3r. I disagree with you on the bandwidth, i ran my board at the same settings , same memory as other people had, and the bandwidth was 400-500 points lower at least in everest, i have had 3 gigabytes in the last 4 months, look in this thread and look at zsasm everest runs, i would like to you crack 12k, or even 11,500 on that ud3p, im sorry buddy gigabyte boards overclock just awesome, but the peformance is subpar at best, you can have your gigabyte board, i wish you the best luck:D. I have my first asus board a striker 2 extreme and comparing it to the ep45t , the asus just destroyes it.
I've done that without much effort mate...
Dunno what was your problem with these boards but sometimes it can be that little device siting between the chair and the screen :rofl:
I would like to see some of your SS's showing Asus destroying anything. *j/k you don't need to send me anything*edit
Now seriously memory bandwidth means nothing if the board doesn't perform well...
Hey no offense ment, i have just had my fill of gigabytes for now. Most of the gigabytes i have seen reviewed are never on top of the benches. As long as your happy that is all that matters :up:
Thanks zsamz and sorry i am late, i have been for a while with the config you recommended trying to get results similar to yours. The highest i try is at 506fsb with 4/5 and pl7, but the board seems to break in pieces:
http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/6885/506bx2.jpg
Same happened with pl6, best results are at 484fsb and 3/4, with about 1,72vnb, too forced for me:
http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/7640/484qn5.jpg
At the end i returned to 430fsb and pl5, after playing crysis some time i rechecked again with everest and seems that while gaming the memory works different, probably a fail:
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8044/430xc1.jpg
Sorry and thanks again
Mtrx the mininmum pl you should be using is 7 @ 500fsb+ its just verry hard on the board
you dont need over 1.6v on nb 1.55v is enough
ok, iīll lower it and try to get it stable, thanks a lot:up:
No luck with less vnb at 506fsb and pl7, prime blend fails with 1,55v in secs, 1,60v in 6 minutes and 1,65v after 9 minutes. At 1,68v passed almost 1,30h but i stopped because was getting toasts, iīm done at lower fsb zsamz, thanks for your help
nice FSB and bandwidth Mtrx :up:
what x38 do you actually have? Maximus formula?
P5E, Rampage?
Yeah, nice bandwidth Mtrx :up:
@MrHydes
this is the p5e with his latest 1102 bios, an old x38 but still working well, have been rejuvenated a bit with these kit. I should try your rampage extreme, those x48 rog looks great boards!
@Zsamz
iīll try again tomorrow using pl8 and 4/5 at 506fsb keeping those vnb, for everyday use i personally prefer the lowest tRD possible at lower volts, but been capable of getting this rig stable at high fsb is a must for a good bechmark session, only needed a cpu than clocks like yours:p:. i found also that at 484fsb with 3/4 and pl7 although according to everest more than about 100mb/s in read/write/copy are missed compared to pl6, the latency remains the same, i have to study that further, the bios and memset must be working different because as i know the latency should increase at higher pl, maybe this x38 canīt scale more, iīll report back if found more info.
@WaterFlex
these cellshock you got there looks nice too, great speed at low volts, if you are using 5/6 that must speedy the bandwidth at low latency. The music of your page sounds good for a bechy session;)
Thanks all you!
Zsamz, i tried last night pl8 506fsb up to 1,63vnb and blend test still crash, maybe more fsb vtt is needed but donīt want to touch it, time ago i wasnīt cautious with an e8500 and his vcore and vtt and probably thatīs why it degrades because this e8600 has been rock solid since i got it keeping vtt at default and vcore at the lowest possible. The results at 484fsb and pl7 are close to yours at 490fsb with the dfi x38 and 3/4, good enough, iīll keep testing, thanks and happy for your help:up:
The new step, try to correct validatsiey improve
1608Mhz G. SKILL F2-9600CL5D-4GBPI http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494227
http://i031.radikal.ru/0901/86/c284bca0027bt.jpg
Pictures of my GSKILL, rightly ProMOS?
http://i005.radikal.ru/0901/f1/b0735fe762abt.jpg
The first 16 pieces U825 18CO926G and second 16 pieces U824 18CO9COY.
Amazing.
Yeah that's ProMOS.
Thank you http://s12.rimg.info/8083a0d67a98f9b...340343b48c.gif , how I have done a little later, there are photographs of. I would like to improve the outcome and CPU-Z error-free.
Some results I had on this fun bench session with Gigabyte:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2rgfdzc.jpg
Full link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=217439
:D:up:
nice cpu
but i still dont like that damn board:rofl:
I think I know what zsamz is saying, the DFI UT P45 produces the best bandwidth of any P45 board I have seen for any given FSB / ram speed. It's faster than my Asus, and can clock higher too. It's not too far off the bandwidth of the UT P35 and that is no small feat.
Everest bandwidth/latency isn't the be all and end all though, I'd like to see some SPI32M & 3D runs of a UD3P vs a UT P45 at identical settings.