Printable View
Informal..it only contains 2...
Alot of the pictures you show also comes from the same place that invented the 4th decoder on 65nm K8. Tho it was a microcode storage or something. And diagrams from AMD dont show any extra FPU. All FPU enhancement is basicly 128bit SSE.
As for the quote: Dirk Meyer said it in pcwatch interview(http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2.../kaigai273.htm)
And here is email of Hans : //hansdevries@chip-architect.com
It can be found at http://www.chip-architect.com/
Yeah,they canceled THAT design and did the new one :rolleyes: .OhhhQuote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
It really does not matter how they doubled FP units - added 2 (4 x 64) or widened (2 x 128) - it is same result.
SSE128 is 4 packed single precision numbers (XMM registers).
K8 did 4 such at once.
K10 will do 8 single-fp.
Brent you just email Hans first and i will have no problem admitting being wrong if that's the way things turn out to be.
Ok,done .
Edit: i saw you made a small mistake in your mail concerning the authorship of the pc watch article.Hope you correct it.Tnx for CCing me.
You do . Well in the jast 5 months Brent has had it right a lot more than you have.Quote:
Originally Posted by LOE
You trust what AMD says after all the lies of the last few months. Thats sad . I feel Brent is relieing on his own knowledge and what AMD has shown us over the last six months. Brent will by K10 if its all that. But I bet he takes a hard look at Penryn first.
Ok, some 3DMark CPU-Scores are "showning up". I have no confirmation and they look a bit too good. But i will post them anyway, even i knwo that the next 10 postings everyone will flame on me...
K10 Dualcores @ QuadFX (4x4) @ 2,3GHz
3DMark06 CPU-Score 7933 Points
It was not a faked screen, but you will see...
Yes and photoshop is a nonexistant product aswell. Too many people "want" to see and make something up in these times. Lets see some official numbers shall we?Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
Also K10 dualcores in a 4x4? Better be the joke. Since those Dualcores will some atleast a quarter after the quadcores if even this year. And why would the extreme edition not be quadcores. AMD will focus 100% on the serverside first.
So please...we had enough fakes from you and others already.
You have more infos than i? Ok, then show them! Its funny, everyone is crying fake and lie, just because they dont knwo :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
That would almost constitute a 3x speed up, clock per clock, vs. a pair of FX-7x series DC K8s.Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
"A bit too good" would seem like one hell of an understatement considering that. IMHO, either (rather unlikely) K10 "breaks" the benchmark, or those are not numbers for a 4-core system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
Hey w0mbat
Any chance you could get your contact to sign up for Wcg for a while so we could see some performance in this great Benchhmark. Would really be cool and it wont harm the NDA would it?
Im running WCG on my Opteron 146@2,8GHz since a while.
BTW: The CPU-Scores are BS. If you read the news section carefully you will find out why.
ahh Welcome:toast: Now you only need to add some more to make barbeque of me:D
Thanks for joining.
What cpu scores are you talking about:confused:
I think it would be very wise for AMD to release even just a few benchmarks as soon as possible. If the numbers are as good as some think they are, alot of the people that read reviews and such would wait til fall instead of jumping ship, and possible pick up a cheap brisbane with the choice of upgrading to K10 when they're ready. Even just a couple bar graphs without numbers would probably do it. :p:
ANY time there wombat.The whole world is waiting for any sign that AMD isnt lost in an attic somewhere playing dressup.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
If you are under an NDA just post numbers,and bench a couple heavy games with it.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1159937 heres a kentsfield score for you.
FYI your cpu score is only in the 10% better range.Which is good for 4x4 on 1207 considering all the PCB it has to go through.Try benching one cpu and then both of them with an nvidia 8800gtx or an ati xtx. Id like to see the fps.
Another issue is that its an fx chip which should ideally be the fastest of the lot,and since intels new quads are coming out with 5% more speed and at a price range of 2-300 dollars; Giving us great benches is kind of important in some ways.
Can someone please slap this guy??Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
I should go over to Intels section and post like he does here.
Except decent people don't do that, so I won't.
Savantu, you're just as bad.
PLEASE, I want to read about K10, not all this core2 is better crap.
New Infos from AMD @ Cebit about the TDP of K10.
The K10 will come in two versions. One is in 95W and the other in 68w.
and the codename is now K10 and not K8L.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
at least not before the locked doors
Should see the start of the K10 w00t train the 2nd week of April if not sooner.
Intel have their price cuts scheduled for the week before from what I see in the channel to try and steal their thunder. All I can say about the new AMD chips is expect some fun real soon now.
Long time no see dude, thanks for the info.Quote:
Originally Posted by Demoulous
On a sidenote, thanks for your work back in the days, loved your A7N8X modded bioses :toast:
Well, i'm pretty sure you sound retarded in every other place as you sound in here...Quote:
Originally Posted by savantu
I hope that the new AMD chip is good. I am very close to going over to Intel.